Seeing the Forest from the Trees
I was originally just going to reply to another post, but I'm legit getting angry at things so I'm just going to do a mad cool fanshot instead. also because i've never done one before.
We're all upset. We've been through some serious rough times the last few years. I know we're paying a lot of money for this team. We want to win. We expect to win. And we will.
Baseball is such a game of inches. They've lost 4 games by 1 run and another by 2. If a couple things go right (Eckstein doesn’t call the balk, the fan doesn’t interfere with the ball, we don’t get blooped to death, we get a few more hits sprinkled in, the defense makes those plays that they can and will make) the Mets are 8-1, maybe even 9-0. If they win 2 or 3 of those games, everyone would be all excited about how awesome of a start the mets have had. So shut the hell up, stop yelling to trade reyes or beltran or wright or every pitcher and especially stop with the goddamn "can't win the big game because they suck break up the gang lolz let's trade murphy a six pack and church for manny and peavy all socal teams are the same right"
You know why the offense has been struggling? Because Reyes hasn’t been getting on base, and we’ve gotten unlucky. But we know how good Jose is. 9 games mean…nothing. Literally nothing. Just as one at bat means nothing. When a hitter makes an out with the bases loaded it doesn’t mean he sucks. It means that even the best players in baseball make an out over 55% of the time, and this was one of those times. We seem, as a fan base, to expect 100% success, when in baseball we know, we’ve had it driven into us ever since we were a 5 year old kid sitting at the ballpark for our first game, that you simply can not be successful anywhere near that much.
Why do we focus on the negative? Why not talk about the positives (while the tiny samples let us feel good about them)? Why is there so much talk about how awkward Wright looks at the plate (and he probably does have the most awkward .900+ OPS I’ve ever seen) and so little about how Delgado is picking up where he left off last season instead of making early 2008 look good? Has anyone noticed that we all of sudden have two pitchers who are at least as good and possibly better (much, much better in Frankie’s case) than anyone we had last year? And that possibly the biggest reason we didn’t make the playoffs last year was because of that bullpen? And that the rest of the team is basically, exactly the same?
We will come around folks. This team is good. We know it is good. We know we’re going to win. And if we have patience with the team, they will reward us. Look past the details and see the big picture - everything's going to be just fine.
0 recs |
3 comments
Comments
I agree with some of this
But I don’t think this is a perfect team. There’s more to the 4-5 record than luck and Reyes. There have been some mental lapses, inconsistent starting pitching, uneven offense.
I agree that this team is good, but I also think this division is good. I don’t necessarily expect this team to win, and I’m going to do my best to enjoy every second of baseball for the six months it lasts, win or not. I would much rather drop the expectations and enjoy the wins when they happen, than expect something close to perfection and revel in righteousness when they do win or beat my head against the wall in wrongfulness when they lose.
Sure, this team will come around, they’re not a .500 team. But neither are the Phillies or Marlins or Braves for that matter. They’ve already lost some very winnable games, and by all accounts deserved to lose some of those games. Come September, if its a close race, those games will count every bit as much as the ones that are yet to be played. Its perfectly reasonable to take an analytical eye to the first nine games of this season and focus on some of the glaring flaws. Sure there are some positive indications, probably more than the 4-5 record indicate, but its not all roses.
by Meddler on Apr 17, 2009 1:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
I don’t think anyone is saying this team is going to win 70 games. I imagine most would agree that we’re good enough to win 88-92 games, but so are the Braves and Phillies, and with a little(lot) luck possibly the Dodgers/D-backs which could possibly come into play with the wild card.
by Gina on Apr 17, 2009 2:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Here's the thing
I’ve had some of the same thoughts you expressed here. BUt here’s the thing: I had a feeling the Mets of 2006 were going to win. They played solid fundamental baseball, with just enough flash, and they buried the division. A missed opportunity late in game 7 of the NLCS cost them a shot at a World Championship. 2007 had the same feeling (but not quite as strong) until that last, horrible 17 game stretch in September. 2008 the feeling was less because of what happened in 2007, and the Mets played just sloppy enough for half the year that you weren’t sure when they turned it around which was the real team. So even when they would jump out to leads early in games, you never got the feeling that lead was safe. Now harken back to 1985. This team played good, fundamental baseball with just enough flash to win, in a very competitive division. I felt like they were always in games, always had a chance. Then 1986 came and I felt overwhelmingly that they would win, a lot. And they did, 108 times. That feeling was derived as much from how they played in 1986 to how well they played in 1985. Even though the ‘85 team lost to the Cardinals eventually, they were a good team, and they proved it overwhelmingly in 1986. Now come to the present day. We as fans are shaped by our experiences, and recent ones count for more. In the last three years the Mets have been good enough to win, good enough to win it all. But every season has ended in disappointment. The last two, especially painful and gut-wrenching disappointment. So while we have hope because we’re only 10 games in now, there are enough warning signs flashing to make us worry. I no longer have the feeling that this team will win, like I did in 1986 and even in 2006. I want to believe they will, but my recent experience has told me otherwise. I’ve invested a lot emotionally with this team over the last 40+ years, and a lot over the last 3, and come away bitterly disappointed. Wright is not at his best right now, apparently he has forgotten he does his best hitting when he’s patient and goes the other way. I believe he’ll rediscover that notion soon. Reyes is pressing, and yes he is still learning the game but at some point he has to graduate from learning the game to applying what he’s learning. He’s not doing that right now. I believe he will do that as well, hopefully soon. Beltran seems to be somewhat inconsistent, going through long stretches of offensive ineptitude followed by shorter stretches of offensive dominance. He’s over 30 now so I would hope to see more consistency and less on/off mentality. I don’t know if he will give that to us. Delgado is indeed picking up where he left off last year, and that is great to see. We need him to be a dominant force in the middle of the lineup. Everybody benefits from his presence. I believe the defense will improve, but it will never match the ‘99 team. All things being equal, if the Mets had any kind of bullpen last year they easily win 97 games. The Phillies miss the playoffs entirely. All things being equal, this Mets team can do the same thing. We have the talent, to be sure. But the history of baseball is filled with many talented teams that failed to live up to expectations. I went to spring training in 1986, sat next to new Pirate skipper Jim Leyland in the stands and told him the Mets would win the series. True story. You could look it up. I was that confident in them. I just don’t have that same feeling about this team. But I want to. I really do.
by zmanmetfan on Apr 18, 2009 12:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 

















