Poll: Which Camera View Do You Prefer While Watching A Game?
Your choices, with "indifferent" also an option:
A) Angled
B) Straight-on
I prefer angled -- it makes you feel more like you are actually sitting in a seat at the stadium. The straight-on view makes you feel like you are stuck at the top of the center field flagpole. It's not a terribly strong preference though.
53 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Definitely angled
Straight on just doesn’t look right
There is no hope.... there is no future....there is only GRISSIONZ
The 2010 Mets- Hey, we may suck, but what did you expect?
I knew something was up with that Twins-Rangers game...
It was kind distressing to me but I’m also traditionally opposed to change. Maybe it’d grow on me? Definitely bad first impression though.
by SheoawnnGreen23 on Sep 5, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions
Tangential, but slightly related
Many older cricket fans bemoan the passing of the time when they had only one zoom camera, so each six-ball over would alternate between being shown looking at the facing batter and looking from behind him at the bowler, thus giving a balanced focus between the two disciplines. These days they have them at both ends so, like in baseball, you always see the batter face on and the bowler’s back.
I voted angled, FWIW. It’s annoying sometimes on marginal edge-of-the-zone pitches but I really like how close in you feel to both ends of the battle.
an over
is when the bowler bowls 6 balls to the batsman; they then change ends and the bowler bowls to the over batsman on the other side.
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
Somebody should write a cricket tutorial specifically geared to baseball nuts
I know it’s not too similar, but it’s a batted ball game and I want in. I pester the West Indian and Pakistani guys at work about taking me someplace to watch it. Anyone know a bar in NYC?
by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Apparently it's taking off wherever there is a big IT boom
because of the immigrant populations from Pakistan and India (and I suppose to a lesser extent Bangladesh and Sri Lanka). I read somewhere that it’s pretty big in Mass. now but the only place you can book a piece of grass big enough and cheap enough is in really rough areas.
Someone appears to have written a very rough guide from a baseball perspective here.
I played when I was a kid going to school in England.
Great game, particularly the part where in theory you can bat forever.
There are games every weekend in Corona Park and others in Queens...
Mostly West Indians but also Indians, Pakistanis etc. If you are nice they will be more than happy to explain the game to you. It’s really not that hard to understand once you get the basics down, though the terminology—like that of baseball—can be absolutely brutal to learn.
Fixed
Great game, particularly the part where in theory you can practice it seems like they bat forever.
Hah
Top drawer. Though I’d be happier with the England team if that were true (well, at least when Pakistan aren’t throwing it…)
Not sure if you saw my post a while back...
I lived in Zimbabwe when they beat ZA in cricket for the first (and I’m guessing last) time. It was a huge moment. I watched the whole thing at the Harare sports club and the old Rhodies taught me how the game worked. It was pretty intense.
Angled. Absolutely. Gif related, my reaction when people dont like angled.
![]()
Consequences will never be the same.
What about from behind home plate?
It wasn’t directly behind home plate, just slightly angled. SNY showed that view a few times and held it there while the pitch was delivered. Wish they would go to it more often. As for the poll, i chose “straight”. I like seeing more of the field.
i am in the minority
i prefer straight-on because i can get an accurate idea of where the pitches are wrt to the plate. with the angled view i have to compensate with my brain, and that doesn’t always work. :/
I prefer it too
but just because it’s a pleasing look to me for some reason.
by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions
I think I feel the opposite of what James said
that seeing more of the field’s pretty geometry is what gives me more of a ballparky feel, less of a TV one.
by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Exactly.
Location and movement of the pitch are a lot easier to get the grasp of with the straight-on view.
I bet Jerry Manuel just bunted.
I like both, and would probably prefer to go straight on on two strike counts.
Also, I’d like the straight on with only the pitchers upper body showing. That might improve the feel of the camera shot, what with it’s being closer in.
I think straight on looks horrible
The plate should not be above the pitchers head
I've never seen straight on on tv
but from the pictures I think I’d prefered that.
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
I like the straight-on view.
You get a better look at where the pitches are, and I think you get a better sense of the movement, too. Pitching in general just seems more natural this way. I suspect that it looks so weird to some people because it’s so rarely used. I see a lot of Twins broadcasts (with the straight-on view), so maybe I’m just more used to it.
I think if I watched more games straight on I would get used to it.
It gives a much more accurate representation on what is going on.
You guys are nuts
Angled obscures both the break and location of the pitch. Makes it much harder to enjoy watching a good pitcher.
BTW, you picked a bad example of “straight on”. Target Field’s camera’s are way to high up. The best, homerism aside, is St. Louis’ or NESN’s.
http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=11709557&topic_id=8879106&c_id=stl
Fire Tony La Russa
That looks interesting.
Might take some getting used to, but it’s a good mix.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
Yup--terrific.
Looks like putting the plate juuust above the pitcher’s shoulder is what’s doing the trick.
Oops
I was watching the Twins-Rangers on FOX which made me think about the question to begin with. Every straight-on view I’ve seen is similar to that one. I don’t recall ever seeing the one in the Cardinals video (maybe I have but am just mis-remembering). That view is decidedly better than the Twins view. It might have me changing my vote to “indifferent”.
by James Kannengieser on Sep 5, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Straight on make judging the vertical movement next to impossible
Angled may not be as good for horizontal movement, but I like it better.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
I like the straight on cameras on NESN
but Target field is terrible, way too high.
I go angled
but I prefer what they do in Atlanta. It seems a little less angled and the break and movement of the ball looks hsarper
This new fangled angled and straight on
I remember when we had 1 camera from behind the catcher.
Them were the the days
"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"
Speaking of "feeling like you're at the stadium"
Did anyone get the MLB.tv postseason package last year? Where they give you 4 raw camera angles but not the edited TV feed? How is it? I canceled cable recently…
Straight on for strike zone reasons but I have a question
Do they use different cameras for replay? It seems like a lot of the time they’ll show a straight on shot live and then 5 seconds later an angled shot on the replay.
I chose straight on...
After being confused about which was which.
I just signed up for the wrong party!
I thought I was signing up at the libertarian table but got confused!
Libertarian... likely story.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
Well there goes my Hollywood career Ogre...
Or should I say, Ogre McCarthy.
by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions
To the blacklist with you!
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
i dont understand which is angled and which is straight on..
but i always prefer the first picture’s view
I might have to see more of the angled to get used to it
but I’m certainly not hating it at first glance. I am also a fan of the behind the plate camera. Also, whatever happened to the catcher cam they used to have? That was terrible but it was enjoyable on replays of home runs.
by Criss Angel Couldn't Make Frenchy Vanish on Sep 5, 2010 11:46 PM EDT reply actions

by 



























