2010 Draft Profile: Matt Harvey
Continuing our look at the Mets’ options with the seventh overall pick in June’s amateur draft, today we’ll take a look at UNC righty Matt Harvey.
Previous profiles: Christian Colon, A.J. Cole, Josh Sale, Karsten Whitson, Zack Cox, Chris Sale, Deck McGuire, Yasmani Grandal, Dylan Covey, Bryce Brentz
The Basics
School: North Carolina
Year: Junior
Birthdate: 3/27/89
Height: 6-4
Weight: 225 lbs.
Bats: R
Throws: R
Position: Pitcher
The Numbers
| Year | W | L | ERA | G | GS | IP | R | H | HR | BB | SO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 7 | 2 | 2.79 | 19 | 16 | 67.2 | 31 | 52 | 1 | 47 | 80 |
| 2009 | 7 | 2 | 5.40 | 21 | 13 | 75.0 | 52 | 88 | 8 | 42 | 81 |
| 2010 | 7 | 3 | 3.10 | 13 | 13 | 90.0 | 40 | 76 | 6 | 32 | 93 |
What He Brings
Harvey has one incredible asset: he’s got a great fastball, one of the very best in this year’s weak college class. He throws it in the 91-95 mph range, and he’s been known to touch 97. Most importantly, it’s not a flat 91-95, either. It’s a heavy pitch that hitters just pound into the ground—the latest ground-ball numbers I’ve seen have his rate at 64%, a very solid mark.
He pairs that with a decent changeup and a slider with some late break, which have become his primary offspeed pitches. I don’t think he has a true swing-and-miss pitch, but when your bread-and-butter is ground outs, you can survive without one. A curve gives him a chance at a four-pitch arsenal.
Mechanically, the arm action isn’t too bad. There are one or two issues to be worried about, but I don’t think it’s a negative on the whole. Finally, there’s his size, which is just right for a college pitcher. He looks like a workhorse, and, true to form, he’s demonstrated the ability to throw hard deep into games.
What He Doesn’t Bring
The offspeed stuff is suboptimal. The changeup is really just average, and while the slider has some late break, it’s not a true two-plane pitch. I think it can be hit when thrown for strikes. Back in high school, when Harvey was regarded as one of the top prep arms in the country, he was known for a big breaking ball. That curve has completely vanished, and he rarely throws it anymore. When he does, it’s very inconsistent and fools no one.
The other big issue is control. Before this season, it’s been real poor, averaging more than five walks per nine innings over each of the last two years. This season it has been much better, but it’s still not considered an asset by scouts.
And when you look at his mechanics, it’s small wonder he’s had control difficulties. He has a slow tempo due to a low separation point at the start of his motion, and he’s not doing himself any favors with his striding leg. Not only is he landing upon it very stiffly, but he’s also not landing in the same spot. He tends to land toward his pitching side, causing him to occasionally throw across his body. It’s very, very difficult to put the ball where you want when you do this.
Final Opinion
I’m just not a huge Matt Harvey fan. I like hard sinkers, but I usually prefer to see them accompanied in a pitching prospect by either pinpoint control or a good slider. Matt Harvey just doesn’t have enough of either of those things yet to convince me that he’s worth the commitment of a top-seven pick, especially if Chris Sale is sitting there (although most signs indicate that Sale isn’t escaping the top five). Now, I’m not a huge Chris Sale fan for similar reasons, but he at least has much better command and a superior ground ball rate.
The command is the deal-breaker here for me. College hitters can be fooled easily. Throw a sinker they can’t see, even if it’s never high enough to be a called strike, and most will swing. But once hitters learn to lay off the sinker below the zone, pitchers need to be able to either adapt their plans with superior secondary offerings, or they need to learn how to pound the bottom edge of the zone. I think Harvey’s going to face an uphill battle to do either one of those things well.
The Video
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He reads like a non-prospect
One pitch, suggesting he’d be a RP, but his big asset is that he can go deep into games. And he has control issues, which is never good.
In fact, he sounds a bit like Oliver Perez.
Ollie isn't comparable at all.
Ollie had a straight fastball with extreme flyball tendencies, and his straight fastball was effective when he had a very good two plane slider working for him. Harvey has a heavy sinking fastball (one of the top GB pitchers in college) with two serviceable if not great offspeed pitches. He’s scrapped his big curve because of mechanical issues. If there is any pitcher on the Mets who thats comparable to, it’s Pelfrey, as it’s almost a carbon copy of his scouting report. If Harvey works on his plant and speeds up his delivery in the minors, he really should be almost a big Pelf clone without all the licking.
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on Jun 1, 2010 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions
Harvey-Pelfrey
Pelfrey was a significantly better pitcher than Harvey was at the same age, and the reason is entirely command. Pelfrey probably had the best fastball command of any pitcher in his draft class. Nobody’s saying that about Mike Harvey, and it makes a huge difference, especially when you’re talking about first-round pitchers.
Pelfrey was able to succeed in the minors in large part because he didn’t have to worry about his plant or speeding up his delivery. And even if he were to become a Pelfrey clone, I don’t know if I’d predict the same kind of success Pelfrey’s enjoying. Because I really have no clue from a big picture standpoint how Pelfrey is pitching as well as he is. Pelfrey gets a good number of grounders. But it’s still just 51%. That not extraordinary. Eyeballing it, he might not even be in the top 25 in baseball at inducing grounders. He’s not an impeccable control pitcher and is walking more than ever before. His strikeout rate is higher than it’s ever been, and it’s still below average. It adds up to the profile of a pitcher who is roughly average, which is nothing to sneeze at.
Of course, Pelf isn’t preventing runs at an average pitcher’s rate. He’s preventing them at a far superior rate. Now, it’s entirely possible that Pelf has sidestepped traditional methods with superior pitching to individual situations. I’m convinced there are pitchers who can do this, like Tom Glavine, for instance. But if that is the case with Pelf, and it isn’t just dumb luck, that’s not something you can attribute to his skill set. That belongs to Mike Pelfrey and Mike Pelfrey alone, and it complements his skill set. That’s not something you can look at Matt Harvey and say, he’s got just what Pelf has.
I just don’t feel comfortable looking at a guy like Harvey and saying he reminds me of Pelfrey, when he’s not as good as Pelfrey was and we have no idea yet what makes Mike Pelfrey Mike Pelfrey.
by Alex Nelson on Jun 1, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
Probably not a good sign that the K rate is decreasing each year
though, right? Maybe he’s pitching to contact, but with a first rounder, you’d like a better K rate.
I don't either
He doesn’t really follow through. Probably loses velocity as a result.
Trying to believe is my full-time occupation.

by 



























