Omar Minaya and Newton's Third Law of Motion.
Isaac Newton's third law of motion roughly says this: "For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction". I've worked at a summer science camp and successfully taught this idea to kindergartners, usually by letting a balloon fly around the room, and the kids usually can comprehend it. I admit that the kids who attend this camp are exceptionally geeky children, whose overeager parents ruin their summers by sending them to science camp, dooming them to lives of ridicule and asthma and nerdy baseball websites, but still, they can understand it because the law is not a particularly difficult concept to grasp. The law's uses reach from billiards to actual rocket science. However, it does not apply to the successful construction of baseball teams.
Let me explain. Each year, Omar Minaya's offseason strategy seems to be dictated by the failings of the previous year. In this bizarro Newtonian scenario, the previous year's failure is the action, and Omar's offseason moves are a reaction. Action > Reaction. The 2007 Mets imploded in epic fashion when they failed to get a big start out of anyone down the stretch (action), so Omar Minaya went out and got Johan Santana (reaction). The 2008 Mets bullpen imploded in equally epic fashion (action), so Omar asked for and received two closers from Santa (reaction). Now, these moves improved the team marginally, but simply fixing the previous year's problem isn't enough. Being a good general manager is about building the best team possible, anticipating new leaks and not just plugging the already dripping ones with chewing gum, ala Chevy Chase in "Vegas Vacation".
A pool ball hit with a set amount of force at a set angle will ricochet around the table in a predictable manner, and will follow a similar path each time it is struck. Baseball teams aren't so easily predicted. Players have down years, up years, they suddenly lose bat speed, they get injured, they get in taxicab accidents during snack runs, they can be Oliver Perez. It's random and often unpredictable. The best strategy to combat the randomness is to construct a team strong in all areas, so a deficiency that inevitably develops in one can hopefully be overcome by strength in another. Building the best possible team doesn't guarantee success, but it seriously improves the chances.
Omar Minaya fails because he doesn't see the randomness. He still sees the pool table. His shot goes awry and he compensates by aiming a little more to the left or right. He gets a Johan Santana but neglects the bullpen. He rebuilds the bullpen, but then hands a AA infielder the starting left field job based on two months in the majors, and the catcher's job to someone with a career .652 OPS in the minors based on one Fenway home run. He sees the 2009 Mets suffer from an absurd number of injuries and an embarrassing lack of power, and then looks for players who don't get injured and hit home runs (I assume). This is a stupid way to build a team. It's like busting on one hand in blackjack, and then refusing to hit on a 5 and 6 because you busted on the previous hand. Its different cards each deal. The shortcomings of last year don't predict as much as Omar thinks because the 162 game season involves a ton of chance. Omar asks himself, "how can I fix the problem?" when he should be asking himself, "how can I put together the best team possible?" He reacts when he should act because he ignores the effects of chance.
Seeing the effects of chance is important. It prevents you from handing out two-year deals to the Julio Franco's and the Marlon Anderson's of the world, and it explains why giving a three-year deal to a relief pitcher is silly. Understanding that old injury prone players get injured more often explains why relying on a 40-year-old Moises Alou is stupid, and why relying on a 41-year-old Alou is unforgivably stupid. More importantly, it keeps you from thinking that just plugging the holes on a rotting ship is enough. Just adding K-Rod and Putz while failing to improve other areas isn't enough. You can keep patching holes, but building a stronger ship is a better plan.
Imagine this plausible scenario. The Mets lacked power this year. Omar, after turning on his computer for the first time ever, will eventually stumble onto Molina's baseball-reference.com page after Google searching "bENngie molina is he anygood please help interweb i might be fired?", and he will see that Bengie Molina hit 20 home runs. He'll miss the part where Molina only walked 13 times because Omar isn't sure what "BB" stands for, and he asks beat reporter Marty Noble, who happens to be walking by on his way to a "Matlock" marathon. Mr. Noble explains to Omar that "BB" is a new Sabermetric whose formula looks like this. So Omar just sees the 20 home runs, and gives him a three year deal, and then gives Jeff Francoeur a three year extension just to make this made up scenario really horrible. Omar puts his feet on his desk and thinks to himself "power problem solved, mission accomplished" and proceeds to hibernate until spring training. Indeed, Molina may patch the home run problem, but does signing the Mario* of the Super Molina Bros. create the best possible team? Probably not, because Bengie Molina is an out-machine on a team that already has too many out-machines, and will likely cost more money than he is worth. Omar needs to ask himself if signing Molina creates the best team, rather than if he just patches a hole. Maybe the money spent on Molina would be more effectively spent elsewhere.
*He gets to be Mario because he's the pudgiest looking one. I think Yadier can be Luigi, and I'll make Jose Wario because he's on the Yankees, and thus the evil one.
Omar Minaya's problem is that he is a reactionary GM. He doesn't realize that reaction is not a plan, it's a response. Fixing a broken bullpen is a good idea, but maybe adding a corner outfielder is a better idea. Doing both is the best idea. The Mets will continue to fail until the distinction between active planning and reactive hole plugging is made.
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
41 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
good post, i’ve always felt the same way. seems every year we’re just trying to plug in last years hole without anticipating any other potential deficiencies….it essentially assumes that the rest of the team will remain in a static equilibrium.
Meanwhile underneath all stopgap free agent signings, we trade away heath bell, matt lindstrom, and henry owens and then seem surprised our bullpen is collapsing a year or two later and all we have is eddie kunz to try and save the day.
That's why I can't ever say Omar is a 'good GM', even with him getting Santana for nothing, or Maine for nothing, or Perez for nothing...
For every move that he’s made that pays off (Santana, Maine), he has moves that were utterly horrible. He’s a sling-shot- he went from having a golden hand in 2006, to putting together a colossal flop of a team in the interim. I’d rather have someone who was steadily ‘meh’ than such a pendulum.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Nov 22, 2009 12:31 PM EST reply actions
Nice post
While I might quibble with the assertion that Johan Santana “improved the team marginally” (Minaya traded little of consequence and got back a five-WAR pitcher), most of what you’ve said here is spot-on.
Also, regarding your summer camp work, kudos for helping to foster in young minds a penchant for scientific inquiry. Surely we need to be doing more of that.
I don't understand this notion that he gave up nothing or little for Johan
Carlos Gomez is a starting CFer and Deollis Guerra had a 3.30 tRA in AA at age 20 this year.
Yeah and at the time
they were serious prospects, I would say Mulvey was considered a better prospect at the time than Niese is by many now. I think when BP did their prospect list after the trade him, Guerra and Gomez all got 4 stars and made up their top 3.
Well, the Twins have already waived Humber.
And Mulvey and Gomez have been traded, (for Jon Rauch & J.J. Hardy, respectively) so Guerra is all that’s left. Not to mention that Gomez hasn’t hit well at all in the majors, and Humber hasn’t been very good. Mulvey hasn’t had much MLB experience yet, but his FIPs were pretty good in the minors.
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 22, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions
But that's hindsite
At the time it wasn’t a bad prospect package.
Not to mention JJ Hardy and Jon Rauch isn’t exactly a bad return.
Oh yeah, I agree with you guys.
In hindsight, it’s not such a great deal. But it’s nowhere near as one-sided as people make it out to be. If Guerra pans out, the only one of the four who didn’t turn into anything good for Minny is Humber. Getting 2 SP and a good-hitting SS for Santana is pretty damn good, especially when you factor contracts into the equation.
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 22, 2009 7:02 PM EST up reply actions
That's fair
Though Jay Payton was once a starting center fielder, so that alone tells us nothing. Guerra also only threw 62 innings this year, so keep that in mind.
The Mets didn’t give up nothing, but trading for Santana improved the 2008 team significantly, not marginally.
I agree
It takes incredible hindsight to criticize the Santana trade
I mean seriously, is there anyone here who didn’t like the trade when it was first announced or didn’t want them to do it period?
Excellent post
One question: is Gustavo the Waluigi of the Molinas, since he’s not really in the family, and no one cares about him?
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 22, 2009 2:49 PM EST reply actions
I hate Waluigi, and therefore, Gustavo Molina.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Nov 22, 2009 9:23 PM EST up reply actions
i wouldn’t give minaya much credit for the santana deal. if there were a bunch of teams vying for him, then it would make sense and it would be a huge steal. but 90% of the deal rested on the fact that there was really only 1 or 2 teams that could afford to sign santana to the extension he wanted, and that was the mets and the yankees. in the end, they made a bad choice (humber over hughes) but minaya had very little to do with it, outside of having permission to throw 140 million at him.
Yeah, it wasn't about Humber v. Hughes
They just wanted to avoid trading him to an AL team.
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 22, 2009 10:50 PM EST up reply actions
Not true.
He also has tunnel vision.
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 23, 2009 2:45 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
well done
this is the most eloquent way I’ve seen anyone say something we’ve been harping on all year
This is really all Minaya knows how to do...
If the Mets were to rebuild, they need to get a new management team, because the one that’s in place right now simply can’t rebuild the way you have to. I remember after the Seaver trade, Jack Lang wrote that the “…Mets would not contend for 10 years because the system is that drained…” He was pretty near accurate, the next time they were in contention was 1984, 7 years away, and you can’t tell me that Cashen didn’t “speed up” that process. If the Mets decide now to rebuild we don’t see a penant before 2018 at the earliest, and CitiField will be a ghost town in 2 years. Anybody who shows up will be able to park by the front door and will get a personal escort to the “Metropolitan Club.”
Minaya has to go, just his presence here, shows the rest of MLB that the Mets aren’t really serious players in this game.
The mets don't need to completely rebuild
they’re not as well off as they were a few years ago, because of the escalation of Reyes’s and Wrights contract and Beltran getting older but a competent gm could easily turn this team into not just a contender but a 95+ win team, I mean just Reyes/Wright/Santana and gimpy beltran should get you to 88ish wins, with a in a year or two. It’s not like we have that many problems Omar just can’t seem to address the right ones or address them properly.
minaya's last stand
Omar, get going otherwise, get out!!!
Harden, Cust, Gonzalez (rp), Pinero, Betancourt, Reed Johnson, L. Nix, Molina, Laird, Carlos Pena, f/a’s and trades, should get mets to 92-94 wins, a couple of other trades
and back to respectability. Please get castillo and o. perez out of here now….maybe
a. ramirez from 3rd to1st???
because he'll make all our other fielders look fantastic by comparison.
by KeithsMoustache on Nov 25, 2009 5:17 PM EST up reply actions
His own, or will he share it with Socks?
by BobbyV_Incognito on Nov 25, 2009 5:58 PM EST up reply actions
Sharing is caring, and I think Francoeur cares
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Nov 25, 2009 10:44 PM EST up reply actions
is that the guy who had the apple drop on his head
what an idiot

by 


























