2009 Player Preview: J.J. Putz

Having sufficiently mourned the loss of Endy Chavez. it's time we recognize how good the guy we got for him is. Before 2006, J.J. Putz was a good reliever with a good fastball. In 2006, he was a dominant closer with two great fastballs. His strikeout rate rose 5 points, his walk rate dropped 2, and no matter who you are, that's the fastest way to become incredible. He seemingly improved upon his success in 2007, albeit with some luck.
Last year Putz missed time with an elbow nerve and a rib cage injury. Likely as a result of these injuries, his control suffered. He also threw more splitters, although it's hard to say what impact, if any, that had on his performance. Most projections, assuming a middle-ground between his 2008 and 2006-2007 control, predict a modest bounce-back in 2009. Assuming he's healthy, however, his control could almost fully rebound. If that happens, watch out: the 2007-version of J.J. Putz is almost certainly better than Francisco Rodriguez. It's hard to foresee him overtaking Rodriguez as the closer, but Manuel seems willing to employ him as a high-leverage bullpen ace.
Up Next: Frank the Closer
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
it Putz the lotion on!
exciting potential, and seems like a good guy to root for, but I guess I’m more worried about last year’s injuries than most. Will the real Putz please stand up?
I.M. Forme
"When you get yourself into trouble is when you feel you have to do something, and then you get yourself in trouble." --Omar Minaya
i will never see Putz' name
without thinking ITS PUTZ THE LOTION ON ITS SKIN OR ELSE IT GETS THE HOSE AGAIN as well. then i’ll spend the next couple minutes going aaaaauuuuuuuuuuuggggghhhhh! AAAAAAUUUUGGGHHHHHH!!!!!
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON. WE WANT THE MANSION NOT THE CONDO.
You've been . . .
Thunder-Putzed? Putz-derstruck?
'Oh yes, I know all about that duty-of-a-citizen stuff. It doesn't go. There are exceptions to every rule, and this was one of them. When a man risks his liberty to come and root at a ball-game, you've got to hand it to him. He isn't a crook. He's a fan.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Mar 12, 2009 2:33 PM EDT up reply actions
I'd venture a look over there
But NYS does not allow this computer to access that website.
'Oh yes, I know all about that duty-of-a-citizen stuff. It doesn't go. There are exceptions to every rule, and this was one of them. When a man risks his liberty to come and root at a ball-game, you've got to hand it to him. He isn't a crook. He's a fan.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Mar 12, 2009 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions
not to nitpick this again
but I still say we didn’t have to give up Endy for Putz. We got Reed for him and lost that part of the deal INMHO. But yes I am biased.
Oh, and for the record.
I think they wanted Endy involved in the Putz deal and they threw us Reed to make it look nicer.
Yeah
I always figured that Endy was the centerpiece of that deal (other than not having to pay Putz) from Seattle’s perspective
Bullpen Ace
Has Manuel said he’d use Putz that way? I haven’t heard him say anything but the 8th inning guy. I wish he’d be used for high-leverage, but it doesn’t seem like that is the plan.
I don't have an exact quote on hand
but he said he’d use him in some tough spots and in some save situations. I hope so.
King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president
yeah, but manuel loves to BS
i won’t believe it until we start seeing putz used outside the eighth inning
by englishgrey on Mar 12, 2009 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Putz Putz Putz
No matter what the situation is you have to love the 1-2 combo of these relievers.
Scott Darrohn
Rapid Recovery Solution, Inc.

by 



























