Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Will Never Top Michael Jordan

Mythical Met Mistakes: Scott Kazmir

Watching the Angels starting pitcher get rocked by the Red Sox on the MLB Network last night, I couldn't help but think that it's time to debunk one of the biggest myths and rants about the Mets organization:

How could the Mets trade away a "stud" like Scott Kazmir?

Simply put, I've been saying from day one that Kazmir is one of the most over-hyped Mets farmhands EVER. And the "career" he has had so far is EXACTLY what I thought his best-case scenario was - an oft-injured, what-if pitcher. I'm not a professional major league scout nor talent evaluator, but I think it's fairly logical that a petite lefty fresh out of high school that throws close to one hundred miles an hour has a definite "shelf life" to perform at that level. A Met writer "in the know" told me during the height of the Kazmir frenzy that he was the second-coming of Sandy Koufax or Billy Wagner. I countered that the Mets would be lucky if he ever became Mike Hampton. Your honor, I rest my case.

On July 30, 2004 - the day Kazmir was traded to the Rays - I told every Met fan who would listen what a great job the Mets organization did in getting a quality return for him. Of course, I was laughed at by all. To remind everyone, at the time of the trade Bartolome Fortunato was a fireballing bullpen stud who was on the mend from surgery. And I took the former Mets pitching coach at his word that he needed less than an hour to "fix" Victor Zambrano. None of us could know that the physical condition of both pitchers - since the Rays LIED about them. Major League Baseball reacted immediatlely after the trade by changing the medical disclosure rules between clubs - call it the "Zambrano/Fortunato" rule if you'd like. The reality is that on paper, the trade was solid, despite what any "scribe" or "fan" thought then - and now.

So here we are eight baseball seasons after Kazmir's high school graduation, and his meteoric rise to the Major League level in less than two years. As of today, his 59 major league wins put him 11 games over .500 in his big league career. He's pitched 896 innings, striking out 922 and walking just 408. Yes, he's had flashes of brilliance - but he's also had extended stints on the DL with shoulder and elbow problems. Not hard to figure out for a player "listed" as six feet tall and 175 pounds. Until they attach a bionic implant below where his left shoulder currently is - I think it's safe to say we've seen his best.

I was in attendance at Kazmir's first professional game in Coney Island, and his career could have possibly ended that night. After uncorking a wild pitch, he strolled towards the plate and cluelessy "hung around" as the catcher attempted to come up with the ball near the backstop. Meanwhile, a baserunner flew down down the line - spikes glistening in the fading sunlight. When asked after the game what he was doing anywhere near home plate, Kazmir mumbled a comment of never having had a runner on third base to that point of his career. It was that moment that when I realized he was a "thrower" and that becoming a "pitcher" was still ahead of him. I can only surmise that Mr. Peterson and the pitching instructors employed by the Mets came to that same conclusion, and decided that the his lack of physical assets coupled with his limited baseball smarts made him expendable.

The perception that things would have been different had he not been traded to the Rays - and instead been holding down a spot every five days in the Mets rotation all these years is baseless. Perhaps that theory held true for Nolan Ryan, who also was a hard-throwing Mets farmhand. Arguably, the Mets gave up on Ryan too early when they traded him to the Angels for veteran Jim Fregosi. Comparing Ryan to Kazmir now is a pipe dream.

The reality of Scott Kazmir is that he is a 10 win, 150 inning lefty who strikes more batters than gives up hits. The Mets have a guy JUST LIKE THAT on their roster right now. His name is Oliver Perez, and you can look it up.

Poll
When their careers are over, who will have won more big league games?
Scott Kazmirr
36 votes
Oliver Perez
6 votes
Jonathon Niese
84 votes
Mike Hampton
40 votes

166 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.

Comment 85 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It was Victor Zambrano, not Carlos Zambrano.

And, yeah, it was still a terrible trade in both process and result.

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 3:29 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

yeah, there's no need to keep reading at the point someone uses W-L as a serious argument

I keep wanting to vote in the poll, and then noticing what the question actually is, and thinking “no way am I dignifying that ridiculous question with an answer.”

by anonymous on May 7, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but if you stopped reading that early

you would have missed this gem of a closer:

The Mets have a guy JUST LIKE THAT on their roster right now. His name is Oliver Perez, and you can look it up.

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

you mean Frank Francisco isn't better than Zack Greinke?

Color me shocked!

"It’s just everytime we think the bar can’t get lower, they lower it. Now next year we’ll just be happy to hear that rogue shirtless officials aren’t implementing useless detrimental drills in spring training for no apparent reason."

-Gina, 3/1/10

by Greenpoint Ian on May 9, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

So,

… from what I can gather … … … Scott Kazmirrrrr = Oliver Perez = Sandy Koufax …
And they Rays lied, cause they said they were going to send Carlos Zambrano, but they sent Victor Zambrano …

In lobby campaign for Chris Carter.

by Michkin on May 7, 2010 3:35 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a bad trade,

regardless of how Kazmir turned out, which has been better than Oliver Perez.

Give me a fly post and I'm all in it.

by Brian. on May 7, 2010 3:39 PM EDT reply actions  

and cheaper

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 5:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

to put it in perspective a 10-12 win per year lefty in our rotation

would have likely put us in the playoffs in 2007 and 2008. There is no arguing that he is injury prone. However since his arrival on the ML scene, he has posted a WAR over 5 once, over 3 twice, and over 2 twice. Victor Zambrano on the other hand pitched about a year worth of mediocre to bad baseball for the Mets before flaming out entirely and never making it back to the Majors. Fortunato spent the entire year after the trade on the DL with a herniated disc. How is this not an awful trade?

by KeithsMoustache on May 7, 2010 3:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Or to look at it from the process angle

We traded our top pitching prospect, a hard-throwing 20-year-old lefty, for an almost 29-year-old converted infielder with significant control issues, and an almost 30-year-old converted outfielder who was a career minor leaguer.

Who in the hell makes that deal?

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Someone in Met management.

I used to think it was Duquette’s idea, but it’s been mentioned here that other voices overruled Jim & decided to trade Kazmir.

Give me a fly post and I'm all in it.

by Brian. on May 7, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

didn't Franco and Leiter

tell management to get rid of kazmir?

by wobatus on May 8, 2010 9:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's what I thought as well.

Predictably, they both denied it but I’d love to hear Duquette really explain as to what the thought process was in making that trade.

There may be sunny days ahead.

by Brian. on May 10, 2010 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jim Duquette

Props to Omar, because I don’t think he would make this kind of deal. He seems to be fairly protective of the “true” prospects in the system, the Martinezes, the Pelfreys (at the time)…

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whenever I think back on that trade,

I come to one conclusion. Though it would be nice to have Kazmir, better losing him then Wright or Reyes. Remember the Wright/Jose Cruz Jr rumors?

"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS

by nrmax88 on May 7, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Terrible then, terrible now

Others covered it in the above comments already.

by James Kannengieser on May 7, 2010 3:46 PM EDT reply actions  

It was a bad move whether or not you use 20-20 hindsight or not:

Kazmir may not be the superace we all thought he could be (he still has time, however), but Kazmir has more accomplishments thus far than Victor Zambrano and Bartolome Fortunado had with us.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

Whatever happened to Aaron Small?

Why don’t we have him on our team? All he does is go out and get wins.

Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.

by Bobby Baseball on May 7, 2010 3:52 PM EDT reply actions  

for a minute I thought you mean Aaron Sele

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 5:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

this post could not possibly be less convincing if you tried
I countered that the Mets would be lucky if he ever became Mike Hampton. Your honor, I rest my case.

Baseballprojection.com WAR has Kazmir about 2 wins short of Hampton’s career total right now. He’s likely to have compiled a better career than Hampton by the end of 2010, and he’s not exactly retiring at that point. And Hampton was probably better than you think, too.

by anonymous on May 7, 2010 3:54 PM EDT reply actions  

true

If you take out batting WAR, Kazmir is already far better than Hampton’s entire career.

by anonymous on May 7, 2010 5:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

ack, no, it's false

Never mind, I was only comparing their pitching WAR initially.

by anonymous on May 7, 2010 5:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

You know what was another Mythical Mistake?

Trading Nolan Ryan. One World Series ring with the Mets. How many did he win after he left?

Your honor, I etc etc etc.

by Lunkwill Fook on May 7, 2010 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

He was a "thrower", too.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nolan Ryan was not going to be successful with the Mets

I think he was one of those classic “change of scenery” guys. He wasn’t happy in New York, so it even thought I would have loved to keep him, I can understand where management was coming from. Specially when you still have Seaver and Koosman and Matlack in the rotation.

Consequently, I don’t think anyone is saying Kazmir is Nolan Ryan; just that in retrospect, had both of these guys been with the club for another year or two or three after we traded them, we’d probably have a WS title. I think the Mets would have easily locked up 06 and been favorites in 07 with Scotty Kaz in the rotation. I really don’t care if he fell off the face of the earth in after a world series title to be quite honest.

Although its worth noting that one of the biggest reasons I remember for trading Kazmir was his violent delivery that Petersen guaranteed would lead to injuries later in his career; he was right.

"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell

by Rey-O on May 7, 2010 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

i think the mets would have broken him

more than he’s already broked.

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 7, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Simply put

the Mets traded someone deemed valuable within the sport and around the league and received a return of players that no one considered worth anything.

Even if they had some secret way of knowing that Petereson would fix Zambrano and that the reliever would become Dibble, they should have still asked for more. The value they gave up in the market place was much more than they received in return. How the players turned out in many ways is not relevent.

by Bruce Wayne on May 7, 2010 7:33 PM EDT reply actions  

but hindsight actually makes the case stronger!

In this case, it’s pretty obvious in retrospect — just as it was to many at the time — that the Mets’ evaluation of the players on both sides of the deal was totally wrong. Even allowing for the vagaries of prediction, Kazmir’s perceived value at the time was not far off his future performance — he’s been a very valuable pitcher, though not Sandy Koufax — and Zambrano’s perceived value(lessness) by everyone except the 5-minute-fix crowd was about right, too.

by anonymous on May 7, 2010 7:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hear you

The point I was making was that in my opinion hindsight is irrelevent. In 2000, if someone could have seen the future and wanted to buy stock in Apple, they should not have paid double the asking price at the time, they should have just bought the stock at the market price in 2000, not paid double just because they secretly knew it would go beyond that.

by Bruce Wayne on May 7, 2010 8:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with the mythical mistake premise

Sure the Mets could have gotten more in return. But Scott Kazmir wasn’t a ‘has been’ , he was a ‘NEVER WAS’. period end of this ridiculous over-hyped prospect story.

by rcnt123 on May 7, 2010 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

But he's still been far better than either of the bums we traded him for.

To rehash the points everyone else has already made above, this was a terrible trade for us. The fact that Kazmir was over-hyped as a prospect doesn’t do anything to lessen the damage done to this franchise by trading him for so little.

May you be locked in a battle of wits against Jerry Manuel.

by BobbyV_Incognito on May 7, 2010 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

um what?

so no one should care if the mets trade f-mart or captain kirk for a bag of balls. or if washington trades strasburg for a reliever? Prospects have a lot of value in MLB today with so many teams unable to afford FA’s.

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 7, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean just for example

there’s no way i can believe Amount is any better of a prospect, but he landed the Mariners Cliff Lee.

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 7, 2010 11:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amount?

Hilarious Freudian slip or just a regular misspelling?

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez

by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 8, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

regular mispelling

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 8, 2010 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

17.5 WAR in 5 years

That’s pretty damn good, especially when only two of those years he made over 30 starts. He strikes out a batter an inning, a career FIP under 4, he’s a very good pitcher.

by Evan_S on May 8, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

So no one ever reached third base against him

That indicates how dominant he was at his level. That doesn’t mean he’s a thrower

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 5:56 AM EDT reply actions  

Assuming the Mets made all the moves they did, but kept Kazmir, and didn't put Perez in the rotation

His 2007 season, of 5.3 WAR would’ve got us into the playoffs. If you replace Perez with Kazmir, the Mets still make the playoffs by 2 games. In 2008, Kazmir was .8 WAR ahead of Perez. That probably would’ve been enough to get the wild card. IN 2009, Kazmir was 3 WAR ahead of Perez, and this year in 2010, Perez is better than Kazmir, though it’s early to tell.

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 6:01 AM EDT reply actions  

His 2005 performance might have changed the season a bit, also.

We were only a bunch of games out of first.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 8, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

he was

he was 2.1 WAR, or something, which is good, but Kazmir was awesome in 2007

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

it's still a bad trade

It just hasn’t reached Jeff Bagwell-for-Larry Andersen levels of the worst in the history of baseball because Kazmir might actually be cooked at this point. Still, he gave TB several very good seasons (including one in which they went to the World Series) and Zambrano gave us one medicore season.

It’s a bad, bad trade, but just not quite as bad as we might have once thought.

"It’s just everytime we think the bar can’t get lower, they lower it. Now next year we’ll just be happy to hear that rogue shirtless officials aren’t implementing useless detrimental drills in spring training for no apparent reason."

-Gina, 3/1/10

by Greenpoint Ian on May 8, 2010 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Trades

The thing about trades is that there is no single proper way to evaluate them. Evaluating them only after the fact ignores one very important aspect: opportunity costs. A prospect is an asset, something with a definite value. What made the trade so terrible was that the going rate for Victor Zambrano, a 30-year-old pitcher with terrible command and recent arm troubles, was nowhere near Scott Kazmir. It might have been Joselo Diaz and Bartolome Fortunato, the throw-ins included in the trade. To suggest that Zambrano and Kazmir were equivalent values at the time was simply laughable. If nothing else, the trade was a misappropriation of valuable organizational resources.

And of course, it’s ridiculous to suggest that Kazmir has been a bust as it is, even if he hasn’t been quite as good as people thought in 2003.

by Alex Nelson on May 8, 2010 5:08 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Exactly the point I was trying to make earlier

the definition of an opportunity cost is the value of the next best opportunity forgone by making a choice. In the Mets case, the opp. cost was actually not the next best, but the better choices.

by Bruce Wayne on May 8, 2010 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

total excellent point

whats crazy is in after the fact, valuing this trade makes it nothing but a disaster for the mets anyway. a quick glance at fan grpahs shows that kazmir was worth something like 69 million dollars the last 5 seasons. he signed an extension in 08 but the first three years were pre-arbitration and he was barely paid a million bucks. his first year of arbitration he made under 4 million.

just considering the 3 season from 05-07 the rays got 49 million dollars of value and paid him under 2 million dollars. meanwhile the mets paid victor zambrano about 5 million bucks and got 5 million dollars worth of value. even being conservative in estimations, the mets basically subsidized the rays to the tune of 40 millions dollars. i know there is risk and uncertainty that needs to be factored in, but no matter how you slice it, the trade was an embarrassment for the mets.

think of these players and their contract like ay other revenue producing asset. if you were in charge of valuating pharmaceutical patents or office buildings and then traded assets with a rival company and those assets then produced results like those above, you would most likely be fired very quickly and probably also laughed at.

kazmir may not end up in the hall of fame, but this trade was pathetic on so many levels.

HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.

by kendynamo on May 10, 2010 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are correct that Kazmir had a bad game the other night...its too bad that it's the only thing in this post you were correct about.

He’s got a career 3.90 FIP in the AL East (and not as a member of the Skanks or Sux, so he gets to regularly face both of them). That’s not exactly a bust…it’s actually exactly the opposite. Compare that to Victor Zambrano and his less than solid 4.95 career FIP (and he was over 5 when the Mets traded for him). It didn’t look good on paper at the time, and it really doesn’t look good now.

Secondly, I wouldn’t exactly call him injury prone. He’s had 3 seasons in his career where he missed any starts, and hasn’t made less than 24 since he was a full time big leaguer. He’s had a few injuries the last few season, but nothing serious and he’s still been very effective when he’s pitched (4.37 and 4.26 FIP’s).

I realize that he had a bad game the other night, but frankly that doesn’t make this argument any better than it was in 2004 (when it was still a weak argument). As has already been pointed out a few times, I’d stay away from using winzzz as the basis of your arguments in the future and actually look up some stats (which in this case all make your argument appear to be completely wrong)

Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...

by Stephen Schmidt on May 8, 2010 6:24 PM EDT reply actions  

ARGh...

I am so MAd! Kazmir… totAlly killed my FANTASY team this wEek1

by gbaked on May 8, 2010 10:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I voted Mike Hampton

Mike Hampton by the way is the shortest of the guys you mentioned, and was certainly worth more than Billy Wagner.

But, yeah, it was real smart of the Mets front office to get something for Kazmir while they could, rather than wait until he declined a bit and they had to settle for something like, oh, Sean Rodriguez.

Not.

by acerimusdux on May 9, 2010 8:33 PM EDT reply actions  

It would have really sucked to have Kazmir in 2007

Instead of nobody.

Nothing can get by him; especially in a small room: Mike Francessa

by GenJackRipper on May 10, 2010 4:17 AM EDT reply actions  

We had Brian Lawrence. WTF do you need anyone else for when you got Brian Lawrence?

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 10, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

True.

When you have Brian Lawrence, you know you’re saving money because you’re not traveling in the post-season. If we’d have had Kazmir, we would have had to make all those reservations.

May you be locked in a battle of wits against Jerry Manuel.

by BobbyV_Incognito on May 10, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

your arguement sucks, it doesn't make sense

you say the trade was good because Niese is better and compare him to Perez. He was traded for Perez he wa straded for 2 guys who did nothing for us. Victor Zambrano was injured after only a few appearances for us and Fortunato I think was gone the next season. Kazmir is a better player than those 2, he could have brought back a better return for his trade.

Kazmir trade was one of the worst prospect trades of the Mets history, we got nothing for someone who was a top prospect. Perez, Niese and hampton have nothing to do with thetrade.

by Rickfansince76 on May 10, 2010 7:29 AM EDT reply actions  

The Rays didn't lie
None of us could know that the physical condition of both pitchers – since the Rays LIED about them. Major League Baseball reacted immediatlely after the trade by changing the medical disclosure rules between clubs – call it the “Zambrano/Fortunato” rule if you’d like.

The mets admitted afterwards that they knew he was hurt when they traded for him. Even if they didn’t they could have required a physical. You know those things where you find out if someone is hurt…

by Joshuah on May 10, 2010 7:55 AM EDT reply actions  

ugh

how can we be so fucking stupid

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 10, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

and more importantly

after nearly a decade of getting burned for the stupid how do we continue to do the same stupid. Are the mets neurons broken? Are they not creating stupid pathways?

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 10, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Neurons?

Omar lobby for dictionary

Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...

by Stephen Schmidt on May 10, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

nope. not true.

You can look it up, it is a matter of fact. The manner in which “confidential” medical information is now exchanged between prospective trading teams went into place immediately after this trade.

There was MORE to the Zambrano injury than what the Mets “knew”, or “thought they knew”. Yes they knew both pitchers were injured, Fortunato was on the mend and the Mets took a gamble. The level of Zambrano’s injury did not come out until later.

The bottom line is that the “top prospect” nonsense about Kazmir is really the point of my post. He wasn’t, isn’t, and won’t be.

by DFreeNYC on May 11, 2010 7:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

{{citation needed}}

From now on, could you provide any evidence at all for your wild-assed assertions, rather than asking us to “look it up”?

by anonymous on May 11, 2010 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

look it up...where...

John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.

by squid92 on May 11, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

except

he was. look it up.

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 11, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Clearly he "won't be" a top prospect since he's 26

But plainly he was at the time.

Not only that, even if Zambrano had been fully healthy, Kazmir was already, at that point in 2004, a better pitcher.

by JoshNY on May 12, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Another problem...

You fail to take into account that if you trade a prospect, the only goal is to maximize what you get for that prospect.

Kazmir was incredibly highly touted at the time. The Mets traded a blue chip prospect for a pile of crap. To say that this was a fine trade because Kazmir didn’t pan out misses the point.

It’s like if I tell you to pick a card from a deck, if it’s red I’ll give you a million dollars, if it’s black, you get nothing. OR, instead of playing this game, I’ll give you 10 cents. You take the 10 cents, look at the card, and it is black. Therefore taking the 10 cents was the smart play.

by Mex_17 on May 12, 2010 2:01 PM EDT reply actions  

thats a glorious example

I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.

by Gina on May 12, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Injury-prone, yes. Sandy Koufax, no. But we sure could have used him when it was Lima time! a couple years ago, instead of having traded him for two sheep and a bag of kibble.

by erich10031 on May 12, 2010 2:24 PM EDT reply actions  

It was only Lima Time in 2006. We were good then.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 12, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was always rooting for Lima to do good, because he was just too outlandish to not want to root for.

He’s pitching for the Ducks, last I remember checking.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 12, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

unfortunately, the Mets front office IS that stupid

don’t forget they lied about J. J. Putz. (trading away 3 prospects, albeit ones minimal trade potential, but still better than getting half a hurt year out of a half-a working middle reliever)

this post is horrid. Kazmir’s had a much better career than any of the three lousy players the Mets traded for. Where the heck are V. Zambrano, Diaz and Fortunado now? Are they even pitching anymore?

is this Jim Duquette in disguise still attempting to say to Mets’ fans that his trade made sense?

"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by feslenraster on May 14, 2010 4:19 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 2 (August, 2011)
Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011)
159714144_040c6c1501_small
The Greatest Bison: Frank Grant and the Color Line
Small
A WIN METHOD Analysis of the Current State of the Mets
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes

Recent FanPosts

Small
A projection of the rest of 2012 using two key stats
Small
Game Replays
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes
Small
Santana or Sabathia?
Small
Whats to be done with the 'Pen?
Small
What about Oswalt?
61atehunexl__sl500_aa300__small
This Week in Mets' Overreaction

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

At 5:30 PM EDT today Starting today at 5:00 PM EDT, witness one of the greatest renderings of visual sound effects ever!

UPDATE 1: My browser has crashed several times in the process from all the rants (FUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!) - as a result, there will instead be 4 or 5 separate installments of fxcarden's Nightly Rants! from 2011, with a similar pattern for the 2012 rants. Take my word for it, when I say that it's for the best. Here's the revised schedule:

Volume 1: 2011
No. 1: Today at 5:00 PM EDT
No. 2: Tomorrow
No. 3: Thursday
No. 4 and No. 5 (?) TBD

UPDATE 2: Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011) is now up!
beeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeautiful colorization of Willie Mays' over-the-shoulder catch. Credit from Beyond the Box Score via Reddit. Embiggen at http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7071/7231074678_3faa94a82b_o.jpg
Frank Francisco is... The Most Interesting Closer In The World embiggen
2013 ALL-STAR GAME(TM) LOGO CONTEST

Major League Baseball has formally announced that Citi Field will be the site of the 2013 All-Star Game. (see video) In light of this, I have decided to launch an All-Star Game logo contest. To help get you started, I provided all of you with a sample All-Star Game logo. (click here to embiggen) If you wish to participate, please enter your submission with an image below, in the comments section. The contest ends on May 31st. I will choose a select number of finalists, and the community will vote on which of those logos is the best one.

Can you create a better logo than the sample logo provided? Then, give it a shot. Good luck to all participants!
Jon Rauch is awesome. Dan Tanna is, obviously, a fan of Greg Pomes.

Recent FanShots

Are Pitch Counts Ruining The Game?
What's Mike Baxter's Ceiling?
Francesa: Ike Has 'Jungle Fever'
Mets At The Quarter-Pole: Doing Things The Wright Way
WTF is up with all the larry lovefest
Corner IF Production: Will Up Go Down if Down Climbs Up?
Tell Me When It's Over: Ron Darling
Top Mets Prospects: Jenrry Mejia Makes Season Debut; Leathersich Dominates

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Yahoo_full_count

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 2 (August, 2011)
Gary_carter_small
fxcarden's Nightly Rant! - Vol. I, No. 1 (July, 2011)
159714144_040c6c1501_small
The Greatest Bison: Frank Grant and the Color Line
Small
A WIN METHOD Analysis of the Current State of the Mets
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes

Recent FanPosts

Small
A projection of the rest of 2012 using two key stats
Small
Game Replays
Img_1435_small
This Week in Mets Quotes
Small
Santana or Sabathia?
Small
Whats to be done with the 'Pen?
Small
What about Oswalt?
61atehunexl__sl500_aa300__small
This Week in Mets' Overreaction

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro