Klaw Chat: "I'd Have Fired Jerry On the Spot"
Jerry Manuel: I pinch-hit Omir Santos for Ramon Castro last night. Then I said sometimes players in the bullpen are more involved in the game than the actual players. The night before I dodged a question about overusing Sean Green by saying "the bullpen will give up runs, I'm not worried about that." Am I the worst manager in baseball?
SportsNation Keith Law: (1:51 PM ET ) I would have probably fired him on the spot for the Omir/Castro stunt.
almost 3 years ago
jasondg
10 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I do not disagree.
KLaw and Neyer (and to a smaller extent Olney) are the only ESPN baseball analysts I agree with.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
Keith Law: "[Watchmen] sucks"
i’m firing keith law on the spot for that statement.
cant really disagree with him on his assesment of manuel’s managerial skills tho.
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON. WE WANT THE MANSION NOT THE CONDO.
The movie did suck
comic book was great
King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president
klaw was talking about the book
in his defense, a reader recomended it as part of TIME magazine’s 100 greatest novels or something. so he was comparing it across media, which is already an exercise in futility. but his review is blatently prejudice, frequently clueless and overall pretty terrible.
and just curious, did you dislike the movie because it failed as an adaptation of the book or assuming you had no previous knowledge of the source material, simply failed as a movie?
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON. WE WANT THE MANSION NOT THE CONDO.
Well I had previous knowledge of the source material
Watchmen had already been my second favorite “graphic novel” after the Dark Knight Returns, for sometime, before I even knew the movie adaptation was ever going to happen.
The primary failing of the movie was Zack Snyder is a total idiot, and in trying to make every single freeze frame match up with the comic failed to actually pay attention to any thematic elements that made the comic so great. Clearly Zack Snyder knows how to make cool slow-motion psychedelic special effects, but those have no place in a Watchman adaption. The whole point of the comic was that the heroes lived in the real world, fought with their fists, and were generally losers. All the slow-motion ninja moves, Dark Knight-esque costumes, and canned dialogue couldn’t seem more antithetical to the book. Even the sex scenes were off, with the mid air fireworks and the Swedish supermodel.
Also the soundtrack was corny as hell. Seriously, I think he just turned on the local classic rock station while filming and wrote some names down. “The Times They Are A’Changin’” GET IT? And that was probably the best song.
King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president
yeah, to me it was a lot like V
neither movie should really be looked at as an adaptation but rather seperate movies inspired by comic books. i enjoyed the movie more than i thought it would. maybe because i saw too many pre production stills and knew it was going to be dark knight with watchmen characters. it was woefully inadequate in capturing all that made the book so satisfying and memorable but i think thats just part of why you have two different works of art in two different art forms. i guess just appreciate how much hard work and millions of dollars that was poured into some small but birlliant part of a mostly ignored geeked out medium
the silver lining is that since watchmen wasnt a run away blockbuster you arent going to see hollywood lining up countless other works of comic art that they will attempt to translate faithfully to film but really only end up raping and murdering in the quest for a quick buck.
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON. WE WANT THE MANSION NOT THE CONDO.
A few quibbles
First of all, despite the fact that I really admire a lot of things about the movie, I’ll be the first to admit that it has a lot of failings. The primary things that come to mind are pacing and the acting of Malin Ackerman and Matthew Goode. But I really didn’t have a problem with the slow-mo action filming. It was never the case that these guys couldn’t fight. When their backs were against the wall, they kicked plenty of ass (even if they were losers/had disturbing, though internally consistent, ethics). My issue with the fight scenes would be how gory Snyder made them, but I personally am cool with gore so I didn’t mind, I just understand that others did. Also, as far as the dialogue, I was actually surprised by how well the new dialogue worked and how bad a lot of the dialogue lifted from the book sounded. I think the writers would have been better off trusting their instincts more often rather than lifting so much dialogue straight from the book, which was written, after all, as a comic, not a film. I also thought they nailed the sex scene in Archie. Alan Moore wrote that to be darkly humorous, and they nailed it, straight down to the money shot of flame that I thought was effectively lifted from the book.
Also, as far as the soundtrack… I mean, most of the songs were taken straight from the chapter titles. It’s not Zach Snyder’s fault that in the years between the release of the book and the movie, those songs became very commonly used in TV and movies. As for The Times They Are A’Changing in particular, I thought that whole sequence was brilliant.
Anyway, the best part about the movie is that a lot of the core ideas from the book really shone through, and Hollywood will probably never see anything quite like it again. Its flaws do bother me a lot, but I take much solace in knowing that Zach Snyder ultimately compromised very little, stuck very closely to the source material (at times perhaps to a fault), and presented a very challenging film that deserves to be seen and appreciated on its merits.
Jon can give you cancer, and he'll turn into a car.
haven’t seen that in a while. Still funny.
'Oh yes, I know all about that duty-of-a-citizen stuff. It doesn't go. There are exceptions to every rule, and this was one of them. When a man risks his liberty to come and root at a ball-game, you've got to hand it to him. He isn't a crook. He's a fan.'
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Apr 30, 2009 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions


























