Amazin' Avenue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Follow the @sbnation NBA Twitter List

On Brandon Knight, fip/tRA*

I noticed that Brandon Knight was 10th in the International league in tRA*, or regressed tRA.  Just behind Chris Tillman, the hyped O's prospect.  Dillon Gee and Jon Niese also rank fairly well in the mid-teens, ahead of Michael Bowden, for example.  So my initial intent for this post was just to say that as a stopgap, the Mets could try Knight in place of Redding, until they can make a trade or decide to give Niese another go (oh, andbtw, Mejia was number 2 in tRA* in Fla St. League before promotion).

But then I decided to look at the major league rankings in tRA*, which some have suggested is a preferred stat, and FIP, and see if anything stuck out versus my own subjective rankings.

I was struck by certain differences in how certain starters were ranked by the methods.  For example.  Mark Buehrle was ranked very low in tRA*, 83rd.  Manny Parra ranked 40th.  That seemed awfully high compared to Buehrle.  FIP was more "accurate" in my mind for these 2. 

Conversely, Chris Volstad was ranked 32nd in tRA*, 60th in FIP.  The FIP ranking seemed too "low".  He has given up 11 homers of course.  But his gb/fb ratio is 1.12.  Seems he is giving up an unlucky number of home runs.   tRA* accounts for that, I think.

Jorge de la Rosa was ranked consistently fairly high in each.  He was 20th in tRA* and 24th in FIP.  But i think that is "too high".  Yes, he strikes out a lot of guys.  He has only given up 4 homers.  But his gb/fb ratio is .83.  Perhaps he has had some luck with homers allowed.  But mainly, despite a k/bb of slightly better than 2, he walks too many, over 4 a game.  And I think that is a better indicator of his run-suppressing abilties.

Of course, these are just isolated cases, smallish samples.  However, it seems important to me to balance out the various methods of evaluating performance.  In this case.  But I'd say FIP gets Buehrle "right", tRA* gets him wrong.  FIP gets Volstad "wrong", trA* gets him right.  tRA* "overrates" Parra.  FIP and tRA* both "overrate" de la Rosa, slightly.

Buehrle's era seems a bit low, but he is a pretty good pitcher with control.  For this year he is about even with Volstad in my book.  de la Rosa a little behind them.  But his era makes him look much worse than he is.  Parra just has walked way too many to be in these guys' class.

Of course, it is what it is.  They each rank where they rank in each metric.  None of them can be said to be right or wrong, or overrate or underrate anyone.  I think, however, most people, in a team neutral, park neutral, salary neutral setting, choosing among them for a fantasy team for the rest of this year,  would be tossed up on Volstad or Buehrle, some going for the vet, some the youngster.  Woud likely like de la Rosa (obviously more so away from the Rockies and Coors) but be a little scared of the walks, and would say thanks but no thanks on Parra, although he has some potential.

I give some of their stats below.  Forgive me for the way it is presented, for I am a bit of a luddite, but will get the hang of some of the sites rich features when i get the hang.

I think all of these metrics need to be looked at, and to weigh them all in the balance.  If any of these lines are out of whack it can be a red flag.  k/bb k/9 and bb/9 are all pretty good indicators. To me, Niese's era (non-sequitor alert) is a bit of a red flag despite the good peripherals, however.

And to come full circle, I still think Brandon Knight, with his number 10 ranking in tRA* in the Int'l League and a 90+ fastball, would be a nice sub for Redding.      

                    inn       h    hr   k   bb  g/f   era    FIP  tRA* rank 

Buehrle      66-1/3  64   7  42  12  .80   2.71  33  82

Parra          57-1/3  69   7  51  36 1.01  6.75  73  40

Volstad      68         56 11  54  21 1.12  3.71  60  20

delaRosa 54-2/3   52   4  57  26  .83   5.43   24   20




0 recs  |  Comment 45 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Around SB Nation

Saturday a.m. Rangers things

Nov 2009 from Lone Star Ball - 39 comments

Rosterbation-Mania!

Nov 2009 from South Side Sox - 234 comments

Friday's Frosty Mug

Oct 2009 from Brew Crew Ball - 18 comments

Comments

Display:

I think what is shows

is that our AAA team has horrible defense and is killing the stats and psyche’s of our pitchers.

by twon8 on Jun 4, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Well something has to prepare them

for the horrible defense of our MLB team.

by Zwill on Jun 4, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its been bad on the big club

But Buffalo is about as bad as a professional baseball team can be in almost every facet. They’re playing friggin’ Mike Lamb at second base. Part of me just wants to pretend they don’t exist at this point.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

There's a saying

that you’re only as good as your AAA team or something. That’s obviously not true, but it begins to become truer when everyone on the big team is hurt and your prospects want to become football players

King of the bling come to lay down the evidence//Not George Bush, L-Millz be da president

by Sam Page on Jun 4, 2009 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It definitely means something here

I mean, guys like Angel Pagan and Ramon Martinez didn’t even have the benefit of an extended stay in that crapfest. They were significantly better than anything the Bisons had, and thus, they got called up before guys who had, you know, been playing baseball for a few months.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 4:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

indeed

But I still think that fip and tRA* don’t capture everything. Niese’s 55 hits in 38 innings and 6 homers may be all bad luck and bad fielding. But I think some of it is he gets hit hard sometimes. Doh.

Still, think League is viable if we want Niese to get a run of success. To help his psyche. :)

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 1:40 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

At least some of it

Is that he has a GB% just under 60% with an infield defense that lately has included Javier Valentin at 3B and Mike Lamb at 2B. That’s not bad. That’s beyond bad.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly

Niese gets ground balls, strikes people out and doesn’t walk that many. That’s all you can ask for

by twon8 on Jun 4, 2009 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I understand all this

and I think he is much better than his era, and I like him a s a propsect. But there’s an elemnt that isn’t caught by just looking at peripherals here. There are grounders, and flyballs, and then there are hard hit balls. When he is good he is very good, when he is bad….this gets smoothed out over time.

My real point in the post is that fip and tRA* alone won’t give a ll full picture, and i don’t believe, although more accurate, that even k/bb and groundball rate do (although I really think sticking to the basics like that help just as much-that’s why I used the example of Buehrle versus Parra on tRA*). You have to look at all metrics. yeah, sometimes even results.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 2:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean, I generally agree

But its not like his tRA* is anything special. 4.59. That seems about right to me.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

it is about right

Knight is slightly better, at 4.47 to Niese’s 4.59. And Knight’s fip is 3.64, to niese’s 4.54. That is the home runs, which, as you say below, he has little effect on.

Knight’s k/bb per 9 is 8.77/3.27. Niese is 8.53/3.08. Almost matches him in ks, better control. And I know, all not huge samples. They are close.

But Niese gets more grounders. 1.75 go/qo. knight .94.

So, actually, it looks like Knight is better, maybe, by peripherals. yet neither FIP nor tRA* capture it. Certainly e.r.a. doesn’t.

Knight has still pitched fairly well, and throws 91 mph, Niese a tick under 90. If they don’t want to go to Niese yet again, they can use Knight.

But it is interesting, the bad luck effect creeps into fip certainly, and maybe even tRA* somehow. It may be that with few grounders and a liot of ks, Knight just won’t give up an inordinate amount of hits, and his homer rate is already about where it should be.

I still like to leave room for results. Tom Glavine is going to the Hall with a career fip half a run higher than his era.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Never use Tom Glavine as a positive example of ANYTHING on a Mets site.

Ever.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I do that

almost precisely because of that reaction. It bothers me too, good with the braves for use, eh here, with those miniscule k rates even when good. How the f did he do it? Most of us here have a visceral reaction against a pitcher like that and him in particular. But he was undoubtedly, over his career, a pretty good pitcher.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's still a douche.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 3:47 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's also a good example of a pitcher

Who simply beats the expected trends. His PECOTA Similarity Index is 13. Anything below 20 is considered “historically unusual”. He’s just a different animal than other pitchers. BTW, Matt Wieters Similarity Index: 0.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 4:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its true

All of these metrics can be fooled, just to varying degrees. You have to take career context into everything. For example, Glavine has a career .286 BABIP, in what’s obviously a huge sample size. I’m not sure how FIP would account for something like that. With someone like Niese, you don’t have that kind of track record to rely on, so you have to go much more on recent trends and realize none of its going to be that accurate. Niese has always had a highish BABIP, save last year when he was in the nominal range, but that’s probably true in the minors a lot, especially in the lower levels, where the defense isn’t as well developed. Knight could actually be a marginally useful pitcher, but he’s got all kinds of disadvantages to Niese. Age, handedness, curveball. They might be similarly useful right now, but more than anything, that would just mean Niese isn’t quite ready yet. Knight, he’s not getting any more ready than he is now.

I think the frustrating thing about Niese is that he’s developed his “stuff” to the point where you can see that he’s not that different from a mid-rotation Major League
pitcher. He could improve his changeup a bit, but he commands his pitches fairly well. He has the average fastball, which may not get much better, but with a plus curve, that’s fine. Right now, he’s in a situation where I can’t help wonder, how the hell is he supposed to learn to use contact to his advantage? I’d love to see what his BABIP on groundballs is, its got to be huge. I’m sure plenty of those are hit hard, but if more than a third of his groundballs are going for hits, how is he supposed to learn which pitches are working and which aren’t? Last year, the BABIP in the majors for Groundballs was about .240. That’d be a huge BABIP deviation, and more than anything, would indicate terrible infield defense. I remember watching the gameday one of his recent starts. He had two run scoring infield hits to Mike Lamb at second base. That does horrible things to a pitcher’s results. That’s how a pitcher winds up with a 48% LOB%.

I’m starting to believe the Buffalo Bisons are just a poor environment for young players right now. They’re so bad, its got to be miserable playing for them. Nothing Niese is doing is working. Evans was in about as horrific a slump as you could possibly imagine. Gee hasn’t been much better than Niese. In fact, he’s probably been worse, but gotten slightly better crappy results. Somehow, the only prospect to actually have success was the 20 year old F!. I still want Thole to wind up there sooner than later, but it just seems like a terrible team to be a part of for a young player right now.

P.S. To JamesK if you happen to read this: Fangraphs actually has the BABIP numbers for GB/FB/LD, and you were right, I was over calculating for FBs. I had them around .220, Fangraphs says last year they were closer to .170. Link.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

knight/niese

Oh, absolutely, Niese will end up being better than Knight and may even be right now. Knight wss just thrown out as someone useful, maybe more so than redding, and if you don’t eant to have Niese spot starting and mopping.

And Glavine IS an extreme example. But I do think he shows that there can be some effect beyond the peripherals.

Yes, buffalo seems tough. You hope that that which doesn’t kill him makes him stronger. valdez and martinez may eventually be back there. And when he is in the majors, and Reyes snags one in the hole for him, he’ll be like, dang, so THIS is the Show. of course, he has already been.

For Nick Evans, hard to see how Buffalo did it to him. Just bad luck and maybe he got into a funk.

Anyway, it still stands in my mind that fip and tra aren’t everything in evaluating. How parra is 40 in tRA* and Buehrle is 83 just shows a blind spot. Sure, Buehrle isn’t 2.75 e.r.a. good like he is now, but he has been a pretty good pitcher in his career, in the AL, in Chicago, where peavy was afraid to go, and we just had a post here about how good Vazquez is and how Chicago hid that to a degree. Parra’s line and walk rate, tehre is no way he is better, even just based on this year, even with luck and park factored out, that shouldn’t be.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 5:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh I'm not saying Buffalo's responsible for Evans' slump

I just think it was the worst possible place you can slump, all the negativity there is going to make it hard to break out of it.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 7:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Awesome Meddler

Thanks for the link. If we use last year’s numbers for Frankie this year:

LD 21% * .73 = .153
GB 23% * .24 = .055
FB 56% * .15 = .084

xBABIP = .292

Actual = .234

Maybe a longer post to follow.

by James Kannengieser on Jun 4, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nice, I'd love to see that

That number definitely seems more reasonable.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 5, 2009 3:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

I have acknowledged the bad fielding. Especially tough on a groundball guy. A lot of home runs considering the grounder and k rate too. he wil almost certainly get better. Is some of it that he dominates a lot of AAA hitters, but some of the better ones can get to him?

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well

Generally speaking, HR/FB isn’t something a pitcher has much control over. Anything outside the 10-12% range is considered, at least to some degree, a product of luck. Right now, Niese is around 18%, so that’s part of what’s getting adjusted in his tRA*.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes I know

Not much control over. Maybe some slightly. But this is helping me think some things through some more.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I mean

It does also mean he’s getting hit harder, but regardless of the abominable results, there are some silver linings for Niese. I mean, would you prefer a guy with a 4.00 ERA, K/BB=1.20, K/9=5.00, GB=35%, HR/FB=6%, BABIP= .250? This guy probably isn’t getting hit as hard, but he’s probably not making nearly as many good pitches either.

"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet

What a fool I was to defy him"

-HST

by Meddler on Jun 4, 2009 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Silver Linings

agree. He still seems promising. And it may be good. maybe no one else will want him in deal as much and Omar has to hold him back. Although Beane would still covet him. he may say, gimme Niese, Tejada and Murphy for Holliday. :)

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All I know

is that all the people who want to trade Niese because we have Gee (not that many, but believe me they exist) need to chillax. This would be the epitome of selling low.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

agreed

Omar could get snookered dealing him.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ugh

I forget where — maybe the Post — but it said the Mets are “down” on Niese.

by jasondg on Jun 4, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course they are!

Because they’re idiots!

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All this means is that in the future, Knight probably won't improve.

It doesn’t mean he’ll be worse, but that (coupled with the age factor) definitely points to Niese as the one more likely to achieve MLB success if called up.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

and looking at the peripherals again, i’d say fip AND tRA* are slightly underrating Niese compared to Knight. Which just goes to reinforce that some basic metrics like k rate bb rate and grounder rate m,ay be even better than the formulas.

Certainly in thr future Niese will be better.

Today, though, for a start, Knight be about as good. And if you don’t plan to keep jerking niese back and forth, spot starting him here and there, etc., knight may be a reasonable guy. You certainly won’t mind him going 7 one day, then skipping a turn for a rainout, then mopping up. Niese you want to keep regular.

This all started because is aw the knight ws doing slightly better than Niese and Gee on tra*. i know he is much older and not a real prospect.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

How about Figgy? What's he looking like down there?

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

later

I am having a hard time getting to the sites right now. Not sure why. Even on my i-phone, getting a “Vortung” message.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Figgy's fip is 5.82

and he throws 86 mph. His tRA* is 4.65. WAR .6. Knight’s WAR .9. Niese .3.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's not bad.

Figgy and Knight>Redding, for sure.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Jun 4, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Niese's xRR -17

Knight’s only -2. Still has the better tRA*.

Hey, I am all for brininging Niese up as well if they won’t panic and will give him regular turns. Actually, knight for redding, and if livan turns back into a pumpkin, bring up Niese.

Unless we can trade Gomez and Guerra for Peavy again.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

carmona

btw, non-sequitor, didn’t someone posit him as a possible trade? Yikes, 7 earned in 2 innings today, era over 7.

by wobatus on Jun 4, 2009 5:29 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

sell lower

or, don’t catch a falling knife. carmona has stunk up the joint 2 years running, no?

by wobatus on Jun 5, 2009 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lee

Never had a strikeout rate below his walk rate. Which carmona has now had 2 years running.

Lee of course got even better than he’d ever been. His tra went from 4.10 to 4.83 to 5.45 to last year’s 2.87 and this year’s below 3 again.

carmona went from 4.08 ro 5.09 to 6.99.

Even in his 2 bad years Lee was walking around 3 a game and his k/bb was about 2/1

Carmona’s walk rate is higher than his strikeout rate and he walked 5 a game last year, 6 a game this year.

He could get better. I wouldn’t pray on catching lightning in a bottle twice.

by wobatus on Jun 5, 2009 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Niese

I don’t see anything special from him. Righties seem to get really good cuts off him to the point that you wince when he faces a good one. That’s the test for me. If I wince when they throw, they are average to below avg. I didn’t wince when guys like Leiter, Viola, Randy Myers and Sid Fernandez pitched.

by David G on Jun 20, 2009 1:20 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Mets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_buddha_by_lord_karsus_small
2009 Mets Gangsta and Grission Awards
Buckner_small
The robcast Mets Offseason Plan
Hamheadshot__1__small
Poem: There's Only One October Wish

Recent FanPosts

Mwsos8pj_1__small
How Would Other Teams Do in 2009 With The Mets Injuries?
Small
Gonzalez over Davis?
Small
Off-season reading: the best baseball books
Small
Thoughts on Yankees vs. Phillies
43cd0dee9d920fd72b0a2b2bce4f8a00-getty-90957610bb021_los_angeles_k_small
Just curious as to why Met fans "hate" the Phillies
Small
It All Started With Torrealba...
Metseyes_small
'10 Mets Sep-Oct Schedule: Advantage Mets

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Pricks Beat Douchebags to Win World Series

Recent FanShots

Hustle, Dedication, Intelligence, and Teamwork
Myers done with Phillies
Chapman likes New York
White Sox Buy Out Dye's Contract
BA Mets Top 10
Carlos Gomez dealt to the Brewers for JJ Hardy
Hit-and-run victim outside Phillies game dies from injuries
Bill James sez:
Red Sox acquire Jeremy Hermida
WAR and BAB

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sponsors


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Cj_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

THE NEWS GURU

Wrightfront_small Joe Budd

POET LAUREATE

Hamheadshot__1__small Howard Megdal