2009 Mets Transaction Register, Part 1
The wretched 2009 season is over, so enter a glut of retrospectives, commentary, and analyses chronicling the whole mess. We'll kick things off by taking a look back at the moves -- trades and signings -- the Mets made since the 2008 season ended unceremoniously (for the Mets, anyway). There's a lot to wade through, so we're going to break this into at least two parts.
November 18, 2008
Signed Andy Green: Andy saw just five plate appearances with the Mets in 2009, spending most of the season with Triple-A Buffalo, where he hit .259./.330/.379 with a .326 wOBA and .5 hWAR. This now qualifies as the most anyone has ever written about Andy Green.
December 3, 1998
Signed Nelson Figueroa: Figgy had a 3.07 tRA in 112 innings pitched with Buffalo and a 5.06 tRA in 58 innings with the Mets. He made the league minimum (less if you consider the time spent on a minor league deal), and has generally been pretty mediocre in his two seasons since returning to the states. He's a useful guy to keep around Triple-A to make the occasional emergency start, and might even be passable as a swingman/mop jockey.
December 9, 2008
Signed Francisco Rodriguez for 3 years/$37 million plus vesting 2012 option worth $17.5 million: We've already covered this. The guaranteed money is probably too much for a good reliever with diminishing velocity, declining strikeout rates, and spotty control, but the overlooked option makes this a brutal deal for the Mets. It seemed like a good idea at the time, ubt unless Frankie's arm falls off the Mets will be on the hook for $46 million over the next three seasons, the mere thought of which just made me throw up in my mouth a little bit. Rodriguez is hardly a bad pitcher, he's just not a great pitcher, and the Mets are paying him to be brilliant. They might be able to swap him for someone else's bad contract -- Milton Bradley's name continues to come up -- but I don't think the Mets are down on Rodriguez at all, let alone as nauseated as we are.
December 11, 2008
Drafted Darren O'Day from the Angels in the Rule 5 draft: This looked like a pretty good move for the Mets at the time, though O'Day only pitched three innings before being waived to make room for Figueroa to make a start in Mike Pelfrey's absence. Few tears were cried over O'Day's departure, until he went on to strike out 54 in 55.2 innings with the Rangers while posting a 2.83 tRA, 11.8% swinging strike rate and a sub-1.00 WHIP. His .244 BABIP might be unsustainably low, but the Mets' loss was the Rangers' gain.
Traded Endy Chavez, Aaron Heilman, Mike Carp, Jason Vargas, Joe Smith, Ezequiel Carrera, and Maikel Cleto in a three-team deal with the Mariners and Indians, getting back J.J. Putz, Sean Green, and Jeremy Reed: Ugh. This one looks worse with each passing day. Green is probably the best player going to the Mets in this deal. Putz was spotty and then injured, and his outlook for 2010 is questionable. He'll pitch, I assume, but the Mets hold an $8.6 million club option with a $1 million buyout, and his return to Queens is hardly guaranteed. Reed was worth -.7 WAR with the Mets in 2009, and is apparently terrible at everything. Endy got hurt but he's Endy which just makes this trade worse for reasons both rational (his leather-flashing puts Rob Halford to shame) and irrational (he's Endy!). Joe Smith was so-so with the Indians; he's a younger, slighty shabbier Sean Green. Carp had a decent season with Triple-A Tacoma and hit .315/.415/.463 in 65 plate appearances with the Mariners. Vargas was nothing special, and managed to allow 16 homeruns in 91.2 innings. Heilman was traded in a separate deal from Seattle to the Cubs, and was about what you'd expect (good strikeouts, too many walks, mirthless scowl). Carrera had a .408 wOBA with Double-A West Tenn. Cleto made eight starts with Single-A Clinton, striking out 24 and walking eleven in 25.1 innings. If Putz had stayed healthy and effective things would look a whole lot different, but as it stands this deal gets worse with each passing day.
December 23, 2008
Signed Omir Santos: We rag on Santos here a lot, mostly because he's bad, but also because the Mets think he's actually good. The truth is that he's pretty bad, at hitting at least, but the Mets paid him nothing and he was worth almost half a win with his bat, and he might be pretty good with the glove, too. The truth is that the Mets could do worse than Santos in a backup role next year, but the frightening reality is that he may be more than that.
January 9, 2009
Signed Tim Redding for 1 year/$2.25 million: Looked like a decent deal for an average starting pitcher. Then he missed the beginning of the season with a shoulder problem. Then he was below average for 120 innings with the Mets. Whatever. I'm not losing any sleep over this one. It was a pretty good one-year gamble.
January 13, 2009
Signed Alex Cora for 1 year/$2 million: A .291 wOBA and -3.7 UZR in 82 games, the best thing you can say about him is that he had the good sense to get hurt and not further hamper the Mets with his sub-replacement ballplaying.
January 16, 2009
Signed Casey Fossum: Appeared in two games for Buffalo and three for the Mets, doing little of anything worth mentioning. Spent most of the season with Triple-A Iowa in the Cubs' system.
January 20, 2009
Signed Cory Sullivan for 1 year/$600k: Posted a semi-respectable .332 wOBA in 156 plate appearances with the Mets, but was unspectacular in the outfield. FanGraphs has him worth $400k, so this signing was hardly a disaster. Nothing to get too excited about either, I suppose.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
December 3, 1998 - Signed Nelson Figueroa: Figgy had a 3.07 tRA in 112 innings pitched with Buffalo and a 5.06 tRA in 58 innings with the Mets...
Heck, I wish it were 1998! Bring back Bobby V!
"The picture looked like I was in the dugout, but they got it all wrong. I absolutely was never in the dugout."
- Mr. B.V. Incognito
I don't think people have a problem with the Sullivan deal in isolation
It’s the piling on of Sullivan like deals, the thought process behind them. You spend small amounts on enough crappy players, who you could easily replace with players already readily available in your system, and you start to create holes elsewhere.
I've seen a ton of moaning
in some places over the Sullivan deal, but I can’t understand why people would be up in arms over a 600K contract when there were sooo soooo many more worse contracts doled out by this team.
I don't get this either.
Sullivan was unspectacular in the outfield? As opposed to who out there in LF – Murphy?
Sullivan was signed for some depth, nothing more. The real mistake was starting the season thinking Murph could be the starting LF.
And good thing we had Sullivan for that depth. Especially when it became evident Murph was no LF coupled with Delgado’s surgery and Beltran’s injury. Without him and Reed, we would have been close to putting an ad in the paper for replacements.
Swap KRod’s contract for Milton Bradley’s contract? Uh, no.
by MetsFan4Decades on Oct 13, 2009 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Mostly agree
600K doesn’t kill the Mets, and I have no problem with them paying a premium for players they want. The problem is this: there was no reason to want Cory Sullivan entering last season.
He’s got a career .721 OPS. According to his UZRs entering last season, he plays solid defense in corner outfield slots but dreadful defense in center. If he were capable of playing great D in center or actually hitting like a corner outfielder, he’d be a real, real solid guy to look at. But he doesn’t, so he’s really pretty useless on anything but a minor league deal.
Again, the money doesn’t truly matter. But what it reveals about the Mets’ thought process does.
Without Sullivan, Nick Evans might have actually seen some playing time.
Not that this team had any apparent interest in seeing a 23-year-old outfielder get any playing time ahead of a 30-year-old sub-replacement level outfielder.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Oct 13, 2009 9:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, I exaggerated a bit.
Not “sub-replacement” but almost exactly replacement level, actually.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Oct 13, 2009 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
not to mention
Livan, Tak, Angel Berroa, and Emil Brown
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
by firejerrynow on Oct 13, 2009 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry, but...
Tim Redding wasn’t an average pitcher. He’d had one year since 2003 when he was usefully below average. He’s the kind of guy a rich team hands 2.25 to when they need a 7th or 8th starter. Typical that the Mets would worry about the 5 spot when 2, 3, and 4 were obvious problems. Between Redding, Cora, and a few other folks Omar gave unnecesary money too, real ballplayer $$$s got away.
Figueroa is just fine as a fifth starter. He’s well cast in that role, he’s cheap, and he’s only a disappointment if you want him to be something other than he is.
As in,
typical that the Mets under Omar would worry about the five spot, and then get it wrong. Apparently Jason Marquis was available, and it’s not hindsight to note Marquis was exactly what the Mets needed going into 2009. A durable pitcher who, in a good year, is a solid #4. THAT’s exactly the kind of guy a big market club can afford. Worst case, Marquis puts up a 5.50 ERA, and that puts him in the top third of fifth starters in the NL. As it was he would have been the Mets second best starter.
by SeanSchirmer on Oct 21, 2009 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions


























