Mets Rid Themselves of Mota, Fill Catching Vacancy
Per Adam Rubin's blog at the Daily News, the Mets have traded useless steroid abuser Guillermo Mota to the Brewers in exchange for catcher Johnny Estrada. Estrada hit .314/.378/.450 with the Braves in 2004 and has yet to crack a 92 OPS+ since then.
Whatever. Mota is gone and the Mets have a platoon partner for Ramon Castro.
DocMets16 and twassel each have posted diaries on this, so check those out as well. Also check out Estrada's career stats at Baseball-Reference.com.
Don Burke at NJ.com confirms the deal, and Omar Minaya adds his take on Estrad:
"Johnny adds depth to our catching situation," said Mets General Manager Omar Minaya. "He's a former All-Star who switch-hits and has hit over .300 three times in his career."UPDATE [6:55pm]: And the Official Press Release.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Doc Mentioned
by NewMet5 on Nov 20, 2007 8:21 PM EST reply actions
Damn... oh well!
by NewMet5 on Nov 20, 2007 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
wow.
excellent
you're kidding, right?
I would dance naked up Broadway if
Schoeneweis
* Yes, I know that batting average isn't an ideal stat, but I'm just working with what was easily available.
by Josh @ Amazin' Avenue on Nov 21, 2007 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
a Thanksgiving gift
I'd go even further
by sireric @ Amazin' Avenue on Nov 23, 2007 11:51 AM EST up reply actions
I Feel Like I Did When Benitez Was Traded
I guess getting a body
Boring boring offseason.
I found it intersting going over to the Brewer siite on the side bar. Although opinion is not unanimous, they also seem to be thrilled with this trade.
Lame deal
by vonhayes on Nov 21, 2007 9:34 AM EST reply actions
How many times have we heard that?
I think "he's got great stuff" is becoming for pitchers what "potential" means for hitters or athletes in general--if they're still saying that about you after you've spent, say, 3+ years in the bigs, it's code for "underachiever."
by madisonmetsfan on Nov 21, 2007 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
he's 34 for and been lousy sans the
Sure...
by vonhayes on Nov 21, 2007 12:59 PM EST up reply actions


























