Winning Is Awesome

Just when you think things can't get any worse, they actually get a tiny bit better. The Mets had countless opportunities to blow this game, but defied all odds by not doing so. The Mets were apparently 1-19 when trailing after six innings prior to this improbable victory, so we can bump that sucker up to 2-19 now. The Mets actually came from behind in the ninth AND twelfth innings, getting unlikely RsBI from Endy Chavez and Fernando! Tatis to seal the win.
Is this the game that snaps the Mets out of their season-long funk and propels them to splendiferawesomeness? It had all the makings of a fate-turner: resiliency, stick-to-it-iveness, comeback-ability, grit, hustle, gristle, dirt. Perhaps most importantly, it was a fun-ass game to watch. Oliver Perez pitched well for a while and then less so for a while. The bullpen was tremendous. Carlos Beltran hit into some more lineouts, but also got lucky in the twelfth when he knocked a single through the vacated shortstop hole, sending an in-motion David Wright from first to third. Both would score two batters later when Fernando! put some shine back on that turd and sent us all home happy.
I suspect Fernando! bought himself a few more starts, especially since it looks like Ryan Church may be headed for the disabled list, hopefully sooner rather than later. He says he doesn't even remember his pinch-hitting at-bat the other day, and while my doctorate in neuroscience is an honorary degree from the University of Phoenix Online, forgetting a whole chunk of time during which you were actually conscious is a bad sign. The Mets have been taken behind the woodshed for the way they have handled the Church situation, but I think the best thing for all involved is for Church to hit the DL and work through his problems while freeing up a bench spot for the Mets.
I suspect that Fernando! will be back in the lineup tomorrow night against Brad Penny, while Nick Evans heads to the bench in favor of Endy and his power lefty bat. Damion Easley will almost certainly be spelled by Carlos Delgado, and Brian Schneider will be back in there as well. Claudio Vargas goes for the Mets, and his days may be numbered with Pedro Martinez possibly returning to action as soon as Tuesday. He had a very encouraging start with St. Lucie on Wednesday, and claims that everything feels great physically. I'm assuming Vargas will go, but it could just as easily be Mike Pelfrey, though I'd like to see Pelfrey stick it out for the whole season and see what he can do with some time and a little confidence.
In shameless self-promotion news, the whole RaysGeek thing as been picked up by The USA Today, in which I'm actually mentioned by name. I'll have to pick up a copy of the print edition to see if it made it in there as well. Also, got more hatemail, subject: YOU suck!!:
You bunch of band wagon jumping pansies! What makes you think the rays would want a bunch of fair weather fans like you? Just give it up because nobody is going to take you serious anymore!
Pansies, I tells you! The only thing that keeps me reading them is that I hope I'll actually receive one without a single spelling or grammatical mistake. Wish in one hand, etc.
* More bad spelling update *
Got some new love mail today!
As a Metsblog devotee, today was my first visit to your site, and it will be my last.
I realize the whole Rays bit may be tongue-in-cheek, but please know it appears that you have given up on the Mets entirely, which makes us real fans cringe, insofar as your blog claims to represent us. However, there have been quite a few "fair weather" Mets fans in the past few years, so I welcome your exodus. Let us fans have our fun, our devotion, and our losses. I'm sure you'll be supporting the Texas Rangers when you find it amusing to do so. Just don't come back to Mets land, because you are not welcome.
YOU GOTTA BELEIVE.
Gotta beleive [sic!] indeed! I'll never understand who put certain Mets fans in charge of including/excluding other Mets fans into/from Mets fandom. To accuse anyone at MetsGeek of being "fair weather" is laughable, but I guess that's just par for the course for the indigenous peoples of Mets land™, where respect for the English language is not only eschewed, but downright discouraged.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
America's Wastepaper
Eric,
Would you have preferred USA Today to at least note the humourous angle with the “RaysGeek” thing? The piece appeared to play it pretty straight and, judging from some of the responses you have received, many people do not appear to have much of a sense of humour about it.
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 29, 2008 9:51 AM EDT reply actions
Nah
People will draw their own conclusions. It should be clear to anyone who actually takes the time to look that we continue to churn out Mets content on a daily basis and have yet to feature any Rays content on the site. If they choose to overlook that fact there’s nothing I can - or care to - do about it.
Fair point
I suppose that makes sense—if you’re too reactionary to get past the header, you might want shut up about it.
Still, great gag and, so far, a winning one.
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 29, 2008 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
Heilman
I was very glad to see him pitch well. That gives him 4 scoreless innings in his last 2 games – here’s hoping he keeps it up.
Yeah, it helps his trade value.
He’s walking at the end of the year anyway to any team that offers him a chance to start, so why not move him before the deadline to get another bat? There are plenty of teams starved for bullpen help that would take a flier on Heilman, and the Mets could use a good backup for 1B. Or OF. Or SS…
by madisonmetsfan on May 29, 2008 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Walking?
This was Heilman’s first year of arbitration eligibility, so he is under the Mets’ control for two more seasons before he can become a free agent. Not sure why the Mets would trade him anyway; side from his rough start this season he has been a terrific reliever.
agree with Eric
besides one of those teams that are starving for bullpen help is the Mets.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
My bad.
Coulda sworn he was a FA after this season. Still, if Sanchez is now the 8th inning guy, why not move Heilman—assuming, of course, that the Mets get an equivalent return? It’s not as if there’s anything in the farm system that would tempt a trade partner,
by madisonmetsfan on May 29, 2008 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions
A few reasons
1 – I’d rather have 2 good righties in the pen than 1
2 – Sanchez hasn’t pitched all that well since coming back – 4.34 ERA, 1.29 WHIP, 14 K, 8 BB in 18 2/3 innings.
3 – Even if Sanchez does improve, there’s no guarantee that his surgically repaired shoulder will hold up.
a 2006-style win
I don’t know if I believe in momentum in baseball, but if any win is going to give them momentum, last night’s win will. Let’s hope that it’s a sign of life from the team.
The Dodgers are playing like crap of late. It’s imperative that the Mets kick them while they’re down.
Flushing, Queens: soon to be known as Johan's-burg!!!
by Greenpoint Ian on May 29, 2008 11:13 AM EDT reply actions
my thoughts exactly
That was my reaction last night—it was like the 2006 Mets came out to play after the team went down 5-4. Bullpen all pitching great, guys like Endy and Tatis coming up big…Keep it up, boys.
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 29, 2008 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions
The Dodgers are playing like crap of late
and the Mets own Penny.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
as long as it's not a rookie
I feel much more confident with the Mets going up against Brad Penny than if the Dodgers had plucked a commenter from this website to pitch tonight. It’s one of the things I just have not been able to wrap my brain around the past year or so.
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 29, 2008 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions
Careful what you wish for
kingcritical has a nasty palm ball and Greenpoint Ian has an eephus that would make Rip Sewell blush.
Put me in, Coach.
I’m ready to play today.
We've got ourselves a ball club, the Mets of New York town!
by kingcritical on May 29, 2008 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions
eephus!
Ok, but how does it compare to Derek Bell’s eephus? And why on earth does that one game stand out so vividly in my mind?
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 29, 2008 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Rookie pitchers
Let’s hope the Mets beat up on Penny, then, because Clayton Kershaw is starting for LA on Friday
By the way
Kershaw is on my fantasy team, so if the Mets could win that game by scoring lots of runs off RELIEF PITCHERS (but not Broxton because he’s on my fantasy team too), that’d be great.
I'm also not sure how much momentum matters
But I’m certainly willing to accept the notion that self-confidence aids one’s ability to hit a baseball in the same way that self-confidence aids one’s ability to do all kinds of other things, and a win like that should do a lot for the team’s self-confidence.
Last email
I’m not sure that the author of the last email knows what “tongue-in-cheek” means. Have to admire his or her grit though.
hat tip on the RsBI
Reminds me of the Onion headline “William F. Buckley orders two Whoppers Junior”
Grazi
RBIs bothers me and RBI as a pluralization doesn’t seem right. Arrrs-bee-eye just rolls off the tongue.

































