Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The End Of Sabanball: Details, Barbarians, And Precision

Jerry Manuel and Bunts

In an effort to figure out whether or not Jerry Manuel is the buntingest bunt who ever bunted, I looked up the number of sacrifice hits for the Chicago White Sox from 1998-2003, which were the years that Manuel managed the team.  In those years, the White Sox had the following number of sacrifice hits:

1998 - 38

1999 - 40

2000 - 55

2001 - 63

2002 - 48

2003 - 43

Average - 47.8

Baseball-reference doesn't list where these totals rank in the majors or the American League, so let's compare them to the number of sacrifice hits the Mets had each year under Willie Randolph.

2005 - 69

2006 - 77

2007 - 77

Average - 74.3

So Manuel should order his players to bunt less than Randolph did.  Great.  Wait, what's that?  This isn't a fair comparison because Randolph often (correctly) had his starting pitchers bunt?  Okay, well then let's take a look at how many sacrifice hits Joe Torre's Yankees had from 1996-2007.  After all, Torre and Randolph have similar managing styles.

1996 - 41

1997 - 34

1998 - 32

1999 - 22

2000 - 16

2001 - 30

2002 - 23

2003 - 25

2004 - 37

2005 - 28

2006 - 34

2007 - 41

Average - 30.25

Uh oh.  Manuel's teams bunted significantly more than Proven Winner Joe Torre's did.  But maybe Manuel isn't so bad.  Let's do one more comparison, this time with everyone's favorite bunter and Manuel's replacement with the White Sox, Ozzie Guillen.

2004 - 58

2005 - 53

2006 - 44

2007 - 41

Average - 49

Crap.  Manuel's teams bunted only slightly less than Ozzie Guillen's do.  And we all know that no one loves bunts more than Ozzie Guillen.  This quick and dirty study is by no means definitive, but it suggests that we can expect lots of small ball from the Mets under Jerry Manuel.  At this point, I can't say I'm happy with the Mets decision to make him their manager.

This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Small ball

They aren’t hitting many homers (at least it doesn’t seem that way) gotta score somehow.

The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.

by sireric on Jun 17, 2008 5:42 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah

And what better way to score than giving away outs to the opposition?

Once more, with feeling: sacrifice bunts almost always DECREASE the chances of scoring in a given situation.

by anonymous on Jun 17, 2008 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Manuel

Wasn’t Manuel the guy who talked Willie into NOT bunting and instead PH’ing the injured Cliff Floyd in game 7 of the 2006 NLCS? Or is my memory failing me?

by Mikeybags84 on Jun 18, 2008 8:45 AM EDT reply actions  

That's the rumor

no idea if it’s really true though.

by ams258 on Jun 18, 2008 9:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good call by Jerry

The fact that a decision doesn’t turn out well doesn’t make it a bad decision

by JoshNY on Jun 18, 2008 11:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure about that

I’ve read some stuff suggesting that it can be beneficial for a team to bunt with runners on 1st and 2nd with no one out. This was the position the Mets were in when Floyd came up to bat.

by ams258 on Jun 18, 2008 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

yes

That’s the one and only situation in which executing a sac bunt increases the run expectancy for the inning (lineup considerations excluded).

by anonymous on Jun 18, 2008 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't believe that's true

Per the run expectancy tables on Baseball Prospectus, in 2006 a team with runners on first and second and nobody out scored, on average, 1.57781 runs. With runners on second and third and one out, teams scored, on average, 1.45439 runs.

Maybe the stat you’re getting at (which would’ve been relevant in the bottom of the 9th inning down 2 runs) is the percentage chance of scoring two or more runs? This article would seem to suggest suggest (scroll all the way down) that the probability of scoring (without qualification as to how many runs) is higher with runners on second and third and one out (71%) than with runners on first and second and nobody out (66%), but bear in mind A) that it uses stats from 1959-60, when the game was played somewhat differently, and B) it doesn’t exactly address the relevant point, which is the probability of scoring TWO OR MORE runs for those situations, since that’s what the Mets needed to do.

So, I’m open to being persuaded that a bunt in that situation would’ve increased the Mets’ chances of scoring two or more runs that inning, and thereby at least prolonging the game. Can anyone provide anything to address that point?

by JoshNY on Jun 18, 2008 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

okay, that's weird

Apparently these stats fluctuate enough from year to year that things come out looking a little differently. I think my recollection was based on older stats.

by anonymous on Jun 18, 2008 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

They do

The fluctuation from year to year isn’t huge, but the difference between now and 1968 or earlier is striking.

by JoshNY on Jun 19, 2008 12:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't trying to say it was a good or bad decision

It was what I wanted at the time, actually. I really thought Cliff was going to win it for us. In fact I told my friends before the game that he was going to come up huge off the bench for us, and when the chance came up I thought I was going to be right. Too bad.

I was just bringing it up because it’s interesting that such a “bunty” coach would convince the manager NOT to bunt in that kind of situation.

by Mikeybags84 on Jun 19, 2008 2:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, I misunderstood you then

Still, it’s an interesting decision to look back on. I thought Uncle Cliffy was going to win it for us too; he’d been great in the division series.

by JoshNY on Jun 19, 2008 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was quite drunk at the time

But I was sure Floyd was going to homer there. Sigh.

by ams258 on Jun 19, 2008 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Judging by the comments to Matt Callan’s ode to 1986 Mets: A Year To Remember from a few weeks back, the video has a devoted Mets fan following. Despite being too young to remember anything about that season, it has a special place in my fandom as well. It was part of a two video rotation (Ghostbusters being the other) which ran almost daily on my television for a few years in the early 90s. And it remained a once-in-awhile watch through high school and college. 

Unsurprisingly, the physical tape deteriorated over time, and the screen jumps and sound skips made for a less than optimal viewing experience. With sale of the video discontinued, my brother converted it to DVD and gave it to me for Christmas in 2010. See the picture above for the box and DVD. He even created a scene selection function which can be accessed from the main menu. "Get Metsmerized!" plays on loop on the menu screen. It is my favorite Christmas gift ever and is still nice to throw on for a viewing.

"How'd we do it? Mirrors!"
I was flipping through some of my parents' photo albums this afternoon in search of one particular shot of the sign my older sister made for Mets Banner Day back in the late eighties. Though I didn't find that one — I'll post it when I eventually track it down, and I can assure you that it's Keith-themed — but I did stumble upon this wonderful photo of my younger sister's stuffed animal menagerie spread out in front of a glorious rainbow-festooned Mets pennant, also from the late eighties.

She works for the HRC now and was particularly delighted to be reminded of this photo.

(click to embiggen)
Now that banner day is back, hopefully this years will look a little like this. I know it's not great, but i don't pretend to be a professional. embiggen!

Recent FanShots

Dickey is # 2 defensive pitcher
Yahoo Sports comments on Sandy's Tweets
Using hindsight to redo the Mets’ offseason | Mets360
Cespedes to the Athletics
Kevin Goldstein Top 101
Okay, there is no way this is Sandy Alderson
Ike & Duda fantasy stocks rising
Sabermetrics! Fantasy League is live.
What if the Mets Never Traded for Johan Santana? | Patrick Flood
[O]f the $136.7M the Mets spent on players in 2011, $72.8M was given to...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro