Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Roy Nelson Willing to Pay for His Next Opponent's Drug Test

Poll: Which was the best offseason 100,000,000 deal?

There have been three mega-money deals signed this offseason, and we've now had a few days to digest all of them.  

Carl Crawford - 7/142 - He was the youngest of the three big money signings (he turns 30 this year), but he plays the least demanding defensive position of the three.  His defense is a major plus, and he's as fast as anyone in the majors.

Jayson Werth - 7/126 - He's probably more well rounded than Crawford, but has never had the elite seasons that Crawford had the last two years.  He'll turn 32 early in the season.

Cliff Lee - 5/120 with a 27.5 million vesting option and a 12.5 million dollar buyout based on 200 IP in 2015 or 400 IP between 2014-2015 - He's the oldest of the three players (turns 33 in August), and is likely at the biggest risk of injury being a pitcher.  He's also on the shortest contract, but at the highest AAV.  The option isn't likely to vest if he's hurt at all in 2015, so there isn't much risk of him being unhealthy and on the hook for 27.5 million (ineffective is still possible).

As Mets fans, any one of these three could fill a long term need (albeit expensively), but Lee would likely fill the biggest void.  I want you to ignore that for the moment.  Assume positional need is currently equal for all three positions, and that we don't have any promising prospects that any of these guys are blocking.  Also assume that any of these three players would accept the same offer they signed for to join the Mets (I know...unrealistic at best), and that ownership is forcing you to make a splash by adding one of these guys before the season ticket renewal deadline.  Based solely on the players in question, their skillsets going forward and their likelihood of injury, which of the three would you sign to the deal they got this winter?  I'd also be very interested to see in the comments section how you rank all three of these mega-deals.

Poll
If you had to take on one of the 100 million dollar deals this offseason and had openings for any of these three, which would you take on?
Carl Crawford
73 votes
Jayson Werth
6 votes
Cliff Lee
67 votes

146 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.

Comment 48 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

although crawford is the youngest

Lee was brilliant last year and pretty much completes one of the best rotations I’ve ever seen. plus they aren’t stuck with him for seven years, like the other two contracts.

by JoeBighead on Dec 15, 2010 6:37 PM EST reply actions  

Carl Crawford will be younger at the expiration of his contract

Than Lee will be when his contract is up.

And it’s a lower AAV.

And he’s a position player.

by Brian Mangan on Dec 15, 2010 6:47 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

In a vacuum? Lee.

In context? Lee.

Werth is good but I doubt he’ll age well and I’m suspicious of Crawford as well. Lee’s the type of pitcher who should be very serviceable by the end date

by METSMETSMETS on Dec 15, 2010 6:52 PM EST reply actions  

I actually think Lee is the worst of the three

It’s essentially either 6/132.5 or 6/147.5 due to that vest. I just don’t like giving that type of money to a pticher. Werth and Crawford were a pretty close call for me, as Crawford is younger but I worry about his aging just due to his reliance on a high BABIP to get on base.

by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 15, 2010 6:59 PM EST up reply actions  

The contract is less than that though.

The $120M includes the buyout. So it’s actually 6/135 max.

by supermets on Dec 15, 2010 11:39 PM EST up reply actions  

None of these deals make much sense to me,

but the Werth deal is clearly insane, and Lee doesn’t have the raw stuff to hang on at a high level when the inevitable drop off comes. Crawford by default.

by Jack Str on Dec 15, 2010 7:12 PM EST reply actions  

I disagree

I think a pitcher like Lee will age well because he has excellent control and doesn’t rely on velocity of his fastball to get outs. I think that Lee can be like Maddux and still have success late in his career if he stays healthy. I think in 5 years from now Lee may be the only one of the three still playing at a high level. Maybe crawford can keep it up but that depends on his health and speed decline.

by Delgado on Dec 16, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Aging well is one thing. A "high level" is where we'll have to disagree.

Generally only HOF pitchers are still pitching at a high level by their late 30s. Given the nature of the beast, Crawford is the most likely to healthy and productive in six years. I think he’ll decline less than the other two.

Btw, I can see Lee as a middle of the rotation guy in six years, the same way that Maddux was towards the end, but to me that’s not the high level we were referring to. Fwiw, Doggie never pitched at a high level after his age 36 season.

by Jack Str on Dec 16, 2010 7:33 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd take Lee by a small margin. If he can avoid major injuries

I’ll take the soft tossing crafty left hander with good control in 2013-16. They usually are still productive barring injuries. I think Moyer or Mets Glavine are his floor.

Werth is easily the worst. I can’t see any scenario where he isn’t slightly above replacement level at the end.

Crawford will probably still be productive at the end. I just don’t like that so much of his game is tied to speed. Any decline or major leg injury and he’s a good corner OF glove who hits 280, doesn’t walk much and has a handful of homers.

by FrancoTAU on Dec 15, 2010 7:25 PM EST reply actions  

Franco, darned if I can find it, but on another thread we linked to studies

showing players whose speed is a big part of their game age as well if not better than other types of players. I know that’s not particularly helpful, but if your search skills are better than mine…

by Jack Str on Dec 15, 2010 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

The study can be found

Here. Once again, as Brooklyn pointed out the catcher aging curve is considerably different from any other position player, and when I emailed the guys at THT I was informed that catchers were indeed included in this study. Assuming that 99% of great catchers did not rely heavily on speed, that factor likely skewed the results some. With the difference being only 0.1 WAR per season, it’s reasonable to assume that gap would partially disappear when removing catchers from the data, as they tend to peak much earlier and skew the decline numbers when applied to only one of the two groups.

by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 15, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Ahem

I pointed out the catcher thing on AA. It was me. Mine. All mine. No credit to anyone else. Mine.

It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.

by MookieTheCat on Dec 15, 2010 9:58 PM EST up reply actions  

My bad

I guess I fail out for citing sources incorrectly

by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 15, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh, you don't fail.

By emailing them you answered the main question I had. You get extra credit, in fact, for using primary sources to prove or refute a hypothesis. And I feel good that someone actually read that post and thought about it.

It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.

by MookieTheCat on Dec 15, 2010 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Speaking of...

I’ve seen that study cited by a few people in the past few days, including more MSM guys. I was too lazy to register on those sites and bring up the question, but each time I wanted to ask them whether they had actually read and thought about the study before citing it. I think it makes some interesting points, and is certainly interesting food for thought, but I hope the Inside the Book guys post a second study tightening it up by doing things like excluding catchers, looking at varying levels of speed WAR as opposed to the 20 (was that the number?) speed runs created over five (once again ?) years. A professor once told me that the best judge of a study is the followup data it creates through further inquiry, and this is one that gets right into that. I just don’t like the way that a few people who get paid to write about sports have used it without really looking into its components.

It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.

by MookieTheCat on Dec 15, 2010 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I've avoided bringing it up not out of laziness, but because I'm just happy they are starting to look at statistical studies like these at all.

I’ll voice my concerns at BTB or Fangraphs, but I’d rather not point out flaws in some more advanced studies when the MSM is just starting to look at them at all.

by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 15, 2010 11:19 PM EST up reply actions  

I find it hard to disagree

But when MSM tries to co-opt something from the nerdy reaches of the universe, I thing nerddom should react and tell them what they might be missing.

It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.

by MookieTheCat on Dec 16, 2010 12:38 AM EST up reply actions  

Don't overdo it, though.

The data sets are small enough that by the time you slice them that finely you wind up with sample sizes too small to be of real use. The point of this study was to create useful information. The assumption challenged by the study, and by other work of Bill James was, ‘speed guys lose it earlier than other kinds of players.’ The studies made indicated that assumption was enormously likely to be false.

by Jack Str on Dec 16, 2010 4:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Thanks for the link.

Btw, jsut off the top of my head, Kendall was very fast his first five years, and so was Ivan. So was Biggio. It’s unusual for a young catcher to have speed, but it’s not rare.

by Jack Str on Dec 16, 2010 4:24 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, i've read that before too. It's just hard to completely accept it.

I buy it more with a guy with a more complete game like Beltran. The only exceptional thing about Crawford is his speed which drives his defense, base stealing and high BABIP. I also hate mega contracts for corner outfielders, perhaps the easiest position to fill.

The best comp I can think of is Kenny Lofton and he was still pretty good at 40. He just had wild swings in value from year to year because his game was all about speed. Kind of similar to Crawford. He’s swung from average to good back to average and than great the last 2 years.

Still, I think Lee is a mildly bad deal and Crawford only slightly worse. Werth is just an outright bad contract that is even worse considering a sub 500 team gave it to him.

by FrancoTAU on Dec 15, 2010 9:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I noticed a lot of holes in that study.

Primarily that it proves that guys who are not out of shape and not catchers tend to last longer. This is akin to those studies that prove things like the highly-disputed claim that overindulgence in alcohol can lead to the symptoms of a hangover such as a headache, nausea, and sensitivity to light and sound (this was, in fact, a real study published in a real scientific journal a number of years ago).

It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.

by MookieTheCat on Dec 15, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm.

I left out the factor of peak performance, which means a better chance of pushing a team to the postseason than more consistent, good seasons do. Guess I’ll switch my vote to Lee as being more likely to have a monster season or two that drives his team.

by Jack Str on Dec 15, 2010 8:13 PM EST reply actions  

Gonna have to vote Crawford, here.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Dec 15, 2010 11:29 PM EST reply actions  

Crawford.

He’s the youngest of the three and plays a position that his new team needed very much.

Save Jenrry Mejia!

by Ogre39666 on Dec 16, 2010 12:55 AM EST reply actions  

It just said "if you had openings"

not “needed” per say.

Save Jenrry Mejia!

by Ogre39666 on Dec 16, 2010 3:43 AM EST up reply actions  

read the paragraph above the poll

I voted for Lee but hadn’t yet read the rules (I admit.) I love the Lee deal for the Phillies, but forced to pick one of these for a Mets team that won’t peak so soon I suppose I’d choose Crawford.

by Pack Bringley on Dec 16, 2010 6:53 AM EST up reply actions  

Probably Crawford's

I could live with Lee’s contract.
Werth’s contract baffles me.

Carter, hand me my thinking grenades!

by meigs1414 on Dec 16, 2010 8:35 AM EST reply actions  

For the Mets? Lee

Every point of WAR from Lee would be added to the team. Also, the contract doesn’t become regrettable until the Mets have five starting pitchers better than Lee, which is unlikely to happen.

For Crawford or Werth, their addition to the Mets is only a marginal increase over who likely be starting at those positions in 2011, and in the future. Just looking at existing Mets outfielders and prospects, how much additional WAR would Crawford and Werth provide over the worst of a best three combination of Bay, Beltran, Pagan, Duda, Ceciliani, Puello and Vaughn over the life of these contracts? Probably less than Lee at any point in the contracts.

"The Mets are gonna be amazing!" - Casey Stengel

by Russ on Dec 16, 2010 9:35 AM EST reply actions  

We're meant to be dealing with this hypothetical rule, though:
Assume positional need is currently equal for all three positions

I guess you could interpret that a couple different ways, so the poll is probably somewhat wonky.

by Pack Bringley on Dec 16, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd still take Lee

There is no chance that five superior starting pitchers will be acquired over the lifetime of that contract. Crawford and Werth are borderline elite who I believe will regress during their contracts to the point where superior players will be available, but their contracts will not be movable.

"The Mets are gonna be amazing!" - Casey Stengel

by Russ on Dec 16, 2010 10:49 AM EST up reply actions  

this was my reasoning in voting for Lee, as well

Ultimately in almost any case besides top-5-in-baseball talent, I’ll take a reasonable 5-year contract over a reasonable 7-year one.

by anonymous on Dec 16, 2010 12:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Adrian Gonzalez is the best in my opinion.

Great D, amazing bat in PETCO that will continue to rape in Fenway…finally an answer to Teixeira.

"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell

by Rey-O on Dec 16, 2010 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

it's not official yet for luxury tax purposes, but its been agreed to

"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell

by Rey-O on Dec 17, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

it could be something ridiculous, thus making it the least best…

by JoeBighead on Dec 17, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I mean most outlets reported a 7 year 154 million dollar deal, that won't be signed until mid April

but I see your point.

"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell

by Rey-O on Dec 19, 2010 12:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Three reasons

1) Officially he hasn’t extended
2) He wasn’t a free agent
3) Even if he has a handshake agreement in place, we don’t know the details to reach a judgement

by Stephen Schmidt on Dec 17, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Crawford

he’s the youngest, and he’s also the one who’ll age the best

Formerly firejerrynow

by Aidan Gibson on Dec 17, 2010 11:28 PM EST reply actions  

Just me

but speed guys age pretty terribly. People love to say that lumbering power hitters age poorly, but not in today’s game with today’s techniques to stay in shape.

by Joshuah on Dec 19, 2010 5:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 2 (August, 2011)
Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011)
159714144_040c6c1501_small
The Greatest Bison: Frank Grant and the Color Line
Small
A WIN METHOD Analysis of the Current State of the Mets
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes

Recent FanPosts

Small
A projection of the rest of 2012 using two key stats
Small
Game Replays
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes
Small
Santana or Sabathia?
Small
Whats to be done with the 'Pen?
Small
What about Oswalt?
61atehunexl__sl500_aa300__small
This Week in Mets' Overreaction

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

At 5:30 PM EDT today Starting today at 5:00 PM EDT, witness one of the greatest renderings of visual sound effects ever!

UPDATE 1: My browser has crashed several times in the process from all the rants (FUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!) - as a result, there will instead be 4 or 5 separate installments of fxcarden's Nightly Rants! from 2011, with a similar pattern for the 2012 rants. Take my word for it, when I say that it's for the best. Here's the revised schedule:

Volume 1: 2011
No. 1: Today at 5:00 PM EDT
No. 2: Tomorrow
No. 3: Thursday
No. 4 and No. 5 (?) TBD

UPDATE 2: Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011) is now up!
beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeautiful colorization of Willie Mays' over-the-shoulder catch. Credit from Beyond the Box Score via Reddit. Embiggen at http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7071/7231074678_3faa94a82b_o.jpg
Frank Francisco is... The Most Interesting Closer In The World embiggen
2013 ALL-STAR GAME(TM) LOGO CONTEST

Major League Baseball has formally announced that Citi Field will be the site of the 2013 All-Star Game. (see video) In light of this, I have decided to launch an All-Star Game logo contest. To help get you started, I provided all of you with a sample All-Star Game logo. (click here to embiggen) If you wish to participate, please enter your submission with an image below, in the comments section. The contest ends on May 31st. I will choose a select number of finalists, and the community will vote on which of those logos is the best one.

Can you create a better logo than the sample logo provided? Then, give it a shot. Good luck to all participants!
Jon Rauch is awesome. Dan Tanna is, obviously, a fan of Greg Pomes.

Recent FanShots

What's Mike Baxter's Ceiling?
Francesa: Ike Has 'Jungle Fever'
Mets At The Quarter-Pole: Doing Things The Wright Way
WTF is up with all the larry lovefest
Corner IF Production: Will Up Go Down if Down Climbs Up?
Tell Me When It's Over: Ron Darling
Top Mets Prospects: Jenrry Mejia Makes Season Debut; Leathersich Dominates
Weekly SB Nation New York MLB Power Rankings

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 2 (August, 2011)
Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011)
159714144_040c6c1501_small
The Greatest Bison: Frank Grant and the Color Line
Small
A WIN METHOD Analysis of the Current State of the Mets
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes

Recent FanPosts

Small
A projection of the rest of 2012 using two key stats
Small
Game Replays
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes
Small
Santana or Sabathia?
Small
Whats to be done with the 'Pen?
Small
What about Oswalt?
61atehunexl__sl500_aa300__small
This Week in Mets' Overreaction

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro