There's Still Time
After a dreadful four-game sweep at the hands of those murderous Friars, the Mets are looking at a 7.5 game deficit in the NL East. The Phillies have been winning almost every day, while the Mets are regularly starting replacement level bats at the three most crucial offensive positions. There's plenty of season left, but these sample sizes are only getting larger and the Mets' image in Philly's rearview is only getting smaller.
That Omar Minaya has spent almost $140 million on this team and yet failed to provide any reasonable contingencies for injuries to the corner outfielders and continued regression at first base is inexcusable. Starting pitching is not this team's problem. Despite Billy Wagner's hiccup on Sunday and Aaron Heilman's season-long nosedive, the bullpen hasn't really been a huge problem. Offense is the problem, and for once the prescription is *not* more cowbell; it's more offense, and I don't know where the Mets are going to find it.
Endy Chavez is a serviceable fifth outfielder. He can't hit and he doesn't steal bases. His glove is his only real asset, though it's a tremendous one. Fernando Tatis is not a major leaguer. He had a nice first week with the team, but regression to the mean is a cruel bitch and she flurked up Tatis something fierce. Carlos Delgado has hit well over the past week, but he has also generally hit poorly over the past 15 months. Which sample is more reliable at this point? The Mets' first-basemen are 14th in the National League in OPS; strangely, the five NL East teams are all in the bottom seven, and the Nationals are the highest-ranked at 10th overall.
Sifting through the ranks of the Mets' high minors doesn't turn up many promising solutions. Val Pascucci has interesting stats at New Orleans, and despite him having been labeled a quadruple-a player, giving him a shot can't possibly be worse than trotting Tatis out there every day. Fernando Martinez has been out of action for the past three weeks with a hamstring injury, and he wasn't hitting especially well when he went down.
Until Moises Alou and Ryan Church come back the Mets simply don't have any productive options at either outfield corner spot. Given Alou's fragility and the uncertainty about Church's post-concussion recovery, there's no telling when either might return, or for how long they'll be around once they've come back. There are always players on other teams that could help, but at what cost? What do you think an Xavier Nady or Jason Bay might require in terms of prospects, if the Mets could even afford the asking price?
I don't think the Mets are *that* far away from being a pretty good team, but at some point you actually have to go out there and start winning ballgames. As the season wears on, "this team is better than this" is eventually superseded by "this team is what it is", and with each successive week that the Mets grapple with mediocrity the playoff dream and that now-tired Shea platitude of "meaningful games" seem even farther out of reach.
The trade deadline is more than seven weeks away, but the longer the Mets continue to tread this fetid water the more likely they are to be characterized as sellers, even though the Wilpons would never admit as much. You don't invest $140 million in a team just to sell off parts to the highest bidder. Willie Randolph's job has been in jeopardy for weeks now, and Omar Minaya's grip on his post is tenuous at best. Their long-term future with this organization likely hangs in the balance of these next seven weeks. If the Mets don't turn things around soon, 2008 will be remembered as yet another lost season at Shea.
0 recs |
15 comments
Comments
we can afford to spend for today
there is no reason to worry about tomorrow. Spend to make it happen today. If that means sending some prospect off for the outfielder we need, then do it.
Also, there’s a guy named Bonds that nobody wants.
by Grouchoman on Jun 9, 2008 10:11 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Acceptance
I see we’ve passed, what, Anger? It’s been a tough pill…but, it’s recognizable. This team just needs a bit of a breakup. We no doubt have raw talent, it just hasn’t gelled to a “team”. I couldn’t tell you why not because - like I said - they have talent. I still see Delgado as a big problem.
I still like our starting rotation. We’re wasting Reyes and Wright this year, though. Beltran is still a dissapointment.
4 games to San Diego is a bitter pill.
The 2008 NY Mets: Reyes singles. Castillo infield single. Wright walks. Beltran lines out. Delgado strikes out. Reyes picked off third.
by ZaBlanc on Jun 9, 2008 11:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
agreed
I feel like dumping Delgado would be a great start towards making things better. He’s been a dead weight on the field for too long now. I am not as down on Beltran; the man has had his fair share of bad luck with the bat this year what with hitting seemingly innumerable line drive outs with men on base.
I do not suppose the Rays could be tempted to give us Uncle Cliffy for a few months, could they?
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 10, 2008 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dumping has a price.
Delgado’s not tradeable because of his vanishing skills and enormous contract-big option/buyout next year. To release him now, the Mets would have to pay the balance of his ‘08 salary plus the buyout for ‘09. That’s a big piece of change for the Wilpons to lay out. It’s easy for us to say, “Waive the bum” because it’s not our money. OTOH, if the Mets have already determined to buy Delgado out in ‘09, all that waiving him now costs is the time factor-assuming, of course, that the Mets have someone to insert at 1B who is certain to exceed Delgado’s production (which they don’t).
On balance, the fault lies with Omar. There was no Plan B for 1B, and the bench has too many elderly pinch-hitters who are all but useless anywhere in the field, let alone 1B.
by madisonmetsfan on Jun 10, 2008 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hurts
It is just dang painful to watch, especially knowing that there is realistically no option but to sink with Carlos D still on the ship.
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 10, 2008 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Mets have to be sellers
Having the worst bench in baseball does nothing to help support the starting lineup, which is struggling as well. I think HoJo needs to go, and a coach who teaches patience and discipline at the plate could be brought in. I do think that the impending return of Jose Valentin will help, as he contributes greatly to team chemistry and his leadership and the respect he receives from other players (especially Reyes) can’t be overlooked.
by wallybackman on Jun 10, 2008 10:35 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Omar is a fool
I’m sorry, but how hard is it to find a Matt Stairs or someone of that sort? And yet, today, Stairs is better than all of our 4C starters except Wright. If a team is suffering for lack of a Matt Stairs type, that responsibility has to lie at the feet of the GM.
by VegasMetFan on Jun 10, 2008 11:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Heh
“Offense is the problem, and for once the prescription is not more cowbell; it’s more offense, and I don’t know where the Mets are going to find it.”
Which is too bad, because I’m sure Cow-Bell Man would be happy to oblige if that would help.
by JoshNY on Jun 10, 2008 11:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I'm done
I’ve had it with this team. They’re not underachieving. They’re doing exactly what a team that’s writing Brian Schneider, Damion Easley, Fernado Tatis, and Endy Chavez into the starting lineup every night should do. For this, there must be changes at the top.
Vote change 2008!
Flushing, Queens: soon to be known as Johan's-burg!!!
by Greenpoint Ian on Jun 10, 2008 2:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and by that
I mean Paul DePodesta as GM (or maybe Chris Antonetti), and somehow, someway, getting Manny Acta back here where he belongs.
Vote change: DePodesta/Acta in 2009!!!
by Greenpoint Ian on Jun 10, 2008 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
hear, hear
If we’re going to fantasize about overhauling the Mets organization, this is the right way to do it.
by anonymous on Jun 10, 2008 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's the thing, isn't it?
The problem isn’t that our bench is bad, the problem is that our bench is starting all the time. (And Schneider, who is the “starter” even though he should be a bench player.) If you’re relying on old, injury-prone players like Alou, you need to have adequate contingency plans in place, and instead we have Fernando Tatis. We had reasonably adequate options in place for when Pedro and El Duque inevitably got hurt (you could do worse than Pelf, Vargas and Figueroa as your 6th, 7th and 8th starters); why didn’t we do the same for Alou?
by JoshNY on Jun 10, 2008 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Pagan
I think Angel Pagan is the answer to that question. Remember the Mets almost traded for Coco Crisp, but Pagan tore it up in spring training.
The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me.
by sireric on Jun 10, 2008 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hmm
Well, on the one hand, they shouldn’t have anticipated that Pagan would also get hurt; he’s got no track record of having injury problems in the minors.
On the other hand, I’m not convinced he’s all that good. Maybe marginally better than Endy because he switch hits and probably has a bit more pop, but I think the skill sets the two possess are similar enough that I’d rather pick one or the other and have a guy who brings something different to the table (a Matt Stairs type, as VegasMetsFan suggests) to complement EndyOrAngel.
by JoshNY on Jun 10, 2008 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs




















