Wednesday Applesauce
Jason Grey, a scouting expert for ESPN.com, checks in with his report from the AFL, which includes some first impressions of Daniel Murphy at second base:
Daniel Murphy's bat is going to play at the big league level, but the question is finding a position for him. As many know, the Mets have him playing second base exclusively here to see if he can handle the position on a full-time basis, and things are encouraging thus far. He hasn't been tested too much, but he also hasn't seemed out of place turning the double play. Murphy has good reactions and adequate footwork, and though his actions are somewhat stiff, he has been making the plays. So far, so good.
Awesome. I have an email out to Jonathan Mayo (name drop!), who said he'll give me an update on Murphy et al once he gets out to Arizona next week.

Rob Neyer (subscription required) discusses a Marty Noble mailbag question about Carlos Delgado and whether he was the Mets' MVP this season. Neyer:
This is probably the last time we'll speak of this matter. But if the Mets had won two more games this season, they'd have qualified for the playoffs, the real MVP voters would have been looking for a Met to vote for, and Delgado might have been the guy because he did come up big after the All-Star break. In a sense, this is the general MVP discussion in a microcosm. Is the Most Valuable Player the player who makes the greatest all-around contribution for six months? Or is he the one-dimensional player who gives his team two or three great months?
At MetsGeek, Chris McCown looks at some of the big name relievers that could be available this offseason via trade or free agency.
At Baseball America, Jim Callis released this past season's draft expenditures of big league teams. The Mets finished 14th, shelling out $6,460,000 for 42 draft picks. The Royals outspent everyone else by plunking down $11,148,000 on 32 picks. The Mets increased their draft payout from $3,821,300 in 2007, so they seem to be moving in the right direction. Bear in mind that the crummier teams with the highest draft picks tend to pay the biggest signing bonuses, though other teams can make up some of that ground by paying above slot money for players with signability concerns.
Could Willie Randolph find his way back to the Bronx? I, for one, couldn't care less.

Arizona Fall League
Surprise Rafters 8, Peoria Saguaros 6
- Daniel Murphy went 1-for-3 with two walks and an RBI.

Dan Uggla may be on the trading block, and the Mets need a second baseman. They've had mostly good success trading with the Marlins in the past (Piazza, Leiter, Delgado, Jason Vargas not so much), but the Fish aren't likely to trade Uggle intra-division unless they're in complete fire sale mode.
J.C. Bradbury evaluates A.J. Burnett, and concludes that he might be best off staying in Toronto. Hank Steinbrenner's wallet begs to differ.
Jake Peavy's agent has listed some places he would accept trades to. The full list wasn't provided, so it isn't clear if New York was on it. Peavy's family lives in San Diego and he seems inclined to stay in the area if at all possible. Whomever trades for Peavy -- if anyone does -- will have to surrender a considerable haul, and they may be accepting a big injury risk.

Yahoo! Sports surpassed ESPN.com in unique September visitors, making it the most popular sports website in the land. Amazin' Avenue was a distant sixth.
Baseball Prospectus has purchased Baseball Digest Daily, which seems to be a sensible partnership: BPro has the analysis game covered, while BDD tackles the news side of things. BDD's Joe Hamrahi explains the deal.
0 recs |
16 comments
Comments
Gina
We increased our spending but we also have 2 first round picks and a supplemental pick this year. I don’t think we had a pick till the 2nd round last year did we?
by Gina on
Oct 15, 2008 10:24 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Two
The Mets had two supplemental first rounders last year: Eddie Kunz and Nathan Vineyard. Full draft results are at Baseball-Reference.com.
by Eric Simon on
Oct 15, 2008 10:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Uggla
Nice bat, but don’t we want someone who is capable in the field as well?
'Catsmeat!' he cried. 'I see it all. It was that chump, Catsmeat.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on
Oct 15, 2008 10:43 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Ideally, yes
Right now the Mets have neither, I think.
by Eric Simon on
Oct 15, 2008 10:46 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Time to fuse Uggla's bat and Our Anus' glove?
Does science have a way to do this yet?
'Catsmeat!' he cried. 'I see it all. It was that chump, Catsmeat.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on
Oct 15, 2008 11:35 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Yahoo and ESPN
Maybe it’s because ESPN’s site design is crappy and overly burdened with video players and popups and embedded audio and score crawls and it takes forever to load each page, while Yahoo’s site is simple and you can get your scores and stats with a minimum of fuss.
I can’t speak for anyone else, but personally, I hardly go to ESPN.com at all these days other than to read Gregg Easterbrook and Paul Lukas.
by JoshNY on
Oct 15, 2008 11:04 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I'm the same way
The only time I go to ESPN is to look up more baseball stats/splits because yahoo doesn’t have them. Otherwise ESPN just gives me a headache. Really I almost stopped using yahoo when they updated to their most recent design. I like things very simple and very plain and very uncluttered.
by Gina on
Oct 15, 2008 11:14 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Split stats etc.
I don’t know that there’s anything you can get on ESPN that you couldn’t get at baseball-reference.com or baseballprospectus.com or fangraphs.com. All three are good examples of simple site design as well.
by JoshNY on
Oct 15, 2008 1:42 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Team and league splits and their relative rankings
They’re very easy to do at ESPN. Their sortable stats are very useful, even if much of the rest of the site isn’t.
by Eric Simon on
Oct 15, 2008 2:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I get unreasonably angry at ESPN's dang embedded video
That site feels like it will collapse under its own weight someday. Soon, I hope. I can see why people would stop visiting so much.
An uninformed alternate theory on the Yahoo numbers: fantasy football. I’ve only ever played in leagues through Yahoo; maybe it’s just the flood of fantasy players in September?
'Catsmeat!' he cried. 'I see it all. It was that chump, Catsmeat.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on
Oct 15, 2008 11:37 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ESPN = NSFW
Yes, the embedded video is the worst of it — the way it capriciously sometimes decides to play itself means you can’t easily browse their site from work because it unpredictably starts screaming at you. They need a competent web editor, stat.
by anonymous on
Oct 15, 2008 11:42 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I agree
with the fantasy football idea. I’ve played a few times, and only on yahoo. but i never go to ESPN anymore due to the aforementioned annoyingness of the videos that play without asking me first.
Plus, I bet the first 6 headlines are about pacman jones, and the 8th is a story by rick reilly about how
“the media” has blown the pacman jones story out of proportion
by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on
Oct 15, 2008 12:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ESPN
ESPN constantly crashes on me. That’s enough of a reason to switch sites.
by Skycat on
Oct 15, 2008 7:23 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Heh
Really? Are you using Netscape Navigator?
by Eric Simon on
Oct 15, 2008 7:26 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I've never had a problem with ESPN crashing
I like Yahoo sports, but I still like ESPN. If you can cut through all the clutter, there’s a lot of really good writing over there.
by cjmulrain on
Oct 15, 2008 9:35 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs















