Mets Announcer Tournament First Round: Lindsey Nelson vs. Gary Thorne
Yesterday's results: Tim McCarver (60%) def. Tom Seaver (40%). It was our first really competitive contest, and Tom Terrific met an early exit. Today's matchup:
Lindsey Nelson VS. Gary Thorne
TV Tenure (1962-1978) TV Tenure (1994-2002)
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Again, hard for me to participate
seeing as Nelson retired before I was born. But based on the fact that he was one of the Mets’ original broadcasters, I’ll give a nod to history here. Thorne was pretty good, but I’ve heard that Nelson was also good.
"One of the nice things about baseball is that there are no rules you can't break." - Jim Bouton
Ooh, this is a tough one
Two excellent broadcasters, both of whom spent a significant amount of time with the Mets. I don’t have any memory of Nelson doing Mets games but I’ve still got to go with him, I think. Sorry Garry, and keep up the great work on hockey.
I abstain
I will throw in another vote against mccarver though.
by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on Mar 17, 2009 12:39 PM EDT reply actions
Lindsey retired before I was born
So I’m voting for Gary, and not just be default. Thorne is really great to listen to on radio or TV, and not just for baseball. One of my favorite games he ever called was in the NCAA hockey tournament a few years ago when little Mercyhurst College nearly upset top-seeded Boston College. Gary’s enthusiasm made that game (and all the others he calls) great. I also love the “looking up!” right before a home run clears the wall.
2009 Mets: maybe its the Phillies turn to have a terrible bullpen?
by Greenpoint Ian on Mar 17, 2009 12:51 PM EDT reply actions
Nelson vs. Thorne
I have listened to them both and as much as it pains me to go against the broadcaster of my youth I voted for Thorne. Nelson was good but he was no Bob Murphy who was hands down the best ever.
Vote for Thorne
A lawyer
A Mets broadcaster
A Friend of Maine Hockey
He’s got it all.
(Paid for by The Committee to Elect Gary Thorne)
Part of the problem
…with this format is that the voting body is skewed younger, which will greatly benefit the more recent guys. Nelson, for instance, quit broadcasting the Mets five years before I was born (for the most part). The Mets have been lucky that they’ve had a remarkably consistent broadcasting team so it won’t really matter, but Nelson is the exception to the rule.
I think Nelson, a fabulous broadcaster honored by both the baseball and NFL Halls of Fame (not to mention 10—not an exaggeration—others), is largely forgotten by the most recent generation of Mets fans. Like Thorne he was remembered most for doing another sport, but Nelson was a phenomenal baseball play-by-play broadcaster. If you ever get the chance, which doesn’t come up very often anymore, listen to a game Nelson did—he’s a remarkable minimalist, and a consummate professional with a somewhat similar voice to Mel Allen or Red Barber, by which I mean a southern drawl that didn’t overpower. He was capable of banter and was funny, but he liked to save it for other opportunities. He often said, “The game is the important thing. The announcer should never get in the way of the game.”
Agreed.
We've got ourselves a ball club, the Mets of New York town!
by kingcritical on Mar 17, 2009 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Format's not ideal
but neither is any March Madness-style tournament. Including the real “March Madness.”
by James Kannengieser on Mar 17, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions
Linked each guy's Wikipedia page
in the hopes that people unfamiliar with the older guys (including myself, born 7 years after Nelson stopped announcing the Mets) would atleast read up a little about them. Nelson’s page has some funny stories, mostly about his offbeat clothing choices.
by James Kannengieser on Mar 17, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions

by 




























