Prospect Smackdown: Davis vs. Freeman vs. Morrison
With so much of the talk during ST revolving around rising stars, I thought the time was ripe for another Prospect Smackdown. And where better to focus than first base, with 3 teams in the NL East nearly ready to graduate young first base prospects, all of whom are big, athletic lefties with similar profiles, figuring to anchor their respective lineups for years to come. As usual, I'll try to be as impartial as possible here.

Prospect Smackdown: Ike Davis vs. Freddie Freeman vs. Logan Morrison
BACKGROUND & INTANGIBLES
Davis: The son of former Yankee reliever Ron Davis, Ike Davis was drafted 18th overall by the Mets back in 2008 and signed for $1.575M. This came after a decorated career at Arizona State which included Freshman of the Year, All-Pac 10 & All-American honors and an ASU Team MVP award over fellow Sun Devil Brett Wallace; he was also the first freshman to ever lead the illustrious Pac-10 in RBI's and served as a middle of the order presence (as well as closer) during two National Championship runs. Ike is known as a hard worker who exudes confidence and is driven to live up to his bloodlines.
Freeman: Frederick Freeman was a second round draftee (78th overall) by the Braves in 2007, signing for just over $400K. Freeman was a highly touted high school player out of SoCal, committing to college baseball powerhouse Cal State-Fullerton before being drafted. He dropped in the draft a bit due to concerns about an 'aloof' approach to the game. Much like Davis, Freeman was known to play at first and corner OF and even pitched out of the 'pen. Also like Davis, he is now well-regarded for his work ethic and drive.
Morrison: Logan Morrison was selected back in the 2005 draft by the Marlins in the (believe it or not) 22nd round (666th overall). However, the explanation is that Morrison, while a strong high school player out of Louisiana, was not particularly high on national draft boards. The Marlins selected him as part of the now defunct Draft-and Follow process and Morrison went on to star at Maplewood Community College (Albert's alma mater) then signed for $225K. Morrison is also known for his solid makeup and good work ethic and, like Davis, is an extremely confident player.
ADVANTAGE: You really can't go wrong here, they're all hard workers, praised for their good makeup. I guess you give a nod to the Marlins for saving a ton of dough by effectively utilizing the DFE process but as far as the players go this one has got to be even.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHYSICALITY & TOOLS
Davis: Ike is 6'4", 215lbs, a lefty thrower and hitter, born on March 22, 1987. His best tool is his raw power as witnessed in this recent ST slam; his smooth uppercut stroke (view below) affords him light-tower power. On the flipside, it can get long, leading to a lot of strikeouts and he doesn't often drive the ball to the opposite field. Davis' other plus tool is his arm strength; as the ASU closer Ike worked in the low 90's. He possesses a projectable frame but is thought of by scouts as more of a baseball player than a raw athlete due to his below average footspeed. Though needing more consistency, Davis is considered a natural at first with the potential for plus defense. Davis' only major injury came in '07 when he was forced to undergo wrist surgery to remove bone chips.
Freeman: Freeman is listed at 6'5", 220lbs (though Mike Newman, of the invaluable Scouting the Sally thinks more like 6'2"-6'3"). He's a lefty hitter and righty thrower and he was born on September 12, 1989. Freeman's best tool is his raw hitting ability. He possesses a superb mixture of contact, developing power and strong plate discipline which combined with his compact stroke (view below) leads to far fewer strikeouts than most power hitters. At 20, Freeman has a big frame with the potential for more strength as he matures, though he will never be mistaken for a speedster. Like Davis, he possesses a power arm, hitting 90+mph on the mound in HS. He is an average defender at first and while he's been mostly healthy, Freeman was slowed by a nagging wrist injury during the '09 season.
Morrison: Morrison is 6'4" (I've also seen 6'2"), 245lbs, a lefty thrower and hitter, born on August 25, 1987. Depending who you ask, Morrison's top tool is either his tremendous plate disciple, his potentially plus power or his excellent raw hitting ability. Though a little long, Morrison has a nice level, line drive cut (view below) which explains his tremendous 20% LD rate between '08-'09 (compared to 17% for Davis & 15% for Freeman) and allows him to drive the ball to all fields. What's more, Morrison accumulated nearly 20 more walks than strikeouts in '09, showcasing his superb on-base skills. Bulkier than the other two, Morrison is not known for his defensive range at first nor in the OF, though he also has a very strong arm and his hands have reportedly gotten a lot better since he was drafted. Morrison has been very healthy but was sidelined early in '09 after suffering a fracture in his wrist. Noticing a trend here?
ADVANTAGE: Davis is probably the best athlete and fielder of the bunch with the most raw power but Morrison has stronger pure hitting skills and far better plate discipline. Freeman is a mixture of both so I think he gets the nod here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PERFORMANCE & SKILLS
Davis: Ike started his pro career in '08 with a strange stint in the NY-Penn League where he went homerless in 215 ab's. He still drove the ball exceptionally well (18.5% LD rate vs. 17.3% in '09) but needed to get that FB rate up. Fortunately he did just that in '09 jumping from 34% flyballs in '08 to 43% in '09 which led to 19 hrs, while batting a robust .309 in his first taste of AA and following that with a stellar performance (.341/.394/.565) in the highly competitive AFL. On the negative side, he struck out 112 times which when coupled with only 61 walks gives cause to worry about his AVG and OBP as he moves up the ladder. Add in his poor platoon split for the trifecta (only .242/.301/.371 against lefties in '09) and suddenly there's cause for some concern.
Freeman: Freeman answered pre-draft concerns about his "energy for the game" by holding his own in the GCL at 17, then bursting onto the scene in full-season ball in '08. Freeman mashed 18 hr's while batting .316 and set the Rome Braves single season hits record. His '09 wasn't so explosive as mid-summer wrist problems sapped his power (.405 SLG vs .524 in '08) but he continued to cut his impressive strikeout total to only 60 vs. 37 walks. Freeman also improved his performance against lefties in '09, with a difference of just .003 points in his OPS splits. He will need to prove that it was mostly the wrist, not advanced competition, that slowed him in AA (as well as the AFL).
Morrison: After an uninspiring pro debut in '06, Morrison too burst into full-season baseball, blasting 23 homers in '07 and exhibiting the ability to drive the ball to all fields (view below). He followed with another impressive performance in '08 where he hit 13 hrs in the pitcher-friendly FSL and batted .332 with a very strong K:BB ratio. Last season, he improved even more in that regard posting a very impressive 63 walks to only 46 strikeouts. However, Morrison's power numbers took a step back in '09 as he slugged only .442 with 8 hrs. Many feel, like Freeman, he too was a victim of wrist woes however, some worry that his consistently low FB rates (33% career vs. Freeman's 38% and Davis' 40%) coupled with high GB rates point to a 15-20 hr hitter, not a 30+ hr stud. He too has had big problems with lefties to this point.
Advantage: You can't punish Freeman and Morrison who both had nagging injuries holding them back, but ultimately Davis put on a far more impressive overall performance in the ever important Double-A litmus test so I have to give him the edge here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROJECTION:
Davis: John Sickels (of the excellent SB Nation Minor League Ball Blog) called him "Lyle Overbay with an excellent glove." I suppose that's a pretty good middle ground comp, though I think that's shortchanging his power a bit. I'd say his absolute ceiling is a great fielder, very good power, lots of K's and low AVG, basically a Carlos Pena-lite type player. Worst case, he can't hit lefties at all and strikeouts kill him: Mike Jacobs.
Freeman: At age 20 you've got to figure he's got more room to develop. So to me, his ceiling is along the same trail that Joey Votto is blazing: 25-30 hrs, .300+ AVG, nearly .400 OBP, equal batting splits and solid defense at first. He'll have to work on taking some more walks but it could definitely happen. More pessimistic, his power stalls out and he's a lefty version of Conor Jackson.
Morrison: His bat looks real, his plate discipline is impressive, It all depends on how you view his power. He clearly drives the ball to all fields better than the other two but will that equate to homers or a lot of doubles in the left center gap? If he develops like Marlins fans think, his ceiling looks a lot like Justin Morneau however, if you're more worried about those low FB rates (as I am) his ceiling is more like an 18-24hr guy in the majors who hits for excellent average, think Sean Casey. If the HR power of '07 doesn't ever reappear, then think James Loney.
Advantage: This really depends what you're looking for: Davis seems to be closest to reaching his potential which eliminates some risk however, he definitely has the biggest flaws. I'd say Morrison's underlying skills are a pretty sure thing to translate in the long run while Freeman's realistic ceiling is higher. If all goes right for Morrison he may challenge that idea but to me Freeman's greater plausability for improvement due to age clinches it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY:
| 2009 Cumulative Stats | AVG | OPS | HR | K:BB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis (A+/AA) | .299 | .905 | 19 | 109:56 |
| Freeman (A+/AA) | .278 | .766 | 8 | 59:37 |
| Morrison (AA) | .277 | .813 | 8 | 46:63 |
Let's go to the Prospect Rankings: In their most recent Top 100 BA sees Morrison ahead at #20, Freeman at #32 and Ike at #62. Though all are ranked at 65 on the 20-80 scouting scale.
Prospect Guru John Sickels rates Morrison as a B+ and attributes the power slippage to his injury. Ditto Freddie Freeman but he raises development concerns. He gives Ike a B but says he sees more "solid regular than future star".
BP/Kevin Goldstein's Future Shock list interestingly places Morrison and Freeman at #51 and #52 respectively, Davis at #87.
If I'm starting an organization today and I need to pick a cornerstone first baseman, I take Freddie Freeman. And my main determining factor is age. They've all put up impressive performances at a high level, each exhibits differing yet very valuable skills and it's very interesting all of the similarities linking the three. But the biggest variation to me is the fact that Freeman has 2 more years to develop beyond Davis and Morrison yet he is already at or near their same levels of performance. Next I'd probably take Morrison for his superior raw hitting skills but IMO Davis' seemingly large defensive advantage as well as the fact that currently he looks closer to being major league-ready makes this much closer than the above rankings portray. The funny thing is that this comparison is close enough that any of these guys could easily end up as the best or worst of the three. However it shakes out, it should be a lot of fun to watch these three guys graduate into the NL East in the next year or so.
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
25 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great article, I picked Freeman as well.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
Same here, with Freeman.
I tend to prefer players who are more overall complete, even if there are other guys who might show more power (ie, Davis), or more technical prowess with the bat (ie, Morrison).
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Mar 13, 2010 2:29 PM EST reply actions
I'm definitely the minority here, but I prefer Morrison
I’d also take Davis over Freeman. Freeman had a fantastic 2008, but his 2007 and 2009 (even prior to the wrist injury) don’t really fall in line with that season. Freeman strikes out the least, but he also has the lowest walk rate of the bunch. Right now he seems like the guy that’s all tools and projection, and his value is largely tied to his power continuing to develop (which I think makes him the riskiest of the bunch). I really wonder if Atlanta pushing him is going to stunt his development by rushing him, much like I think Fernando would have benefitted from a little slower path through the minors.
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 13, 2010 3:11 PM EST reply actions
Is anyone else having trouble viewing sbn blogs in firefox?
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
it's like the formatting broke
it’s just a big jumble on the side of links and blue. I was viewing it on the newest firefox so I don’t know if that’s part of the problem. I’m having no issues on chrome right now.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
I was having problems earlier, like 8:00 or so, but it went away
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Mar 13, 2010 11:43 PM EST up reply actions
Can't see taking Freeman
I just don’t see the upside some are seeing in Freeman. I don’t think he’ll ever have much power. He’s only 20, but Ike at that age was more accomplished. And seeing him this spring, it just doesn’t look so far that he’s adding the power some are hoping for.
The main thing is, physically, rather than a lean projectible 6’ 5", he looks more a rather unathletic 6’ 2", with physical projection and upside more similar to Stefan Welch than to Ike Davis. He does have some good contact ability, but he really doesn’t look like a top 100 guy to me, I think he’s been over rated. I’d probably take Lars Anderson over him.
A clip of freeman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1Fcizm1vis
You can see Freeman there standing alongside Cardinal catching prospect Bryan Anderson, who is listed at 6’ 1".
by acerimusdux on Mar 14, 2010 12:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I really think that 1st base prospects in general are being overrated.
Just looking at FanGraphs top 50, there were 8 first basemen included and two more just outside of it (and those numbers don’t include guys like Alvarez and Ackley that may have to end up there).
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 14, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions
I think maybe it might have to do with their floors?
Like at the very worse most of them will end up being league average to above average first basemen or dh’s.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Possibly.
I think they are just “safer” guys to add to prospect lists. So many of the more important defensive positions tend to develop their bats later than most of the guys already penciled in at 1st. I don’t know that even the majority of those 10 guys will end up being average 1st basemen, but their current batting numbers just make it easier to justify a miss and still have people take their lists seriously several years down the line. In that way I kind of like BA, who doesn’t seem to mind taking a flier on a guy with no production who has the tools to be an elite player at a more demanding position.
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 14, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
yes
what it shows is that despite all of our projection systems, tools ratings, advanced scouting insight, etc ultimately, most people still heavily rely on the #’s to make their predictions. and of all the offensive positions, first basemen are the ones who put up the most, at virtually every level of organized baseball.
by Rob Castellano on Mar 14, 2010 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Montero/Wallace/Hosmer
Fangraphs isn’t the sine qua non of prospecting at this stage, but it does add to the collection of voices.
In their top 50 you mention 8 1Bs. Montero really isn’t a 1B. he hasn’t played a game there yet. He is a catcher for now but most likely a DH. wallace is a 3b who has such a huge lower body that he is destined for 1B. Hosmer had a terrible year and shouldn’t be top 50 at this stage.
Moving on, Carter has been tried at 3b, outfield, everywhere. he isn’t a great 1B and may end up as a DH as well.
Morrison relly had an interesting year as far as his batting eye and k/bb rates. He may not be a huge power hitter but I like him. I think Freeman is mostly age relative to league for now and am not sure about his power ceiling. Ike definitely has more power potential in my mind than tghose 2, if not the batting average potential.
This is a big year for Ike and the Mets’ prospects in general. So many will be knocking on the door later this year and next year: Martinez, Ike, Mejia, Tejada, Havens, Captain Kirk, maybe Holt gets his act together, and back just a ways Familia and Allen.
Holt is an interesting guy
He was tearing up St. Lucie, and looked good in his first Bingo start. Right after that he sprained his ankle and struggled with his control when he returned. I think too many guys evaluating his performance discount the effect that ankle injury likely had. I think too many people think he struggled with the promotion to AA, and don’t take that injury into account at all.
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 15, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Should have said
gets his act back together. He was on BA’s top prospect list mid-season.
I also forgot to mention Thole in my list of guys to get excited about. Nice winter league for him.
Thole is a guy I'm not worried about at all.
He should be fine defensively as long as he gets repetitions, and I think Omar actually planned well for that this year. I think there will be alot of excitement about the Mets in 2011, with a real possibility of Thole, Davis, Fernando, Tejada, Niese, and Mejia all having major roles on the team right out of spring training (which would also free up some serious cash for a run at Brandon Webb).
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 15, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions
We already have ~$120 million guarenteed for next year
So we’re a little strapped on cash next season.
Maybe
I wouldn’t be surprised to see the payroll jump back to 2009 levels (espescially if the economy continues to rebound), which would leave a decent amount to spend without having a ton of holes. Maine and Francoeur could realistically be DFA’d or traded, and Pedro may be off the books as well. I could see them making a big offer to a pitcher while just offering them a slightly smaller year one salary (ala Bay).
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 16, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
The 2009 levels are a bit misleading
I believe they include Sheffield’s $14 million contract, so that $149 million is more like $135 million. Assuming we make one big signing (maybe Lee?) or even add a guy for $8 million next year we’re right back at that level.
According to Cots, we paid about 140 million last year.
Here. That doesn’t take into account what we saved on Wags, but that is about all that is missing. I don’t think we’d be after a Lee type (huge contract pitcher), but I think we could be going after a guy like Webb/Vazquez type and still have room to fill out the bench and bullpen. Assuming Davis, Thole, Niese,vand Fernando are ready, that really doesn’t leave any major roles other than a starter that need filling.
Pinella: Where th f*ck was that pitch at?
Ump: Lou, don't you know that you're not supposed to end a sentence with a preposition?
Pinella: Where the f*ck was that pitch at, a$$h*le?
by Stephen Schmidt on Mar 16, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
I imagine if Webb comes back strong
he’d fall into the huge contract pitcher area too. I’d also be surprised if the Yankees didn’t resign Vazquez if he wasn’t commanding a huge amount of money, plus I’m not sure how good of a fit Vazquez is unless we’re expecting our defense to make massive leaps and bounds considering his often noted struggles pitching from the stretch/how he falls apart after a few unlucky breaks in an inning.
"We have a plan, and our plan, I like our plan'
it's Omar's world, we're just livin in it.
Give me Morrison
Obviously there is a Mets biased looking at that poll. I’ll take Morrison though. Better hitter than Davis. Morrison also has more power than he showed last year coming off an injury.

by 





























