New York Press: Gratingly Clueless on Piazza
The New York Press recently launched its annual whinier-than-thou slugfest known as the "50 Most Loathesome New Yorkers". Mike Piazza is ranked all the way at #13, but the NY Press doesn't seem to have a good understanding of how baseball works:
Mike came to New York with such promise in 1998. He fulfilled most of that promise. He turned the Mets into a playoff winner in 1999 and led them into the World Series in 2000. Those were good years, and when the Mets went sour Mike Piazza tried to pull the team up. It didn't work.But he tried and New York loved him for that. So much so that we were willing to play him into 2005. Hell, for his lousy 2005 year, New York gave him $16 million dollars. But even by 2003 it was clear that Piazza was a terrible catcher.
The joke in gay bars in New York was, what do a lot of gay men and Mike Piazza have in common? They both can't throw a man out going for second base. (At least he deflected the "gay rumors" with good humor and a Seinfeldian "Not that there's anything with that.")
Mike, we stuck by you anyway. New York always had your back. So how did you repay us? You ran away when the going got tough--not for the team, but for you. And Mike, that makes you a selfish baby. Now we're glad, glad, glad to see you go. We hope the door didn't hit you on the way out of Gotham. New York is bigger than any one athlete. We swallow them whole. So when we like you, behave or we will destroy you. Just ask Ed Whitson, Calvin Scharadi, Chuck Knobloch, Charles Smith, Neil O'Donnell and Tim Berra. We will eat you and your young. Piazza knew his contract would end in 2005. He could have gracefully retired. We in New York would have hailed him. Given him a job with a Minor League team or in the front office--and maybe one day he could manage the Mets.
But Mike's ego got the best of him. We even would have let him stay if he learned first base and signed as a part time player for the Mets as a back-up at catcher and first. But no, Mike will not accept aging gracefully. The American League--where he would be a natural as a designated hitter--passed on him and he fled to San Diego to be a "star" again. Mikey, your time has come and gone. You should have retired in 2005 and let us given you the big sendoff. But you are going south to a baseball wasteland and will disappear like Ed Whitson.
Oh boy, that gay joke, har har. (And nice job flubbing the Seinfeld quote.)
But seriously, "ran away"? What idjits. Piazza was in total decline (as even the Press understood) and the Mets wanted nothing more to do with him. You can blame Piazza for a lot of things - such as this - but running away just isn't one of them.
What's more, as we all know, Piazza did try his hand at first base. The Press just sounds hopelessly clueless when they act as though that episode never happened.
Look, I'm not happy to be defending Mike Piazza. I'm glad he's gone, and that he's found a nice, politically conservative city to call home. But when hipster wannabees who think they're such hot shit but actually don't know jack about baseball start spouting off, it really grates on me. Morons.
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I didnt know....
the post seems to understand sports
seriously though, that article was crap.
I lost a lot of respect for Piazza when he said that about Rush, and I think he could have done a better job handling the whole first base experiment, but those are minor quibbles.
He was still a great player for this team, and I don't think any Mets fan rues the fact that he signed with San Diego. It simply wasn't feasible for him to come back, especially since he signed with the Padres for far less than the Mets would have had to give him.
I suspect that article was written by a Yankee fan, since they always hated Piazza, and since many of them don't know much about baseball anyway.
And did Piazza really need to be 13/50? Even if their gripes were accurate, A-rod was #50 last year, and he's a much bigger tool than Piazza.
by peteyfan45 @ Amazin' Avenue on Apr 10, 2006 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions
What is it?
NYP
Then it was sold, and I think the editorial staff has turned over a few times since then.
The short of it is, after it was sold, they let go of a lot of writers--probably because the paper didn't want to pay them--and the paper's decline was immediately noticible. The paper lost its voice; the editors were obviously clueless as to what made the paper (modestly) successful to that point; and they resorted to stories such as "The 50 most loathsome New Yorkers."
I always used to pick up NYP each week in the late 90s or 2000, maybe for another year thereafter, even. Then I resorted to reading some of it online, and now I can't even be bothered. Yeah, the NYP editors/publishers are clueless, but is their paper even relevant anymore?

by 


























