Met's have 20th best farm system
Tied with the Yanquis.
I agree, nice job with the international sugnings, but WHY don't we pay over slot in the draft? Throw you're weight around why don't you, you large market wimps!
8 months ago
kendynamo
6 comments
0 recs |
Comments
This is how I feel about over slot in the draft.
I was thinking about this earlier today, coincidentally. I see it like this. In baseball, you draft guys knowing they will need at least a year before they can play at the big league level. And, in baseball, prospects are more important as trade chips than in other sports, such as football or basketball. So, in general, you just want to get the best player available, without regards to positions. Now, baseball also does not have a salary cap. This is good for teams such as ours, but not as good for teams like the Pirates. For example, last year, the Pirates had a lot of trouble signing Pedro Alvarez because of his extravagant demands. Aaron Crow and the Nationals failed to come to an agreement. Teams such as the Yankees go over slot in the draft because they can. They can afford to draft and sign the players that slip between the cracks. So why can’t the Mets? But then again, why can’t the Mets pony up an extra $2 million to get Derek Lowe instead of Oliver Perez, which would not only give us a better player, but give us a first round draft pick and a supplemental? Things like this lend credence to people dissing the Wilpons/Omar.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Mar 3, 2009 11:56 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I feel like the going over slot thing is overblown
and more of an excuse for poor drafting strategies. It seems to me like we just target quicker turn around players earlier, especially in the more recent years, rather than targeting guys who will be cheaper to sign.
by Gina on Mar 3, 2009 5:02 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Also it seems like the rankings are a little misleading
Some of those systems have recently graduated a lot of high impact players, the D-backs and Reds, and maybe the Twins, which is why they’re so low on the list.
by Gina on Mar 3, 2009 5:05 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I always preferred Kevin Goldstein
Top 10 under 25 method when thinking about a system. Although it would have to expanded past the top 10 obviously.
by Sokojoe on Mar 3, 2009 6:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
not sure how you want them to rank it
If the #1 system in baseball has 5 very good prospects who are near ML ready this year and all 5 of them make the majors and have good rookie seasons, but they have no good prospects behind those guys, it would be silly to still rank them as the best system the following year. The ML team will likely be good, and young, so the lack of a farm system might not hurt as much, but it would be silly to say that team still has a good system.
by cjmulrain on Mar 4, 2009 12:46 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So wait the Dodgers gave Cleveland a better ranked prospect for Casey Blake than the Brewers gave them for CC Sabathia?
Thats amazing.
by Ohpityme on Mar 7, 2009 7:41 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

















