Angel (Pagan) In The Outfield
Angel Pagan was selected by the Mets in the fourth round of the 1999 draft1 and put up so-so minor league numbers before being sold to the Cubs during the 2006 offseason. He had a couple of so-so seasons as a part-time player with the Cubs before being dealt back to the Mets during the 2008 offseason in exchange for two minor leaguers. Pagan then spent the next year-plus repeatedly showing promise and then subsequently getting hurt. After returning in July following his second stint on the disabled list this season, Pagan settled in as the Mets' regular centerfielder and has shown, at least so far, to be better than just an adequate fill-in for Carlos Beltran.
For the season, Pagan is batting .298/.343/.498 and his .356 wOBA is ninth among big league centerfielders with at least 240 plate appearances. He hasn't walked much -- just 16 unintentional walks in 248 times to the plate -- but he hasn't struck out much, either. Pagan's power has been the most surprising aspect of his game, as his .200 ISO is even higher than Carlos Beltran's .191. Much of his slugging surge has come as a result of his eight triples, a mark that would extrapolate to a franchise record over a full season. Only half of his triples have come at Citi Field, so it's not as if he's simply taking advantage of the spacious dimensions of his home park. The bump in power is not entirely unprecedented for Pagan: in 161 plate appearances with the Cubs in 2007 he posted an ISO of .175. He is also just entering what would normally be considered the prime of his career -- he turned 27 in July -- so it's not out of the question that he might begin to play his best baseball right around now.
Further, his .298 average doesn't appear to be luck-inflated, as his .319 BABIP is supported by his 20.3% line drive rate (if we use a revised xBABIP we get .293, which is a bit lower than his actual BABIP of .319, but not dramatically so).
Defensively, Pagan appears adequate in centerfield. UZR has him rated around average: a few ticks above for his arm, a few ticks below for his range. Of course, it's hard to glean much from the range numbers because UZR is still using Shea's dimensions to calculate its values. His .989 RZR is the best among big league centerfielders. I'd guess he's at least an average defensive centerfielder; anecodotally, he doesn't appear to be embarrassing himself out there.
The bad news is that Pagan's value takes a big hit if he doesn't play center. If Carlos Beltran is healthy next year, Pagan will be relegated to either a) a corner outfield spot, or b) a bench role, with occasional starts in center to give Beltran some rest. The good news is that if Pagan's power spike is real, and if his defense is above average, he might actually be competent enough to play a bit of left field for the Mets. Short of that, his pop would make him plenty useful as a bench player/spot starter, and the fact that he hits pretty well from both sides of the plate makes him versatile in a good way. He would also be a decent insurance policy against Beltran missing significant time due to injury again.
Given Pagan's own injury history, it'd be tough to endorse him as a Plan A starter in 2010, but we know he'll be cheap and, if healthy, pretty effective to boot. Whatever 2010 holds for him, he has been one of the few bright spots for the Mets this season.
1Interestingly, the Mets didn't have a first-round pick the year Pagan was drafted, having signed Robin Ventura the previous offseason. With their compensation pick, the White Sox selected future Met Matt Ginter.
0 recs |
22 comments
|
Comments
Nice analysis Eric
and I agree, Pagan has been one of the few reasons to smile this year. I would be very happy to have him back next year at worst as 4th OF, and wouldn’t even mind him playing a bit more often than that. One area of concern for me has been his baserunning, but I think that might just be down to him not having been a regular starter in much of his career. Hopefully he is learning.
by deadspy3 on Sep 3, 2009 6:11 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
didn't i come up with that nickname
Self-proclaimed president of the Pat White and Brian Hartline fan club.
No hating on Jay Fiedler, please.
by samdaman on Sep 3, 2009 8:23 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think Disney did, around 1994
by James Kannengieser on Sep 3, 2009 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
yes, then i cleaverly called angel "the angel in the outfield" after that disney movie
Self-proclaimed president of the Pat White and Brian Hartline fan club.
No hating on Jay Fiedler, please.
Official LOL'er.
by samdaman on Sep 4, 2009 9:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's a pretty solid plan A 4th OF then
which means he’ll be in left with Frenchy in right on opening day.
by HotChipWillBreakYourLegs on Sep 3, 2009 9:44 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
He should absolutely be on the team as a 4th OF next year.
He’s earned it.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Sep 3, 2009 10:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ever since that dominant spring training in 2007
he’s been great to watch.
by TheBigStapler on Sep 3, 2009 11:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
4th outfielder?
Unless they plan on spending this off-season, or maybe f-mart starting, im lobbying rubin to lobby him for some starting position.
Also I remember someone else mentioning this in another thread but any chance they move Beltran out of center, with his knee problems? How would that affect everyones value?
by Gina on Sep 3, 2009 11:47 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Prior to last season, BP had Pagan at a 40% breakout rate, which was the highest for any of our players going into last year.
If Beltran can play CF next year I see no reason not to move Angel to RF.
by twon8 on Sep 3, 2009 11:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Well that would look pretty sweet
if Holliday was in Left, but if it’s F! there might be a lack of power
by deadspy3 on Sep 3, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
seriously though
for all the people who talk about justify how francoeur needs to be our starting RF next year, how can they give it to him over pagan?
by firejerrymanuel on Sep 3, 2009 12:44 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
BECAUSE FRANCOUER HAD AN SI COVER ABOUT HIM DOOFUS
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Sep 3, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to try to make a case
But yeah, its just not doable. Pagan’s got a bit more pop than I’d have to give him credit for, enough so that he doesn’t even need a lucky BABIP to be a valuable player, and if he does have a lucky BABIP, he’s pretty similar to what Francoeur would be with a lucky BABIP.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Meddler on Sep 3, 2009 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anothe thing to consider with Pagan as a COF
His defense would be vastly greater than what the position traditionally has. I’m not saying he should be our starting LF or RF, but in terms of WAR; which is popularly thrown around here; he would probably have a 1-2 WAR in UZR alone in the corner.
I think he is more likely to be a good player next year than Francoeur and he should be in RF over Francoeur for his defense alone next year. I wouldn’t mind them getting a LF (not a huge name, but a legit bat), using Murphy at 1B as a stop gap till Davis is ready, and have Pagan in RF.
They really need to invest their money into a starter next year, and should waste money on Francoeur in RF even if its only 3mil.
by Balagast on Sep 3, 2009 1:14 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
And for his offense alone.
Francouer has negative batting value; Pagan does not.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Sep 3, 2009 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sold!
Above average offense, average defense in center…. or…
Average offense, above average defense in a corner spot.
Really, that versatility makes Pagan an ideal 4th outfielder. Someone who can play competently at any of the outfield spots as opposed to a defensive specialist like Endy Chavez or a lumbering slugger like Gary Sheffield.
by TheBigStapler on Sep 3, 2009 2:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Name the starter though
Aside from Holliday, the only decent values on the FA market next year seem to be more CF types than RF types. Maybe dealing for a guy like Brad Hawpe? Makes $7.5 mil in 2010 and has a $10 mil option for 2011. Seems like a guy the Rockies might shop considering Fowler and Gonzalez both came up and made an impact this year.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Meddler on Sep 3, 2009 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where is
all shook down now to say that Pagan is good at very little.
by Delgado on Sep 3, 2009 2:48 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
All Shook Down is actually Angel Pagan
It’s an elaborate ruse.
by James Kannengieser on Sep 4, 2009 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I have to say this post opened my eyes quite a bit
Pagan has gone under my radar for nearly all of the past 2 years, viewed as just a replacement player performing above expectation due to small sample size. Now, he’s been performing well for a while and has definitely earned a better reputation than the one he has.
Thanks, Eric, for the in-depth analysis.
by TheBigStapler on Sep 3, 2009 3:03 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I was hoping someone would make a post like this for a while now.
With Kirk, Pagan, and F! as more than serviceable options for the future and the present, I’m a little less concerned about the offseason than I was before. But that’s like taking it from a 10 to a 9.7.
"I dunno. I never smoked any Astroturf"
-Tug McGraw
by squid92 on Sep 3, 2009 5:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs




















