Mets Community Prospect List 2010: #11
Welcome to the 2nd Annual Amazin' Avenue Mets Community Prospect List. Every poll will include eight candidates for the next spot on the list, as well as a separate group of testers. Testers will be rotated into polls with each new installation, replacing each poll's winner and any name that's not getting votes. After a few rounds, if a candidate on the ballot receives a decidedly low vote total , they'll be replaced on the ballot by a tester. But for the first couple polls, I won't remove candidates with these low totals.
After the poll, Zach Lutz is the choice for the #10 prospect in the Mets' system with 43% of the votes. Replacing him in the poll is Robert Carson. Josh Stinson has been added to the testers. To recap:
- Wilmer Flores
- Kirk Nieuwenhuis
- Reese Havens
- Matt Harvey
- Jeurys Familia
- Lucas Duda
- Darrell Ceciliani
- Aderlin Rodriguez
- Cesar Puello
- Zach Lutz
- ???
The contenders:
Juan Urbina (17) R (G) SP 48.1 IP, 5.03 ERA, 54 H, 14 BB, 38 K, 5 HR
Dillon Gee (24) AAA SP 161.1 IP, 4.96 ERA, 174 H, 41 BB, 165 K, 23 HR
Sean Ratliff (23) AA OF .317/.37/.562, 311 PAs (242 at A+)
Cory Vaughn (21) A- OF .307/.396/.557, 313 PAs
Brad Holt (23) A+ SP 65.0 IP, 7.48 ERA, 68 H, 56 BB (14 HBP), 62 K, 4 HR (30.0 debatably worse IP at AA)
Jefry Marte (19) A 3B .264/.333/.401, 366 PAs
Steven Matz (19) SP N/A
Robert Carson (21) SP A+ 86.1 IP, 4.17, 98 H, 33 BB, 69 K, 5 HR (48.2 IP in AA where he was pretty bad- 8.32 ERA)
Testers: Eric Campbell, Zach Dotson, Josh Satin, Jordany Valdespin, Matt den Dekker, Kyle Allen, Wilfredo Tovar, Armando Rodriguez, Javier Rodriguez, Mark Cohoon, Josh Stinson, Eddie "Ruff Rider" Kunz
As always, voice opinions for the next ballot spot in the comments, and vote away!
This FanPost was contributed by a member of the community and was not subject to any vetting or approval process. It does not necessarily reflect the opinions, reasoning skills, or attention to grammar and usage rules held by the editors of this site.
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lobby Armando Rodriguez added to the contenders next
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
by Ogre39666 on Sep 7, 2010 7:42 PM EDT reply actions 3 recs
Never new "Arm-Rod" had any other supporters.
And no, I’m not suggesting we start calling him “Arm-Rod”.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
Ehhhh
He looks to me like he’s kind of this year’s version of Eric Beaulac, an older guy dominating much younger competition. I know he struggled this year, but I don’t see how you don’t put Kyle Allen ahead of him. He’s still only 20 and was nearly as effective last year in the same league, three years Rodriguez’s junior. There are some guys that aren’t even testers yet that I’d probably put ahead of Armando Rodriguez. Scott Moviel comes to mind. He’s had a mediocre season, but he’s the same age and a level higher and his size keeps him at least a little interesting for now.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 8, 2010 9:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Haha, we know Gina, we know
You don’t let us forget :P. He did have an awesome August. 1.85 FIP, 25 Ks, 6 BBs, 57.4 GB%, 0 HR, 19.3 IP. By far his best month as a pro. I’ve heard almost nothing about him this year, but worth noticing. Maybe he’s finally figuring out that big, lanky frame. I wonder if they’ll start him in Double-A next year.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 9, 2010 12:18 AM EDT up reply actions
3.08 ERA, 3.05 FIP, 9.4 K/9, 2.8 BB/9, 0.3 HR/9
Rodriguez (6’ 2", 185 lbs) also has a nice frame. I understand being 22 in Low-A isn’t exactly desirable, and I don’t know enough about Allen, Moviel, or even Rodriguez to really say anything with absolute conviction, but it seems wrong to write him off.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
i don't think he's writing him off as saying he's not really anyone to get hype about
at this point
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
This more than anything
Beaulac’s an instructive example I think. He was 22 in Savannah last year, had a 2.95 ERA, 3.05 FIP, 10.03 K/9, 3.09 BB/9. Moved up to HiA this year he hasn’t been nearly as impressive. 3.59 ERA, 4.30 FIP, 6.21 K/9, 5.21 BB/9. He was recently promoted to Double-A, but the numbers hardly suggest he’s ready for it, and he’s already 23 now. He’s also got a nice frame (6’5", 190 lbs listed on B-R) and his stuff has always generated nice reviews (Low-mid 90s fastball and good slider). He’s still a fringe prospect, but a reliever at best (I actually still think his stuff would play very well in relief). I could see a similar path for Armando, and unless he dominates the FSL next year I can’t really imagine his upside is anything more than reliever.
Allen’s still got a lot of upside. He was basically neck and neck with Familia a year ago, they had very similar seasons at the same age in the SAL, but his nosedive this year has been much harder (walked more batters than he struck out). I’ve heard rumblings that he’s had some kind of anxiety problems, but don’t remember seeing anything official. Still, he was a two-way player in High School (also played shortstop), a good athlete, and was considered a nice draft prospect but fell due to a perceived commitment to attend college. He’s only 20 and has three good pitches including a solid fastball that gradually got better as 2009 went on and he worked on his mechanics (not to mentioned one of the best pickoff moves in the system). He’ll almost certainly repeat the FSL next year, but at 21 he’ll still be on the lower end of the age curve and have plenty of time to re-establish himself. We ranked him #13 in the system last year, two spots behind Familia (with Lutz in between). He doesn’t throw quite as hard as Familia, but at least in the SAL showed a much better feel for the changeup. A lot of people (including myself) thought he was a big breakout candidate this year.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 9, 2010 12:10 AM EDT up reply actions
allen
in an interview i had with him last week he addressed those walks by telling me he suffered a back strain early in the season which stuck with him all year and eventually forced him to shut it down in early august. he described how it wasn’t always really pervasive but overall it messed with his mechanics and his ability to finish his pitches, hurting his command and obviously leading to increased walks.
all in all, i’d agree that we shouldn’t just write off allen as a failed prospect so soon, especially since this sounds like a reasonably legitimate excuse. though i will say that with numerous outlets pointing to a breakout 2010 we all may have been a bit overenthusiastic putting him on the same level as familia so soon with such a huge disparity in overall stuff.
by the way, that interview (as well as a number of others) will be up for one of the next few Minor League Mondays.
by Rob Castellano on Sep 9, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
That's awesome!
Can’t wait to see it.
Question, how big did you consider the disparity in overall stuff? Most of what I read, at least until the very end of last year when those sketchy reports of Familia hitting triple-digits came out, had a disparity in the fastball but not a huge one, and there was some debate as to who had the better second pitch. Its always tough with guys below HiA (who don’t pitch for Brooklyn), as there was only one credible first hand source that I’m aware of who was seeing those players on a regular basis (Newman, though now Toby Hyde’s there too). Most of Newman’s writing seemed to suggest that Familia’s breaking ball was much better than any second pitch Allen had, but there seemed to be more debate among the second-hand prospect guru types who got their info from a variety of scouts. And no one seemed to doubt that Allen had the better third pitch, as Familia didn’t really have one to speak of. The conclusion I remember having at the end of the year was that Familia was a slightly better prospect, as he really just had one large adjustment to make before he could sustain some upper level success: a reliable third pitch, while Allen had many more small adjustments he would have to make: as improving his fastball, developing a true secondary out pitch, cleaning up his mechanics a bit more, etc. Having two plus pitches gave Familia both a higher floor (good chance he’d become a major league reliever even if he never found a third pitch) and a higher ceiling (mostly because of the fastball), but Allen had a more projectable frame and was the better athlete, which counts for something too.
I’ll still stand by the ranking we gave them a year ago, there was a pretty significant dropoff after Allen anyway (Marte was #14), but Familia’s definitely separated himself further this year even with the ugly overall numbers. He still had the better year than Allen, and showed more signs of making the specific adjustment I thought we should be looking for: getting swings and misses from lefty batters.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 9, 2010 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions
Question
Are you saying Allen’s stuff is superior to Familia’s? I think they are two totally different pitchers, in that Familia overthrows (25 WPs and 74BB) and doesn’t have a change up that is useful. Which points Familia to the pen. Familia will hit 98 on the gun although it may hit the backstop or be shelled like in the Futures Game.
On the other hand, Allen was reported to be sitting 92/93 early on hitting 94/95 while playing with a cracked vertebrae (as reported) vs strain in his back. Two different bears.
Did Allen tell you he had a cracked vertebrae as was reported vs a strain back?
I read the strain happened early on (like Spring/April) time frame and they Mets continued to run him out there and eventually lead to tests which showed the single crack in the lower back. Multiple cracks would have required surgery, but the spine repairs itself according to google searches.
Billy Chapel: "I can always tell when I'm in New York."
by LoveofTheGame on Sep 11, 2010 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree that it's worth maybe putting him on the poll though.
I think he’d likely have a few supporters here.
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 11, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions
Gee had a great outing tonight
Question on Vaughn, what’s the average age for NYPL? He’s been good, but I’d like to see him duplicate his numbers at Savannah/St. Lucie
"I reject your reality and substitute my own"
-Adam Savage
by blueandorange4life on Sep 7, 2010 9:26 PM EDT reply actions
21
So Vaughn’s pretty much dead average. It’s a good performance but still too early to get excited about.
Dude...
I thought you had a plan, and your plan, you liked your plan? What’s this with #11?
Voted Gee again.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
After last night, I'm voting for Gee
My favorite Mets prospect not yet voted in is Cory Vaughn. I just hope that he can continue his current level of performance in A+ and higher.
Thats the key for me
Brooklyn isn’t exactly overwhelming competition, many NY-Penn pitchers are young flamethrowers with no secondary stuff.
Reyes, Thole, Wright, Beltran, Bay, Davis, Martinez, Tejada...
by Stephen Schmidt on Sep 8, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Gee
with the SSS bump.
I went with Ratliff. 2nd in the Eastern League in wOBA at age 23 (300 PA or more, he actually doesn’t qualify for leaders, and Lutz was actually higher but had even fewer PA) isn’t shabby. Even if he has gotten a little babip lucky.
Havens, Evans, Lutz and ratliff all among the top 10 in EL wOBA if they qualified. Kirk number 12 among actual qualifiers. And a lot of guys among the leaders are older guys, like tagg Bozied, the leader, 30, Ray Giminez, 27, Justin Christian, 30.
Yeah I voted for Vaughn
but in hindsight I wish I had voted for Ratliff
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
Love Vaughn
so far. Just that it’s 3 levels down from Ratliff. Do most teams put college guys from the relatively early rounds (say 4 or higher) in SS ball? Guys like Vaughn, Havens when he was there, seem fairly advanced for the level. I suppose that way they jump right in and aren’t crashing a season already well underway, like the Sally.
I think pretty much everyone starts off in rk ball
unless they’re like otherworldly college types like strasburg
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
or mike leake
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
well Sale is up in the bullpen that's different
I don’t think he’s the first bp arm to be up the year he was drafted.
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
Yeah
I suppose so. I think Brooklyn is a step above rookie ball like Gulf Coast League. Brett wallace and Alonso started out at A ball and A+ respectively, while the Mets put Ike in short season, which is A-. Of course, it’s not like he performed like he should have been in a higher league. And Alonso and Wallace were a tick above Ike coming out of the draft. He may have passed them as far as 1Bs from the 2008 draft.
You just hear so much about vaughn being advanced for the level, not a good read, so maybe they could have bumped him to Sally at some point.
oh I thought Brooklyn was rookie ball
in that case yeah whatever Brooklyns classification is that’s probably where. And I think they mean advanced for the level since being put there, I don’t know why they didn’t move him up but when he was drafted he definitely wasn’t considered advanced for the level.
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
He's been better than expected
he was a bit disappointing in college. But the funny thing is, when he did well, Law, or Goldstein, i forget which said, yeah, but he’s advanced for the level, which to me is kind of saying whoa, we didn’t see that coming. For now that looks like a good pick.
With Ike, Holt and havens they skipped them right over the sand Gnats and sent them right to Florida State League. Vaughn was not as a high a pick, but considering how well he’s done he might skip Savannah as well. Sems like the internaional signings and HS guys go there after rookie ball, the higher round college draftees go from Brooklyn to FSL.
That’ll be a real test for vaughn. Pitcher’s league.
At least with the Mets
Having college players come out of the draft and skip Full Season-A isn’t that uncommon regardless of draft position as long as they’re successful. I don’t think the post-draft talent level of SS-A is very different from FS-A. From what I recall the Mets tend to load up Savannah with the younger players who are succeeding anyway, while putting college draftees and older players in Brooklyn. I think a lot of it has to do with how they handle their IFAs too, as Savannah is probably a much easier place to acclimate young, foreign, Spanish speaking players away from the glaring lights of the big city; and also how they handle Brooklyn, as more of a moneymaker and a local franchise that they gear at least as much towards winning games as developing players.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 8, 2010 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions
That's what its for
Yeah that league is mostly for college guys fresh out of the draft, so they don’t have to disrupt the full season rosters to find spots for them all.
Think of the short season leagues this way:
GCL – rookie ball for HS players
APPY – rookie ball for college freshman and sophmores (JC players)
NYPL – rookie ball for college juniors and seniors
The average age in the NYPL is only a few months younger than the SAL. Often it’s labeled short season A ball rather than rookie ball.
NYPL is short season A
It is not just labeling, it is A. Some of Brooklyn’s roster played in GCL or Kingsport last year.
Where do guys with PhDs in mathematics play?
Oh yeah, AA.
by MookieTheCat on Sep 9, 2010 12:05 AM EDT up reply actions
I just hope people don't take last night's start and blow it out of perspective.
Let’s be real, folks, even 5th starters throw great games.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
Meh, I still think he should have been on at least two spots ago even before the impressive start
Though not necessarily ahead of Lutz or Puello, somewhere along with them, ahead of Ceciliani and Aderlin. His MLE xFIP is 3.98 (and that’s regressing his HR/FB to 10%, not even all the way to league average). That’s better than 5th starter. His inflated ERA is mostly due to a high BABIP and HR/FB, and the latter is also why is FIP is even a bit inflated. I think 5th starter is his downside, upside is more mid-rotation third starter kinda guy at this point. His breaking pitches look a lot sharper than I remember, more like true put-away pitches, and it probably explains why he was able to miss so many bats this year. He may always have a highish BABIP and HR/FB because of the underwhelming fastball, but he could also very well be a guy who keeps is K/BB pretty consistently around or a bit above 2.00, which makes him a very viable major league starter. My biggest question for him is if he can stay pretty GB/FB neutral. If he starts relying too much on the flyball, he could get into some trouble, but if his batted ball profile maintains I don’t see him as all that much worse than a league average pitcher.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 8, 2010 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions
I like Gee, but
there are guys whose HR/FB rate you don’t want to regress. He’s one of them.
What do you mean?
His HR/FB in Triple-A was 12.3%. When I say regress I don’t mean get worse, I mean move towards league average, which in his case would be a good thing. HR/FB isn’t very controllable for pitchers (it is to a degree, more than say BABIP probably, but when there’s a large deviation its still mostly a product of luck). That what xFIP is for, its FIP with HR/FB regressed to league average (actually I think its HR/OFFB regressed to league average, but using HR/FB because its more widely accessible isn’t that problematic).
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 8, 2010 9:18 PM EDT up reply actions
Righty Jason vargas
Just on the k/bb and flyball tendencies. Although Varagas never got to 9 k/9 in AAA. If the fielding is good around him he could be decent in Citi.
yeah but what about out of citifield
that’s pelfrey big problem now. out of citifield he’s a below average pitcher.
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
At least
Citi is sorta built to take advantage of guys like Gee. I still have ratliff ahead of him.
I se the Mets packaging Evans, Ratliff, Gee and Familia for the ghost of jon papelbon.
looks like Gee is going to get this one
the next few are going to be tough for me because everyone is pretty close in my opinion
I like Ike, I hate Jerry
those were the 3 i was debating
but i am not sure which order i would put them in personally.
I like Ike, I hate Jerry
I keep shuffling them too
I actually voted for Vaughn, but I had Ratliff ahead of him until now, and will probably go back to Ratliff next poll. I originally had Urbina ahead of both, but after a good look at end of season numbers, I’m now leaning Ratliff, Vaughn, Urbina.
Poor Juan
I’ve had him on the poll since the beginning, and he’s still only barely getting the 3rd most votes.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
I think once this round ends
we’ll start seeing the votes start to spread amongst the candidates a lot more.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
In lobby for Josh Byrnes/Chip Hale as Mets 2011 GM/Manager.
He's still something of a lotto ticket
Great raw tools for a young pitcher, but they said similar things about Francisco Pena and look how that worked out. I might vote for him next, his upside is probably higher than anyone else on the poll. Its either him of Vaughn for me next. I’m not a big believer in Ratliff. A 23 year old with 138 strikeouts in HiA and Double-A? Not sold.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 8, 2010 9:29 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed on Ratliff.
I’d obviously be more optimistic if I thought he could stay at second base.
John Olerud, Hall of Famer. Got a nice ring to it.
Ks/power
Howard struck out 30% + in high A at 23. Not that ratliff has that kind of power. His BB/K rates were 7.4%/25.6% in AA, Nieuwenhuis was 6.9%/23.6%. Kirk is only 6 months younger, more athletic. And he is a better fielder, but if he can’t stay in center, his advantage diminshes. Not to say Kirk isn’t a better prospect, but they aren’t all that far apart. Ratliff out ISO’ed him .246 to .221 and out wOBA’ed him .404 to .370.
I'm actually not as high on Kirk as the community ranking here is
But the overall tools count for something, more than actual defensive position. It doesn’t matter where they play, the defensive value difference is still basically the same when you account for positional adjustments and production relative to average for each position. Its just a question of how much range Kirk loses as he continues to fill out.
I will say, I’d kind of written off Ratliff’s ISO jump as a possible sample size fluke, especially since NYSEG stadium tends to inflate lefty power, but his 12.8% HR/BIA is pretty impressive, and that number tends to be more reliable in smaller samples. Still, its similar to what we saw with Ike Davis, a lefty power hitter actually substantially improving their offensive numbers when making the in-season jump from the FSL to the EL (and Davis had the advantage of an 11.6 BB% to offset the Ks).
Kirk is six months younger and started the year a level ahead. He’s basically a year ahead of Ratliff in terms of ARL. Honestly, a year ago Ratliff was barely even on my radar. I want to see another year of him producing like this and having some success in Triple-A before I start giving him the benefit of the doubt, but I am willing to call him a legit prospect now. I can buy that if Kirk is #2 maybe Ratliff belongs about #12, but I would probably have them both a bit lower than that. I worry that Kirk’s also going to have a lot of trouble controlling the zone and that his offensive production is going to be pretty limited unless he can either increase the walks or decrease the strikeouts.
I mean, I know it’s only been a handful of ABs, but look at how hard of a time Duda’s having controlling the strike zone, and that was always considered his strength in the minors. He’s swinging and missing a ton, the only thing helping him is that at least he’s still walking a bunch too. That was also a strength Howard had going for him in the minors. In his age 23 season his BB% was still 9%. In HiA this year Ratliff’s was 7%. It may not seem like much, but that 2% is the difference between above and below average, and its just another weakness upper level pitchers who can control the zone and quality offspeed pitches are going to have an easier time exploiting. Plus Ryan Howard’s a freak of nature. For every Ryan Howard, there are probably 10 guys who show good power with too many strikeouts in the upper minors and wind up well below average major leaguers and Quad-A all-stars.
"All energy flows according to the whims of the great magnet
What a fool I was to defy him"
-HST
by Mark Himmelstein on Sep 9, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Also yeah I lobby for the inclusion of Kyle Allen and Scott Moviel!
mediocrity thy name is Wilpon- jdon
Cohoon over Holt
and Almonte over a LOT of the testers
Holt should not be on the list of top 20
sorry, just don’t see the reasons why he should. He has regressed too much to be considered a factor for 2011, unless he is hiding an injury…
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"

by 


























