Can David Wright Sustain His Torrid Pace?
After 6 straight multi-hit games followed by Sunday's one-hit disgrace, David Wright has raised his average to a MLB-leading .364. This increase in average, coupled with his relative homerun drought and increased stolen bases, has lead many to conclude David has "changed his game" to deemphacize power for more speed and average. Wright himself has defended his stats against those quick to point to the homer count:
"I enjoy home runs just like everybody else but, you know, I don't necessarily need it to be successful." AP
There's no doubting the truth to that quote, but can David Wright, a traditional 30 HR guy, maintain such success? First, consider what he's contributing now. His walks are up slightly but his strikeout rate (26.7%), easily a career high, suggests an overall decline in plate discipline. So really, the question becomes, can David Wright maintain a very high average?
His BABIP of .484 suggests no. The rule of thumb is to add .120 to a player's LD% to calculate expected BABIP, and David's is 25.9%, right in line with his career performance. Based on that rule .259+.120= .379, which is certainly higher than most player's can sustain but not .484.
Line Drives, however, are only one influence of whether balls put into play fall for hits. Examining some other factors that influence BABIP provides an opportunity to both determine whether David's BA prognosis is less grim than it seems, and also test the claim that he's become more of "speed guy". Dutton and Bendix's famous article on predicting BABIP doesn't provide an alternative formula to the .120 rule, but does identify other factors that should be considered. These factors are, roughly: batting eye, both pitches seen and BB and K; LD%; FB/GB ratio; speed; contact rate; and spray, the ability to hit to different parts of the field.
Wright's batting eye was covered above, and his pitches seen are also what we'd expect from him at this point in the season. His LD% and BB/K are nearly identical to last year. His speed, however, is a little harder to qualify. He's had a higher percentage of infield hits, but that's really justy a quirk of the small sample size (he's only got 6). Baseball Prospectus calculates a statistic called "Equilvalent Baserunning Runs," which attempts to quantify exactly how many runs a player contributes, or costs, his team on the basepaths. Obviously, baserunning is more than basestealing, and so far Wright's 17-8 SB-CS has been counterproductive. I'll stop short of saying he should stop stealing, because of his empirical success and rough start, but it's another worrisome side effect of the Mets' overagressiveness. From 2005-2007, according to EQBRR, Wright contributed in the range of +2-5 runs each year on the basepaths. Last year, however, he registered a -3.24471 mark, good for worst on the team. Worse than Schneider. This season he's experience a modest bounceback at +0.27766, which puts him on base to finish +.74. Given that his basestealing has cost him an entire run, however, Wright seems to be mostly in-line with his career numbers, proving 2008 an aberration. So while 2009 may seem like a big improvement in speed, he's really just the same.
His contact rate (81.3 %) is down due to his increased strikeouts. Interestingly enough, he's swinging less, but make less contact at the pitches he does swing at. Maybe David's taking some pitches he used to drive? It's hard to say, but either way, continued strikeouts won't help his batting crown chances.
So that leaves "spray," a pretty unlikely reason for a ridiculously high BABIP, but worth checking out nonetheless. I made a chart of the distribution of David's hits to each field in 2008, 2009, and for his career and the results are somewhat interesting:
| Field | 2008 | 2009 | Career |
|---|---|---|---|
| LF | 42.1% | 32.1% | 35.7% |
| CF | 46.0% | 51.9% | 45.7% |
| RF | 12.0% | 16.0% | 18.6% |
This season he's hit more balls to center. That may suggest an increase in singles as balls hit straight up the middle are harder for infielders to catch but generally don't go for extra-bases as often. Still, this data can't explain away his .484 BABIP and Wright is probably due for a major regression soon. His BABIP may remain generally high, say close to .385, due to park factors in Citi Field, but not where it is now. Hopefully, his 6.3 % HR/FB regresses to his career mean at the same time and we end up with familiar ol' David at the season's end.
2 recs |
38 comments
|
Comments
Good post
Thanks for the stats. I think we’re still in small sample size territory here. His early 2006 numbers were kind of similar except with more home runs, and we were chanting “MVP” around July 4.
I don’t think he needs to change his approach or his swing. Dude just needs to grow a mustache.
by Misopogon on Jun 16, 2009 8:02 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Great article Sam
I think something we also need to think about is how big Citi field is. We tend to say that bigger parks are going to be pitcher’s parks, but just imagine an outfield that grows exponentially. There is a vast amount of space to put hits (probably not many traditional homeruns, but certainly hits).
With all the outfield room in Citi, David’s BABIP should expect a certain increase because many of the line drives he hits find space to fall. In a park like Fenway, Wright may have 3-5 more homeruns already (if not more), but who knows how many line drives to left, center, and right, that fall in front of outfielder at Citi, would have been caught in Fenway?
Anyway, David is currently having the best season of his career, and while he will not be able to keep up his BABIP at the “torrid pace” he currently is, he’s certainly been spectacular.
Thanks again for a great article.
Jerry Manuel...stop being....stupid...
by MetsGeek on Jun 16, 2009 8:38 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Hmm... vedy intahdestink
good read man.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
by dcrockett17 on Jun 16, 2009 8:43 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And let me add that
Peter Bendix and Chris Dutton are awesome guys. I’m biased, as I know them from Tufts, but still, I always love reading that article. It’s a great piece.
Jerry Manuel...stop being....stupid...
by MetsGeek on Jun 16, 2009 8:46 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
haha yesss
you go/went there?
Jerry Manuel...stop being....stupid...
by MetsGeek on Jun 16, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
class of '98
met my wife there
wish I was eating a calzone from Espresso’s right now
by metsjetsnets on Jun 16, 2009 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Silly question
but as a British person I don’t know the answer. Where is Tufts, and is that its full name or a nickname?
Cheers
by deadspy3 on Jun 17, 2009 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boston area
and I suppose its full name is Tufts University. The school’s mascot is Jumbo the elephant.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 17, 2009 9:30 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cheers
I love the bit in Spinal Tap where the manager says Boston isn’t a big college town. Hah! There’s like, what, six big universities there?
So was there a Mr Tuft?
by deadspy3 on Jun 17, 2009 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Just off hand I can think of
Harvard, MIT, Tufts, Northeastern, BU, BC, Brandeis. If you include smaller schools like Emerson, Lesley or all the Fenway schools, the list gets considerably longer.
by Zwill on Jun 17, 2009 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Correct
PT Barnum donated a bunch of money to the school back in the day. He also donated the stuffed corpse of Jumbo. Legend says he was killed by a train while nudging a smaller elephant off the tracks to safety. Jumbo’s stuffed remains then burned down in a campus fire. Part of his tail remains in the University archives, while a jar of his ashes sits in the Athletic Director’s office.
Um, you’re welcome for this information.
by metsjetsnets on Jun 17, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Stuff
Best thing is DW’s quote and attitude about this. I’m glad he understands that the park may not necessarily be suited to his swing, but that it doesnt mean he needs to change what he’s trying to do to be successful.
I always thought DW was more of a line drive/gap hitter that had a few pitches that were susceptible to his swing for HRs and he would fluke out a few more a year. its refreshing to hear that he understands that 30 HR isn’t the only way to help his team win.
As always, he’s once again shown how lucky we are to watch/root for this guy in his pre-prime and prime years.
by mets81 on Jun 16, 2009 9:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Everybody complains when he doesn't "hit as many balls to right field"
It’s no surprise people will complain when he doesn’t pull enough balls over the wall. So it goes.
I’ll take the more Olerud-like numbers.
by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on Jun 16, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The more like Olerud, the better
by James Kannengieser on Jun 16, 2009 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
except the speed thing
I like the current combination of Wrights speed with Olerud’s on base skills…
by djg2111 on Jun 16, 2009 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dub Can't Keep This Up Because He is Not A Winner or Leader
Jimmie Rollins and Chase Utley are gamers, not Dub.
But whatever, Dub is gonna hit some home runs this week at Camden Yards. I will be in the stands in my GRISSION tee-shirt.
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 9:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What number did you put on that shirt?
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 16, 2009 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NUMBER 1!
I send you a picture message on Satruday, jerk.
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 10:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't get it?
maybe?
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 16, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Im telling mom!
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I love Satruday
It’s awesome when we get those three day weekends. Satruday is right in between saturday and sunday, not to be confused with saturnday which is something completely different.
by Delgado on Jun 16, 2009 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I already told mom.
She said to tell you to shut up.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jun 16, 2009 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Vera said that?
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Love the Casino Episode
Barney: Man, that’s classic compulsive behavior. Wow, free beer! [Chugs all three buckets of quarters!]
Man: Buddy, those are my quarters!
(Barney burps.)
Woman: This guy’s paying off!
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 3:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm hopefully going down to the game on Thurs.
Do you (or anyone else) have any advice/recommendations regarding Camden Yards (parking, where to sit, etc.)?
by Mount17 on Jun 16, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
maybe this is obvious but...
eat Boog’s BBQ
have fun – it’s a beautiful place to see a game
by metsjetsnets on Jun 16, 2009 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The real question is
can David Wright maintain and increase his recent level of clutch?
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jun 16, 2009 11:37 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Who said he was clutch?
And since when was ‘clutch’ a word? I thought what David lacked was ‘clutchiness’ and ‘grission’.
Grission and Husart - that is either the non-union Mexican equivelant of "Starsky and Hutch" or the key to winning the World Series.
by IanB in MD on Jun 16, 2009 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going back to basics, and yeah, I forgot.
The grissiontastic hit he had against Mariano isn’t clutchy because we didn’t win.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jun 16, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeouts
While his BABIP will almost certainly drop, I think his K-rate will as well. He’s already begun to cut down on his K’s.
by T Pac on Jun 16, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I also think the power will rebound at some point. So my guess is he’ll look more like David Wright and less like Ty Cobb c. 1913 down the stretch.
by sjohnson125 on Jun 16, 2009 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
this is totally anecdotal, but i feel like he's always hit them in bunches
a couple hot HR weeks and he’ll be right on track
by metsjetsnets on Jun 16, 2009 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
sometimes I wish Wright was more like Cobb

by cjmulrain on Jun 16, 2009 6:45 PM EDT up reply actions 2 recs
I really wish that picture weren’t just a white box with a red x in it!
by TheBigStapler on Jun 17, 2009 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I just noticed the photo caption for this piece
David Wright plans the trajectory of his next single.
That’s hilarious enough to warrant a belated rec.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Meddler on Jun 18, 2009 3:45 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






















