AAOP: First, do no harm
First, do no harm
Actually, first fire Jerry Manuel. No point in putting together a decent team only to have gangsta pitching moves and first inning bunting ruin the whole thing. While we're at it, we'll also fire the medical staff, and replace them with people who, you know, have been to medical school and know what concussion is.
Keep the core
(all contracts are from here)
3 of our position players are 'no brainers'
SS: Jose Reyes ($9M)
3B: David Wright ($10M)
CF: Carlos Beltran ($18.5M)
Total $37.5M
The 2006 Mets came close. The same core (Wright, Reyes, Beltran and Delgado) would've made the playoffs in 2007 and 2008 by winning the last game of the season, despite the supporting cast. The core is awesome. When they went down to injury in 2009, the Mets finished 23 games back. How the Mets do in 2010 is dependent on how well Wright, Reyes, Santana and Beltran recover from injury and how Delgado's production is replaced, making the 2010 season something of a gamble.
If Wright, Reyes, Beltran (and Santana) come back to perform as well as from 2006-08, then the 2010 Mets just need to replace Delgado's production to be in contention. But that is a big 'if', and therefore it makes little sense to go all out for 2010 if that means gutting the farm and giving out big, long term contracts that cripple the club for years to come. Instead, I here propose some short-term moves that should mean that if the core comes back healthy, the Mets will be in the mix for the playoffs, while if they don't the club will be in good shape for 2011 and beyond, when (hopefully) some of their prospects will be ready to make an impact.
To do this, we're going to upgrade the starting rotation and improve the team's defense: the Mariners went from a 61-101 record in 2008 to a winning 85-77 in 2009 largely through improved defense (including the awesome Franklin Gutierrez who was robbed of a gold glove). Both Wright and Reyes have some history of being good defensive players, so we'll hope for the same in 2010. Luis Castillo, however, has to be replaced by a decent defensive 2B. If rumours are to be believed, the Dodgers are interested in Castillo; rather than take a bad contract in return, let's pay some ($2M?) of his contract, and get a minor prospect in return. It doesn't really matter what we get for Castillo, as long as his lousy defense is gone.
2B: By 2009 UZR, Felipe Lopez and Placido Polanco are the obvious free agent options at 2B. Both were paid around $5M, with Lopez both younger and better in 2009. Although 2009 was by far Lopez' best defensive year, we'll take a chance and go for the younger player, $12M over 2 years with player and club options. This commits a total of ~$8M to 2B.
C: Omir Santos is cheap ($0.4M) and therefore a serviceable back-up. With no great free agent catchers available we'll partner him with Greg Zaun for $2M. Fingers crossed Josh Thole is ready to take over by 2011.
1B: Daniel Murphy was the second least valuable 1B in the majors 2009. As he isn't good enough to play every day, he moves to the bench (or even AAA to see if he can learn 2B). With no great free agent options, we're going to try a platoon at 1B. Nick Evans ($0.4M; remember, Jerry is long gone) can play against lefties, and we'll try the fruits of the Billy Wagner trade by pairing him with Chris Carter ($0.4M) against righties. This isn't ideal, and the defensive skills of this platoon may leave something to be desired (Murphy may get the nod when Pelfrey is on the mound if his defense really is this good). At least it won't block Ike Davis, and might make the Billy Wagner trade non-terrible.
(We're also going to sign Val Pascucci a year too late, and stick him in AAA - maybe he can be the 2010 Russell Branyan)
RF(CF?): Mike Cameron is coming back to the Mets on a very reasonable $10M/1 year contract. A considerable amount of time in spring training will be spent teaching Cameron and Beltran not to run into each other. Maybe Cameron can learn to shout 'Yo La Tengo'? Frenchy is non-tendered or traded to a GM more stupid than Omar (his OBP would fit right in in Kansas).
We're also going to pick up Matt Murton, either through a non-tendering, or minor trade. It shouldn't cost much after he was DFA'd last year.
LF: Angel Pagan is cheap ($0.6M) and plays good defense. Hopefully Fernando Martinez can master AAA and be ready to take over in RF or LF as required in 2011.
Bench:
Daniel Murphy ($0.4M)
Oil Spill Valdez (for his defense and cheapness) ($0.4M)
Carter or Evans and Santos or Zaun, depending on platoons
Murton ($0.4M)
(Total cost of position players is $60.5M)
Starting Pitching
The Mets need more starting pitchers. Oliver Perez is off to the bullpen until he learns how not to be awful. Thus the rotation is:
SP: Johan Santana ($21M)
SP: Mike Pelfrey ($0.5M, should benefit most from improved defense)
SP: John Maine ($2.6M)
SP: Jon Niese ($0.4M)
We could go out and sign a big name free agent starter (John Lackey) or a medium name, expensive free agent (Randy Wolf, Joel Pineiro). But as we're already gambling on the core being back to their brilliant best for 2010, we might as well go all in and take a risk on signing 2 of 3 of (in order of preference): Ben Sheets, Erik Bedard and Rich Harden, depending, of course, on the medical reports from our new, competent, medical team (and it's not like Lackey and Wolf are strangers to the DL themselves).
SP: Ben Sheets ($6M rising to $10M)
SP: Erik Bedard ($6M rising to $10M)
(Brad Penny's 2009 salary was $5M +$3M incentives)
With Sheets and Bedard coming off injury, we'll sign them for 1 year for a (hopefully realistic) $10M including incentives for innings pitched, and vesting options based on 2010 performance. Maine, Niese, Sheets and Bedard will play some kind of injury-based starting pitcher game of musical chairs. If all 6 starters are healthy, Niese can go to AAA and/or Maine can join Oliver Perez in the bullpen, waiting for Sheets/Bedard to hit the DL. It's a big risk, but if healthy, a rotation including Santana, Sheets and Bedard would be amongst the best in the majors.
(hopefully deep enough) Bullpen
Feliciano ($1.6M; available in the right trade, one day his arm will fall off)
K-Rod ($11.5M)
Green ($0.5M, should benefit from improved defence)
Perez ($12M!)
Nieve ($0.4M)
Bostick ($0.4M)
Parnell ($0.4M)
Misch ($0.4M)
Stokes ($0.4M)
Stoner ($0.4M, but this should easily be recouped through shirt sales)
Rule 5 draftee(s), the 2010 Darren O'Day
Arms received in trades for Castillo/Frenchy
(Nieve, Perez and Misch (at a stretch) can start in an emergency. Figueroa can wait in AAA; hopefully we'll never see him in the majors).
Pitching total = $72.5M
The bullpen is cheap (aside from the horrible K-Rod/Perez contracts) and full of arms. We'll see which ones stick. One aim for the new, statistically minded manager will be to make sure K-Rod finishes the absolute minimum number of games possible in the hope of avoiding that vesting 4th year option. Don't tell the player's union. With starters like Perez, Nieve, Misch and possibly Maine/Niese in the bullpen, we'll see the end of the ridiculous 1 pitcher -1 batter lefty-righty match-ups of the Jerry Manuel years. These guys will be expected to pitch multiple innings of relief per appearance.
Total Cost = $133M. All cash saved will be spent on the draft and international free agent signings. Or my misunderestimations of how much cash free agents will want.
With a full bill of health, this team could win it all in 2010. Could.
Thanks for reading.
(Sadly I think Omar is more likely to end up with something like this:
C: B. Molina/Santos
1B: Huff, the only 1B less valuable than Murphy in 2009
2B: Hudson (after trading Castillo for nothing and paying most of his wages. Hudson will get the Castillo contract and we'll be back where we started)
3B: Wright (unless he is traded for Halladay!)
SS: Reyes (Alex Cora will be signed as a back up for 'grission')
LF: Jermaine Dye (on 3 year contract)
CF: Beltran
RF: Frenchy (with 3 year extension)
Bench:
Pagan
Murphy
Cora
Someone old and rubbish
someone else old and rubbish
SP
Santana
Pelf
Wolf
Marquis
Maine/Perez
Bullpen - Feliciano, Green, K-rod, someone old and overpaid, a rule 5 draft pick who will be waived within weeks and end up being awesome for someone else.
(this is without the horrendous trade that will inevitably give up various prospects like Niese/Evans/Davis for some overpaid old rubbish).
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Very thoughtful
My main disagreement is that there’s no real reason not to get two solid starters and a righty mashing 1bman. You’ve stayed well below the budget limit, so why gamble with the rotation when two durable, average to above average starters might well bring this team to the playoffs? You yourself made the point about how close the Mets core in 2007 and 2008 got the team to the playoffs. Two decent starters effectively replace what we got from Maine and Perez those years.
Really like using the money saved towards the draft and international FA
Nothing flashy, but an extremely sensible plan
pretty good plan, I don't really have any major arguements here.
I’d love to see Ollie banished to the pen, but I’m not sure this is gonna happen at 12M/year. Other than that, its not overly ambitious and your decisions are pretty reasonable. Nothing earth shattering, but a good step in the right direction.
by KeithsMoustache on Nov 13, 2009 11:55 PM EST reply actions
David Wright and Jose reyes are good defensively?
This year Wright had a UZR/150 of -13.2 and Reyes had a UZR/150 of -9.4.
Don’t judge fielding solely on gold gloves and announcer’s praise.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Nov 14, 2009 12:30 PM EST reply actions
Wright and Reyes are obviously going nowhere
and they have both been decent defenders in the past – Wright had positive UZR ratings in ‘07 and ’08, Reyes in 03, 04, 06 and 07, I’m hoping they’ll bounce back (there are links to their fangraphs fielding stats in the text).
(This plan does involve a lot of keeping your fingers crossed).
That Reyes number is extremely misleading
He barely played. His UZR this year was -1.9, all that number means is that had he played at the same level over the course of 150 games, his UZR would have been -9.4. He’s an above average shortstop, he wouldn’t have been that bad. Also, in 07 and 08 Wright posted positive UZR’s, he was good, he had a bad year in 09. Finally, UZR shouldn’t be looked at on a year to year basis, 3 years of defensive data is equal to one of offensive, or so I’ve read.
"We must win and we must know how to win rather than win because we have statistical people."
Some of this is very sensible
I like the “do no harm” mantra, but I’m a bit confused. On the one hand we seem to be sacrificing this year for the future (which I have no problem with, actually) when it comes to offense — but have a totally different strategy when it comes to pitching. For example, our offense features Nick Evans at first base, Lopez at 2B, Zaun at C, Pagan at RF — with the pitcher that’s 5 average or worse slots in the lineup. If it’s in the name of being smart and clearing room for prospects and a better free agent crop next year, great. But at the same time, we’re shelling out bucks to high-upside injury-prone pitchers like Harden and Sheets for one-year contracts.
Hard to reconcile the two approaches, I think.
To me, they are part of the same approach
I didn’t want to totally rebuild, but at the same time, Ii wanted to work out a cheap (albeit risky) way to win in 2010 IF Reyes, Wright, Beltran and Santana come back fit and healthy. The position players I added (Cameron, Lopez, Pagan over Frenchy, Valdez on the bench) are mainly there to improve the defense, whilst not totally sucking at the plate (aside from Oil Spill); coupled with massively improved pitching my 2010 Mets should be able to win more games without having to score as many runs – this kind of approach was successful for the 2009 Mariners. This to me seems a more interesting way to add wins than signing a big slugger – although my 1B platoon could be a disaster both offensively and defensively.
Given that the payroll is only $133M I don’t think that spending $20M of that on Sheets and Bedard is unreasonable – as you say, they are high upside pitchers. And I’d love to watch Santana, Sheets and Bedard pitch on consecutive days or in the playoffs. If it works in 2010, all well and good, if not, there is lots of payroll flexibility, plus roster space for prospects like Ike Davis in 2011.
I like this a lot
And I love this:
Someone old and rubbish
by James Kannengieser on Nov 14, 2009 1:52 PM EST reply actions
you like to gamble?
You say we are gambling that the core is going to be healthy, so we should gamble on a few possibly really good pitchers being healthy – one who didn’t pitch last year. This is bad logic. If we are really lucky, it all works out and we are a great team. Chances are some of it works and some of it don’t, we end up waiting on people to come off the DL, we all yell and blog about how much we hate Omar for being so dumb and making such risks and say how we saw this coming, complain and are in no better position next year because we have to sign the same amount of pitchers and are just looking like a dumb, bad organization




























