Will They Ever Learn?
What the hell was that crap about? I don't know why I bother sometimes, because staying up late to watch this team give it up like that as often as they do really takes a lot out of me. This loss was such a wretched, phenomenal failure, but none of us can say that we didn't expect the game to end poorly, at least a little bit. This team seems to be a magnet for suffering, and if there's a reasonable way to lose a game they can usually find it.
Pedro was terrible, then it rained, and then he was much better. Overall, still terrible, but he showed signs of putting things together after giving up four runs in the first. I don't know if he's still tipping his pitches or disguising them well but executing them poorly, but last night's poll still stands as a big question mark for the remainder of the season.
This loss really hurts. The Mets haven't won a single game this season during which they've trailed by more than two runs at any point. Last night they were down by four runs and they charged all the way back to take a two-run lead in the seventh. They'll kick themselves because they had a couple of chances to pad that lead: first in the seventh when Jose Reyes lined out to center to end the inning with two runners on base, and again when David Wright hit a one-out triple in the eighth, only to be stranded when Carlos Beltran struck out looking and Ryan Church grounded out to second. The Beltran-haters will come back out of the woodwork to pillory him for failing to get the runner home from third with less than two outs, but the guy has come through in that situation something like 65% of the time (per the on-screen display SNY flashed right before the whiff).
An extra insurance run or two would have made a big difference, obviously, as Pedro Feliciano promptly gave up the lead in the bottom of the eighth when this fucklick hit a two-run homerun to tie the game. Chris Duncan is generally as bad at hitting southpaws as Brett Myers is good at hitting his wife, and Feliciano has been murder on lefties this season (and in general), but those two facts blatantly disregarded each other and conspired to screw the Mets and left me with no choice but to pathetically cry myself to sleep. Again.
The real hero last night was Jerry Manual, who deftly displayed the same lack of managerial ingenuity that made Willie Randolph the target of much fan ire. With the game tied at seven in the bottom of the ninth, the Cardinals were set to bring up the meat of their order: Pujols, Ankiel and Glaus. Fine, tie game, other team's best hitters coming up, rollercoaster of a game possibly hanging in the balance. What to do? If you're Jerry Manuel, you bring in the worst pitcher in your bullpen and a dude who sauntered around the field before the game wearing a Hello Kitty backpack (that, of course, has nothing to do with his crappiness). Billy Wagner is twiddling his thumbs in the bullpen, and he's the best pitcher you've got, and I don't care that it isn't a save situation or that you might have a save situation next inning or the inning after. If you don't get through their team's best hitters RIGHT NOW then there won't be a game to save later. I've basically accepted the fact that a manager will never bring in his best reliever to pitch to the heart of the order in the seventh or eighth inning, even though it may be the highest leverage inning of the game. It's the right thing to do, but it doesn't happen and it might never happen because closers like to pitch the ninth inning. But this *was* the ninth inning, AND it was the highest leverage situation of the game, and Manual still made the absolute wrong decision and the Mets lost the game because of it. There were other things the Mets screwed up, and even if Muniz (or Wagner) came in to shut down Pujols, Ankiel and Glaus, there's no guarantee that the Mets would have won the game anyway. But you've gotta give them a chance, Jerry.
Of course Carlos Muniz retired Pujols and Ankiel, and of course Glaus hit his second homerun of the game. Of course the Mets lost, and of course I'm moving on.
Big winners: David Wright, +22.5% WPA, Damion Easley, +18.5% WPA
Big losers: Carlos Muniz, -35.8% WPA, Pedro Martinez, -25.4% WPA
Teh aw3s0mest play: Damion Easley two-run double, +14.7% WPA
Teh sux0rest play: You know what, -46.3% WPA
Total pitcher WPA: -80.9%
Total batter WPA: +30.9%
Game Thread Roll Call
Nice job by JoshNY; his effort in last night's game thread embiggens us all.
| Name | # of Posts |
|---|---|
| JoshNY | 25 |
| Prince | 19 |
| JohnPeterson | 12 |
| ZaBlanc | 11 |
| DoctorK16 | 10 |
| metsexile | 4 |
| gogomets | 4 |
| itsmetsforme | 4 |
| Reg Dunlop | 4 |
| LOUtheMETfan | 3 |
| goth brooks | 1 |
0 recs |
9 comments
Comments
Do I get swag for that?
I can post a link to a Youtube video of the Giuseppe Franco commercial if it would help.
I mean, come on! The man has met Gary Busey and lived to tell the tale! Truly he is an inspiration to us all.
by JoshNY on
Jul 3, 2008 10:55 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
duncan
wow, what a real piece of shit.
and cant believe manual left wagner in the bullpen. this isnt that hard to figure out. are managers still not getting the highest and best use of a closer thing?
by kendynamo on
Jul 3, 2008 11:11 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Nice Job
Josh NY and all the other threaders (threadees?) I had to miss most of the game last night due to a silly work function but I was logged on in spirit and did make it back for the sixth inning on. I was totally stunned that Muniz was brough in to pitch the ninth. Wasn’t Wagner warming up? Crazy. A huge huge loss as a win would really have given us some momentum for the first time in a long while. Manuel really screwed the pooch on this one.
by Endys Game on
Jul 3, 2008 11:31 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Regarding the use of a closer...
... Sing it ,sister. When did managers turn off their brains when it comes to using their closers?
Guess what? This team isn’t going to have 100+ save opportunities this year. Holding to this very limited use of Wagner could lead him to be the highest paid pitcher on a “per pitch basis.” Easily.
"It's Father's Day today at Shea, so to all you fathers out there, Happy Birthday." -- Ralph Kiner
by dissento on
Jul 3, 2008 1:08 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
JE
Agreed.
There’s not much to say regarding Duncan vs. Feliciano. The odds were heavily in our favor but shit really does happen.
Regarding Manuel’s use of Wagner, I remember reading an article last October about the use of closers in the ninth inning when the team in question was leading by three runs. In a nutshell, the article pointed out that any pitcher could be entrusted with protecting that lead - yes, even Joe Borowski! - but that you need your best reliever on the mound when you cannot afford to give up even one run.
I mention this piece, of course, because the night before, Manuel brought in Wagner in the ninth to pitch with, yes, a three-run lead.
Essentially, Manuel is using Wagner in a way that makes the agent happy (more saves = more green) but not give the Mets a greater chance of winning games.
So, to summarize: ugh!
by JE on
Jul 3, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Precisely
This has been long espoused by the sabermetric community as the most effective use of a team’s best reliever. Bill James wrote a number of years ago that your closer (i.e. your best bullpen arm) should always pitch the most important, highest leverage inning(s), and that those innings aren’t always going to be save situations. His idea has been inaccurately tagged as “bullpen by committee” because you might have different guys closing different games, but the salient point is that your best pitcher should pitch to the best hitters in the most important situation, even if that situation comes up in the sixth, seventh or eighth innings, or, heaven forfend, the ninth inning of a tie game on the road.
by Eric Simon on
Jul 3, 2008 2:28 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Bullcrap
The Beltran-haters will come back out of the woodwork to pillory him for failing to get the runner home from third with less than two outs, but the guy has come through in that situation something like 65% of the time (per the on-screen display SNY flashed right before the whiff).
Did the stat take into account late inning? No chance. No change it’s anywhere near 65%.
The 2008 NY Mets: Reyes singles. Castillo infield single. Wright walks. Beltran lines out. ZaBlanc bitches. Delgado strikes out. Reyes picked off third. Fans boo. Padres win 2-1.
by ZaBlanc on
Jul 4, 2008 10:03 AM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
B-Ref
Unfortunately, Baseball-Reference.com doesn’t put percentages on them, but they do provide “Runner on third, less than two outs” splits and Carlos Beltran has hit .474/.455/.684 in those situations this year (link). Feel free to draw your own conclusions.
by Eric Simon on
Jul 4, 2008 11:00 AM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs












