Could You Root Against The Mets?
For fans of the Phillies, Braves, Yankees and probably every other team in MLB, the titular question is a simple one. For those who pledge loyalty to the Flushing Debacle, things might be a little murkier. Mets fans: imagine you're watching Mets-Nationals on May 19th. Francisco Rodriguez comes into the game in the 9th inning, attempting to protect a 7-4 lead. He loads the bases and surrenders a game winning grand slam to Adam Dunn, and the Nationals win 8-7. The Mets fall to seven games out in the NL East -- and you are happy about it. Why? Because you want the Mets to have a poor season, hopefully forcing a massive organizational overhaul.
Omar Minaya's contract was inexplicably extended in September 2008, with the Mets in the midst of a pennant race. It made no sense then and looks even worse now. Recapping the failures of the Mets front office since then would be redundant -- we all know the blunders of Omar and co. by heart at this point, culminating in the preposterous Carlos Beltran surgery situation. It's pretty clear that Omar needs to be relieved of his duties. In addition, a drastic change in front office philosophy is necessary. Think Bavasi to Zduriencik drastic. Another disastrous season, record-wise, might bring about such a transformation. If a repeat of 2009 meant the end of the Omar reign and impetus for ownership to make a change, could you root for it to happen? Could you root against the Mets?
In the short term it would hurt. David Wright and Jose Reyes should be entering their primes, and Johan Santana is in his late prime. Rooting for another wasted season as players like these age a year would be difficult. Presently constructed, the Mets look capable of winning 85 games, which would probably give most fans a feeling of optimism and Omar a stay of execution. A 70-75 win season is likely needed for the Wilpons to consider pulling the trigger. Injuries and underachievement make this a very real possibility, as we learned in 2009.
The apparent disregard the current regime has for utilizing all information available for player evaluation is unacceptable for any franchise, much less one with the considerable resources of the Mets. A change is needed, and the long-term benefits to the team and its fanbase would probably outweigh the 2010 disappointment. No more lectures about "false hustle". No more absurd vesting options. It's not a given that ownership would seek a candidate in the mold of Theo Epstein or Andrew Friedman -- they could hire Omar Part Deux. However, dismissing Omar would at least give the Wilpons a chance to start over and right the ship.
In theory, hoping the Mets lose makes sense -- it's for the greater good. In reality it's tough to root against individual players, and therefore nearly impossible to root against the team (for me, at least). Most of the team is comprised of likeable, hard-working players. The Alex Cora signing was dumb but rooting for a man of his ilk to fail is pretty misanthropic. Jeff Francoeur's bizarre refusal to adjust his approach at the plate is frustrating, yet his swing is sweet and it's fun watching him hit line-drives. Go Jeff! The Mets losing might ultimately be beneficial, especially out of the gate (adios Jerry Manuel). Unfortunately, it's just not something I can bring myself to root for.
A request for this poll -- please don't take part unless you are a Mets fan.
0 recs |
126 comments
|
Comments
I've secretely reveled when the Mets are already out of it
and some person I don’t like does bad (the actual K-Rod grand slam vs. the nats) made me happy. Perhaps I am a sick and twisted individual though.
Travis Hafner is made of gold
Yes, but
Only when they are out of the playoffs for sure and I’m pulling for that protected first round pick on FA signings.
As bad as Omar has been lately, I just don’t trust the Wilpons to hire anyone better. Thus, doesn’t make a whole lot of sense pulling for a clean house when the cockroaches continue to scurry into a corner before they can be removed.
- Rivers McCown, From Mom's Basement | Twitter
I'll root against the players I don't like
Assuming we’re out of it by the All-Star break. We need to be civil war surgeons. Sacrifice the leg to save the body. Letting the bad fester for any more seasons is just going to kill us in the long run.
If they finish with 70 wins, they'll use the injury excuse again.
We make fun of the Mets doctors, but it’s not their fault that they have old/injured players, the training staff/manager/front office won’t listen to their recommendations (“just cortisone shot them”), or that the depth/bench is so bad (for the same Cora-GMJ money they could have better players) the drop in production is huge.
Even if everyone was healthy, the problem is the dysfunctional organization that poorly constructs rosters, among other faults.
In my mind, hoping for a 70-win season is like hoping our core players get hurt again. So, that I won’t do. Last year, when he had a lineup of Angel Berroas and we were competing for a higher draft pick, I had no problem if they lost.
“In theory, hoping the Mets lose makes sense — it’s for the greater good.” Sorry, but whenever someone says “it’s for the greater good”, it sounds really suspicious to me.
Omar’s job is already in jeopardy so he might be fired anyway. Since Jeff is calling the shots, it’s as if he was fired already.
Learn from the Knicks
As others have pointed out, losing hardly insures better decision making.
We’re actually better off rooting for the team to play to potential, warts and all, but for some performance-unrelated scandal or other drama like the Knicks had. They were bad, but it’s not like they were underperforming. Their inability to stay out of the media’s crosshairs was—not so much the losing—is what resulted in sweeping change. Donnie Basketball is the anti-Isaiah.
That’s what usually happens when scandal brings change (rather than just poor performance). You have to replace fallen leadership with a totally different type.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
^^ and that's not even getting into the potential entertainment value...
The Bernazard/press conference episode pushed Omar further out the door than the mediocre state of the minors itself. If anything, that part helped save him from outright firing.
"Those who fear disorder more than injustice inevitably produce more of both." -- Rev. William Coffin
learn from the Islanders
I am also an Islanders fan, and I rooted against them last season. Now in hockey it is a little different in that we all knew John Taveras was going to be the #1 pick, and ending up last in points gives you a great shot at getting that pick. Once we got to Feb. last season and it was a given that we were not even close to a playoff team, I wanted us to lose just enough to end in last place.
Now baseball is a little different because you usually do not get an immediate impat from the draft, plus I see alot more late round picks playing at the big league level in baseball than hockey.
I agree I would hate for Wright, Reyes and Santana to have to waste their prime but it may be necessary for the good of the franchise. I would like to see the next GM, praying that Minaya i sgone…try Garth Snow’s plan, and make trades that bring in extra early round picks. lock them up, and hope for a brighter future
Yeah, I can, but
I was REALLY hoping that we absolutely TANKED last year, so this change would have occurred NOW.
We are gonna shock them with 5,000 mega watts of raw ROO POWER.
For me the key is this:
“It’s not a given that ownership would seek a candidate in the mold of Theo Epstein or Andrew Friedman — they could hire Omar Part Deux.”
The Wilpons would probably hire Bavasi. These owners are clueless. I have no faith in them.
Well sure:
his dad was GM of the Dodgers for 150 years. Slam dunk!
Oh, the butcher and the baker and the people on the street: wheredotheygo?!?!?
Can't do it.
I don’t think a new GM is likely to change anything anyway.
You don't cheer for the Mets. You drink for the Mets.
I could never ever, root against any of my teams!
why would one ever root against what one believes in???? im a Met fan and as all of u guys we have suffered alot, but rooting against our team is just wrong, and losing doesnt make things better, look at the clippers in the NBA or the Lions in the NFL! its not the solution!
Audentes fortuna iuvat
agreed
winning is better than losing
sure, 10 extra losses this year could prevent 45 losses in 2011-13, but there could be a solar flare or pandemic in the meantime and we’d be back to the Stone Age with no baseball at all.
I might let my attendance slip if they’re sucking, but with the lack of impact of draft picks, it’s unconscionable to root for the Phils, Braves, or Cards which is essentially what you’re doing.
(If the Mets are playing the Cubs or Indians, I might root less hard because their fans are even worse off than us.)
Believe it or Not ...
… they might be taking the sane course by standing relatively pat, thereby saving their financial resources for next year’s monster FA class. That said, a sub 85-win season will probably cook Omar’s goose.
I could probaby root against them...
…for like the first month of the season, hoping a slow start would trigger firings when the season wasn’t completely a wash. I’ve heard multiple people say that Omar especially is on a tight leash and a bad start might give him the boot. That being said, I’m sure they will be just mediocre enough for everybody to keep their jobs.
by SheoawnnGreen23 on Jan 28, 2010 9:07 AM EST reply actions
I knew
They were losing that game against the Nats. I turned off the tv at the gym, went home and found out they blew it. Wasnt surprised. Skinny guy battling, fouling ball after ball off, I knew it was coming.
I can root against the Mets, why? When they are doing poorly and you know that it isnt just a matter of injuries, or rebuilding, its incrediable mismanagement that was covered up by deep pockets. Hard to have an underperforming team at the majors and in the minors with no depth, its time to overhaul. The only way to do that is losses.
Now why doesnt that previous statement make sense? Ill play my own devil’s advocate. If they keep making the playoffs who cares right? If a series of debatable trades/signings + lucky drafting turns into a solid organization should I root for losing since luck played a far greater roll? I guess the ends would justify the means… but thats not the case with this current FO so I guess the point is moot.
Theres my rant for the day
Never. But I have checked out before, and could end up doing that again.
I’ve been a Mets fan since the early 1980s. I was five or so years old when my parents schlepped me to Shea, so figure 1983. I’m die-hard, as evidenced by the fact that I’m here over 25 (yikes) years later.
However, I don’t really remember the Daryl Boston era. To a large degree 1991-1995 are a Mets blur to me. Part of that is because I was in high school, maybe, but I think a lot of it has to do with how bad the team was. My mom is a life-long Mets fan but she’s very quick to check out when they suck, and my dad could not care less about baseball, so it’s not like anyone was going to the games or even watching them on TV. Looking back at b-ref, I’m honestly shocked — today — to learn that HoJo played a plurality of the CF innings for the 1992 Mets. I have absolutely no recollection of him ever being in the OF.
But it’s not like I became a fan of another team. I explicitly remember wearing my Shea Stadium commemorative Mets cap in high school, and regularly, until someone threw it down a ramp, never to be found. I also remember replacing it with another Mets hat. I remember drafting Robin Ventura on my fantasy team and hoping he’d be a Met. And I hated the Yankees then more than I do now.
I really like a lot of players on this team — Wright and Reyes, most notably — so I think it’d be hard for me to fall aside this year. But it could happen.
Can't do it
And I’m a hypocrite for it, because I firmly believed that all Redskins fans should have been rooting against their team in the second half of the season to ensure that there would be a full front office change, and also to get a better draft pick. But it’s easy to say that from the outside looking in, much harder when you feel passionately about a team. I even rooted for the Mets late last year when the games meant nothing and losing could actually have helped in terms of draft position and potential change. It’s just not in my makeup to root against this team, even if on a rational level I completely understand and even agree with what you’re saying.
It'd be easier to root against them
if i thought the wilpons would actually make a “change”, more than likely they’d just replace Omar with another puppet.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Yeah I don't have much confidence either
But given the choice between Omar and no Omar I’ll take no, and cross my fingers that his replacement is an improvement.
by James Kannengieser on Jan 28, 2010 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
Be careful what you wish for...
You don't cheer for the Mets. You drink for the Mets.
Agreed
"Never throw a slider to The Glider."
- Ed Charles, No. 5
Still rooting for the Mets
because I don’t have the hubris or factual basis to suppose my rooting for them or not makes any difference in the outcome of their performance. If they’re not contending, I might stop watching because personally I don’t want the heartbreak, but effectively it’s all the same.
The small extent to which I can show a vote of no-confidence is to not attend games nor buy Mets merch. If I had season tix (I don’t), I could choose not to renew them. (I could boycott sponsors’ products, but most of them sponsor the opposition, too, so not much logic in that.)
phliadelphoe ite domum!
Had to think about it a moment
logically I should want them to lose, but I just can’t ever see myself cheering against them. I was still cheering for them at the end of last year, albeit with a bit more vitriol at how meaningless the games were. I’ve been a Mets fan for as long as I’ve watched baseball (about 20 years now) and I’ve seen some pretty awful Mets teams in my day, this is just classic Mets. A few years up, a few years WAY down. It’s a team of extremes and you never know which you’re gonna get. Sure, I’d like to see Omar gone, I’d like to see the Wilpons wake up, I’d like to see Frenchy walk more than 10 times per year, but in reality I’m cheering against all hope that even this misfit team can somehow find a way to win.
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 9:59 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
You say this now ....
but let’s revisit the question once you’ve seen the “product” on the field for half a season. How many times are we going to continue to bang our head against a brick wall?
I’ve been a Mets fan since the days of Jerry Buchek, Bob Shaw and Jack Fisher. I watched rookies named Tom Seaver, Bud Harelson, Nolan Ryan, and Jerry Koosman come up be amongst my favorite all-time players. I’ve seen them go from lovable losers to World Champions in a single season. 100-1 odds. And if the Mets could do THAT …. then I thought ANYTHING WAS POSSIBLE in life.
But now, this organization is making me nauseous. I’m getting physical reactions in response to the complete ineptness of this organization and, in particular, its ownership who I have lost all faith in.
Trust me, I want them to succeed and win. But that will not happen with this group I’m sad to say.
"Never throw a slider to The Glider."
- Ed Charles, No. 5
Maybe I have the advantage of being just young enough
that I picked up watching the Mets a few years after their ‘86 win, I have no sense of what complete victory feels like. I know the product is bad, I’m pretty vocal about my displeasure at their blatant stupidity most of the time. That said, I still get excited when I watch a Mets game, whether it be on TV or at Citi (or even more fun at Philly which i’ve done a few times, they get so mad!) I love the game, that any given second something amazing or ridiculous could happen (Think “The Catch”, we lost that game, but it was still such an incredible moment none of us will forget it, even if it didn’t change the course of our postseason), and I’ve seen enough good and bad teams to appreciate that even in the worst season there are always reasons to watch. The team is poorly run, needs a complete overhaul, and is likely a few years away from being even competitive again, and I’ll still watch every game I can of the team slowly pulling itself back together no matter how long it takes. Isn’t that what being a fan is?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 2:15 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd for being so true.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 28, 2010 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
Well I don't actually think the team is a few years from being competitive again
But I think what JamesK is saying is that if a fan has the choice of either watching a team stay permanently mediocre, as in unless an awful season happens that “slowly pulling itself together again” is never actually going to happen (The Lions under Millen is a good example of this), or going through an awful season in order to cause a complete change.
If you know the team, or front office really, needs a complete overhaul, and you no there’s absolutely no way the complete overhaul will ever happen unless something drastic happens, because more than likely if we’re somewhat in contention the next few years they won’t actually change anything just replace one puppet with the next, would you root for that something drastic or would you accept the mediocrity and resign yourself to the fact they’ll never be better?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I'd like something drastic to change
but not at the cost of no longer enjoying watching baseball, even for a season. I can watch the putrid play of last season more easily than I can distance myself from the game and coldly hope the Mets lose, even if I know deep down it may be the best thing for them. Plus the flipside to this whole argument is if we have a season bad enough for a massive overhaul, Jeff and Fred are going to still be in charge, everyone will know it, and we’ll be even more hard pressed to get any free agents to come here because now not only are we still owned by the Wilpons, but we’re not even feigning competitiveness.
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
I think you can basically sum up the problem with the mets as
if we lose we lose
if we win, we still lose
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
You're probably right.
I can watch the putrid play of last season more easily than I can distance myself from the game and coldly hope the Mets lose, even if I know deep down it may be the best thing for them.
I know, I’ll probably be joining you … but I can see it alreay, I won’t be a happy camper. I guess if I can watch the Knicks for the past decade, I can watch the Mets. I mean, I love “The Mets.” I’m just so full of despair right now.
"Never throw a slider to The Glider."
- Ed Charles, No. 5
I messed up the block quotes ...
The first quote is Keith’s. The below quote is my response. Sorry
"Never throw a slider to The Glider."
- Ed Charles, No. 5
super block quotes!
Yeah I don’t expect many of us to be happy campers, but as Mets fans we wear that misery like a badge of honor.
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
I usually have no problem wearing misery
but it’s extra frustrating now because we could so easily be better. I mean just adding like Zaun, Piniero, Winn could take us to 90 wins, but instead we’ve managed to spend more money than that would have cost and possibly gotten worse than last year, or we would have been last year if not for all the injuries. If this team actually was so bad it needed a complete overhaul I could probably deal with it, but you don’t need Andrew Friedman or Theo Epstein or intense knowledge of mathematically analysis to turn a team with Beltran/Santana/Reyes/Wright and our financial resources into a 90+ winner, or even an 88 game winner, just half a brain for talent evaluation, which we apparently don’t have.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I don't even think its that we don't have the brains to do it
with how tentative we are about spending on players, theres clearly more going on behind closed doors than we know. We have the money (we’re way under payroll from last year) so either the Wilpons are trying to adopt the Florida model where they pocket all the money, or they’re just so bad at figuring out what fair contracts look like that nobody comes here (and since all contracts have to be OKed by them, theres not much room to maneuver). I think the world of baseball has changes very rapidly these days, and ownership is struggling to keep up with the times.
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 4:00 PM EST up reply actions
I definitely agree with the last sentence
but i mean even if ownership wants to be tight with the pocket books, we could have improved and still spent less money than we’ve ended up spending. The 16 million to Bay, 5 million to Frenchy, 2 million to Cora could have paid for Piniero, Zaun, Cameron with money left over. So it seems like the problem is as big a scouting/talent evaluation problem as it is a money problem, though I do agree that I think the Wilpons have been relatively “cheap”, I’m just not sure loosening the purse strings would mean anything other than Omar giving out a bunch of bad contracts. I mean Florida spends almost no money but they still do an awesome job of scouting and developing and when they make trades they almost always get the best of it.
Also I’m not sure they even want to keep up with the times, apparently they targeted Omar for the gm job because he didn’t believe in all the silly “new-age” stats like obp.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I don't think its them trying to be cheap
I think it is that they genuinely don’t understand how the player market works in this day and age, with guys like Boras who are experts at playing teams against each other.
They said the Mets were “sticker shocked” this offseason, but I think more likely it is that the Wilpons are process shocked. The 16 mil to bay wasn’t ideal but not terrible either and it was a pretty easy contract to work out because nobody else really wanted him. I think the high amounts of money to Cora and Frenchy are because they were already here, and therefore it avoided the need for them to enter the more complex negotiations required to bring in players leaving other orgainzations who have multiple teams bidding for them. The more I think about it, the more I feel like the Wilpons aren’t afraid of spending money so much as they’re afraid of entering the uncharted wilderness of free agent negotiations, they take the path of least resistance so they can avoid the hard work and things they don’t understand.
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 28, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah to me the problem isn't even the product on the field
it’s the constant media embarrassments, coaches throwing players under the bus, “midnight firings”, (alleged) hiring of unqualified buddies. There’s a difference between being lovable losers, and just being a joke of an organization from the top to bottom. At this point I just feel bad for the players.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Very true.
It seems to never end.
"Never throw a slider to The Glider."
- Ed Charles, No. 5
Cant do it. It would be like stabbing a friend in the back
And the notion that the Mets will improve because the Wilpons will fire Omar is a theory with little substance behind it. I will not defend Omar but I do want to see him have a clear unobstructed command in the FO. I do not believe he has this from what the media reports. He has no definite budget figure, has to clear every decision with Jeffy, has to work one FA at a time and seems to be a puppet of the Wilpons.
My question is; What GM prospect is going to want to step into the shitpond that is the Wilpons front office? Omar will be replaced by another puppet and the same result is assured. Force the Wilpons to step back and let people who know what they are doing run the Mets.
"Wait till Biggus Dickus hears about this!"
by scott from peekskill on Jan 28, 2010 10:12 AM EST reply actions
Can't root against them
Wish THEY would sacrifice a year or 2 in order to get this franchise stabalized. Omar’s only around to take the blame. Jeff is calling the shots now and what GM that WE would want would even come to this team with him hovering around the baseball side. And now other teams (Seattle and Boston) are starting to pick our pockets. It’s not unlike Gene Michael finally able to run the Yankees with a long term vision because Steinbrenner had been suspended. Does anyone have anything on Jeff? Anyone know where Howie Spira is? Without removing Jeff from the baseball side no other changes will have any effect.
I can't do it either.
I think of this “plan” we’ve come up with here as a long term plan. And I hate long term plans. Because most of the time they don’t work, and it’s just been all that time wasted. We could root against them, get Omar fired, and have him replaced with another idiot. Or, we could root for the the Mets, enjoy their great wins or hysterical losses, and accept the fact that as long as the WIlpons are in charge, this is what we’ve got.
And even when they’re sucking as bad as they did last year, I’ll always watch. I mean maybe I haven’t seen enough of this team to get sick of seasons like this yet. But in seasons like last year, when they have those rare really REALLY good wins (i.e. the “OMIRacle”, David’s two homers against the Phillies…that’s it.), you get such a bizarre satisfying feeling. Like, you shouldn’t feel that happy about having a nice win, because other teams are doing it everyday, but you do. And I sort of love that feeling in an unusual and unexplainable way.
And whether they win or lose, make a good deal or bad, the same people will be back here everyday making jokes (myself included) and that’s fine. So to wrap this up, I get what you’re saying in rooting against them, but I don’t see what it will really do except make them that much harder to watch.
P.S. I used paragraphs for my rant this time! Score.
by wrightttxgirlllx3 on Jan 28, 2010 10:27 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Nah, my rooting doesn't change a goddamn thing
So I might as well not sully myself
by letsgocyclones on Jan 28, 2010 10:29 AM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Nope...
Been cheering for them since 1962, when both they and I were new to baseball and this isn’t the first time the franchise has been dreadful. That said, if you can guarantee me that a zero for April start will get Jerry fired and out of town, and will be followed with a run to the wildcard, I’ll be happy to be an anti-Met for April. As bad as Omar is, Jerry is worse, and if the Mets had a bright, innovative and knowledgeable manager, maybe there’d be a source of insight for the organization and a curb on Omar’s self-destructiveness.
no can do
ya gotta believe right?
I mean… what if FYF all of a sudden had a great season and actually started to develop into a real ballplayer… would you be mad? Would you rather he stay bad so you can stand on your perch and yell “I was right!”
I refuse to believe that we have no chance of winning it. I refuse to believe it until it is mathematically impossible. Until that point, I will root for every met to win every game. I will root for Jerry’s gut to be right, and I will root for KRod to get a save every game.
Seriously, if we the fans dont believe… who will?
I can't root against them.
But I can secretly be satisfied with failure or frustrated with successes. Like with Frenchy last year: I was very angry about the trade and though while watching him play I would hope for a hit when he was at-bat, I was quietly frustrated by his short-term success as a Met. This isn’t because I wanted to say “I was right! He sucks!” but because I actively believe he sucks and didn’t want the front office to be seduced by a fluky hot streak and re-sign him. C’est la vie, I wish him the best this year.
What I can do is not financially support the team. I haven’t been to Citi yet and made a vow to my best friend that I wouldn’t go until Omar was fired. We’ll see if I keep it up.
And yes I think Omar’s firing would be a good thing. I believe the Wilpons would replace him with someone better by sheer dumb luck. There are what 3 or 4 GMs who are arguably worse than Omar (Moore, Sabean, Wade). The law of averages says that his replacement would likely be better, although what that means with Jeffy apparently making baseball decisions I don’t know.
Anyway, Let’s go Mets!
Does
rooting for the Wilpons to have lost all their money in the maddoff scam count? God I had never wished poverty on a family as much as I did during those months…
"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell
Mike Singletary said it best
Can’t do it
I wont root against them
But I will take satisfaction in knowing why they lost, while listening to the teeth gnashing from the peanut gallery ala Joe Benigno and his ilk.
by aparkermarshall on Jan 28, 2010 11:22 AM EST reply actions
Shocked
I’m guessing that there are many true non-Mets fans voting in this poll, just to get Mets fans’ goat, but even with a conservative estimate, that leaves 10% of Mets fans who say they’d root against their own team. I read this blog every day, but rarely comment. The people who do comment certainly know baseball, but if you would root against your team, you don’t know sports nor loyalty. Sure, Mets ownership isn’t the best, but what about the players? They go out there, and for the most part, give it their all for 162 games. And for the people who are going to whine and scream that Beltran, Castillo and Reyes don’t give their all, that’s just sheer nonsense.
And guess what – rooting against a team and being satisfied with that team’s failure is the SAME THING!
For people who demand a World Series win every year, it’s time for you to face the facts. Only 1 out of 30 teams wins the World Series. That means there’s a 96.6% chance the team you’re rooting for will lose and you will be unhappy.
Losing interest in a team is one thing, but rooting against your home team is despicable, no matter what the circumstances.
Professional athletes thrive off their fans’ enthusiasm and cheers. The more you root for them, the better they perform. Not going to a home game because you don’t like the Wilpons is a pathetic case of cutting off your nose to spite your face. If you answered “yes” in this poll, then why don’t you start now? You’re not a real fan, so go away. And don’t come back when the Mets make it to the postseason again.
I'm not sure you're arguing against the same thing he's talking about
he’s not saying root against Reyes/Wright because they’re not giving their all. he’s saying if the mets in 85 games we’ll be stuck with Omar and his ineptitude. I’m not sure what expecting a world series every year or rooting whining about players has to do with it.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
It is the same thing
Rooting against management/ownership is exactly the same thing as rooting against the players. If the Mets win 85 games, that’s a winning record, and quite possibly enough to get into the postseason. Pushing aside for a moment the fact that winning 85 games is not inept, who cares if Omar is still there if the Mets make the postseason?
And I wrote that part about winning a W.S. because at what point does a team meet your expectations? Look at the Braves of the 1990s, for example. How many times did they make the postseason and how many World Series did they win? Is that a failure or a success?
If people are willing to go so far as to root against their team for a change, then at what point is that change good enough?
Go read the lyrics to “Take Me Out to the Ballgame.”
At what point is change good enough?
When the mets aren’t run like a circus? When FA’s don’t have us at the bottom of their lists? When coaches/ownership don’t throw players, especially stars, under the bus?
In fact to me if you’re truly rooting for the players, like Reyes, Wright, Beltran and Santana, then you wouldn’t want them to waste their careers, assuming Reyes doesn’t leave for saner pastures after 2011, with inept management. I want management changed because I want to see Reyes and Wright hoisting the world series trophy for the Mets, and any player who’s loyal enough to stick with this madness/sign here as an FA to be eventually be rewarded for their loyalty and perseverance. So I say rooting for the management is the same thing as rooting against our players.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Talk about insane!
Think about what you’re saying.
If you hate your boss, would you want the company to fail?
And by the way, I like the guys you mentioned, but I root for them as Mets. It’s not like I rooted for Beltran when he was an Astro. I root for the Mets as a team. The team is a collective of players who thrive off their fans’ enthusiasm, despite what people who don’t wear the uniform do.
Well, if you'll excuse me...
I’m gonna go on an overnight drunk and in 10 days I’m gonna set out to find
the shark that ate my friend and destroy it.
Anyone that would care to join me is more than welcome. Real Mets fans only.
It has nothing to do with hating my boss
if I think my boss is heading the company in the wrong direction and because of him the company will eventually go out of business then i would want the upper management to replace him. And if the only way for the upper management to replace him was for the companies revenue to dip significantly then I would hope for it, because if it doesn’t in the long run the companies going to go down and I’m going to be SOL anyway.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
by Gina on Jan 28, 2010 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
nah - cant do that
mostly cause not enough will change in the mets favor. its not like basketball where 1 good draft pick at the right time can change the whole team around. too much has to happen with a baseball organization. i will root for omar’s firing at this point AND for the wilpon’s sell the team or go broke so they have to sell the team to raise cash or something.
but rooting against my man belty belts and joey kings and d dubs and broham samtana. nope. not even if big pud lo duca was signed and started catching again. i’d just stupidly root for people like alex cora and dan murphy to have illogically great break out seasons and lead the team to figure because i’m a glutton for punishment and love wallowing in misery like a pathetic lump.
i mean dont we all?
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.
also screw the braves
no matter how bad things got i could also root for the braves to lose, which is nearly as satisfying. also the phillies. screw them all. screw them all right to hell.
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.
In other words . . .
go Mets, die Braves?
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jan 28, 2010 1:06 PM EST up reply actions
Sounds about right.
If there's ever a riot at Citi Field and Oliver Perez was the starter, I started the riot.
Is it wrong to root for them to wait until after the trade deadline
to go on improbable winning streaks.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I WANT to believe.
y’know?
Oh, the butcher and the baker and the people on the street: wheredotheygo?!?!?
Mets Fans
Whoever said yes and that was a Mets fan then your not a real fan, I don’t care how bad the Mets do I will still be a fan until I die!!!!
bleed blue and orange
by LostOnRevisIsland24 on Jan 28, 2010 12:57 PM EST reply actions
James
Your logic is backwards.
Are you saying that if the Mets do well this year, you’ll be unhappy? If the Mets win the pennant, it’s unlikely there will be changes to the front office. How horrible!!!
What if the Mets had great ownership, but crappy players? Yes, this can happen. What if there was a bizarrely high number of injuries to the core of the team? Yes, this can happen too.
What if the team you rooted for had great ownership, but not enough money to put together a winning team? Then what would you complain about?
Mets fans like to revel in their frustrations, but it’s way better rooting for the Mets than almost every other team out there. Every fan of every team in every sport has frustrations and disappointments.
A team can have the greatest ownership and GM, with a huge payroll to get the best players available. But there’s still a 96.6% chance that team will not win the World Series.
(see the 2008 Yankees)
LET’S GO METS!!!! (No matter what!) And let’s go Omar and the Wilpons! There are people out here who want you to win!
I don't think he's saying rooting against them winning a pennant
I think he’s saying that if we win like 83 games, finish well well outside of the wc race but above .500.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Also teams can have great ownership and a gm and a huge payroll
but we’re not one of those teams. I don’t understand why you keep bringing up the limited odds of winning the world series. Everyone in here knows the post season is a complete crap shoot and that has absolutely nothing to do with James’s argument. If we had a great gm, great ownership and built a solid team no one would have an issue. The issue people have isn’t that we lose, it’s that we lose because we’re run by an inept front office who is incapable of putting together a team and as long as they’re kept in place we’ll completely waste the primes of Wright and Reyes, assuming Reyes even re-ups with us, and we’ll never been better than an 88 win team IF everything breaks right, when any competent gm could easily turn us into a legit contender, maybe not a world series win but not depending on sheer luck to even get be in the race for the wild card.
If we used a good process and consistently loss none of us in here would really care, if we used a bad process and consistently won, we’d be confused but probably wouldn’t care. We care because we use a bad proccess continually, continually get bad results and still refuse to make changes to the bad result.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
My points are
1. A true fan roots for their team no matter what (other than perhaps a total betrayal by management).
2. I bring up the odds of winning the W.S., because at what point is a fan happy if the team doesn’t win it all?
3. Even suggesting that you should root for a team to lose months before the season begins is a betrayal by the fan.
Here’s a question for you: If the Mets win the NL East with 90 wins, but then don’t win a game in the NLDS, should Omar be fired?
No but once again you're missing the point
no one’s saying if the mets win the NL east omar should be fired. They’re saying if the team is about as good as they should be expected to be, 85 wins, which with the current state of the NL would likely leave us well out of wild card contention because the one of the Braves/Phillies, Cubs/Brewers/St. Louis, Rockies/D-backs/Dodgers should be expected to win 88+ games and not win the division. and it’s possible more than one of them will, then the Wilpons will be happy with “good enough” and there will be no change in the status quo. If 85 wins is good enough to win the wc then I’m all for it, but more than likely we won’t be within 4 games of the wc winner.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Sorry, but you're missing the bigger picture
Which is that a true fan doesn’t talk about rooting against his or her team months before the season even starts.
Seriously, go root for the Phillies. Mets fans need optimism, not negative crystal ball projections from you, James or Marty Noble. Yeah, you’re in the same category as Marty Noble.
False.
James gives scientific projections. Noble gives the “negative crystal ball projections.”
Being a true fan does not equal being blind to the sorry state of affairs of the organization.
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions
Flagged
For comparing Gina to Marty Noble.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Jan 28, 2010 2:45 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
How is it missing the bigger picture
to think that finishing worse this season is better in the long-run, than being an also-ran? No one has said they’d rather the mets win 70 games than the wild card, but that the mets would probably be better off in the long-run finishing 15 games out of the wild card race than finishing 6 games out of the wild card race.
Maybe it’s because I’ve been a nets fan for so long and had to deal with .500 season after .500 season were we weren’t good enough to actually accomplish anything but we’re not bad enough to have no real incentive to change but I think it’s pretty obvious across sports that often in sports teams you have to take a step back if you ever want to take two-three steps foward, or you’ll be permanently in a zone where you’re not awful but not anywhere near good enough to accomplish anything, which is where the mets are at. So why would i rather stay in that mediocre zone where we’ll never accomplish anything than take a step back to eventually take a step forward?
And I never said I would be rooting against the mets, just that your logic is inherently flawed.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
You're saying
you want to root against the Mets now, hoping that they will have a poor season that will ultimately effect change to bring about improvements.
I’m saying I will continue rooting for the Mets and hope that they have a great season. If they don’t, then I hope change will come.
But I will not root against the Mets for that change to come.
Well I think thats what we're all saying
I’m not saying I’m actually rooting for the mets to win 70 games, I hope they win 100, what I’m saying is that I’d rather them win 70 now, and a mass overhaul comes, then win 83 for the next 5 years and never being good enough to accomplish anything but never being bad enough for anything to change.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
There is absolutely not a 96.6% chance that a team will not win the World Series
Better teams have a better chance of winning the world series. So it’s your logic that is backwards.
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 2:40 PM EST up reply actions
See the beginning of 2008
Check out the payrolls and players for the Yankees and Devil Rays. And there is absolutely a 96.6% chance that a team will not win, no matter how good the team is. This has nothing to do with a good team’s chances of getting into the postseason, and it goes back to what I was saying – at what point do you consider a team a success or a failure?
Look, if you want to root against the Mets, then go start now.
What does payroll have to do with how good a team is?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
That's my point
What makes a “better” team better months before the season start? It’s all perception.
My point is people are flying off the deep end saying they’re going to root against the Mets before a single pitch has been thrown.
But that's not true
plenty of people thought the Rays were going to be a 90+ win team. The Rays had good players with a low payroll, the Yankees had good players with a high payroll, as did the Red Sox. What makes them good has nothing to do with payroll or perception it’s having good players. What makes the Mets bad, is they don’t get good players. Pretty much every team, aside from maybe KC, maybe the Giants, has some system, whether it be scouting or mathematical analysis that identifies good players and bad players. Now you can argue back and forth about which is better, but when a team is consistently giving out bad contracts, and acquiring players that leave scouts/pretty much every source around the league scratching their heads, AND aren’t producing wins, they clearly aren’t good. And that’s the mets, it’s not like we’re making moves that makes sense and getting unlucky, or making moves that make no sense but winning, we’re making moves that make no sense and we’re not improving, which is clearly the same of a bad team.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
how many is plenty
and who are they? who had tampa winning 90+ in 2008? optimistic projections had them around 500, every espn analyst had yankees or red sox winning the al east. they were a huge surprise.
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
Optimistic had them around .500?
Pecota I know had them at 90+, most number based projections I recall had them well above .500 usually upwards of 88. I wouldn’t really consider espns analysts a very good source for predictions.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
wrong
pecota had them at 82 wins in 08
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions
Are you sure?
was that including possible contribution from Longoria? Because I definitely remember reading a projection, I thought was from BP maybe not Pecota, that had them at 90 wins. I remember cause there was a huge argument in the baseball forum I was in because a yankees fan said even if they had the talent there was no way they would do it because they didn’t have a winning atmosphere.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
bp is pecota
and had they forgotten the rookie longoria, would his inclusion have added 8+ victories to the projection? doubtful.
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:10 PM EST up reply actions
I know thats why I said I thought it was from BP
and I mean they didn’t necessarily forget about him but not knowing when/whether he’d get the call up could diminish his WARP projection, and considering they’re projections for Wieters last year, and that Longoria was considered in that same mold of prospects, I definitely think differences in projecting his playing time could cause a 4-5 win difference, considering he ended up being like a 7 win player and pecota was rated him pretty aggressively.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Also I meant that every BP write up
isn’t necessarily following Pecotas projection exactly, also that projections written about earlier in the off-season when Pecota first comes out could change as new information becomes available and the projections are updated.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Anyway heres the projection I was talking about
From march 5th
There have been unfamiliar sights in the stands of various spring training stadiums along Florida’s Gulf Coast during the early stages of the Grapefruit League season: people can be spotted wearing Tampa Bay Rays caps, T-shirts, and jerseys. Perhaps it’s the new color scheme of blue and green, part of the rebranding of the franchise from Devil Rays to Rays, that has caught the locals’ fancy. However, it is more likely the fans are excited about the collection of young talent the Rays have assembled after a decade of futility, when they averaged of 97.2 losses a season since the franchise began play in 1998. Whatever the reason, the Rays finally have fans—and expectations, too. Talk-show callers frequently suggest a season of 80 wins-plus, and so does PECOTA, forecasting an 89-73 finish for the Rays in 2008.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
ugh stupid link
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
and i’m not naming espn for their prowess at predictions but they do compile a diverse group of baseball people’s opinions and none of them were among the “plenty” touting the rays
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:06 PM EST up reply actions
Rays and Yankees despite drastically different payrolls
were both good teams with good players, as were the Red Sox. If a good team doesn’t make the play-offs that’s not a failure, a failure is when you fail to put together a good team which the mets have consistently done by not surrounding their stars with a supporting cast.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Dude
Are you in 5th grade or something? What are you trying to say?
Most projection systems predicted a vastly improved Rays team in 2008.
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
Actually, I'm in the 2nd grade
Typing away on my T-Mobile Sidekick during social studies class. And even I know that EVERYBODY projected the 2008 Yankees to do better than the 2008 Rays. In your eyes, the Yankees failed that year. Did you see Yankees fans call for rooting against them?
Dude, if you call yourself a Mets fan then root for the Mets.
I’ve got to get back to class. The teacher is getting suspicious….
Live and let live, dude
The world’s awfully tired of people telling person X he’s not a “true” Y.
by letsgocyclones on Jan 28, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
yeah...
vastly improved from winning 65 games every year, around a 500 team. nobody had the rays in the playoffs, saw them winning 90, or doing anything but challenging for 3rd place
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions
Saying nobody had them in the play-offs is totally false
plenty of people had them in the play-offs and expected a huge improvement. Like I mentioned earlier before the season started Pecota had them winning 90 games, and pretty much every metric based analysis said they were going to be really good. Maybe mainstream media didn’t see it coming but to act like it was a complete shock, that no one expected it and that it’s proof you can’t quantify good before a season is absolutely false.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
in the words of jerry seinfeld
who ARE these people??
in the first full paragraph here: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=757
nate silver says:
“the Devil Rays — who we’re showing one game over .500 — could make things interesting if their young pitching pulls together.”
link me, gina
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:08 PM EST up reply actions
Chone had them at 89
Chone, the forum the projections were posted on doesn’t exist anymore but I’m certain there was more than one, I just have to search for them one by one.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
yeah, i saw that
but as far as the projections go i think it stands alone.
speaking for your side of the debate though, their biggest improvements were defensive. just something not likely to show up as large in the stats that drive the projection systems.
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 5:37 PM EST up reply actions
It probably wouldn't show up in old pecota
because they used some weird defensive measurement, but I’m pretty sure projection systems expected a huge changed for the Mariners because of defense, it probably depends on where the improvement occurs on defense, since for example totalzone seems to be more accurate on outfield defense than infield, and whether the system uses +/-/uzr or something else to project defense.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
that was the initial PECOTA projections
don’t have the link, but think remembering their projection improved before the final version
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 6:18 PM EST up reply actions
Gina linked it above
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
yep yep
i’m surprised that they’d swing so much over the course of a couple pre-season months, but there it is
by inventor frank on Jan 28, 2010 10:22 PM EST up reply actions
I have absolutely no problem in rooting against the Mets
As a Mets fan, I want whatever is best for the Mets organization. At this moment, the Mets inept management, Fred and Jeff Wilpon, have run a baseball club that lacks a clear organizational focus. They do not, as I believe Ken Rosenthal wrote a few days back, understand how the business of baseball works. While I think the general manager, Omar Minaya is terrible, the real problem is the clueless ownership. A drastic change in organizational philosophy is necessary for this team to be a consistent contender in the mold of the Yankees or Red Sox.
Thus, I would not mind seeing a horrendous season that causes a massive public outcry against the Wilpons. Against such absurd pressure, the Wilpons may decide to either a) sell the team (probably very unlikely), or b) give complete control of the organization to personnel that run a team in the opposite mold of Minaya. Unless this happens, it may be a while before the Mets become a top-flight organziation. Yes, they will still often compete for years to come because of the excellent “core” of talented players. There may even be a championship if the stars align correctly. But a more likely scenario is a couple seasons like the last one over the next few years. With such great young talent that is absolutely unacceptable.
For the greater good of the organization, and for an exciting future as a Mets fan, a poor 2010 season may be beneficial.
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
And competing for years to come
is assuming Reyes re-ups with us, Santana’s “decline” is slow and steady and we somehow replace Beltrans production. Which IMO are big ifs considering the current state of the organization.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
True.
I was just trying to be a little optimistic about the long-term potential of the Wilpon-Minaya Mets, since I was being so critical.
"For $11.4 million you can actually get a good player. But of course this is one of the things foolish organizations do: They complain that they can't afford good players after spending millions of dollars on not-good players." --Rob Neyer
by boom_roasted on Jan 28, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
This.
Those of you expecting the next GM to be good are forgetting that:
A) He’d probably have to be the kind of GM that would agree to the autonomy curbs/no-budget nonsense that Jeffy seems to have put on Omar. (We probably don’t want someone that desperate or stupid, no?)
B) The same folk who thought Howe “lit up a room,” whacked McIlvane for Phillips in the middle of the Mets late-90s upswing, stood by Phillips over Bobby V, presided over the weird Guerrero/Rodriguez negotiations, and that “meaningful games in September” (essentially, the perpetual “maybe-contender” that we’re arguing AGAINST here) was an admirable goal… these folk would be left behind in an Omar purge. And they’d be doing the hiring.
You really trust them to find the next Zduriencik?
by LeiterMilnerFasterStronger on Jan 28, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
Can't do it
No, I can’t root against them. However, I’m expecting it to play out that way in 2010. I can’t see any other scenario. The team isn’t different enough from last year’s, and even if everyone’s healthy (and let’s just say they are within two games of .500 and within four, maybe five, of first in the NL East when they get Beltran back), I don’t see much more than 85 wins. I’d like to hope and root for more, but I don’t see it happening. So I’m hoping for that 82nd win, but I’m not expecting it, and I’m not expecting Minaya to be back in 2011.
I don’t think he’s the main problem, though. I think he’s had his hands tied this winter, and those recent reports about how the Mets are run from the top down are both disturbing and, again, a bit unsurprising, because it had been pretty apparent that there didn’t seem to be a cohesive plan in place.
So I’ll root as I always do — starting on Opening Day, as I have for the past 10 years — but I don’t think it’s going to turn out well.
Can't do it
but if I root for someone like Francoeur or Cora to pull a hammy, and miss a couple months, because their absence could help the team, is that wrong?
Nope
On principle, regardless of the situation, I am rooting for the Mets to win. At times- like last season, for example, when it became apparent that the best ending to the season we could have would be the one with the lowest amount of wins, because that would give us the lowest draft pick possible- I don’t want the Mets to win, but I still root for them to win.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 28, 2010 1:48 PM EST reply actions
coudlnt do it.
I cant. i thought long and hard how and if i could. answer kept coming back no. The Mets for as much emotional stress they have put me through in my life, im only 27, i keep coming back for more. I was pissed when Generation K failed, Kazmier got traded, we keep Luis Castillo, Armando Benetiz closed games over John Franco, and we fired Bobby V. But each april im infront of the tv, or internet, watching and listening to opening day thinking "It’s our year.’
Its what makes me a Met fan. Eternal optimism through pessimism. I love ’em to a fault.
That puts it so well: Eternal optimism through pessimism.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 28, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions
Um, absolutely not.
The Mets will probably frustrate me to no end this year and perhaps the next, but I’ll be loyal to them until the day I die.
I can
I see it as if we don’t make the playoffs then we might as well be the worst because then we get a better pick in the draft and I don’t think this team is going to be over .500 this year.
Um...
I’ve been that guy as a football fan. (The Jets winning their last game in 2007 against the Chiefs— and dropping 3-4 draft slots along with— made me punch my wall. Not as much as their picking Vernon Gholston over Jerod Mayo or a DB, but hey…) Even then, it didn’t feel so good. And it made a lot more sense in football than it does in baseball.
My main problem with rooting for the tank-job is… well… I really don’t think anymore that Omar’s the main organizational problem. And I really don’t trust the main organizational problem to fire itself… or dig out the next Epstein/Zduriencik.
by LeiterMilnerFasterStronger on Jan 28, 2010 5:04 PM EST reply actions
See I never really root for that in the NFL
mostly because I don’t think there’s much difference in talent usually and higher picks come with insane financial commitments. But anyway I don’t actually think they’ll go out and look for the next Zduriencik, I just think it’s more likely to happen with a major shock than it is if we permanently maintain status quo. I mean weren’t the mariners owners considered old fashion and purposely avoided stats before hiring Zduriencik?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
When I voted the vote count was 666
That should mean something right?
By the way there is no way, no matter how stupid the management is, that I could openly root against the Mets. Of course if this reign of terror continues I may stop caring-and I think that’s much worse.
Jerry and Omar assclowns for life
by Ghost of seven in a row on Jan 28, 2010 8:05 PM EST reply actions
I wanted them to lose all those games from when they were clearly out of it, so early August
I really wanted Bryce Harper. But even though I wanted them to lose to get the first pick, I couldn’t really root against them in any game. I guess it’s hard to explain, I want what’s best for the team, even if that means losing, but on a game to game basis, I root for them to win.
"Three home teams advance, and the fuckin' Jets" - Rex Ryan
Sometimes, you've got to hurt a lot more before you can heal
I’ve missed the party, but here’s my $.02. I can’t root against the Mets. I’ve invested too much in this team over the past 22 years to turn on them. Besides, that’s just not my style. I’ve stayed with this team during the days of the Worst Team Money Can Buy, I have been faithful as they dealt away prospects for middling veterans and gave absurd contracts to guys who weren’t worth the money. I’ve been with them through 100-loss seasons, and through playoff runs. And I am tired of seeing a team with such vast resources settling for “almost good enough to win it”, of aspiring to play “meaningful games in September”. I’m tired of the incompetence, of the lack of planning, of the mismanagement, of the astounding inability to leverage their advantages into any kind of sustained success. And if it takes another 90 losses for that to finally change, then so be it. It’s short-sighted to say that you’d rather see 5 83-79 seasons in a row than suffer one bad season that brings about the kind of sea change we need in this franchise. Because that kind of continuing mediocrity will not do anything more than give us a new manager and GM, and that’s not enough. There needs to be a complete overhaul of the Mets, and that can’t happen without us feeling some pain.
by BobbyV_Incognito on Jan 29, 2010 2:22 AM EST reply actions
I tried this with the Knicks
For years I wanted to root against them, for them to massively fail, for the whole organization to have to be ripped up from the top. But watching each individual games, I just couldn’t do it. Jamal Crawford game winners, that crazy tip in from Lee – I was super pumped about all of them. They’re my team. I can think it’s better for them to lose, but I just cannot root against them in a game. Same goes for the Mets.

by 




























