Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miikka Kiprusoff Wins 300th Game, Buffalo Crushes Boston

Is Francoeur the cure for the punchless Mets?

(bumped from fanposts. --eric)

I've read a few comments suggesting that Francoeur's power makes up for his OBP, especially on a team like the current Mets, who can get on base but suffer from an inability to score once on. The idea is that a low OBP / high SLG player is more valuable on this team than yet another high OBP / low SLG player.

Could this be true? I'll start with a extreme over-simplication of the Mets' situation. Let's assume we have two players, whom I'll call L. Castilla and J. Francore. Castilla is a singles hitter, but gets on base, while Francore never takes a walk, but can really hit the ball.

Star-divide

Name BA OBP SLG OPS wOBA
L. Castilla .300 .370 .300 .670 .315
J. Francore .245 .245 .500 .745 .309

 

Both of these are mediocre hitters, and although their OPS isn't that close, their wOBAs are. (I assigned singles / doubles / home runs / walks to each player and used the basic wOBA formula.)

As a start, assume the team is composed solely of Castilla-type players, and I have the opportunity to trade one for Francore. Will the team score more runs as a result? I'll turn to Base Runs, which is widely considered one of the better run estimators available. Base Runs is a dynamic model and operates on a team level, which means that there are multiplicative effects between players. For instance, walks and home runs will interact.

Skipping the math for the conclusion: A lineup of nine Castillas will score 4.25 runs per game (I fudged here, actually Base Runs per 27 outs). If we replace one Castilla with Francore, the team now scores 4.34 runs per game.

Great! Francoeur is actually an improvement for the Mets, even with his low OBP and inability to take pitches.

Not quite. The real Mets aren't as terrible as a team of nine Castillas, and the real Jeff Francoeur didn't replace Luis Castillo. To measure the impact of trading Church for Francoeur, what we can look at is the actual Mets' results, find the Base Runs, then subtract out all PA by right fielders and add in Francoeur. Since the trade occurred on July 10th, I'll use the Mets before then and all PA by right fielders. The question is which Francoeur to use? I've given him the benefit of the doubt and add in the Francoeur from 2006, who had 29 home runs, a sub .300 OBP, and a .308 wOBA. Next I scaled his 2006 numbers by the PA needed to replace all PA by Mets RFs. For comparison, I also used his season this year with the Braves prior to being traded.

Team BsR BsR / 27
Mets (through July 10) 382 4.92
Mets - RF 344 4.98
Mets - RF + 2006 Francoeur 386 4.93
Mets - RF + 2009 Francoeur 374 4.77
Mets - RF + 1975 Kingman 390 4.98

 

I threw the last one in there for a real low OBP / high SLG comparion. Kingman's OBP was .284 and SLG was .494 that year.

Perhaps I shouldn't be surprised, but the Mets have not had good production out of right field at all this year. However, even if Francoeur returned to hitting 29 home runs a year, he'd be a marginal improvement to this team. I think in certain circumstances sacrificing OBP for SLG can help a team score more, but Francoeur is not the answer. I also can't help but note that since being traded, Church actually has a higher SLG than Francoeur, albeit in limited at bats.

This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.

Comment 78 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

didn't read it

but I can tell you no.

"We must win and we must know how to win rather than win because we have statistical people."

by Evan_S on Aug 9, 2009 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

you should read it

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 9, 2009 1:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was not what I expected

Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all

If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.

GET THAT VORP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!

by baetown415 on Aug 9, 2009 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Now that I've read it:

Nice article, but we didn’t really learn anything. At best he’s a slight improvement and as is he sucks. Still a nice read.

And sorry if my first comment was kind of douche-y towards you, it was only meant to be douchebaggy towards Francoeur.

"We must win and we must know how to win rather than win because we have statistical people."

by Evan_S on Aug 9, 2009 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice read

Aaron King is still my homeboy... iffy mechanics and all

If Dustin Pedroia played in Seattle, not many people would be talking about him.

GET THAT VORP SH!T OUTTA HERE!!!

by baetown415 on Aug 9, 2009 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

wait they have email?

Omar knows how to use it?

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 9, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

if you do

make sure you sign it
Adam Rubin

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 9, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good read.

To people who say we need a high SLG player instead of a high OBP player: Fine, but Jeff Francouer=/=Prince Fielder.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 9, 2009 2:17 PM EDT reply actions  

You would both

literally and figuratively need two Francouers to make one Fielder.

by deadspy3 on Aug 9, 2009 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

And furthermore

Prince Fielder actually has always been a good to very good OBP guy.

Brewers Baseball and other assorted nonsense (mostly the assorted nonsense) at my blog, What's a Tararrel?

by Lefti on Aug 9, 2009 6:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, that too.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 9, 2009 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Am I missing something?

Why do you call them Castilla and Francore half the time, and spell them correctly the rest? Is there some kind of inside joke I’m missing.

by Steeeve on Aug 9, 2009 3:11 PM EDT reply actions  

It was just a joke he made.

I thought it was pretty funny

"We must win and we must know how to win rather than win because we have statistical people."

by Evan_S on Aug 9, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I laughed

The real Frenchy gets more HBP than Francore

You don't cheer for the Mets. You drink for the Mets.

by Kevin H on Aug 9, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

They are exaggerations

Castilla hits nothing but singles; Francore never walks. Castillo and Francoeur do a little bit of hitting for power and walking, respectively.

by Eric Simon on Aug 9, 2009 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wait, the Mets signed Vinny Castilla?

Actually, I wouldn’t be all that surprised at this point.

by JoshNY on Aug 9, 2009 4:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

to fill out the DL

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Aug 9, 2009 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ohhh wow

I’m stupid. I misread that part. And by misread I mean skipped over entirely because I have little to no attention span.

Hey leave me alone! I dont take my Adderall on weekends :-P

by Steeeve on Aug 9, 2009 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good job

One minor point in Francoeur’s favor: even base runs doesn’t account for situational hitting ability, which does actually exist, albeit to a small degree. And Francoeur at least has shown some situational ability to score base runners, a stat that seems to have at least some persistence.

Per Baseball-Reference Francoeur has scored 306 of 1922 base runners for his career, or a BRS% of 15.9%. The 2009 Mets meanwhile, sans Francoeur, have scored 378 of 2617, or 14.4%. Ryan Church this year was at only 12%, but is 15.2% for his career. Now truthfully, most of these things should probably be regressed quite a bit toward the mean. But, let’s assume that Francouer truly is going to score 1% more of baserunners. I don’t have baserunners broken down by position, so I’ll assume they are proportional to PA, and the RF would have come to bat with 299 runners on base. An extra 1% means about an extra 3 runners scored. But, even that isn’t worth a full 3 runs. Some of those runners would have been scored anyway by the following hitters. The actual run value ends up maybe half that.

On top of that, I’ll add the best context sensitive measure is probably WPA, which considers the impact of all events (including the situational impact of getting on base or not), and there Francoeur is -4.57 for his career. That comes to about -1.05 per 150 games (to be fair, -4.17 of that was from an awful 2008, so he at least has been near average at other times). Now, the baseline here is an average player, so -1 wins might still be about +1 above a replacement player baseline.

Bottom line, while situational and context sensitive stats are useful, they are useful primarily as secondary measures, to look at after looking at more reliable rate stats. They are useful primarily because they measure some of the very small things that aren’t included in OPS or Base Runs, or wins above replacement. But bringing them into consideration shouldn’t dramatically change the conclusion.

Here, I think the best overall measure for me is WAR, which shows Francoeur at +5.9 wins for his career, and in negative territory for 2008 and 2009. Even if you assume his career numbers are more representative of his talent, he’s about a +1.2 win player. Keep in mind though, the baseline here is replacement level, so even that is about -0.8 wins below average.

He’s still young, and if you are really optimistic, maybe there’s still a chance he could even be near league average one day. And right now, a +1 to +1.25 WAR player isn’t bad to have as a bench and platoon guy, and might even be worth the cost of arbitration.

But, he’s certainly not going to be “the answer” to anything, unless it is a question that is very trivial. Solid defense and some small degree of situational hitting are nice to have as part of the package, but there are still some god awful on base skills wrapped up there in the same box.

by acerimusdux on Aug 9, 2009 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

i enjoyed reading this balanced analysis, thanks

the constant return to frenchy’s inadequacies that everyone seems to enjoy here seems ill-timed. We’re focused on tweaking a Ferrari when what we’re driving a very old VW van with no bumper and a serious timing belt problem.

I.M. Forme
"When you get yourself into trouble is when you feel you have to do something, and then you get yourself in trouble." --Omar Minaya

by itsmetsforme on Aug 11, 2009 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

metaphor confusion

Shouldn’t we be trying to replace the parts of the van that are worse than all those replacement parts lying around our garage?

by anonymous on Aug 11, 2009 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Could have told you . I’m a Braves fan and was never much of a Frenchy fan because of his OBP and his inability to remember his coaching instruction. He can be a good hitter if your batting coach will take the time to sit with him after every game and watch his hitting videos and explain to him what he did wrong. Every time they did that in Atlanta he would hit well for a week or 2. If Francouer had any sense,( I’m not saying he doesn’t) he would take a 110 grand of his 3.5 million salary,part of which is still being paid by the Braves, so happy to be rid of him they were and hire a good college hitting coach to retrain him nightly. If you want to send something to your front office this little tidbit would be a good one.

by jimmontg on Aug 9, 2009 3:53 PM EDT reply actions  

"I also can't help but note that since being traded, Church actually has a higher SLG than Francoeur, albeit in limited at bats"

Is that indicative of HoJo not doing his job? Or is it that Church just simply sucks when he was on this team?

As far as Frenchy goes, nice analysis by all here. However, considering that we have Omar as our GM(and still will have him in the foreseeable future) and the WilponD-SCUMS as our Owners, I’m not going to hold my breath and hope that they get a better Right OF this offseason.

So, in other words, I can live with Frenchy doing his thing….Just as long as we have Beltran, Wright, and some new acquistion(a power bat) hitting in front him to at least give him some “situational RBI” situations(trying say THAT 3 times fast…lol). He doesn’t have a bad arm either as we saw last night…

by MetsGod on Aug 9, 2009 4:57 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah

If we plan on winning games, I’m going to have a problem starting a player everyday who has negative value. I can’t live with it because we won’t be able to win with it.

ain't had enough...

by BlackOps on Aug 9, 2009 5:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

But if the Mets were healthy with players that have POSITIVE value,

then I don’t believe it would be so bad to have Frenchy batting…say….6th in the lineup.

Here’s my lineup for next year (keep in mind that I’m taking into consideration that Omar does NOTHING to upgrade the outfield aka getting someone else to replace Frenchy) :

1 Jose Reyes
2 Luis Castillo
3 Carlos Beltran
4 David Wright
5 Free Agent Power-Bat (Delgado is history)
6 Frenchy
7 Angel Pagan
8 Schneider/Santos
9 Pitcher

Or maybe I should switch Frenchy and Pagan? Hmm….Pagan does have a nice habit of getting on base; giving Frenchy an opportunity for an RBI hit….

by MetsGod on Aug 9, 2009 7:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like this starting line-up

From 1-4. 5, of course, does not exist yet. 6-8 is terrible. 9 is, well, 9.

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Aug 9, 2009 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

That whole suggestion

is predicated on the idea that you can easily get a premier FA to fill out the middle of the order. Without acquiring that player, that lineup is actually pretty mediocre, especially when considering the possibility that Beltran may miss some or all of next season if his injury is as bad as some have reported. So what options are available to fill that hole? The list of potential free agents here is not all that promising. Other than Holliday, there isn’t much out there. Bay, Vlad and Abreu are likely to draw some attention but all of those guys are essentially DHs at this stage of their respective careers.

More interesting options are available on the Mets’ roster. Delgado is actually much more attractive as a free agent after this season as his pricetag will likely be much lower than it would have been last winter. It’s entirely possible that the club can bring him back on a one- or two-year deal before Ike Davis is ready for promotion. In the outfield, Evans and Fartinez are deserving of at least platoon roles.

If they can sign Holliday for a reasonable contract, they should. Otherwise, they should avoid the majority of the hitters available via free agency. The trade market will be the way to go.

by Zwill on Aug 9, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're forgetting that the Mets are handicapped...

We’ve got Omar as our GM.

Things are not looking good.

by MetsGod on Aug 11, 2009 3:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

NO.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 9, 2009 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

You certainly have a way with words, squiddy.

You say “No” with such passion and panache. lol.

by MetsGod on Aug 11, 2009 3:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I try, haha.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 11, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just out of curiousity

what in the name of Benny Agbayani is Angel Pagan doing starting for us in your apparently ideal 2010 Mets lineup? Do you really think we could win next year with at least 2 sub-par bats at major power positions? Even if we wind up with your non-specific slugging 1B, we’re ceding a lot of offense by starting Pagan and Frenchy at the corners.

by BobbyV_Incognito on Aug 10, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey I never said it was a Good Lineup...

I was just tossing a “possible” lineup next year. I’m sure many here have waaay better lineups.

And I know 99% of you have lineups that DO NOT have Frenchy on the team…but I have a feeling that Frenchy will stick around, mainly out of necessity since Management has shown that it is content with spinning its wheels in place instead of getting somewhere….

by MetsGod on Aug 11, 2009 3:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lets give a little credit to the Wilpons

Even after losing lots of money in the Madoff scandal, they were willing to sink more than every other owner not named Steinbrenner into this team. It’s the only reason this team isn’t in last place given our GM.

by yellomellojello on Aug 9, 2009 7:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

they didn't find out about Madoff till well after this year's salary had been set.

can’t give them credit for that as there is no way they could get out of paying the team.

by twon8 on Aug 9, 2009 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have always been pleased with their financial commitment to the team.

I used to think that was all you could hope for from ownership, but that is not the case. While everything that has occurred is obviously not their fault, they do not have people running this organization who are indicative of a big market franchise’s personnel.

We can and should do far better. If they can steer clear of themselves enough to make the needed changes in the near future, I have no problems with Coupons and Son.

Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but Jerry abuses the privilege.

by AnthonyR on Aug 9, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Platooning?

I think the Braves have been platooning Church, or at least that was the initial plan. He has about half the PA that Francoeur has, so he’s definitely not playing every day. He does have a pronounced split against LHP for his career. If he only hits against RHP now, that could account for this improved performance.

Regardless, small sample size, so this won’t necessarily continue. I just put that in because it’s funny. (Or sad.)

by mnbv on Aug 9, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

24 hour Francouer hate blackout?

Is there any hope we can go 24 hours at some point this season without bitching about Francouer’s low OBP?

It was mildly amusing the first 10,000 times.

Is there nothing else to talk about? I mean, we all get it. Francouer has a low OBP. He never walks. He sucks. He’s the worst player ever. He’s way worse than Church. He should be DFA’ed this offseason and never play organized baseball again. He’s a shitty defender. It was a stupid trade. Anyone who doesn’t think Francoeur sucks is an idiot who doesn’t understand sabermetrics. Theo Epstein would never take Francoeur.

Did I miss anything?

Seriously though, this “Francouer never walks” ranting is starting to turn this board into a yawnfest. Every f-ing day there’s yet another “analysis” of Francouer’s low OBP. It’s really not very interesting anymore.

The horse was dead 3 weeks ago. Barbaro has more life than this topic. Please stop the beatings.

Thank you!

by Mex_17 on Aug 9, 2009 9:44 PM EDT reply actions  

So, I'm guessing you didn't read this piece?

It engages in some analysis to respond to the argument, advanced here in the comments to at least one recent post, that Frenchy’s relatively high SLG % is more important than his low OBP. As far as I see, it does not engage in the sort of hyperbole you present in your comment.

If you disagree with mnbv, perhaps you could prepare a FanPost that rebuts his analysis.

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Aug 9, 2009 10:38 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So, did you read my post?

Point out where I disagree with his post…

by Mex_17 on Aug 10, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

I stand corrected

Nowhere in your comment did you disagree with the premise put forward in mnbv’s FanPost. I suppose I was thinking of an older comment in a different thread that seems to have offered the very thought mnbv sought to debunk. My bad.

But, really, if you aren’t interested in the particular post, why read it? Why bitch about it in the comments? There are currently nine Francoeur-free FanPosts in addition to the front page material and various FanShots. I’m sure you can find something agreeable to you in all of those.

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Aug 10, 2009 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Actually

I was rooting for Francoeur and hoped that his SLG did outweigh his OBP. Unfortunately that doesn’t seem to be the case. Just a futile hope that the front office maybe considered this and has a super-secret way of evaluating players beyond Fangraphs.

by mnbv on Aug 9, 2009 10:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

because facts and analysis are BORING!

Thinking things through based on evidence is so last year. Get with the program! Unsupported opinions are where it’s at, because they can always be fresh, new, and different rather than annoyingly repetitive.

by anonymous on Aug 10, 2009 12:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yay for subjective opinions!

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 10, 2009 1:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yay for having no reading comprehension skills!!!

You sound like you just like to argue, making you come across as a bit of an inflammatory ass.

Let me speak slowly for you: My point is not that I hate Francouer, or that I love Francouer, or that I have any opinion whatsoever about Francouer. The first few posts about Francouer, and his piss-poor OBP, were mildly interesting. Good information.

But this board has turned into “The Daily Francouer Show”.

It’s boring as hell.

by Mex_17 on Aug 10, 2009 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree to an extent.

But there’s nothing wrong with taking another angle on it, like mnbv did here. When you make a comment saying the topic isn’t interesting, it’s sort of insulting to the person who did all the work in the first place when you just disregard all of that information to complain about the topic.
If you disagree with the points at hand, give a reason why, instead of trashing it as you did above.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 10, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then don't comment on it.

That simple.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 10, 2009 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

If you don't like it, don't read it.

And I’m with squid92 — you don’t sound like you read this post, which was a fantastic piece of new analysis. Anyway, AA doesn’t operate in a vacuum; if there weren’t people all over the New York sports media creaming their jeans over Francoeur’s supposed “injection of new energy” into the team, then we could move on more easily. But when even some posters here still haven’t twigged that Frenchy was a major downgrade from Church (albeit these seem to be posters distinguished more by persistence than cleverness), the point still needs arguing.

by anonymous on Aug 10, 2009 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Has Francoeur done anything stupid lately?

Besides botching that flyball? I miss hating on him. I’m a Braves fan, BTW.

If Dunn walks 30 fewer times, he'll drive in 15 more runs. This is thanks to the scientifically proven formula: RBI = (this is nonsense) (I made it all up).

Here's a stat: Wins as manager: Dusty Baker, 1,162; Bill James, 0.

by TradeAndruw on Aug 10, 2009 11:29 AM EDT reply actions  

If the OPS is 75 points higher

I’ll take it everytime, thanks. Interestingly, this is kind of the same argument in the Castillo vs. Hudson case. Do you take Hudson’s added slg. or Luis higher OBP? I like the slugging, personally.

by David G on Aug 10, 2009 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

OBP is more important that slugging

"We must win and we must know how to win rather than win because we have statistical people."

by Evan_S on Aug 10, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

More accurately

A point of OBP is more valuable than (near twice as valuable as) a point of slugging. It’s a difference in scale. The actual skills are equally valuable; it’s the measurements that aren’t on the same footing.

by acerimusdux on Aug 10, 2009 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

huh

I never really realized why that was the case, re. the scale thing

by JoshNY on Aug 10, 2009 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good point.

"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw

by squid92 on Aug 10, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Totally

SLG and its corollary, OPS, are weird statistics. It should be called total base percentage because that’s what it measures. It’s misleading to call it “slugging” percentage and it’s even weirder to add it to OBP to create a total quantity.

Consider an extreme example. Batter A has OBP of .100 and SLG of .800. Batter B has OBP of .800 and SLG of .100. Which one do you think ends up adding more runs to a team?

Furthermore, I don’t like the idea that a double is exactly twice as valuable as a single, a triple is 3x as valuable and a home run is 4x, which is to say, the fundamental message of total base %..

by TheBigStapler on Aug 10, 2009 4:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

(wha? What's that, sonny? I can't hear you...)

SLG and its CORONARY??

Yes, I’m being silly now.

But it’s certainly better to joke about things than having to think about yet another mets loss….

by MetsGod on Aug 11, 2009 3:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Can you have an OBP of .100 and an SLG of .800?

I’m trying to figure out how that would work. I mean, if you never draw any walks, your batting average will be roughly equal to your OBP, so if the guy has a batting average of .100, and all his hits are HR, then wouldn’t his SLG be .400?

Or, looking at it another way, if all your hits are HR, then your BA will be 1/4 your SLG, so the guy’s BA would have to be .200. I know in some rare cases, you can have an OBP that’s lower than your SLG, but could it ever really get THAT MUCH lower?

Sorry, I know this is far away from the point you were trying to make, but it’s late in the day and I’m a little loopy.

by JoshNY on Aug 11, 2009 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where's my dunce cap?

You’re totally right. I didn’t think that one through.

by TheBigStapler on Aug 11, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

whole lotta sac-flies.

"Look at me! I'm Tomokazu Ohka of the Montreal Expos!"

by jessef on Aug 13, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

He Needs Extra Help

I told you guys how to fix Francouer,he needs his own personal batting coach to hold his hand and walk and talk him through his problems everyday. When he came back from Texas and instruction from Rudy Jaramillo he did well in the month of April. He received no help from the Braves hitting coach,Pendleton, and started going down again,a lot of his teamates turned their backs on him because Chipper considered him an asshole. In the Braves clubhouse you don’t go against Chipper Jones. When Bobby Cox would take him aside and train him he did very well, This happened just a couple of days before he got traded to the Mets. That’s why he did so well his 1st couple of weeks with the Mets. What pisses me off is simply that Francouer’ mojo was blamed for the Braves bad outing before the allstar break. There was a lot of hate directed at him here. He’s like some of the little leaguers I used to coach,he needs extra instruction not a bunch ofn hate because he isn’t as good as Chipper Jones, who by the way isn’t doing so well.

by jimmontg on Aug 11, 2009 6:47 AM EDT reply actions  

Horrible analysis. Though I do agree that FYF needs plenty of “extra instruction”.

If Dunn walks 30 fewer times, he'll drive in 15 more runs. This is thanks to the scientifically proven formula: RBI = (this is nonsense) (I made it all up).

Here's a stat: Wins as manager: Dusty Baker, 1,162; Bill James, 0.

by TradeAndruw on Aug 11, 2009 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

Horrible analysis?

You have something better, I suppose?

by MetsGod on Aug 11, 2009 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

When he came back from Texas and instruction from Rudy Jaramillo he did well in the month of April.

Well only his standards.

He received no help from the Braves hitting coach

He received extensive help from TP as well as Chipper and McCann.

his teamates turned their backs on him because Chipper considered him an asshole

News to me, source?

There was a lot of hate directed at him

Because he was the worst starter in baseball and had a obnoxious attitude. He probably still thinks he’s a all-star. Good riddance.

If Dunn walks 30 fewer times, he'll drive in 15 more runs. This is thanks to the scientifically proven formula: RBI = (this is nonsense) (I made it all up).

Here's a stat: Wins as manager: Dusty Baker, 1,162; Bill James, 0.

by TradeAndruw on Aug 11, 2009 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Regardless of whether or not he helps the Mets

he’s been a great addition to the team on “the show”. Honestly, that’s about the only time I get to see meaningful Mets games now anyways.

"We're just as bad as the old Mets, but this time nobody's laughing"
-Dallas Green

by Stephen Schmidt on Aug 17, 2009 1:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

I was flipping through some of my parents' photo albums this afternoon in search of one particular shot of the sign my older sister made for Mets Banner Day back in the late eighties. Though I didn't find that one — I'll post it when I eventually track it down, and I can assure you that it's Keith-themed — but I did stumble upon this wonderful photo of my younger sister's stuffed animal menagerie spread out in front of a glorious rainbow-festooned Mets pennant, also from the late eighties.

She works for the HRC now and was particularly delighted to be reminded of this photo.

(click to embiggen)
Now that banner day is back, hopefully this years will look a little like this. I know it's not great, but i don't pretend to be a professional. embiggen!
In order to raise extra capital, the Mets have explored signing Kosuke Fukudome to a minor league contract with an invitation to Spring Training (replete with curiously high uniform number).
i saw this on the marlins statue/abomination story. gif in the comments

Recent FanShots

Binghamton Mets Baseball - Online Clearance Sale
Mets Revoke Megdal's Credentials
Lewin to Mets radio booth - Mets Blog - ESPN New York
The Book On Mets Prospect Zack Wheeler
Baseball Losses in 2011
Nationals launch Take Back the Park Campaign
Embiggen
NL East loaded
Josh Hamilton on the bottle again?
Mets Top 50 Prospect List (With new prospect grading system)

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro