David Wright Swing Zone Update
Now that I'm situated in my new place in California, and the internet is finally (and mercifully) hooked up, it looks like it's time to take a look at David Wright again. He is an all-star on the field and he's an all-star in our hearts and he's accrued the fifth-best WAR among position players to date. At the same time, thee hand-wringing has continued, and his strikeout rate is still significantly worse than it has been in the past.
We're past the thresholds at which strikeout and walk rates become significant, so it's worth noting that he's whiffing at the eighth-worst strikeout rate among qualified batters. Can we figure out why? There's been a lot of work at this, of course, and we may find the same things here, but let's take a look at his approach with heat maps. Jeremy Greenhouse at Baseball Analysts was kind enough to break down Wright's hitting zones for us, and if you haven't checked out his work, it is consistently excellent and deserves accolades. The colors indicate run values, so closer to red the better, and the contours show Wright's swing tendencies. He swings at 75% of pitches within the smaller circle, and 50% within the larger one, in other words.
Unfortunately, these charts are worrisome.
Let's tackle the run values first. The good news is that Wright is spanking the pitches he should be spanking right now. Look at those nice run values in the middle of the plate for 2010. However, it's not all good news. In 2007-2008, he had a slight hole away in the zone, and was either around zero or better everywhere else. Then that hole grew and worsened last year. He slightly mitigated the severity of the hole this year, but it's moved and it's right were we might have thought it was. We've seen Wright flail at the outside pitch, and watch outside strikes into the mitt, and there it is, in stark blue and baby blue.
On to the swing contours. With his increase in strikeout rate, it's not at all suprising to see that he's showing the largest swing contours of his career. His reach rate (29.5%) is way above his career reach rate (21%), and here we have it represented visually. It's nice to see that he's still swinging at the best part of the plate, and that his hole has moved further away from his 75% swing contour, but it's still a problem. He's swinging 50% of the time at low-and-away pitches, the worst part of the zone for him.
Sometimes it's nice to put pictures to numbers and thoughts. We've known that he's having some issues on the outside of the plate, and the pretty colors hammer that point home. Wright is having a good year, but in order to return to the great promise of yore, he needs to swing a little bit less often on pitches on the outside corner, because he's definitely developed a hole out there.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Shove it up your ass.
…whoops. Sorry.
What I mean is, he’s basically returned to the “great promise of yore”. 4.1 WAR in half a season isn’t great?
I get that you want to delve deep into his swing and all that. And this is a good post, lots of good info. Yes, he could improve his swings on the outside of the plate, but I think contextually, this post is sorta off. Maybe I’m wrong, but I dunno, I sorta feel like right now, we don’t really need another post about Wright’s swing mechanics, especially when he’s hit so well lately.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
by squid92 on Jul 7, 2010 2:07 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
why
How is this post off contextually? It is contextualized perfectly in the first paragraph: Wright is great, he’s having a great year, here’s an area where there is some room for improvement. That seems like a perfectly reasonable and useful post to me.
Basically, look at GenJackRipper's post below.
If this data was from the past month and a half or so, I’d probably give it a bit more credence, even with the smaller sample size.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
just to clarify, because i would have thought the opposite looking at the charts
negative horizontal numbers are inside and positive ones are outside?
and its so positive away from the zone because he lays off those pitches and gets walked? it would seem then that he has expanded his zone down and away but at least gotten away from chasing as much high stuff.
also, it would be more helpful (if sample sizes and such were big enough) to look at wright when he was struggling v since he got hot as i imagine things look way different
stats, they are seriously never in Francoeur's favor
or at least to look at the charts from when he was struggling still
and compare to now, with the total seasons data used
stats, they are seriously never in Francoeur's favor
The chart is from a catcher's point of view
Thus to the left (negative horizontal numbers) is inside and to the right (positive) is outside.
stupid question
why is there any data at all way outside the zone? Are those just walks/HBP/ all balls?
All Balls and HBPs
Funny thing, if you do this sort of thing for the whole league, you get two HUMONGOUS hot spots at a certain point on each side of the plate…because those are all HBPs.
It’s pretty hysterical.
I'd be curious to see Francoer's
The amount of balls he swings at outside of the zone would probably cause his to look quite different than Wright’s.
It seems more like a step in the Wright direction to me.
Obviously, Wright’s best years (number wise) came in ‘06-’08 and his worst year was ‘09. In ’07-’08 Wright was right in the middle of the run value chart throughout almost all of the strike zone. In ‘09 a large hole developed through nearly the whole outside part of the plate, and the rest of the plate remained at middle run value. Now in ’10 the hole is shrinking to the lower-outside part of the plate, while he now has more Red (or high) values inside of the strike zone. What that tells me is, he is connecting on more of the pitches inside of the strike zone that he should be. His numbers this year are returning to normalcy, even though his swing isn’t exactly the same. Yes, he still has his flaws, but so does Pujols. He is connecting well with the ball as of late, and I find it hard to argue with his recent success despite the high K’s.
Kinda need to divide the year early
He was terrible early, and has been great of late. You need the numbers since June to see if he’s really that far off the days of yore.
Nothing can get by him; especially in a small room: Mike Francessa
I wish...
we had these for every batter so that we had something to compare to. It’s hard to make any claims based on this thought it does confirm the visual evidence that he is concentrating on the inside part of the plate and sacrificing the outside corner.
He stands so far away from the plate these days. If pitchers could consistently hit the outside corner he would be in some trouble but obviously he’s doing pretty well as is.
The charts match up pretty nicely with Wright’s heat charts in my Batting Goggles app but these are obviously much more detailed/useful.
Oh shit, I have a cool idea for a graph
Plot out every single batters big swing zone in a density plot so you can see where guys swing the most.
Oh shit, I have a cool idea for a graph
Plot out every single batters big swing zone in a density plot so you can see where guys swing the most.
Would be interesting...
What I want to see, though, is something which puts these in context. For example, Albert Pujols has had a pretty big hole low and away the last few years (if I recall correctly.)
Would this be worrisome? I’m wondering if it’s just the nature of batting that you are going to have a hole or two in which case it doesn’t really scare me that Wright does.

by 


























