Mythical Met Mistakes: Scott Kazmir
Watching the Angels starting pitcher get rocked by the Red Sox on the MLB Network last night, I couldn't help but think that it's time to debunk one of the biggest myths and rants about the Mets organization:
How could the Mets trade away a "stud" like Scott Kazmir?
Simply put, I've been saying from day one that Kazmir is one of the most over-hyped Mets farmhands EVER. And the "career" he has had so far is EXACTLY what I thought his best-case scenario was - an oft-injured, what-if pitcher. I'm not a professional major league scout nor talent evaluator, but I think it's fairly logical that a petite lefty fresh out of high school that throws close to one hundred miles an hour has a definite "shelf life" to perform at that level. A Met writer "in the know" told me during the height of the Kazmir frenzy that he was the second-coming of Sandy Koufax or Billy Wagner. I countered that the Mets would be lucky if he ever became Mike Hampton. Your honor, I rest my case.
On July 30, 2004 - the day Kazmir was traded to the Rays - I told every Met fan who would listen what a great job the Mets organization did in getting a quality return for him. Of course, I was laughed at by all. To remind everyone, at the time of the trade Bartolome Fortunato was a fireballing bullpen stud who was on the mend from surgery. And I took the former Mets pitching coach at his word that he needed less than an hour to "fix" Victor Zambrano. None of us could know that the physical condition of both pitchers - since the Rays LIED about them. Major League Baseball reacted immediatlely after the trade by changing the medical disclosure rules between clubs - call it the "Zambrano/Fortunato" rule if you'd like. The reality is that on paper, the trade was solid, despite what any "scribe" or "fan" thought then - and now.
So here we are eight baseball seasons after Kazmir's high school graduation, and his meteoric rise to the Major League level in less than two years. As of today, his 59 major league wins put him 11 games over .500 in his big league career. He's pitched 896 innings, striking out 922 and walking just 408. Yes, he's had flashes of brilliance - but he's also had extended stints on the DL with shoulder and elbow problems. Not hard to figure out for a player "listed" as six feet tall and 175 pounds. Until they attach a bionic implant below where his left shoulder currently is - I think it's safe to say we've seen his best.
I was in attendance at Kazmir's first professional game in Coney Island, and his career could have possibly ended that night. After uncorking a wild pitch, he strolled towards the plate and cluelessy "hung around" as the catcher attempted to come up with the ball near the backstop. Meanwhile, a baserunner flew down down the line - spikes glistening in the fading sunlight. When asked after the game what he was doing anywhere near home plate, Kazmir mumbled a comment of never having had a runner on third base to that point of his career. It was that moment that when I realized he was a "thrower" and that becoming a "pitcher" was still ahead of him. I can only surmise that Mr. Peterson and the pitching instructors employed by the Mets came to that same conclusion, and decided that the his lack of physical assets coupled with his limited baseball smarts made him expendable.
The perception that things would have been different had he not been traded to the Rays - and instead been holding down a spot every five days in the Mets rotation all these years is baseless. Perhaps that theory held true for Nolan Ryan, who also was a hard-throwing Mets farmhand. Arguably, the Mets gave up on Ryan too early when they traded him to the Angels for veteran Jim Fregosi. Comparing Ryan to Kazmir now is a pipe dream.
The reality of Scott Kazmir is that he is a 10 win, 150 inning lefty who strikes more batters than gives up hits. The Mets have a guy JUST LIKE THAT on their roster right now. His name is Oliver Perez, and you can look it up.
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
85 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It was Victor Zambrano, not Carlos Zambrano.
And, yeah, it was still a terrible trade in both process and result.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 3:29 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wins: A Bad Way To Evaluate Pitchers Since 1876!
by JoshNY on May 7, 2010 3:31 PM EDT reply actions 4 recs
yeah, there's no need to keep reading at the point someone uses W-L as a serious argument
I keep wanting to vote in the poll, and then noticing what the question actually is, and thinking “no way am I dignifying that ridiculous question with an answer.”
Yeah, but if you stopped reading that early
you would have missed this gem of a closer:
The Mets have a guy JUST LIKE THAT on their roster right now. His name is Oliver Perez, and you can look it up.
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions
you mean Frank Francisco isn't better than Zack Greinke?
Color me shocked!
"It’s just everytime we think the bar can’t get lower, they lower it. Now next year we’ll just be happy to hear that rogue shirtless officials aren’t implementing useless detrimental drills in spring training for no apparent reason."
-Gina, 3/1/10
by Greenpoint Ian on May 9, 2010 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions
So,
… from what I can gather … … … Scott Kazmirrrrr = Oliver Perez = Sandy Koufax …
And they Rays lied, cause they said they were going to send Carlos Zambrano, but they sent Victor Zambrano …
In lobby campaign for Chris Carter.
Basically

"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions 6 recs
oh how i love this picture
it makes me laugh every time
by KeithsMoustache on May 7, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
This is one of those situations where I wish SB nation had a "vote up/vote down" option on posts.
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on May 8, 2010 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions
It was a bad trade,
regardless of how Kazmir turned out, which has been better than Oliver Perez.
Give me a fly post and I'm all in it.
and cheaper
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
to put it in perspective a 10-12 win per year lefty in our rotation
would have likely put us in the playoffs in 2007 and 2008. There is no arguing that he is injury prone. However since his arrival on the ML scene, he has posted a WAR over 5 once, over 3 twice, and over 2 twice. Victor Zambrano on the other hand pitched about a year worth of mediocre to bad baseball for the Mets before flaming out entirely and never making it back to the Majors. Fortunato spent the entire year after the trade on the DL with a herniated disc. How is this not an awful trade?
Or to look at it from the process angle
We traded our top pitching prospect, a hard-throwing 20-year-old lefty, for an almost 29-year-old converted infielder with significant control issues, and an almost 30-year-old converted outfielder who was a career minor leaguer.
Who in the hell makes that deal?
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 7, 2010 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions
Someone in Met management.
I used to think it was Duquette’s idea, but it’s been mentioned here that other voices overruled Jim & decided to trade Kazmir.
Give me a fly post and I'm all in it.
didn't Franco and Leiter
tell management to get rid of kazmir?
That's what I thought as well.
Predictably, they both denied it but I’d love to hear Duquette really explain as to what the thought process was in making that trade.
There may be sunny days ahead.
Jim Duquette
Props to Omar, because I don’t think he would make this kind of deal. He seems to be fairly protective of the “true” prospects in the system, the Martinezes, the Pelfreys (at the time)…
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions
Whenever I think back on that trade,
I come to one conclusion. Though it would be nice to have Kazmir, better losing him then Wright or Reyes. Remember the Wright/Jose Cruz Jr rumors?
"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS
Terrible then, terrible now
Others covered it in the above comments already.
by James Kannengieser on May 7, 2010 3:46 PM EDT reply actions
It was a bad move whether or not you use 20-20 hindsight or not:
Kazmir may not be the superace we all thought he could be (he still has time, however), but Kazmir has more accomplishments thus far than Victor Zambrano and Bartolome Fortunado had with us.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 3:51 PM EDT reply actions
Whatever happened to Aaron Small?
Why don’t we have him on our team? All he does is go out and get wins.
Gas prices today are a lot like a pitcher's ERA. Anything under 3 is amazing, under 4 is pretty good and anything 5 and up is something you want to avoid.
for a minute I thought you mean Aaron Sele
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
this post could not possibly be less convincing if you tried
I countered that the Mets would be lucky if he ever became Mike Hampton. Your honor, I rest my case.
Baseballprojection.com WAR has Kazmir about 2 wins short of Hampton’s career total right now. He’s likely to have compiled a better career than Hampton by the end of 2010, and he’s not exactly retiring at that point. And Hampton was probably better than you think, too.
true
If you take out batting WAR, Kazmir is already far better than Hampton’s entire career.
ack, no, it's false
Never mind, I was only comparing their pitching WAR initially.
You know what was another Mythical Mistake?
Trading Nolan Ryan. One World Series ring with the Mets. How many did he win after he left?
Your honor, I etc etc etc.
He was a "thrower", too.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 7, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Nolan Ryan was not going to be successful with the Mets
I think he was one of those classic “change of scenery” guys. He wasn’t happy in New York, so it even thought I would have loved to keep him, I can understand where management was coming from. Specially when you still have Seaver and Koosman and Matlack in the rotation.
Consequently, I don’t think anyone is saying Kazmir is Nolan Ryan; just that in retrospect, had both of these guys been with the club for another year or two or three after we traded them, we’d probably have a WS title. I think the Mets would have easily locked up 06 and been favorites in 07 with Scotty Kaz in the rotation. I really don’t care if he fell off the face of the earth in after a world series title to be quite honest.
Although its worth noting that one of the biggest reasons I remember for trading Kazmir was his violent delivery that Petersen guaranteed would lead to injuries later in his career; he was right.
"I only wanted a few things out of life -- a wife, children, to play baseball and to hunt deer." - Turk Wendell
i think the mets would have broken him
more than he’s already broked.
I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.
Simply put
the Mets traded someone deemed valuable within the sport and around the league and received a return of players that no one considered worth anything.
Even if they had some secret way of knowing that Petereson would fix Zambrano and that the reliever would become Dibble, they should have still asked for more. The value they gave up in the market place was much more than they received in return. How the players turned out in many ways is not relevent.
but hindsight actually makes the case stronger!
In this case, it’s pretty obvious in retrospect — just as it was to many at the time — that the Mets’ evaluation of the players on both sides of the deal was totally wrong. Even allowing for the vagaries of prediction, Kazmir’s perceived value at the time was not far off his future performance — he’s been a very valuable pitcher, though not Sandy Koufax — and Zambrano’s perceived value(lessness) by everyone except the 5-minute-fix crowd was about right, too.
I hear you
The point I was making was that in my opinion hindsight is irrelevent. In 2000, if someone could have seen the future and wanted to buy stock in Apple, they should not have paid double the asking price at the time, they should have just bought the stock at the market price in 2000, not paid double just because they secretly knew it would go beyond that.
I agree with the mythical mistake premise
Sure the Mets could have gotten more in return. But Scott Kazmir wasn’t a ‘has been’ , he was a ‘NEVER WAS’. period end of this ridiculous over-hyped prospect story.
But he's still been far better than either of the bums we traded him for.
To rehash the points everyone else has already made above, this was a terrible trade for us. The fact that Kazmir was over-hyped as a prospect doesn’t do anything to lessen the damage done to this franchise by trading him for so little.
May you be locked in a battle of wits against Jerry Manuel.
by BobbyV_Incognito on May 7, 2010 10:54 PM EDT up reply actions
um what?
so no one should care if the mets trade f-mart or captain kirk for a bag of balls. or if washington trades strasburg for a reliever? Prospects have a lot of value in MLB today with so many teams unable to afford FA’s.
I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.
I mean just for example
there’s no way i can believe Amount is any better of a prospect, but he landed the Mariners Cliff Lee.
I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.
Amount?
Hilarious Freudian slip or just a regular misspelling?
"He's definitely mixing it into his repertoire. That's French for 'repertoire' " - Keith Hernandez
by Catsmeat Potter-Pirbright on May 8, 2010 1:09 AM EDT up reply actions
17.5 WAR in 5 years
That’s pretty damn good, especially when only two of those years he made over 30 starts. He strikes out a batter an inning, a career FIP under 4, he’s a very good pitcher.
So no one ever reached third base against him
That indicates how dominant he was at his level. That doesn’t mean he’s a thrower
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
Assuming the Mets made all the moves they did, but kept Kazmir, and didn't put Perez in the rotation
His 2007 season, of 5.3 WAR would’ve got us into the playoffs. If you replace Perez with Kazmir, the Mets still make the playoffs by 2 games. In 2008, Kazmir was .8 WAR ahead of Perez. That probably would’ve been enough to get the wild card. IN 2009, Kazmir was 3 WAR ahead of Perez, and this year in 2010, Perez is better than Kazmir, though it’s early to tell.
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
His 2005 performance might have changed the season a bit, also.
We were only a bunch of games out of first.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 8, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
he was
he was 2.1 WAR, or something, which is good, but Kazmir was awesome in 2007
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
by firejerrynow on May 8, 2010 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions
it's still a bad trade
It just hasn’t reached Jeff Bagwell-for-Larry Andersen levels of the worst in the history of baseball because Kazmir might actually be cooked at this point. Still, he gave TB several very good seasons (including one in which they went to the World Series) and Zambrano gave us one medicore season.
It’s a bad, bad trade, but just not quite as bad as we might have once thought.
"It’s just everytime we think the bar can’t get lower, they lower it. Now next year we’ll just be happy to hear that rogue shirtless officials aren’t implementing useless detrimental drills in spring training for no apparent reason."
-Gina, 3/1/10
Trades
The thing about trades is that there is no single proper way to evaluate them. Evaluating them only after the fact ignores one very important aspect: opportunity costs. A prospect is an asset, something with a definite value. What made the trade so terrible was that the going rate for Victor Zambrano, a 30-year-old pitcher with terrible command and recent arm troubles, was nowhere near Scott Kazmir. It might have been Joselo Diaz and Bartolome Fortunato, the throw-ins included in the trade. To suggest that Zambrano and Kazmir were equivalent values at the time was simply laughable. If nothing else, the trade was a misappropriation of valuable organizational resources.
And of course, it’s ridiculous to suggest that Kazmir has been a bust as it is, even if he hasn’t been quite as good as people thought in 2003.
by Alex Nelson on May 8, 2010 5:08 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
Exactly the point I was trying to make earlier
the definition of an opportunity cost is the value of the next best opportunity forgone by making a choice. In the Mets case, the opp. cost was actually not the next best, but the better choices.
total excellent point
whats crazy is in after the fact, valuing this trade makes it nothing but a disaster for the mets anyway. a quick glance at fan grpahs shows that kazmir was worth something like 69 million dollars the last 5 seasons. he signed an extension in 08 but the first three years were pre-arbitration and he was barely paid a million bucks. his first year of arbitration he made under 4 million.
just considering the 3 season from 05-07 the rays got 49 million dollars of value and paid him under 2 million dollars. meanwhile the mets paid victor zambrano about 5 million bucks and got 5 million dollars worth of value. even being conservative in estimations, the mets basically subsidized the rays to the tune of 40 millions dollars. i know there is risk and uncertainty that needs to be factored in, but no matter how you slice it, the trade was an embarrassment for the mets.
think of these players and their contract like ay other revenue producing asset. if you were in charge of valuating pharmaceutical patents or office buildings and then traded assets with a rival company and those assets then produced results like those above, you would most likely be fired very quickly and probably also laughed at.
kazmir may not end up in the hall of fame, but this trade was pathetic on so many levels.
HELLO HELLO MR WILPON... BUY THAT MANSION. WE DONT NEED A CONDO.
You are correct that Kazmir had a bad game the other night...its too bad that it's the only thing in this post you were correct about.
He’s got a career 3.90 FIP in the AL East (and not as a member of the Skanks or Sux, so he gets to regularly face both of them). That’s not exactly a bust…it’s actually exactly the opposite. Compare that to Victor Zambrano and his less than solid 4.95 career FIP (and he was over 5 when the Mets traded for him). It didn’t look good on paper at the time, and it really doesn’t look good now.
Secondly, I wouldn’t exactly call him injury prone. He’s had 3 seasons in his career where he missed any starts, and hasn’t made less than 24 since he was a full time big leaguer. He’s had a few injuries the last few season, but nothing serious and he’s still been very effective when he’s pitched (4.37 and 4.26 FIP’s).
I realize that he had a bad game the other night, but frankly that doesn’t make this argument any better than it was in 2004 (when it was still a weak argument). As has already been pointed out a few times, I’d stay away from using winzzz as the basis of your arguments in the future and actually look up some stats (which in this case all make your argument appear to be completely wrong)
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
I voted Mike Hampton
Mike Hampton by the way is the shortest of the guys you mentioned, and was certainly worth more than Billy Wagner.
But, yeah, it was real smart of the Mets front office to get something for Kazmir while they could, rather than wait until he declined a bit and they had to settle for something like, oh, Sean Rodriguez.
Not.
It would have really sucked to have Kazmir in 2007
Instead of nobody.
Nothing can get by him; especially in a small room: Mike Francessa
We had Brian Lawrence. WTF do you need anyone else for when you got Brian Lawrence?
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 10, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
True.
When you have Brian Lawrence, you know you’re saving money because you’re not traveling in the post-season. If we’d have had Kazmir, we would have had to make all those reservations.
May you be locked in a battle of wits against Jerry Manuel.
by BobbyV_Incognito on May 10, 2010 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions
your arguement sucks, it doesn't make sense
you say the trade was good because Niese is better and compare him to Perez. He was traded for Perez he wa straded for 2 guys who did nothing for us. Victor Zambrano was injured after only a few appearances for us and Fortunato I think was gone the next season. Kazmir is a better player than those 2, he could have brought back a better return for his trade.
Kazmir trade was one of the worst prospect trades of the Mets history, we got nothing for someone who was a top prospect. Perez, Niese and hampton have nothing to do with thetrade.
The Rays didn't lie
None of us could know that the physical condition of both pitchers – since the Rays LIED about them. Major League Baseball reacted immediatlely after the trade by changing the medical disclosure rules between clubs – call it the “Zambrano/Fortunato” rule if you’d like.
The mets admitted afterwards that they knew he was hurt when they traded for him. Even if they didn’t they could have required a physical. You know those things where you find out if someone is hurt…
and more importantly
after nearly a decade of getting burned for the stupid how do we continue to do the same stupid. Are the mets neurons broken? Are they not creating stupid pathways?
I wonder if Carl Everett believes Jamie Moyer exists.
Neurons?
Omar lobby for dictionary
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on May 10, 2010 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions
nope. not true.
You can look it up, it is a matter of fact. The manner in which “confidential” medical information is now exchanged between prospective trading teams went into place immediately after this trade.
There was MORE to the Zambrano injury than what the Mets “knew”, or “thought they knew”. Yes they knew both pitchers were injured, Fortunato was on the mend and the Mets took a gamble. The level of Zambrano’s injury did not come out until later.
The bottom line is that the “top prospect” nonsense about Kazmir is really the point of my post. He wasn’t, isn’t, and won’t be.
{{citation needed}}
From now on, could you provide any evidence at all for your wild-assed assertions, rather than asking us to “look it up”?
No, I googled it,
It said you fuckin’ blow.
"Relax, all right? Don't try to strike everybody out. Strikeouts are boring; besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls. It's more democratic."
- CRASH DAVIS
by nrmax88 on May 12, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions 5 recs
Clearly he "won't be" a top prospect since he's 26
But plainly he was at the time.
Not only that, even if Zambrano had been fully healthy, Kazmir was already, at that point in 2004, a better pitcher.
Another problem...
You fail to take into account that if you trade a prospect, the only goal is to maximize what you get for that prospect.
Kazmir was incredibly highly touted at the time. The Mets traded a blue chip prospect for a pile of crap. To say that this was a fine trade because Kazmir didn’t pan out misses the point.
It’s like if I tell you to pick a card from a deck, if it’s red I’ll give you a million dollars, if it’s black, you get nothing. OR, instead of playing this game, I’ll give you 10 cents. You take the 10 cents, look at the card, and it is black. Therefore taking the 10 cents was the smart play.
It was faded a little, so it was kinda pink.
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on May 13, 2010 9:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Injury-prone, yes. Sandy Koufax, no. But we sure could have used him when it was Lima time! a couple years ago, instead of having traded him for two sheep and a bag of kibble.
It was only Lima Time in 2006. We were good then.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 12, 2010 5:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I wouldn't mind Lima time in 2010
Better than Ollie P time.
by James Kannengieser on May 12, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I was always rooting for Lima to do good, because he was just too outlandish to not want to root for.
He’s pitching for the Ducks, last I remember checking.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on May 12, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions
unfortunately, the Mets front office IS that stupid
don’t forget they lied about J. J. Putz. (trading away 3 prospects, albeit ones minimal trade potential, but still better than getting half a hurt year out of a half-a working middle reliever)
this post is horrid. Kazmir’s had a much better career than any of the three lousy players the Mets traded for. Where the heck are V. Zambrano, Diaz and Fortunado now? Are they even pitching anymore?
is this Jim Duquette in disguise still attempting to say to Mets’ fans that his trade made sense?
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by 
































