Amazin' Avenue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Around SBN: Headlines: BC Beats BU 4-3 in 58th Beanpot Championship

Fig Nuthin': Diamondbacks 6, Mets 5

Let's play a game. I'm going to show you two numbers and you have to guess their significance to tonight's game. Easy enough. Ready? Here we go.

6
4

These numbers could mean a lot of things. The Diamondbacks scored six runs. The Mets left four men on base. Angel Pagan hit his sixth triple of the season. The Mets went through their lineup exactly four times. Are any of these things that to which I refer? No, they are not. I'll give you a hint: brainstorm. Give up? Alright, I'll let you in on the fun.

6 = the total number of pitches Jeff Francoeur saw on Monday night.
4 = the number of plate appearances he had.

We all know one game doesn't mean that much. Hell, David Wright only saw eight pitches! Jeremy Reed saw six pitches in his one pinch-hitting appearance. Of course, the problem isn't just one game for Francoeur. Over the expanse of his entire career he has established himself as Mr. Swing-At-Anything. No pitch is too high, low, or otherwise outside the strike zone. Why? Because Francoeur doesn't have a strike zone. Most players look for strikes between the letters and the knees and between the corners of the plate. They don't necessarily look to swing at all of these pitches, but good hitters will acknowledge that these are the rough dimensions of the strike zone, notwithstanding the odd creative umpire. Francoeur's strike zone has no such measurable limitations. Francoeur's strike zone is limited only by the universe of possible endpoints for a ball thrown by a pitcher. Over his head, it's in the zone. In the dirt, it's in the zone. Behind him, in the zone. Practically into the dugout, in his zone. This is it. He's not going to change. Let's just hope the Mets' front office dream team figures this out and rightly non-tenders him this offseason.

The real story of the game was Nelson Figueroa, who gave up six runs on ten hits (three homeruns) and a walk in 1.2 innings and will be DFA'd tomorrow. It takes a stupendously awful pitching performance to make Tim Redding look downright decent by comparison, but Figueroa made it happen. Redding relieved the Fig-bomb and tossed 3.1 scoreless innings of relief while throwing just 43 pitches in the process. The entire Mets bullpen was actually quite effective, giving their offense an opportunity to creep back into the game against Dan Haren. The Mets bunched some hits together to plate three runs in the fifth and a Daniel Murphy Blue-Collar Blast in the sixth brought the Mets to within 6-5. They had a chance to tie it in the eighth when Gary Sheffield doubled with one out, but Murphy popped out to third and Failcoeur grounded out on the first pitch he saw to bring the inning -- and the Mets' last real scoring chance -- to a crashing halt.

One bright spot for the Mets' offense was Pagan, who reached base three times and makes me eat crow everytime I portend his imminent demise. I still assert that he'll have a sub-.300 on-base percentage before the season closes, assuming he doesn't suffer some arbitrary injury before then.

Funny thing I observed: Pagan has six triples in 128 at-bats this season, which seems like a lot.

Johan Santana takes on Joel Pineiro at 7:10pm Tuesday as the Cardinals roll into town for a two-gamer.

Star-divide

Swag Contest

Swag contest results can be found here and the next game's swag form already available. You can read more about the swag contest here.

SB Nation Coverage

* Traditional Recap
* Boxscore
* Amazin' Avenue Gamethread
* AZ Snakepit Gamethread

Win Probability Added

Big winners: Angel Pagan, +11.9% WPA, Bobby Parnell, +9.9% WPA
Big losers: Nelson Figueroa, -37.7% WPA, Jeff Francoeur, -15.4% WPA
Teh aw3s0mest play: Murphy solo homerun in sixth, +13.6% WPA
Teh sux0rest play: Sheffield GIDP in fifth, -12.5% WPA
Total pitcher WPA: -13.4% WPA
Total batter WPA: -36.6% WPA
GWRBI!: Mark Reynolds

Game Thread Roll Call

Nice job by Jadden Hopkins; his effort in the game thread embiggens us all.

Num Name # of Posts
1 Jadden Hopkins 99
2 fxcarden 95
3 Chickendirt 44
4 Abstract NYC 41
5 AnthonyR 36
6 RIPShea 31
7 KeithsMoustache 30
8 Mex_17 30
9 Pat Andriola 28
10 Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright 18

0 recs  |  Comment 40 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

From what I've noticed of the Met's ways...

Figueroa has pitched halfway decently a few times, which would get him DFA’d. So right now the Mets are probably getting ready to name him the number two starter for next year. Redding will probably be number one. Francoeur will probably hit a few more homeruns from now until the end of the season, and the Mets will really like that he played in most of the games, so he’ll be back in RF next year.

"I was so frustrated [Saturday], I [could have said] anything," ~Oliver Perez

by Lance Johnson on Aug 4, 2009 12:05 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Failcouer.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 4, 2009 12:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

One swinger

in the lineup isn’t so bad.

Unless you are David Wright’s real girlfriend

by Delgado on Aug 4, 2009 4:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Figgy

I saw his last game in Buffalo on Tuesday against Pawtucket, and he was lights out – 9 K’s, only a few scattered hits. I really thought he would be useful as an ML pitcher the rest of the year. Depressing to see his line tonight. Guess he’s the definition of AAAA

by cjmulrain on Aug 4, 2009 12:41 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It could've been one bad start

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 4, 2009 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I can almost guarantee

that there is no way that Francouer will not be tendered. Jerry has already stated that Francouer can “carry a team” and he “plays really hard.” That seems like the RF of the future to me

by njmetfan12 on Aug 4, 2009 1:31 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don't know if this is possible

but after Murphy’s homer, I believe Francouer actually recorded an out before Daniel had finished rounding the bases.

by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on Aug 4, 2009 8:40 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Frenchy

How does he not understand yet? How can he possibly think what he’s doing at the plate is remotely acceptable? If I were Howard Johnson, I’d fine/bench/punch Francoeur for every game he sees less than 10 total pitches. Failing to non-tender him this offseason would be far worse than the initial trade to sign him, yet I’m terrified that it’s going happen.

by James Kannengieser on Aug 4, 2009 9:50 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

The ol' FBP

Fine, bench, punch. In that order.

by TheBigStapler on Aug 4, 2009 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd prefer PKP

Punch, kick, punch

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 4, 2009 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would you vary

punches? Like roundhouse, sweep-kick, uppercut? I’m picturing Streetfighter II now.

by deadspy3 on Aug 5, 2009 7:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hadouken!

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 5, 2009 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bright side

Since we are stuck with Francouer for at least this half a season, there are some good things with him this run with the Mets. A small sample size yes, but some of his power seems to be back and he’s not striking out, maybe he can continue some of these trends.

by Willninho on Aug 4, 2009 11:12 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

His trend right now is replacement level production

which I guess is better than his customary sub-replacement level production, so there’s that.

by James Kannengieser on Aug 4, 2009 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So is everyone

I think Sheffield is the only corner OF who is hitting above replacement, Church was at that level too.

by Willninho on Aug 4, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

jeff

Francouer is everything the mets are not. He is agressive at the plate, in the field, and has power.
He ATTACKS the ball. now im not saying that he is better than david wright. David is an all star, and bats 300 year in and out. but davids lack of power i feel is from a lack of aggressiveness at times.
I dont know what it is about, but every now and then id like to see david go up there and hack away.
He doesnt look like he is swinging with much power and it shows in his numbers.

by ImaMoose on Aug 4, 2009 11:17 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree with some of that

Wright could use a little more aggressiveness. He’s so concerned with going to right, that he doesn’t turn on balls he should probably jack. But Francoeur’s performance was abysmal last night, he was swinging at pitches at his ankles. It was like he had a plane to catch.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Being aggressive for the sake of being aggressive is stupid

whether it’s hacking at balls a foot out of the strike zone or trying to take an extra base when your chances of success aren’t high. If his results were good that’d be one thing, but they just plain aren’t.

by JoshNY on Aug 4, 2009 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Francoeur's quote in the paper today:

“Second time up, I decided to take a pitch,” he said, “and he probably threw the only straight ball he threw all night.”

That right there is Frenchy. He’s concerned about the one pitch he didn’t swing at, and wishes he swung at it!

And, worse, it confirms he has no pitch recognition at all. Early in the count, he often either decides to take a pitch or decides to swing before it is thrown, that’s what that quote tells me.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is incorrect

Wright’s problem is not lack of aggression. For the season, he has swung at 65.8% of pitches in the strike zone, which is almost exactly the league average. Furthermore, the players on the active roster who’ve been more aggressive (code for “worse plate discipline”) than him include Schneider, Tatis, Reed, Sullivan and Francouer. You feel like Wright should be more like that group of bums?

Wright’s problem is not a lack of aggression. His problem is that he infrequently bats with teammates on base and is positioned in front of Murphy and Francouer, which provides opposing pitchers no incentive to throw him strikes.

by Zwill on Aug 4, 2009 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

That doesn't explain his lack of power

He’s had plenty of pitches to hit, especially early in the year when Delgado and Beltran were playing, and he didn’t hit homers then, either. He’s just late on a lot of pitches, and he also seems intent on going to rightfield more than he ever has. The ratio of his hits to right are the highest of his career.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's a totally different issue

I wasn’t trying to explain his lack of power. Much of what I’ve seen from HitTracker suggests that his power slump is partially attributable to bad luck with CitiField’s dimensions. I haven’t reviewed the distribution of hits well enough to confidently state that he’s hitting more balls to RF but instinctively that makes sense to me. In any case, it’s false to suggest that his sagging power numbers are due to a lack of aggressiveness as ImaMoose had posited.

by Zwill on Aug 4, 2009 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He's now lost 8 home runs to Citi Field that would have been gone at Shea

and I remember he hit one up on the hill in Houston that would be gone at most stadiums. His power is down but I think a ton of it is flat-out bad luck.

by James Kannengieser on Aug 4, 2009 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're really stretching with that

Especially when you factor his road performance. Most of the homers he’s lost (and I think it’s 6 or 7, not 8) have gone to center and right center, the fact remains he’s not turned on balls and driven them like he has in the past. The shots he used to hit high into the picnic area would be out of Citi.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

As of July 2nd

in the article here it was 6. This past week against the Rockies he hit 2 shots that certainly would have been gone at Shea, notably the rocket of the top of the wall in dead center field below the apple. I don’t believe I’ve stretched anything.

by James Kannengieser on Aug 4, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

your stretching your point

because you have no answer for his lack of pop on the road.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 3:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And further

How long is Citi Field going to be an excuse? It’s not producing homers at an alarmingly low rate for opposing teams at all, everyone’s seen that. At some point, you can’t say “that would have been a homer at Shea.” You play the ballpark that you’re in. Wright’s ground ball pct. is still too high as well. That’s not the stadium, he’s not getting the ball in the air enough to begin with.

by David G on Aug 4, 2009 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

His ground ball % is 37.3%

2008: 36.2%
2007: 39.3%
2006: 36.5%
2005: 39.4%

by James Kannengieser on Aug 4, 2009 8:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sigh

I miss the days of, “Wright tries to pull everything! He needs to go to right field more like he used to!”

by blains2000 on Aug 4, 2009 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The swings that produced those hrs

were of the golf swing uppercut variety. I’m not upset that he’s not doing that anymore. The real problem is that it might be physically impossible for him to hit one out the other way. In fact, I’m not sure if any righty has hit a true opposite field homer at Citi this year.

by Mount17 on Aug 4, 2009 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That ball he hit in Houston

was around 425 feet. It was on the hill in front of the 436 sign.

by blains2000 on Aug 4, 2009 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope, you're wrong.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 4, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

i dont get why everyone...

is jumping on our hottest hitter right now. Since he joined the team. another thing is i cant stand to watch the mets… its just boring. but somehow i wind up on the couch watching them night in and out with the same crappy result.

the mets suck. fact.
any quick fixes? No. wait till next year.

by ImaMoose on Aug 4, 2009 4:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Francouer is just not good. Sorry, he sucks.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 4, 2009 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you made a sign and took it to Citi

which said “TAKE A DAMNED PITCH, FRENCHY!” do you think you’d get thrown out?

by deadspy3 on Aug 5, 2009 7:22 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Mets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

159714144_040c6c1501_small
Our National Baseball Laboratory
Small
Looking At What We Have, Part 1: Position Players
Small
Looking at what we do have, Part 2: Pitchers
Headshot_small
Omar Minaya's UltiMET Lineup
House_016_small
A Day in the Life of Gary Matthews Jr. - A Gift From Halos Heaven

Recent FanPosts

Mr-met-r_0_small
Do the Media and Blogosphere owe Omar an apology?
Small
The Truth about the Mets' 2010 Budget
Small
2010 Most and Least Improved Teams
Misc_007_small
When Cliff Floyd Spoke, Players Listened
39135485-59af19dbb26654095f910f34176af094_4ae8a81e-scaled_small
Predictions Group
Buckner_small
Updating the 'Diamonds in the Rough'
Small
Debunking False Childhood Memories

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Omar's off-season contract strategy.  (Get it?)
(Yes, I'm having too much fun with GraphJam)
I'm doing a little study on the NL East and thought I'd share an interesting little tidbit.  To all of the self-loathing Mets fans/lazy 'MLB insiders' and journalistic parrots who have 1) Condemned the entire Mets organization as a joke 2) Written off this core's impressive run to date and 3) Deified the Phillies as unstoppable juggernauts w/ no chance to lose this division:

Yes, those wins are weighted towards '06-'07 and yes, the Phillies' are more recent but the fact remains that no other team in that span can even come close to the Mets total of days in first place, which should be garnering a lot more respect than it has.  If only because we still have nearly the same core in place that has clearly had a lot of success and health-willing can very easily do so again in 2010.

Recent FanShots

Mets close to minor league deal with Mike Jacobs
FORBES RIPS WILPON
Mets Equipment Truck Leaves for Spring Training
Mets Claim OF Jason Pridie Off Waivers From Twins
Ted Berg on the Mets offseason
Dykstra is at it again..
Phillips admits he made some mistakes
Felipé Lopez anyone???
Pleasepleasepleasepleaseplease

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sponsors


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Mos_def_def2_small Sam Page

Aaavatar_small Mark Himmelstein

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

THE NEWS GURU

Wrightfront_small Joe Budd

THE POET LAUREATE

Hamheadshot__1__small Howard Megdal