Marchman On Closer-By-Committee
Good read about the closer-by-committee situations currently working in Atlanta and Tampa. Don't expect it anytime soon in Flushing, but I particularly liked this from the article:
"As the story goes, a team that declines to slot its pitchers into rigid roles is supposed to suffer all sorts of problems, as anguished relievers find themselves unable to prepare and mentally broken by the idea of pitching with the game on the line......a pitcher's job is to get outs whenever the manager asks him to get them rather than to fulfill a certain marquee role."
8 months ago
James Kannengieser
4 comments
0 recs |
Comments
What? That's preposterous!
Tony LaRussa told me so!
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Jul 10, 2009 5:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The problem is
Aside from Frankie’s contract, we don’t have a manager who properly understands situations to begin with. So even if we had a comparable reliever to Frankie (say, a healthy Billy Wagner or a healthy JJ Putz, which me way have soon), I don’t really trust him to divide up the work in the best way anyway. I almost prefer Jerry just assume that the 9th inning is the most important and that he use Frankie there, he’ll screw up less than if he actually tries to use him in more creative ways.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jul 10, 2009 5:28 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh I agree 100%
I posted this mainly because it’s well-written and interesting. I don’t want the Mets implementing this.
by James Kannengieser on Jul 10, 2009 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hah, fair enough
It is a nice article for sure, I wish we had a manager that could understand it
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Jul 10, 2009 8:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs




















