Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: More Televised Winter Baseball, Please

Where Should Carlos Beltran Play in 2010

The headline pretty much says it all.  We can all assume that Beltran will be moving to RF next year, although that's a pretty big assumption given some of the moves/non-moves this team has made in the past. But moving forward with the assumption that he will slide over next season, how should we treat Beltran this year? Should the Mets give Beltran a head start on the inevitable and shift him over to RF now, or is learning a new position while trying to get his legs under him too much to ask.

Poll
Where Should Beltran Play in 2010?
CF
21 votes
RF
50 votes
LF
2 votes
The Bench
16 votes
Don't care, it's almost football season
29 votes

118 votes | Poll has closed

This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.

Comment 64 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I don't see why "we can all assume" Beltran is moving to right

and that a non-move would be another example of the Mets screwing something up. Sure, he’ll probably never be the CF he was, but an offseason of rest, conditioning and being further from surgery could help. Pagan’s D is totally sweet at all three outfield positions, his defense brings value whether he’s at a premium defensive position or not. So, for me, I will reserve judgement until I see how Beltran looks in spring training. As for this season, I prefer Beltran work on getting his timing at the plate back as well as learning to play with the brace rather than try to learn a position that he hasn’t played since the Mets were in the world series.

by Sokojoe on Sep 7, 2010 1:35 PM EDT reply actions  

Beltran is -11.3 UZR/150 right now, and was -6 last year

Pagan was +2.1 last year, and +13.1 this year. Not putting the better fielder in center is a bad move.

Will Beltran continue to be terrible in the field? I’m not sure, but it’s unlikely he’ll be as good as Pagan has been over the last few years. A non-move to right is definitely not the correct call – unless Beltran miraculously becomes awesome in the field again.

I guess anything is possible though.

by Mike Clemente on Sep 7, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pagan's career UZR/150 in RF is 24.7.

A run saved in RF is just as valuable as a run saved in CF. I don’t believe you have to automatically put the best fielder in CF. Say for example that Pagan who is solid in all OF positions has a +10 UZR anywhere in the OF. However, Beltran has a -5 in CF and a -10 in RF, then I would argue putting Pagan in RF is the right move.

Again, I will reserve judgement until I see how Beltran looks in spring training.

by Sokojoe on Sep 7, 2010 3:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

although isn't the common assumption that

moving to a corner spot ups your UZR by like +10 runs or something?

by Mike Clemente on Sep 7, 2010 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think in general,

but on an individual it’s tough to say. Pagan and Endy played better in the corners but Mike Cameron brief stint in RF didn’t go so well. Of course, there are a lot of factors to consider such as age, sample size, experience at each position. etcetera. I have no idea how Beltran will perform in RF just like I have no idea how his legs will look after a winter of healing, so I’m willing to keep in CF for now and make a decision when more information is available.

by Sokojoe on Sep 7, 2010 5:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

this is a good point

but if (And this is clearly speculative) Beltran does’nt have the range to play CF anymore, but still is mobile enough to play an average or above average RF (an “easier” position), then i’d rather have a plus CF and an average to plus RF, than an above average RF and a below average center fielder. In one, the runs saved by one are offset by the runs given up by the other, while in the other scenario, both are playing at the optimal positions for their current skill levels.

Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?

by KeithsMoustache on Sep 7, 2010 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

ah just realized it said in 2010, not 2011

although I’d still say let pagan continue to develop his skills in CF. He’s greatly improved this season, and more practice can only help to keep him sharp and maybe even improve further

Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?

by KeithsMoustache on Sep 7, 2010 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Quick question about UZR -

If your CF has a higher UZR, does that make it more likely your LF/RF will have higher UZR’s as well? (Versus your RF having the best UZR)

by Criss Angel Couldn't Make Frenchy Vanish on Sep 8, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think that for the most part

UZRs are pretty independant of each other; however on the extreme side having a great CF and real weak corner would probably increase the CF UZR while decreasing the corner UZR as the CF will “take plays away” from the corner. I think the amount of plays over the course of the season wouldn’t have that dramatic of an impact but then there are all kinds of other variables such as positioning that would need to be considered. So, I guess what I’m trying to say is I have no idea.

by Sokojoe on Sep 8, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand how that's supposed to work, but just for more clarification:

Imagine an outfield that never let a ball drop – making every play. Theoretically, would they have an aggregate UZR of 0? i.e. A CF makes a play in right center that increases his UZR by 0.1, does that mean the RF’s UZR goes down by 0.1?

by Criss Angel Couldn't Make Frenchy Vanish on Sep 9, 2010 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think its a zero sum game

since it’s based on the probability of each position making a play. A fly to center may be a .9 probability of an out for the CF, and a .25 probability of a LF making the out.

by Mike Clemente on Sep 9, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

well

I think it would be the better move to slide him over to right, but to assume the Mets will do it because of UZR seems to be overrating their stats department just a touch.

ain't had enough...

by BlackOps on Sep 7, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

More than that, it wouldn't be possible as there's no data to use

and wouldn’t be a large enough sample size to use for years. Just giving an example where I would see a reason to put an inferior defenisve player at a position. I’m not really assuming the Mets would do it but more my personal opinion. Although, I’m biased in that I run my baseball mogul team with this method and real baseball might be a bit different than my spreadsheets.

by Sokojoe on Sep 7, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

My first choice is CF

If he can play productive baseball, that’s where he should be. If he can’t, my second choice is the bench.

by Russ on Sep 7, 2010 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep him center the rest of the way

1) Managing veteran ego — why risk upsetting him over 24 games that don’t matter? He’s been a center fielder forever, I’d imagine he doesn’t want to give it up at the drop of a hat.

2) He’s still recovering from injury. Let him focus on his swing and getting healthy.

3) The topic can be broached in the offseason (and I think it should be, Pagan will almost certainly be a better defensive CF next year). Beltran can get reps in right next spring. There’s no urgency here.

by James Kannengieser on Sep 7, 2010 4:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Agree with this...

The team will have plenty of opportunity to reevaluate him before next season. Hopefully he is getting PT and the knee will be a lot better then. Just let sleeping dogs lie on this one.

by MookieTheCat on Sep 7, 2010 4:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

So if Pagan is a +++ fielder in right field

and Beltrans – in cf, but Beltran in rf is average and Pagan is slightly less plus do we assume either orientation is more or less equal?

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 7, 2010 5:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Let's see how he does in Spring Training.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 8, 2010 12:36 AM EDT reply actions  

You should add an option for "not on the Mets"

for all the Beltran haters. I prefer RF as of right now, but I’m still an optimist and I don’t believe he’s finished (i.e. completely unable to play) in CF yet.

by Criss Angel Couldn't Make Frenchy Vanish on Sep 9, 2010 6:32 PM EDT reply actions  

trade with cubs?

I’m a guest from bleedcubbieblue. What do you mets fans think of a carlos zambrano for beltran and rodriguez and k-rods buyout money for his last year? It trades salary pretty evenly, and trades bad attitudes (z and krod).

by neifiisgreat on Sep 10, 2010 11:40 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

No thank you.

Beltran, there’s no reason to trade him while his value is at it’s lowest. All signs indicate that, come the 2011 season, he’ll be performing better than he has in his limited 2010 season, meaning that we can keep him and feel somewhat confident at CF/RF, or trade him during the season when his value is up. K-Rod, he didn’t have a fully horrible season in 2010. And, like him or hate him, there isn’t anybody particular on the FA market or in the system right now, that I would be more comfortable with closing games.

Zambrano, at this point, is a middle-of-the-rotation starter. The FA market has a few of those available, most of whom will likely cost less than Zambrano would.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 10, 2010 1:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

No thanks

Zambrano’s contract is horrific. If we’re smart, which we’re not but lets pretend, we’ll be done with Beltran and Rodriguez next year and have a combined like 31 million coming off the books. Where as we’d be stuck with Zambrano for an extra year. Plus Zambrano is insane.

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 10, 2010 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

We do need another starter, but no thanks.

Zambrano’s numbers this year are worrisome, while Beltran is coming around and Jailhouse Roddy was pitching well before the whole punching thing.

I’d be adding another ace if it was my money, particularly after Santana’s injury, and certainly want the Mets to pick up one more solid starter for 2011 (they won’t—if they didn’t after 2009 they won’t now). If we deal for Z we’d still need to pick up a starting OFer, so figure on adding $7-10m in payroll just for that…

by Jack Str on Sep 10, 2010 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe a Beltran, K-rod

Fukudome and Z swap?

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 10, 2010 10:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

In my opinion

the Cubs would jump on that trade. The reason I didn’t include Fukudome in my original trade idea was that I didn’t think the Mets would want to add that much payroll. Fukudome, while performing well in August/September has been a very disappointing contract overall, and I think the Cubs would even send a few million along with him to clear payroll, especially if it brought back players with upside, such as Beltran & Rodriguez.

Fukudome and Zambrano have played very well the past month, Z has an ERA of 1.04 in his last 5 starts. I think that the Cubs are still weary of his antics, and I’m not convinced that he will produce much better than the past few years in the next 2 years of his contract, so I think they would move him for a decent return.

by neifiisgreat on Sep 11, 2010 8:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Cubs must take Ollie

Give them freaking Ollie. That is all.

by Joshuah on Sep 15, 2010 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reyes

Out of curiosity, how do the Mets value Jose Reyes now? With his injury status, and the presence of Wilmer Flores in the system, what would it take to acquire Reyes?

by neifiisgreat on Sep 11, 2010 12:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Wilmer Flores isn't considered to be a SS prospect

The general consensus is that he’ll be moved to a corner position.

by Russ on Sep 11, 2010 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

How do we value him?

Generally speaking, I think we all like Reyes and what he brings to the table, and find him satisfactory. Most other short stops are downgrades from Reyes. The organization, and the general fan base, I’d be surprised if they were still as high on Reyes as we generally are.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 12, 2010 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Someone should fanpost(shot?)

Where we would rank Reyes compared to other SS’s?

I put him 3rd behind, Tulowitzki, and H. Ramirez.

On first thought I figured that there would be more guys ahead of him, but I did a quick look, and there is not. So even when Reyes is having a down season, he is still above average for a SS.

by Joshuah on Sep 15, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

BTW Tulowitzki

is freaking awesome. He is having RBI baseball numbers today.

by Joshuah on Sep 15, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Completely agree

Hanley and Tulo are better. After him, cases can be made for a few other players, based on their strengths and weaknesses as compared to Reyes, but there’s nobody other than those two who are definitely superior to him, while there are plenty who are definitely inferior to him.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 15, 2010 11:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hmm...

So, in a down year both offensively and defensively, mired with various injuries, Reyes can still be included in the top 10 (Where’s Jimmy “MVP” Rollins? Exactly.).

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 15, 2010 11:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like keeping him in CF

I like keeping Pagan in RF – for 2011 at least. I like moving Bay out of here for a pitcher and bringing Endy back, while working some of the kids in – Fernando, Captain Kirk, Nick Evans, Duda, whoever. And I like keeping Beltran on the Mets at least until the trade deadline. Either we’re in contention and he’s helping, or we’re not and he can either be traded or play out the string. It’s hard to see a scenario where we’d be in contention without Beltran helping. Of course without Johan, it’s hard to see a scenario where we’ll be in contention at all in 2011.

by Boz_Paladin on Sep 16, 2010 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

don't see why not

I think the Red Sox may be willing to a) bet that Bay will return to form in Fenway and b) admit that Lackey was a mistake for them. With Bay’s vesting option 5th year, their contracts are almost identical. Alternatively, the Giants have plenty of young pitching and don’t need a $17mil 5th starter. Zito might be pried away, if he’d forgo his no-trade clause. Zito’s remaining contract is also remarkalby similar to Bay’s.

For the Mets, I’m thinking a) we need a veteran arm now more than ever with Santana’s issues; b) we can replace Bay’s whopping 1.3 WAR, 6 HR, 47 RBI; and c) Lackey in particular would benefit from leaving Fenway and AL East for Citi and NL East. I’m less excited about Zito, but would make the deal if Lackey couldn’t be done.

by Boz_Paladin on Sep 16, 2010 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I doubt that anyone will trade for Bay until it is shown that his concussion is behind him

especially with that contract. Also, other teams see the same craptacular numbers that we do.

by Russ on Sep 16, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if Bay was tradeable, I wouldn't do it for Lackey.

He’s going to decline much more than Bay during their respective contracts.

May you be locked in a battle of wits against Jerry Manuel.

by BobbyV_Incognito on Sep 16, 2010 6:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bay, with his

whopping 1.3 WAR, 6 HR, 47 RBI is not something that is going to repeat. Wright, with his crappy numbers last season, didn’t repeat, and I see no reason to believe that such a huge drop-off in production is anything other than an mostly unexplainable anomaly, like Wright’s season last year was.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 18, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

wrights actually been less productive offensively this season

and isn’t at the point where he should be declining, which Bay is.

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 19, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bay's also now going to be recovering from a concussion

and really 2.5-3 WAR is about what we would have been expecting Bay to average over his career even if he had put up a 4 WAR season this year, and since that’s exactly what Lackeys been it’s still pretty likely an even trade.

mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon

by Gina on Sep 19, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

The point is that there no reason to think that Bay's 2010 season

is nothing but an aberration. Regardless of whether or not he returns to the level he normally played at (2-5 WAR, given the ups and downs of his career), even with age regression and possibly lingering injury problems, I see no reason why we should believe he is going to be worth 6 HRs worth of offense.

"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.

by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Sep 19, 2010 9:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Judging by the comments to Matt Callan’s ode to 1986 Mets: A Year To Remember from a few weeks back, the video has a devoted Mets fan following. Despite being too young to remember anything about that season, it has a special place in my fandom as well. It was part of a two video rotation (Ghostbusters being the other) which ran almost daily on my television for a few years in the early 90s. And it remained a once-in-awhile watch through high school and college. 

Unsurprisingly, the physical tape deteriorated over time, and the screen jumps and sound skips made for a less than optimal viewing experience. With sale of the video discontinued, my brother converted it to DVD and gave it to me for Christmas in 2010. See the picture above for the box and DVD. He even created a scene selection function which can be accessed from the main menu. "Get Metsmerized!" plays on loop on the menu screen. It is my favorite Christmas gift ever and is still nice to throw on for a viewing.

"How'd we do it? Mirrors!"
I was flipping through some of my parents' photo albums this afternoon in search of one particular shot of the sign my older sister made for Mets Banner Day back in the late eighties. Though I didn't find that one — I'll post it when I eventually track it down, and I can assure you that it's Keith-themed — but I did stumble upon this wonderful photo of my younger sister's stuffed animal menagerie spread out in front of a glorious rainbow-festooned Mets pennant, also from the late eighties.

She works for the HRC now and was particularly delighted to be reminded of this photo.

(click to embiggen)
Now that banner day is back, hopefully this years will look a little like this. I know it's not great, but i don't pretend to be a professional. embiggen!

Recent FanShots

Dickey is # 2 defensive pitcher
Yahoo Sports comments on Sandy's Tweets
Using hindsight to redo the Mets’ offseason | Mets360
Cespedes to the Athletics
Kevin Goldstein Top 101
Okay, there is no way this is Sandy Alderson
Ike & Duda fantasy stocks rising
Sabermetrics! Fantasy League is live.
What if the Mets Never Traded for Johan Santana? | Patrick Flood
[O]f the $136.7M the Mets spent on players in 2011, $72.8M was given to...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro