Friday Applesauce
News, Signings, Etc.
Daniel Murphy has a strained right hamstring and will skip winter ball in Puerto Rico (what will Nick Evans do now?). The Mets say they still plan to use him as an outfielder, though much of that will depend on what becomes of Luis Castillo.
Yesterday was the deadline for teams to add players to their 40-man roster, a necessary move in order to protect those players from next month's Rule 5 draft. The Mets did just that with Mike Carp.
In case you missed it yesterday, Chase Utley had hip surgery and is expected to miss four-to-six months.
The White Sox have reportedly signed Cuban defector Dayan Viciedo, a 19-year-old third-baseman, for something like $11 million. South Side Sox has more.
The Cardinals have signed lefty Trever Miller to help fill out their bullpen. Neither the deal nor its terms have been officially announced as Miller still needs to undergo the requisite physical. Miller pitched with the Rays last season.
Webstuffs
At MetsGeek, john continues his excellent 2008 profile series with an analysis of Pedro Feliciano.
At his ESPN.com blog, Jason Gray. Gray sort of prattles on a bit about Kunz's poor numbers in Arizona before deciding that he just needs to improve his command. For his part, Kunz didn't think he was so ruff. Gray also adds this tidbit on Daniel Murphy:
Daniel Murphy looked like he could handle second base well enough, given his offensive ability. Whether that's enough for the Mets remains to be seen. He has limitations, but he didn't embarrass himself.
At Bugs & Cranks, Brad Borton lays out the pros and cons of the Mets possibly signing Francisco Rodriguez. It's mostly a rebuttal of all of the reasons Rodriguez might make sense for the Mets, and some of it is tongue-in-cheek, though I take issue with this one:
PRO: "He has thrived in big situations and media pressure his entire career. New York shouldn't phase him at all."
CON: This is what they said about Billy Wagner.
If we accept that injuries happen and that they aren't necessarily the fault of the player, I have few complaints about Wagner's tenure in New York. He burned out down the stretch in 2006 and 2007, but at all other times he was one of the best closers in the league and certainly the best reliever the Mets have had since Armando Benitez circa 1999-2000 (minus the playoffs, of course).
At Cardboard Gods, Josh Wilker busts out a 1976 Topps Dave Kingman and, as is his style, veers wistfully off-topic to discuss how tall ballplayers -- like Kingman -- had it made while shorter guys -- Like Freddie Patek -- often got short shrift.
Joe Posnanski gives us the internet's 27,483rd column on why batting average, homeruns and RsBI, while nice, are outdated and inadequate tools for evaluating -- i.e., determining the value of -- baseball players, for awards voting or otherwise.
0 recs |
12 comments
Comments
Kunz's needs to work on his command?
What a revelation.
Also I don’t understand why the front office hasn’t seemed to take Murphy at 2nd seriously, I know they could just be saying that to not hurt Castillo’s trade value, although I doubt most other teams are that dumb but w/e, but Omar did say Murphy would have been playing left field in winter ball. It seems to me that unless some sort of miracle occurs with Castillo Murphy would have to be close to historically bad at 2nd to be a worse option than Castillo when you consider their offense and defense.
by Gina on
Nov 21, 2008 11:10 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
It's posturing
Not only for Castillo’s trade value, but free agents and other possible trades not involving Castillo. Murphy as our “LF” gives us a complete team. Murphy as our 2nd Basemen puts us in the market for another OF as well as put Castillo out of a starting spot. Not only would OF FA ask for more money, Orlando Hudson might demand more money if he sees that the Mets don’t think Castillo can bounce back and they are planning on using an unproved rookie-ish player.
I’ll hold off poo-poo-ing the Mets handling of Murphy until the direction of our off-season is further along or, perhaps, until Castillo proves he really is done that it wasn’t his knees last season and the Mets refuse to use Murphy as a solution.
by Sokojoe on
Nov 21, 2008 11:58 AM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wags
I’m often perplexed by the anger some of my fellow mets fans have towards wagner. He was a very good closer more often than not. I often wonder if a lot of mets fans have mariano rivera syndrome, and assume that infallible closers grow on trees, and the mets are the only team that doesn’t have one. Hell, even Mariano shat himself in game 7 of a WS.
by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on
Nov 21, 2008 11:27 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Sure
You get a great closer, and after a while you think he’s expendable.
By the way, I hate the argument that Rivera is the ultimate big-game closer. I suppose he’s closer to being perfect in those situations than anyone else. But he blew a save in Game 7 of the World Series, took the loss in a playoff series, and often struggles against the Yankees’ fiercest rivals.
"I just want to thank you for being such a goddam prince, that's all." - Holden Caulfield
by Prince on
Nov 21, 2008 1:45 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I respectfully, completely disagree
Mo’s stats in the playoffs: (as flawed as ERA is)
Division Series – 47.2 IP, 0.38 ERA, 20 hits, 5 BB, 35Ks
League Championship -38.2 IP, 0.93 ERA, 28 hits, 5 BB, 29 Ks
WS – 31 IP, 1.16 IP, 24 hits, 6 BB, 29Ks 1 Loss
Playoff Totals – 117.1 IP, 0.77 ERA, 72 hits, 16 BB, 93 Ks, 8 Wins, 1 loss, 10 ER
I am a Mets fan. I hate the Yankees. Rivera is the ultimate big-game closer.
You say he “took the loss in a playoff series,” he has taken exactly one the loss in 76 games. One bloop single with the infield in makes him not a big-game closer. With that criteria, who could possible be a big-game closer? One last point, Mo has given up 10 runs in total in the playoffs, Steve Trachsel almost gave up that many runs in 1 inning in 2006.
by Sokojoe on
Nov 21, 2008 2:11 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
is it cool to be happy about utley's injury?
because i am. i know it sounds terrible but he’s still rich and famous and probably pulls hot ass and even if he never fully recovers to his former playing ability, he’ll definitely be able to walk and function normally. anyway, i know that makes me scum in many people eyes but unless it’s an injury of the life threatening or crippling sort, i root for stars on teams i hate to get injured. this hip injury does sound pretty bad tho so maybe i wont get too psyched about it.
by kendynamo on
Nov 21, 2008 12:23 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I think it's ok
to be happy that the Phillies lose a couple of winshares. But I don’t think it’s cool to root or hope a star player gets injured. Espically, if someone slides into him on the playing field, cheering for the possibility that a player is hurt is not cool.
by Sokojoe on
Nov 21, 2008 1:19 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
D-Murph...Exhaustion
Forgive my ignorance about “off-season” b-ball, but doesn’t all of this time playing basically wear the guy(s) out? Are they expected to play so much year in and year out? I understand getting timing down for batting and working on defensive mechanics, but doesn’t this just invite exhaustion / injury.
Someone educate me.
" Don't expect any gifts this Christmas. My money is tied up in the bailout. "
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on
Nov 21, 2008 2:36 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
That's a good question
I don’t know the answer, but if anyone else does, I’m also curious to hear it.
by JoshNY on
Nov 21, 2008 3:16 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I always figured this was a bigger deal for young pitchers
I mean, everyone spends so much time obsessing over pitch counts and innings; doesn’t it seem a bit odd to have young kids keep throwing after the season?
'Catsmeat!' he cried. 'I see it all. It was that chump, Catsmeat.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on
Nov 21, 2008 3:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs











