3 Way Trade I Thought Of, What Do You Think?
This trade is based off of the fact that the Mets need starting pitching, better second base defense, and power. I heard talks about Aaron Harang and Brandon Phillips being available and they really intrigued me. I also heard that the Dodgers were hoping to shred some payroll. So here it goes, projected salary in parenthesis:
Mets get: Aaron Harang (12M), Brandon Phillips (7M), and Ronald Belisario (400K)
Reds get: Andre Ethier (5M), Luis Castillo (6M), and Reese Havens (minor league)
Dodgers get: Jennry Mejia (minor league), Jeff Francouer (4M), and Yonder Alonso (minor league)
I figured out the payroll changes for all of the teams involved and here they are, keep in mind my math is not great since I was a bit lazy in that aspect and I also rounded a few players salaries up or down to the nearest million:
Mets payroll increases by about 12M
Reds payroll decreases by about 9M
Dodgers payroll goes down by about 1M
Why It Works
For the Mets: They get a good starter in Harang and an excellent second baseman in Phillips who will play great defense and hit second in the lineup behind Reyes and also adds power to the lineup. Belisario is a good reliever who can fit in nicely as a middle reliever and also provides set-up depth in case of an injury. They also get rid of Castillo. Even though we gave up our best pitching prospect in Mejia, I think the return of Harang, Phillips, and Belisario over the next few years is good enough to outweigh that. This trade does increase our payroll a lot, but we probably still have about 20M to sign Jason Bay (I prefer Matt Holiday but if we sign Bay he will probably be cheaper leaving us with some extra cash to sign Bengie Molina and maybe even another quality reliever) and Angel Pagan could play right field. Later on in this post I will outline the possible roster for the Mets if this trade went down and how it could affect other offseason moves.
For the Reds: They shred a lot of payroll and acquire a great player in Andre Ethier, who will give them some much needed power. Ethier plays terrible defense but with the presence of speedy outfielders like Chris Dickerson and Willy Tavares, this shouldn't be much of a problem. Luis Castillo is a decent player who can man second base and get on base in the absence of Phillips. They also get Reese Havens who will probably be able to play second base every day in a few years after Castillo's contract expires. They do give up a great prospect in Yonder Alonso but he is strictly a first baseman and with the presence of Joey Votto he will not be needed in Cincinatti.
For the Dodgers: They have to give up Andre Ethier which is a big blow but with guys like Manny Ramirez, Casey Blake, Matt Kemp, Russell Martin, and James Loney they still have a very strong lineup. They acquire Jeff Francoeur who is a little less gifted as a hitter but he is only two years removed from a 29 homer season and he has a great arm, plus perhaps Matt Kemp can help him fix up that ugly UZR. The Dodgers also get Jennry Mejia who will be a great pitcher in a few years and Yonder Alonso who will provide some power and also be able to man first base if the Dodgers decide to trade James Loney for some pitching. They also shred some money assuming Ethier makes more money than Francoeur through arbitration.
Mets Projected Lineup If This Went Through
1. Jose Reyes, SS
2. Brandon Phillips, 2B
3. Carlos Beltran, CF
4. Matt Holiday/Jason Bay, LF
5. David Wright, 3B
6. Bengie Molina, C
7. Daniel Murphy, 1B
8. Angel Pagan, RF
9. Pitcher
2. Aaron Harang
3. Oliver Perez
4. Mike Pelfrey
5. Jon Niese
CL: Francisco Rodriguez
SU: Ryota Igarashi
SU: John Maine
LS: Pedro Feliciano
MR: Bobby Parnell
MR: Ronald Belisario
MR: Sean Green
Henry Blanco, C
Alex Cora, IF
Chris Gomez/Jerry Hairston Jr./ Mark Loretta/Alfredo Amezega, IF
Nick Evans, OF
Chris Carter, OF
Yes, I know you all hate Molina but admit it, if we can get him on a one year deal he would be pretty good, giving us some extra power. The bench may not be perfect but I just kind of threw it together because that wasn't the point of this post and this is not an AAOP. If we really had to, we could probably send some money over to the Dodgers if they didn't like this deal. I know we are spending a lot of money but Omar keeps saying that there is no set payroll limit and the Wilpons are willing to give him more money if he needs it, so this shouldn't be an issue if we spend a few million dollars extra.
Anyway, what do you guys think?
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
80 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
can I have some of what your smokin?
Let me get this straight, the Reds are giving up a good starting pitcher and an all-star second baseman, and are getting back Andre Ethier and garbage? No wonder why they are saving money, the trade sucks for them.
The Dodgers give up Ethier, for a prospect and Francouer who isn’t nearly as good as Ethier? Hmmmmm, not a great deal for them. And what in hell is a Yonder Alonso?
But the Mets make out like bandits! They get rid of Castillo and get a starting pitcher and an all-star second baseman. Wow! Sign me up.
Realistically, you’d have to give the Dodgers and Reds a lobotomy, to get them to swallow this horseshlt.
A Yonder Alonso, according to Baseball America, is:
The most dangerous slugger on one of the nation’s top hitting college teams, Alonso has produced consistent offensive numbers for Miami in each of his three years. As a freshman he led the team with 69 RBIs, leading the Hurricanes to the College World Series. As a sophomore, he led the Atlantic Coast Conference with 18 home runs, and finished the season with a .376 batting average. A native of Cuba, Alonso came to America at age 9. He was drafted out of Coral Gables (Fla.) High in the 16th round by the Twins in 2005. Alonso has always hit for average and power, and he is considered one of the most professional hitters in this year’s draft. Blessed with superior plate discipline, Alonso has a great strikeout-to-walk ratio and has an advanced approach. He swings lefthanded and has power to all fields, making consistent contact. In the field, Alonso is limited to first base but plays the position well. He is a below-average runner with adequate arm strength, but he should be an above-average defender. Alonso’s professionalism and makeup are both strengths as well, making him a safe pick to reach the major leagues.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 18, 2009 6:37 PM EST up reply actions
So Alonso is blocked by Votto, assuming the Reds plan to keep Votto.
Verrrrry interesting trade idea. (You’re really Billy Beane, aren’t you?)
At the moment I won’t throw out an opinion just to throw out an opinion, but I’m not high on Harang as he’ll never be the pitcher he was from 2005-2007 and I worry about him losing 20 innings a year. A physical might give me the info I need to make a decision on him. Given Harang’s salary (and the 2m buyout) I don’t see the Reds moving him as anything more than a salary dump on their part. Certainly I won’t give them a good minor leaguer for Harang. So the trade comes down to Phillips, a very good second basemen, at less than market value and under club control for three years, for….? TWO very promising minor leaguers seems like too much. Also, one minor leaguer with 1-2 starter upside is also too much. I’d be willing to deal Havens and another minor leaguer, but Jenrry? That’s more than I want to part with. Perhaps if I pay half of Castillo’s salary the Reds would take Havens and a pitcher with less upside… How about fitting Maine in there along with Havens?
In any case, very interesting proposal. One of the better Fanposts in a while, Bobby. This is the kind of move the Mets make if they’re serious about contending in 2010. Solidify the pitching, patch a likely major hole in the lineup.
by SeanSchirmer on Dec 19, 2009 1:36 AM EST up reply actions
Oh--and a flat no to Molina, btw.
His WAR is thoroughly misleading. Dock him a half a run for each of: his terrible baserunning, his poor defense, and likely age-related decline, and you’re paying real money for a replacement level catcher.
No, thanks.
by SeanSchirmer on Dec 19, 2009 1:38 AM EST up reply actions
Whatever, take Barajas
That wasn’t the point, I didn’t do much research there.
Thanks for the compliment though.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 8:34 AM EST up reply actions
Couldn't one of them move to third?
If Alonso is supposed to be an above average defender couldn’t he fit at 3rd?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Your guess is better than mine. I just don't know.
Btw, if the Mets start the season with Wright at 3b and Murphy at 1b, and Wright’s D continues to go south, will they consider a midseason swap of positions for those two? Also, given that if Murphy’s defense is a little above average at 3b and the Mets have no real place for him, I’m a little surprised Murphy hasn’t drawn more interest from teams looking for a cheap, league average or thereabouts 3bman.
by SeanSchirmer on Dec 19, 2009 7:02 AM EST up reply actions
It was a pretty deep market for third baseman this year
Which made it not the ideal time to market Daniel Murphy. Polanco signed to play 3B, plus you had Beltre and Feliz
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
And Figgins
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:34 PM EST up reply actions
I don't think Alonso's thought of as that great a defender
And his arm isn’t supposed to be terrific either. From what I’ve read the Reds are leaning more towards Votto to the outfield if it comes up, since he’s the better overall athlete. Not many guys who get drafted as first baseman wind up at tougher infield positions.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
Cant trade him for one year from the date he was drafted.
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 1:44 AM EST up reply actions
he can be traded as a ptbnl
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
He was drafted in 2008
A couple picks in front of Ike
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 8:00 AM EST up reply actions
Sorry, thought I read he was drafted this season.
Then yes, he can, of course, be traded.
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
Oh, and the Dodgers get two prospects, not one. Two very good prospects on that foot.
Plus the case can be made the Francoeur is not that much worse than Ethier. He is worse, but not “not nearly as good as Ethier” as you put it.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 18, 2009 6:39 PM EST up reply actions
Ethier is a very good player...Francoeur is awful.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 8:01 AM EST up reply actions
Here is why Francouer is not sooooo much worse than Ethier (yes Ethier is the better player I will admit)
UZR in right field last three years:
Ethier: 4.1, -5.5, -16.2
Francoeur: 17.1, -4.7, -6.1
Both have been on the decline defensively but Francoeur definitely has a better defensive upside.
Fangraphs Arm rating in right field last three years:
Ethier: -1.6, 0.2, -5.5
Francoeur: 16.5, 2.0, 4.0
Obviously Francoeur is better in this aspect.
Expected Outs in right field the last three years:
Ethier: 171, 180, 271
Francoeur: 306, 273, 290
Francoeur wins.
Ethier is pretty much better in most offensive areas, but Francoeur’s defense is much better and with the defense of Matt Kemp, James Loney, and Jamey Carrol not being so great, it might help to have a defensive upgrade in right field since center, second, and first all are kind of connected defensively with right.
Plus if the Dodgers get Mejia and Alonso, there is a good chance they will turn out to be very good players and the slight degrade of Ethier to Francoeur may be worth it.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions
This is why ethier is soooo much better

Ethier is good…Francoeur is not. The fact that Francoeur has a better arm doesn’t make up for the fact that he has an inadequate bat for a corner outfielder.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
BUT
Does the fact that the Dodgers could be acquiring a future ace/number 2 starter and a future all star slugger make up for the degrade from Ethier to Francouer?
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions
Sure, but that's a small market type of risk
The Dodgers may not be in the best financial situation, but they’re coming off a playoff season, why would they make themselves worse in the short term for the sake of the long term when:
a. They’re very good in the short term
b. This deal doesn’t really help them a ton financially.
I think it makes some sense for the other two teams, but if the Mets want to three-way it up with the Reds, I doubt it’ll be the Dodgers getting into it.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 2:48 PM EST up reply actions
It could, but the trade make zero sense for the Reds.
Brandon Phillips is the best player involved in the trade, Ethier is not enough to justify losing him. Alonso is a more valuable prospect at this point than Havens, so their farm system takes a hit. Harang is a more valuable piece than Castillo, so in the end this deal would be all about dumping payroll and becoming much worse in the process. If they really wanted to do that, I’m sure there’s plenty of teams that would give up something to just take Harang’s contract. Phillips would net them a very good return. There’s no way that team would ever consider this trade, the inclusion af Alonso makes no sense at all. It’s a good enough deal for the Dodgers, and it makes some sense for NY, but only because it completely hoses the Reds.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 5:09 PM EST up reply actions
Wow you are right.
I didn’t think of it that way. I guess that’s why 89% of the Reds fans who voted didn’t like this trade for the Reds.
http://www.redreporter.com/2009/12/19/1208776/3-way-trade-what-do-you-think
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 5:52 PM EST up reply actions
lol
Francoeur has a better bat… he just has yet to harness that potential by learning how to take a pitch. His .836 OPS as a met is a very promising sign though. Ethiers value is tied up almost completely in having Manny for protection. Without Manny, he’s an average hitter at best.
They also lose a Top 20 pitching prospect
And a Top 20 middle infield prospect. And that’s being pretty conservative about Mejia and Havens. The combined surplus value, according to Victor Wang’s prospect valuation research (summarized here), is in the neighborhood of $30 million-$35 million. Even if you assume the worst for Francoeur and Castillo, as long as Francoeur isn’t extended, their combined surplus value is no worse than about -$7 million. So by the most conservative estimates, the Mets are giving up about $23 million in surplus value.
In return, they get Brandon Phillips, under team control for three more years and about $30 million, and a guy who we can estimate as being worth about $15 million per year x 3 years =$45 million, so that’s $15 million surplus value. Meanwhile, Aaron Harang, who makes about $25 million if his option is picked up, $14.5 mil if it doesn’t, figures to be worth almost exactly $25 million in production value if he performs well enough to get his option activated, and will be worth substantially less than $14.5 million if his option is not activated. So we can, even being a bit optimistic, assuming his surplus value is pretty close to 0. Bellasario, a decent but unspectacular reliever, figures to be worth about $3-3.5 million on average over the next five years, and after two years his contract will escalate in arbitration, or if things go poorly, he’ll get non-tendered. So optimistically, we can say he’ll be worth about $3 million surplus over the next two seasons, and then about $1 million surplus (on average) over the subsequent three seasons. That would give him a $9 million surplus value, for a total package of $24 million surplus value.
To summarize, the most pessimistic take on the Mets package values it at $23 million, and it could be closer to $30 or $35 million in surplus value. Meanwhile, a streamlined or even slightly optimistic view of the Reds package, unless you want to somehow believe Harang can correct his issues from the last two years (pretty much impossible to project without more relevant information) is worth $24 million. So no, this is not the Mets “making out like bandits”. Its not even a GREAT deal for them, its solid, and definitely helps in the short term, but it absolutely kills them in the long term by dealing away two very good prospects and one player who is cost controlled and going year to year, meaning if he fails, there’s no commitment (Francoeur) and taking on two players who are guaranteed quite a bit more money regardless of performance.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions
Reds do get hosed a bit in this trade
and I’m not sure I like losing Havens and Mejia just so we can win this year, thats the mentality thats gotten us into this depth problem to begin with.
I’m usually very high on keeping as much of the farm intact as possible, I believe its the first step to a successful ballclub (unless you can spend a few hundred mil in an offseason like SOME team we know).
a little part of me however likes any idea that gets rid of castillo and replaces him with a defensively competent 2b
by KeithsMoustache on Dec 18, 2009 6:30 PM EST reply actions
This is not just a "win now" thing
Harang has an option for 2011 and Phillips has an option for 2012.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 18, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
i like philips
and Harang if healthy would be a huge boost, i just don’t like trading both Mejia and Havens away to do this. The rest of MLB has caught on that you should try to bring up your young talent and lock them in at low prices. This mentality of trade away the youth for expensive and older players is the reason its so hard for us to fill all the gaps in our team, as the turnover rate is too high. The free agent market prices have become so bloated its impossible to keep filling a roster year after year with free agents.
by KeithsMoustache on Dec 18, 2009 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah I have to agree
Havens and Mejia are the two guys I would absolutely hate to trade right now. Havens because I think he’s getting undersold by the general prospect community, and Mejia because he’s so high risk/high reward. If its Holt and Tejada, it makes more sense for both teams in a way.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
it would make more sense to hold onto Havens and have Castillo keep the spot warm for him
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:38 PM EST up reply actions
I don't like giving up those Minor Leaguers, Mejia especially.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Dec 18, 2009 8:47 PM EST reply actions
the mets and the dodgers get hosed since ethier is on the rise and .........
Mejia might be the best the Mets have in minors…Davis is almost ready. You saw F-Mart.
I don’t think that Omar is crazy. Better glove O. Hudson signed and Castillo released and
paid in full would be an option. Harang who, I always liked, I believe is in serious decline.
yeah
I don’t think the fat lady has sung about him yet.
But can people please call him by a different name?
What about Fernando! (like the Abba song) or just Marty (but say it like Ben Kingsley in Sneakers)?
What a genuinely enjoyable film.
Great cast, great story, and Kingsley seems genuinely forlorn just before he opens fire.
by SeanSchirmer on Dec 19, 2009 1:22 AM EST up reply actions
Hey mardeeeeee
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 1:46 AM EST up reply actions
Oh, yeah.
He’s still crazy young, and the fact that he was even IN the majors at all this year is enough to promote more interest.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
I'd love to see Fern (not what you had in mind?) patrol the OF at Citi for a decade or so.
But I do NOT want him in the majors until Sept 1, at the earliest. Let him stay healthy, play regularly, then come up when rosters expand—maybe.
by SeanSchirmer on Dec 19, 2009 1:24 AM EST up reply actions
Orlando Hudson is NOT better defensively than Brandon Phillips.
Last 3 years of UZR:
Hudson: 0.5, -5.1, -3.3.
Phillips: 14.7, 11.3, 6.9
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 8:53 AM EST up reply actions
remember Victor Zambrano for Kazmir (who should have been the mets closer).......
do you really want to trade Mejia?
No way.
Phillips and Harang are not worth losing Havens and Mejia.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
This is actually a pretty balanced trade
The Reds are taking a hit talent wise, but depending on how much they feel the need to cut payroll, it could potentially go through. Dodgers get a great return for Ethier, definitely good enough to take it. The Mets are a bit of a question, in that I’m not totally sure giving up Mejia and Havens is a good idea, but kudos for actually creating a workable three-way trade.
by yellomellojello on Dec 18, 2009 9:51 PM EST reply actions
Good post
I dont think the Dodgers would be happy about what they get back nor should the Mets give up those guys.
Keep trying.
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 1:47 AM EST reply actions
Of all three teams, the Reds are the ones getting hosed the most.
Phillips has a ton of value. Harang at one year and 15 million has some moderate value, espescially after Garland, Piniero, and Marquis sign. Alonso is a very good prospect. All they can get for that is Ethier, Castillo (who is the least valuable piece of this deal), and Havens (who is probably a step down from Alonso at this point)?
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 5:35 PM EST up reply actions
And they shad payroll which is the point of the exercise
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions
Make that "shad" a shed.
The Reds would only trade these guys to save payroll.
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:40 PM EST up reply actions
Trading Harang by himself would allow them to shed his contract and recieve a decent prospect or two.
Phillips would net them a pretty good return, likely similar to Granderson. They really have no reason to trade Alonso. They may want to shed a few dollars, but that doesn’t mean that they are going to give away their players.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 20, 2009 9:11 AM EST up reply actions
Steve Phillips
Would make this trade in an intern-f*cking second.
I wouldn’t, but the overall architecture makes some sense. I think someone would have to pay Francoeur’s salary for the Dodgers to even consider something like this… divorce hurts more than just mommy and daddy.
by LeiterMilnerFasterStronger on Dec 19, 2009 1:30 PM EST reply actions
i just
don’t see the dodgers given up ethier for francouer
"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell
You guys don't get it
Doesn’t the top pitcher in our farm system and the top hitter in the Reds farmsystem make up for this degrade?
Anyway, I saw this coming which is why I suggested we give them money.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions
Its not so much a financial problem I don't think
Pure Value-wise it looks pretty good all around, in that everyone’s getting back a similar value to what they give up. And for the Mets and Reds, the change makes some extra sense, and serves each team’s immediate needs. But it doesn’t really work out that way for the Dodgers. Its a total rebuilding for the long-term move for them. Acquiring two Top 50 prospects would really deepen their farm, but why are they looking to build a team that’s going to be good in two or three years when they have a very good team right now? They should be buying market value wins right now, not building probabilities for low cost wins in the future.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
I see your point and it is a good one
Maybe because now they can make a trade for pitching which would help them compete?
I don’t know, you are probably right.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
No, you don't seem to get it.
This trade fills the needs of the Mets but the only thing it does for the Reds is save money, and it doesn’t do anything to help the Dodgers right now (even though they make out very well). No way the Reds do this, and no way the Mets should either.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 5:38 PM EST up reply actions
But why would a team trying to contend now
make a trade that downgrades their major league team? If the dodgers were rebuilding maybe, but even then if you’re rebuilding I don’t know that it would make sense to trade cheap young players like either, but a team that’s in contention isn’t going to make this trade.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I have gone ahead and joined the SB Nation sites for the Reds and Dodgers
I have posted this thread on the Reds site and I will do the same as soon as my Dodgers registration has fully activated. I want to see what other fans think of this.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 2:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
man you are committed to this post!
Asking a General Manager to slim down his budget is like asking an alcoholic to blow up a distillery.
by scott from peekskill on Dec 19, 2009 7:42 PM EST up reply actions
Well it only takes like 2 seconds to sign up
I just wanted to see what other people thought
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 9:19 PM EST up reply actions
Do you realize that Mejia and Havens are a better than the top two guys the Mariners just gave up for Cliff Lee?
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 5:54 PM EST reply actions
Well the Reds fans still aren't very happy with it....
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
by Bobby Baseball on Dec 19, 2009 5:59 PM EST up reply actions
Are we sure they are?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
No he has the ceiling of a front of the rotation starter
His arm action is just dangerous
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I'd take Mejia over Aumont due to Aumonts TJ surgery and delivery concerns.
I think Havens has more value than either of the other prospects Philly recieved. Toss in a Scott Moviel type, and I think the Mets could have made a comparable offer (not that Philly would have sent him here).
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 20, 2009 9:16 AM EST up reply actions
I'd rather have Meija too
But saying Aumonts ceiling is a closer is ridiculous and completely false, and I think how much rawer Meija is balances out with Aumonts injury concerns. And Mets fans think Haven is more valuable but that’s based more on perceived improvements we expect than anything he’s done yet.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Hey, Sickels thinks that's his ceiling.
So don’t bash me TOO much. Then again, I don’t exactly trust Sickels’ analysis.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
I mostly trust Sickels analysis
And I can understand how people might think that’s his most likely scenario, but I don’t see how it could possibly be considered his absolute ceiling.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Not absolute ceiling
but I’d say, more than most power arms with lots of upside with reservations (i.e. Mejia), Aumont seems to carry more “future closer” than others.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
They aren't the team you have getting Mejia.
I’m just saying if you’re willing to trade these guys, aim a little higher than Aaron Harang. Those two would be the base of a very solid offer for a guy like Gonzalez or Josh Johnson.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 6:01 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
meant to reply with that comment
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 19, 2009 6:01 PM EST up reply actions
Florida apparently turned down
Smoak and Feliz for Johnson, so I don’t think Meija and Havens come close to getting it down. maybe if you throw in Holt Davis and Tejada too.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Yeah it'd have to be like
Mejia, Fernando, Havens, and Niese or something like that. And that’s just thinking about the four guys who the Marlins could get the most mileage out of. If they’re not happy with Morrison, Davis would absolutely have to be in there, I’m just assuming they’d prefer the middle infielder and the value of a MLB ready Niese.
Really, if they said no to Smoak and Feliz, there aren’t many packages that they’d consider. Maybe they’d take something like that if it wasn’t Smoak because of Morrison, but still, that’s one of the top 0-3 players and Top 10 prospects in the game.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Dec 19, 2009 10:53 PM EST up reply actions
Jon Daniels denied that offer was ever made.
I haven’t heard any comment from Florida, but I really think that was something entirely created by the media. I could see one of them being the base to a package, but I don’t think Texas would send both.
"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green
by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 20, 2009 9:21 AM EST up reply actions
It's hard for me to see this deal happening
because in the deal the Reds seem to not be getting much of anything.
Here’s how I see it for them:
They lose Phillips for Ethier, which in terms of performance is almost fair, with a slight edge toward Phillips. The thing is, they’re not gaining a player who’s very controllable. Ethier’s been in the game for 4 years and just had his breakout. He’ll be seeing the free agency in a year probably, meaning this deal is even more for the short term than just keeping Phillips, making it a huge waste for Cincinnati.
They lose Harang for Castillo and Havens. First off, they’re looking for relatively young, controllable MLB players for Harang, and neither Castillo or Havens fit the bill. Castillo is probably negative value in their eyes, in fact. So basically we’re trading one minor league and trash for a very good pitcher with a very favorable contract. I see no reason why the Reds should take this.
For the Dodgers, they basically add another hole to their MLB roster, as if they don’t already have enough to worry about (2 empty spots in the rotation, no second baseman). Alonso and Mejia are a pretty solid return in terms of talent, but honestly I don’t see much reason for the Dodgers to trade him when they could just extend him.

by 

























