Mets Journal: 4/21
I am reading the Amazin' Avenue Annual 2010 and I must say, I am pretty impressed. It is well-organized, well-written, and well-conceived. Even Matt "Ellipsis" Cerrone contributed a sensible, if vague, article. Seeing this work makes me want to be part of the Mets blogosphere once again, but I'm not sure I can do it.
The Ike Davis era has begun, and fans are bound for disappointment, as Davis will probably not be a premium first baseman or corner outfielder unless he stops prematurely dropping his hands and thus develops more consistent line drive and home run potential. We'll see a lot of pop-ups and lunges until then. Still, he is superior right now to Mike Jacobs and Mike Hessman, and probably Chris Carter too. Daniel Murphy, the other option at first base, might be able to outperform Davis but is better suited as a four-corners utilityman. Nick Evans probably belongs on the major league bench, but shouldn't be a starting first baseman.
Murphy and Evans are the kinds of players the Mets just don't understand. They provide cheap value, but they have to be used correctly. They shouldn't be counted on as regular starters and aren't worth much as trade bait. They are kind of home-grown players that should be filling out the Mets' bench at a low price instead of relatively high-priced free agent/washout acquisitions like Tatis, Cora, and Matthews.
I was very surprised at Luis Castillo's performance last year, with a .387 OBP and 20 steals. I didn't think that Slappy was able to do anything but decline miserably. Unfortunately, he is still doing that on defense; he is a defensive specialist who can't field anymore. Major league baseball teams have a hard time defending their use of all-field, no-hit infielders, but when it's no-field, no-hit, it's really not worth it. If Castillo could put up a SLG of .400, with a .360 OBP, his sub par defense might be playable. Instead, he lives almost entirely on singles and walks, and not many of those singles are the infield hits he enjoyed earlier in his career. Castillo has some speed left and is a smart baserunner, but his usefulness as a starter is long gone. This is why it is so frustrating that the Mets, who clearly recognize this, failed to sign Orlando Hudson or Felipe Lopez after they couldn't find a taker for Castillo's stupid contract (which, by the way, I predicted before it happened.) It's quite sad that the Mets are sticking a .350 slugging percentage in the 2-hole every day when statistical analysis shows that it is not patience at the plate or contact ability that is most important for that spot, but slugging percentage.
Frank Catalanotto: the Mets could do a lot, lot worse. They have in the past, and they will in the future. Franky the Cat is nothing special for a pinch hitter, of course, but at least he's not Julio Franco. It should go without saying, also, that Catalanotto should not be hitting cleanup.
Speaking of Jerry Manuel being a bad manager, he should really chill it with the relief pitchers. And yes, of course, Jenrry Mejia should be starting games in AA, or at least AAA. And if he has to be on the big club, he should still be starting. I would give him John Maine's spot, because his arm looks dead and I'm still hoping that Oliver Perez has something left.
That makes me kind of like Omar Minaya. In my general post about the fallacies of Mets management strategy, I got some great comments. The best point was that Minaya sometimes acquires adequate personnel but grows attached to them; or, he makes a good gamble and loses but instead of moving on he keeps trying to extract value from the same ghostly, sunk cost player. Minaya should understand that General Managers gamble and lose all the time, but they make up for this by other gambles, by being flexible and fluid with their player acquisitions. But, Omar is not that kind of GM; he's the kind who says, "OK, he's nine out of ten against this guy. Am I going to get that nine out of ten or that one out of ten?" (Quotation courtesy of Derek Carty, writing in the Annual.)
Finally, if the Mets are close (5 games) to the division lead in July (I doubt it, but it's totally possible), they should seriously consider trading Fernando Martinez.
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'm not for trading Fernando Martinez yet.
I really don’t think Frenchy will be able to sustain his production over the year. If anything, Frenchy should be the one we trade. He seems to be falling back into his old habits and if we can trade him while he still has value that would be ideal.
by aparkermarshall on Apr 21, 2010 4:36 PM EDT reply actions
I second this motion.
We are too right handed as currently constructed.
I'm afraid F-Mart will lose his trade value rather quickly.
But I agree, Francoeur is the one who should be replaced. The Mets will not do it, though.
by JohnPeterson on Apr 21, 2010 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Francouer has hit a slump but not in old habits
his old habit was striking out, he only has 6 Ks this season in 57 AB , 65 PA. 1K/10.83PA
Wright 18K in 50AB/69PA 1/3.83
Bay 22 in 54/63 1/2.86
Reyes 10 in 50/52 1/5.2
GMJ 13 in 28/32 1/2.46
by Rickfansince76 on Apr 22, 2010 7:44 AM EDT up reply actions
He's also been swinging at just about everything the last few games.
Seeing 8 pitches in 4 AB is a lot like old Frenchy, even without the Ks.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on Apr 22, 2010 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Can we trade F-Mart for Chris Iannetta?
The Rockies Wilin Rosario should be ready for a July call up.
The rockies already have a loaded outfield
not sure they’d give up much for F!
by KeithsMoustache on Apr 21, 2010 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions
If the Mets are close by the trade deadline,
there simply isn’t a piece that would be able to close a five game gap within half a season unless we’re getting Pujols or Mauer and that’s far from a certainity. Basically, I see trading Fernando as we lose a prospect in order to sllightly increase our fleeting chance to make the playoffs, then we miss the playoffs, and when Fernando finally is a free agent we will sign him to a roughly market rate contract. Or Jason Bay part deux.
Yea, I guess I should have said, "Mets fans should prepare for the possibility of an F-Mart trade,"
especially because the Mets seem satisfied with Swingcoeur and have floated the possibility of an extention. It’s partly just me being contrarian, but I do think there are many trades in which F-Mart could return significant value.
by JohnPeterson on Apr 21, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions
or Scott Kazmir part deux
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
by firejerrynow on Apr 21, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions
None
I want to have the problem of having too many young and talented players and not enough positions on the team for them to fill. I’m tired of having to pay mediocre players more than they’re worth because we have no other options. The future of MLB is clearly young and cheap talent that you can control for multiple years. Unless they change the salary rules, there’s no future for teams to be run like the Mets currently are.

by 































