| Sign Up | Google+
 

A Reminder Of Why ERA Is Bad

Stay connected for news and updates

A tale of two players:

First consider their performances,

Player 1: 4.91 K/9, 2.98 BB/9, 56.2% GB, 1.38 HR/9, 5.02 FIP
Player 2: 5.27 K/9, 3.21 BB/9, 52.6% GB, 0.60 HR/9, 4.00 FIP

Pretty similar skill-sets, huh? Player 2 seems to have pitched better this season, but given better HR suppression, Player 1 could close the gap.

Pitcher's don't pitch in a vacuum, however. Much of the results on the field has to do with the defense behind a pitcher.

Player 1's Team: 18.1 Infield UZR + 14.5 Outfield UZR = 32.6 UZR
Player 2's Team: -21.8 Infield UZR + -14.5 Outfield UZR= -36.3 UZR

Their respective team's fielding prowess is reflected in their ERAs...

Player 1: 4.21 ERA
Player 2: 4.67 ERA

...and in the stories written about them.

Player 1:

Porcellonews_large

Player 2:

Pelfrey_news_large

Since pitching horribly in April/May with a strikeout-rate hovering around 1.5 K/9, Pelfrey has posted a 6.37 K/9, 2.99 BB/9 (May 23 to present). In that time span, his ERA has risen. Step back?

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Recent Posts

The Next Read

There are 37 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5351_tracker