Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

Poll: Which Camera View Do You Prefer While Watching A Game?

Your choices, with "indifferent" also an option:

A) Angled

Angledview_medium

B) Straight-on

Straightonview_medium

I prefer angled -- it makes you feel more like you are actually sitting in a seat at the stadium. The straight-on view makes you feel like you are stuck at the top of the center field flagpole. It's not a terribly strong preference though.

Poll
Which camera view do you prefer while watching a game on television?
Angled
269 votes
Straight-on
156 votes
Indifferent
42 votes

467 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 53 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Definitely angled

Straight on just doesn’t look right

There is no hope.... there is no future....there is only GRISSIONZ

The 2010 Mets- Hey, we may suck, but what did you expect?

by Syler on Sep 5, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

I knew something was up with that Twins-Rangers game...

It was kind distressing to me but I’m also traditionally opposed to change. Maybe it’d grow on me? Definitely bad first impression though.

by SheoawnnGreen23 on Sep 5, 2010 12:02 AM EDT reply actions  

Tangential, but slightly related

Many older cricket fans bemoan the passing of the time when they had only one zoom camera, so each six-ball over would alternate between being shown looking at the facing batter and looking from behind him at the bowler, thus giving a balanced focus between the two disciplines. These days they have them at both ends so, like in baseball, you always see the batter face on and the bowler’s back.

I voted angled, FWIW. It’s annoying sometimes on marginal edge-of-the-zone pitches but I really like how close in you feel to both ends of the battle.

by deadspy3 on Sep 5, 2010 12:04 AM EDT reply actions  

What's a six-ball over?

We don’t know much about cricket on this side of the pond.

by Russ on Sep 5, 2010 3:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

an over

is when the bowler bowls 6 balls to the batsman; they then change ends and the bowler bowls to the over batsman on the other side.

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Sep 5, 2010 7:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Somebody should write a cricket tutorial specifically geared to baseball nuts

I know it’s not too similar, but it’s a batted ball game and I want in. I pester the West Indian and Pakistani guys at work about taking me someplace to watch it. Anyone know a bar in NYC?

by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 8:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Apparently it's taking off wherever there is a big IT boom

because of the immigrant populations from Pakistan and India (and I suppose to a lesser extent Bangladesh and Sri Lanka). I read somewhere that it’s pretty big in Mass. now but the only place you can book a piece of grass big enough and cheap enough is in really rough areas.

Someone appears to have written a very rough guide from a baseball perspective here.

by deadspy3 on Sep 5, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I played when I was a kid going to school in England.

Great game, particularly the part where in theory you can bat forever.

by Jack Str on Sep 5, 2010 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

There are games every weekend in Corona Park and others in Queens...

Mostly West Indians but also Indians, Pakistanis etc. If you are nice they will be more than happy to explain the game to you. It’s really not that hard to understand once you get the basics down, though the terminology—like that of baseball—can be absolutely brutal to learn.

by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 9:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fixed

Great game, particularly the part where in theory you can practice it seems like they bat forever.

by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hah

Top drawer. Though I’d be happier with the England team if that were true (well, at least when Pakistan aren’t throwing it…)

by deadspy3 on Sep 5, 2010 9:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure if you saw my post a while back...

I lived in Zimbabwe when they beat ZA in cricket for the first (and I’m guessing last) time. It was a huge moment. I watched the whole thing at the Harare sports club and the old Rhodies taught me how the game worked. It was pretty intense.

by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

What about from behind home plate?

It wasn’t directly behind home plate, just slightly angled. SNY showed that view a few times and held it there while the pitch was delivered. Wish they would go to it more often. As for the poll, i chose “straight”. I like seeing more of the field.

by Rats on Sep 5, 2010 12:29 AM EDT reply actions  

i am in the minority

i prefer straight-on because i can get an accurate idea of where the pitches are wrt to the plate. with the angled view i have to compensate with my brain, and that doesn’t always work. :/

by voidstar on Sep 5, 2010 12:30 AM EDT reply actions  

I prefer it too

but just because it’s a pleasing look to me for some reason.

by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 7:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think I feel the opposite of what James said

that seeing more of the field’s pretty geometry is what gives me more of a ballparky feel, less of a TV one.

by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 7:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Location and movement of the pitch are a lot easier to get the grasp of with the straight-on view.

I bet Jerry Manuel just bunted.

by GilbertP on Sep 5, 2010 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like both, and would probably prefer to go straight on on two strike counts.

Also, I’d like the straight on with only the pitchers upper body showing. That might improve the feel of the camera shot, what with it’s being closer in.

by Jack Str on Sep 5, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think straight on looks horrible

The plate should not be above the pitchers head

by Brittannia on Sep 5, 2010 12:36 AM EDT reply actions  

That’s the thing. The horizontal angle is not the only difference. The straight-on shot is fom a more elevated position.

by TMS on Sep 5, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've never seen straight on on tv

but from the pictures I think I’d prefered that.

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 5, 2010 12:42 AM EDT reply actions  

I like the straight-on view.

You get a better look at where the pitches are, and I think you get a better sense of the movement, too. Pitching in general just seems more natural this way. I suspect that it looks so weird to some people because it’s so rarely used. I see a lot of Twins broadcasts (with the straight-on view), so maybe I’m just more used to it.

by EricAColucci on Sep 5, 2010 12:48 AM EDT reply actions  

I think if I watched more games straight on I would get used to it.

It gives a much more accurate representation on what is going on.

by EtSuKe on Sep 5, 2010 1:13 AM EDT reply actions  

You guys are nuts

Angled obscures both the break and location of the pitch. Makes it much harder to enjoy watching a good pitcher.

BTW, you picked a bad example of “straight on”. Target Field’s camera’s are way to high up. The best, homerism aside, is St. Louis’ or NESN’s.

http://stlouis.cardinals.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=11709557&topic_id=8879106&c_id=stl

Fire Tony La Russa

by vivaelpujols on Sep 5, 2010 1:34 AM EDT reply actions  

That looks interesting.

Might take some getting used to, but it’s a good mix.

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ooh that is really good

That has the ‘close-in’ feel that the Target Field one is lacking

by deadspy3 on Sep 5, 2010 9:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yup--terrific.

Looks like putting the plate juuust above the pitcher’s shoulder is what’s doing the trick.

by Jack Str on Sep 5, 2010 6:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Oops

I was watching the Twins-Rangers on FOX which made me think about the question to begin with. Every straight-on view I’ve seen is similar to that one. I don’t recall ever seeing the one in the Cardinals video (maybe I have but am just mis-remembering). That view is decidedly better than the Twins view. It might have me changing my vote to “indifferent”.

by James Kannengieser on Sep 5, 2010 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

straight on

Angled messes up the strike zone.

by gogomets on Sep 5, 2010 1:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Straight on make judging the vertical movement next to impossible

Angled may not be as good for horizontal movement, but I like it better.

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 1:50 AM EDT reply actions  

makes*

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 1:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like the straight on cameras on NESN

but Target field is terrible, way too high.

by Brittannia on Sep 5, 2010 4:27 AM EDT reply actions  

I go angled

but I prefer what they do in Atlanta. It seems a little less angled and the break and movement of the ball looks hsarper

by jdon on Sep 5, 2010 6:27 AM EDT reply actions  

This new fangled angled and straight on

I remember when we had 1 camera from behind the catcher.
Them were the the days

"We're investigating the investigative procedure of the investigation of Tony Bernazard"---Omar Minaya (he really didn't say it but he would"

by firejerrynow on Sep 5, 2010 7:50 AM EDT reply actions  

Speaking of "feeling like you're at the stadium"

Did anyone get the MLB.tv postseason package last year? Where they give you 4 raw camera angles but not the edited TV feed? How is it? I canceled cable recently…

by Pack Bringley on Sep 5, 2010 8:29 AM EDT reply actions  

Straight on for strike zone reasons but I have a question

Do they use different cameras for replay? It seems like a lot of the time they’ll show a straight on shot live and then 5 seconds later an angled shot on the replay.

by packard37 on Sep 5, 2010 8:39 AM EDT reply actions  

anyone who chooses straight-on is a communist

John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.

by squid92 on Sep 5, 2010 10:22 AM EDT reply actions  

I chose straight on...

After being confused about which was which.

by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 9:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Commie!

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 9:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just signed up for the wrong party!

I thought I was signing up at the libertarian table but got confused!

by MookieTheCat on Sep 5, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Libertarian... likely story.

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 9:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

To the blacklist with you!

Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.

by Ogre39666 on Sep 5, 2010 10:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

That's the angled one

The pitching rubber and home plate are not aligned, hence angled

by deadspy3 on Sep 5, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I might have to see more of the angled to get used to it

but I’m certainly not hating it at first glance. I am also a fan of the behind the plate camera. Also, whatever happened to the catcher cam they used to have? That was terrible but it was enjoyable on replays of home runs.

by Criss Angel Couldn't Make Frenchy Vanish on Sep 5, 2010 11:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Judging by the comments to Matt Callan’s ode to 1986 Mets: A Year To Remember from a few weeks back, the video has a devoted Mets fan following. Despite being too young to remember anything about that season, it has a special place in my fandom as well. It was part of a two video rotation (Ghostbusters being the other) which ran almost daily on my television for a few years in the early 90s. And it remained a once-in-awhile watch through high school and college. 

Unsurprisingly, the physical tape deteriorated over time, and the screen jumps and sound skips made for a less than optimal viewing experience. With sale of the video discontinued, my brother converted it to DVD and gave it to me for Christmas in 2010. See the picture above for the box and DVD. He even created a scene selection function which can be accessed from the main menu. "Get Metsmerized!" plays on loop on the menu screen. It is my favorite Christmas gift ever and is still nice to throw on for a viewing.

"How'd we do it? Mirrors!"
I was flipping through some of my parents' photo albums this afternoon in search of one particular shot of the sign my older sister made for Mets Banner Day back in the late eighties. Though I didn't find that one — I'll post it when I eventually track it down, and I can assure you that it's Keith-themed — but I did stumble upon this wonderful photo of my younger sister's stuffed animal menagerie spread out in front of a glorious rainbow-festooned Mets pennant, also from the late eighties.

She works for the HRC now and was particularly delighted to be reminded of this photo.

(click to embiggen)
Now that banner day is back, hopefully this years will look a little like this. I know it's not great, but i don't pretend to be a professional. embiggen!

Recent FanShots

Dickey is # 2 defensive pitcher
Yahoo Sports comments on Sandy's Tweets
Using hindsight to redo the Mets’ offseason | Mets360
Cespedes to the Athletics
Kevin Goldstein Top 101
Okay, there is no way this is Sandy Alderson
Ike & Duda fantasy stocks rising
Sabermetrics! Fantasy League is live.
What if the Mets Never Traded for Johan Santana? | Patrick Flood
[O]f the $136.7M the Mets spent on players in 2011, $72.8M was given to...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro