Amazin' Avenue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: The Record of Wrongs: Vanderbilt Commodores

Saturday Applesauce

I mentioned it yesterday, but Brandon Knight is making his first big league start tonight against the Cardinals in place of Pedro Martinez, who is on the bereavement list after the death of his father. Knight was out of baseball last season before his wife convinced him to take a spot pitching in the Independent League. The Mets signed him to a minor league deal in May and he has been dominant in five starts (eleven appearances overall), striking out 49 and walking just ten in 39.1 innings, notching a 1.60 ERA. Now, Triple-A isn't quite Quadruple-A (read: Tampa Bay pre-2008), which isn't quite the major leagues, but it's a good story and we all love good stories, right?

Ryan Church has begun light conditioning, but could still be a week or two away from returning. Jerry Manuel says Church will need upwards of seven rehab starts once he's ready to go, though Church is taking "the under" on that one. With the trade market thin and pricey, a Church return would be a huge addition to the Mets' offense. Names like Raul Ibanez and Casey Blake are out there and they'd definitely be upgrades over Chavez and Tatis, but would like cost at least a B-level prospect and the Mets don't have too many of those lying around. Larry Brooks at The Post has more on this.

Mark Hale on Mike Pelfrey's awesomeness.

Newsday's Jim Baumbach caught up with Dwight Gooden after an autograph show yesterday and god an update on where Doc is at right now. Something you may not have known: Gooden has six kids between the ages of 3 and 21.

Steve Popper at The Record takes a look at the Mets' Double-A team in Binghamton, where the Mets have started to stockpile a decent set of players. An interesting tidbit in the middle of the article: "GM Omar Minaya said Cleveland GM Mark Shapiro told him that he had the pieces to get C.C. Sabathia."

In case you missed it last night, the Yankees acquired Xavier Nady and Damaso Marte from the Pirates for four "prospects": Jose Tabata, George Kontos, Russ Ross Ohlendorf and Phil Coke. More coverage at Bucs Dugout and Pinstripe Alley.

As with any link dump, I encourage you to add your own links in the comments.

0 recs  |  Comment 14 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

yanks traded tabata?

and some yankee fans i know were trying to say that he was better than f-mart. if they traded him for nady and marte, couldn’t have been that hot of a prospect i guess.

by gogomets on Jul 26, 2008 12:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ohlendorf

should be pissed that nobody seems to know his name is Ross, not Russ. On the other hand, given how he’s pitched in the majors, the media could be forgiven for forgetting his name.

by anonymous on Jul 26, 2008 12:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hah

I kept hearing ‘Russ’ so that’s what I went with.

by Eric Simon on Jul 26, 2008 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Curse you Eric

For tempting me to read a Larry Brooks article!
Headline:

METS CAN’T AFFORD TO FORCE OF TRADE
– What does even mean? Was it supposed to read Mets can’t afford to force A trade or Mets can’t afford the price of a trade?

Sometimes less is more, except when it comes to pitching. Sometimes chemistry trumps talent. Sometimes the best team doesn’t have to have all the best players at all of the positions. Quick. The shortstop for the 1986 Mets was . . . ?

A. Rafael Santana with some Kevin Elster and HoJo thrown in
B. Are you really trying to justify Chavez/Tatis/Anderson by citing the 86 Mets? Really? A team that ranked #1 in the NL in BA/OBP/SLG? A team where 7 of 8 regular position players (all except Santana) had an OPS+ over 110? Really? A team that also led the NL in ERA? This is your justification for why it’s O.K. to have two duds in your corner outfield? (Not to mention a catcher who can’t hit and first basemen who has hit for four weeks) Really?

by Reg Dunlop on Jul 26, 2008 12:22 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Yea

The headline is a head-scratcher, though I think the ‘OF’ is meant to be read ‘outfield’.

by Eric Simon on Jul 26, 2008 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That might explain it

It still doesn’t excuse the insane use of the 86 Mets to justify the current OF

by Reg Dunlop on Jul 26, 2008 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh

And chemistry. Because that’s what these guys

were known for. Chemistry!

Although I guess they did destroy that plane as a TEAM!

by Reg Dunlop on Jul 26, 2008 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

How come all these dunderhead sportswriters who (presumably) followed baseball in the 1970s aren’t aware of the fact that Reggie Jackson won 5 world series in that decade playing on teams where everyone hated each others guts? If the 1972-74 A’s and 1977-78 Yankees aren’t living, breathing arguments against needing “chemistry” to win, I don’t know what is.

Vote change: DePodesta/Acta in 2009!!!

by Greenpoint Ian on Jul 26, 2008 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what a steal for the Skanks

Who wouldn’t take Nady and Marte on the Mets for a fucking bag of balls. Wake up, Omar! You’re asleep at the wheel.

We've got ourselves a ball club, the Mets of New York town!

by kingcritical on Jul 26, 2008 1:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Marte/Nady

While Tabata isn’t exactly a bucket of baseballs, it turns out the deal was reported incorrectly. The Yankees actually gave up Jeff Karstens and Dan McCutchen in lieu of Coke and Kontos. So it’s now Nady and Marte for Tabata, McCutchen, Karstens, and Ohlendorf. Not a terrible haul, considering McCutchen was one of the Yankees’ best pitching prospects.

by Alex Nelson on Jul 26, 2008 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow, that’s not a bad deal for the Pirates. Yankees traded pretty much all of their top prospects for Nady & Marte. Not so smart. Frankly, I was a little surprised they made the deal.

by BobbyV_Incognito on Jul 26, 2008 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Funny

Cos Buck and McCarver just called it a “steal” for the Yankkkees on the Fox broadcast, and then went on to talk about how the Mets have been trying to get Nady back since the day they traded for him.

I mean, I don’t care what Buck and McCarver have to say about much of anything, but still it is funny to hear that take on it. And, of course, they neglected to mention why the Mets traded Nady in the first place.

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jul 26, 2008 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

also

Blake isn’t available any longer. The Dodgers got him for a pair of minor leaguers.

Vote change: DePodesta/Acta in 2009!!!

by Greenpoint Ian on Jul 26, 2008 2:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Mets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mr-met-r_0_small
Do the Media and Blogosphere owe Omar an apology?
159714144_040c6c1501_small
Our National Baseball Laboratory
Small
Looking At What We Have, Part 1: Position Players
Small
Looking at what we do have, Part 2: Pitchers
Headshot_small
Omar Minaya's UltiMET Lineup

Recent FanPosts

Small
Poll: What is going to be the biggest hole in the 2010 NYM?
Small
I Believe in Comebacks... and Chan Ho Park?
Small
The Truth about the Mets' 2010 Budget
Small
2010 Most and Least Improved Teams
Misc_007_small
When Cliff Floyd Spoke, Players Listened
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Buckner_small
Updating the 'Diamonds in the Rough'

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Omar's off-season contract strategy.  (Get it?)
(Yes, I'm having too much fun with GraphJam)
I'm doing a little study on the NL East and thought I'd share an interesting little tidbit.  To all of the self-loathing Mets fans/lazy 'MLB insiders' and journalistic parrots who have 1) Condemned the entire Mets organization as a joke 2) Written off this core's impressive run to date and 3) Deified the Phillies as unstoppable juggernauts w/ no chance to lose this division:

Yes, those wins are weighted towards '06-'07 and yes, the Phillies' are more recent but the fact remains that no other team in that span can even come close to the Mets total of days in first place, which should be garnering a lot more respect than it has.  If only because we still have nearly the same core in place that has clearly had a lot of success and health-willing can very easily do so again in 2010.

Recent FanShots

Another Ken Rosenthal fail..
Mets reach agreement with Pagan
Mets close to minor league deal with Mike Jacobs
FORBES RIPS WILPON
Mets Equipment Truck Leaves for Spring Training
Mets Claim OF Jason Pridie Off Waivers From Twins
Ted Berg on the Mets offseason
Dykstra is at it again..
Phillips admits he made some mistakes

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sponsors


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Mos_def_def2_small Sam Page

Aaavatar_small Mark Himmelstein

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

THE NEWS GURU

Wrightfront_small Joe Budd

THE POET LAUREATE

Hamheadshot__1__small Howard Megdal