Mets Fans: A Balanced Load?
Recently, Hardball Talk's Craig Calcaterra had a brief post on longtime Met Ed Kranepool, and how Steady Eddie says he doesn't watch the Mets unless they're "a good product." There was nothing too earth-shattering in it, and I agree with the author's assessment that someone who gave so much of his life to a team can watch that team (or not) however much he feels like.
I was more struck by Calcaterra's assertion that this reflected a characteristic of Mets fans in general:
I don’t think there’s a fan base of its size in all of sports that has a more balanced take on things. Mets fans love ‘em when they win. When they don’t, well, they’re not gonna cry about it and make their lives miserable. Don’t get ‘em wrong — they’ll be there for the team through thick and thin — but you rarely find a Mets fans who lets his team’s misfortunes truly upset him any more than a few minutes after the game is over. Life goes on. There’s another game tomorrow.
Of course, Calcaterra is a Braves fan who does enjoy tweaking the Mets at times (particularly in his Twitter feed). But this came across as neither a dig nor a backhanded compliment, but simply an observation, one that gave me pause. Is this really true of Mets fans?
Personally, I would take issue with the "they don't make their lives miserable" assessment. Tune into WFAN sometime after a brutal Mets loss and hear how many fans take things in stride. The same could be said of the Mets blogosphere, which has more than its share of hand wringing after each defeat. And I'm as guilty of this behavior as any one else. Drop by my house while the Mets bullpen is blowing a formidable lead and see how calm I am, even if it's a virtually meaningless game in May.** If you do plan to drop by my house, please call first.
Granted, the number of people who call talk radio or write blogs is miniscule compared to the population at large. Still, I feel that whether we like it or not, the Joe Benigno's of the world ("oooooh, da pain!") represent a sizable portion of the Mets' fan base: the fan that elevates each and every game to the same level of tension as defusing a bomb. Whether you want to call this passion or insanity is up to you, but either way, it's not indicative of people who just let losses roll of their backs.
And as much we don't like to admit it, I wonder how much The Other Team in Town is to blame for this mentality. If you live somewhere in the tri-state area and are gainfully employed, you almost assuredly work alongside a Yankee fan who is more than happy to bust your chops whenever the Mets fail. And if not, you probably have a relative who does the same. And if you're really unlucky, you have both. So when we root for the Mets to come back or hold on, we're really rooting for That Guy in Sales with the pinstriped cubicle and our Uncle Ted to keep their big mouths shut for once.
On the other hand, I believe there's at least a kernel of truth to Calcaterra's assessment, at least for this coming season. In stark contrast to the most vocal Yankee fans--who insisted an already loaded team HAD TO get Cliff Lee OR ELSE--I feel like most Mets fans are measured and reasonable in their expectations for 2011.
The angry parishioners who call into WFAN notwithstanding, Mets fans seem to understand that the team is hamstrung financially at the moment, and that the big ticket free agent is not coming through the clubhouse door this year. They'd prefer that Sandy Alderson and co. do no harm this offseason so the rebuilding process won't be any more painful or prolonged than it needs to be. I think any fanbase would react the same to the situation in which the Mets find themselves. The only thing that makes Mets fans a special case in this respect is the existence of a ravenous sports press that hungers for moves.
From Steve Phillips forward, Mets GMs have polished the deck chairs on their respective Titanics with Big Moves, which both helped to mask larger problems within the organization (i.e., no farm system) and fill up precious newspaper column inches. Alderson's refusal to make Big Moves for the sake of doing so seems to baffle and, in some cases, annoy certain sportswriters (see: Jon Heyman). Despite living in such a media environment, I believe Mets fans, for the most part, have resisted the temptation to join this chorus.
There's no real answer to the question Calcaterra's assessment poses, since it's unfair to generalize any group as large and diverse as Mets fans. My own feeling is that he's both wrong and right--wrong about the "living and dying" part, but right about Mets' fans reasonableness and perspective (at least for the moment). What say you?
87 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
nope
I don’t think Mets fans are any more reasonable or have any more perspective.
Maybe there are more fans that are than other teams, but certainly not enough to create any real trend.
For what it’s worth, accepting it as a given that a team is rebuilding/not competing and that one is okay with that from a long term perspective does not make a fanbase more reasonable.
-Ceetar, the Optimistic Mets Fan
Confermation bias, probably,
but personally, Mets fans are some of the worst ones out there. A lot of it probably has to do with the crummy radio/print/TV media, which, in turn, influences peoples’ opinions of things. “They’ll be there for the team through thick and thin”? Because of our repeated misfortunes over the last couple of years, a large segment of the bandwagoning people have detatched themselves from the general fanbase (a good thing, relatively speaking), but how many “true” fans have you heard say things like, “Boycott Citi Field until X”, or “Yay, we signed Chris Young! When do we win the World Series?” or, “Sign Cliff Lee, Carl Crawford and trade for Adrian Gonzalez at all costs!” To me, all of those things demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding, I guess I’d call it. A “true” fan, you have that fundamental lack of understanding. “But you rarely find a Mets fans who lets his team’s misfortunes truly upset him any more than a few minutes after the game is over. Life goes on. There’s another game tomorrow.” Personally, I think the 2007 and 2008 seasons, followed by the injury-plagued 2009 team has demented and cynicized a large portion of the fanbase, because you hear too much of what I addressed above in earnest, and true ‘desperation’, or ‘disgust’ or whatever, and resignation when that does not happen.
But, yeah, I don’t have a very high opinion of most other Mets fans, present company excluded.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 24, 2011 12:19 PM EST reply actions
I get all that
but “some of the worst?” No way. The worst fans are apathetic. They are yuppies who come for a delightful outing, leave in the 7th, and say, “what fun!” I guess the Mets have some of these, but other ballparks are plagued by them. We in New York are extremely lucky to live in a baseball town where the sport matters to people across the spectrum. I’ve never seen crowds as diverse as at Met games — not even close. And I’m consistently impressed by crowds laughing and jeering en masse at the right moments — calling out Chipper for a comment he made the night before, getting excited for a debut, etc. The flip side of all this is noisy, stupid opinions, but at least that’s not a wee dab or polite interest. THAT shit is embarrassing.
by Pack Bringley on Jan 24, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
sounds like Dodgers fans
leaving by the 7th to beat traffic. Still better than places like TB and Atlanta where they can’t even get fans to come for playoff games
Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 24, 2011 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
Not only
do dodgers fans leave in the 7th to beat traffic they dont show up until the 3rd.
by bigbluefan1985 on Jan 24, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
also true
makes you wonder why they bother to pay for the cost of the ticket.
Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 24, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
Its called La-La Land for a reason
"The Mets are gonna be amazin'!" - Casey Stengel
"Bounding and astounding!" - Clyde Frazier
I love Calcaterra's work, but disagree this time
Mets fans ABSOLUTELY live and die with their team. A heartbreaking loss can make us miserable at work the following day…or week or month. We STILL haven’t gotten over Yadier effing Molina. I’ve let Met losses ruin dates. I live in Pennsylvania and refuse to date Philly fans. As for the reasonableness…well, I guess it depends on whether or not you think WFAN callers represent the majority of fan opinion.
I will say this – Mets fans on the whole are extremely passionate. Maybe not on the same level as Red Sox fans or Cardinal fans, but it’s the middle of January and bloggers are writing 500-word essays breaking down the LOOGY battle. I don’t think you find the same level of passion in most fan bases. NOBODY in Pittsburgh is counting down to pitchers and catchers right now, whereas Mets fans would still be here typing away regardless of the outcome of last night’s football game. Even the “Fire Sandy Alderson” guy displays a level of negative passion you won’t find anywhere else.
My girlfriend is a Cardinals fan
She knows that to tweak me all she needs to do is bring up Molina.
I had (stupidly) convinced my best (female) friend to let me spray Champagne on her when the Mets got the World Series, but after Molina, that shit went out a 4th story window. That one hurt more than any other one for me.
That said, after the end of the season I bounce back into offseason mode and immediately look forward (which looked pretty great in December 2006), so I actually agree with Craig’s quote, but increasingly I think that’s just me and other more engaged fans vs. the WFAN calling, Post reading mongoloids out there.
Well that ruined my week/month
Thanks.
Im not a “balanced mets fan”. No..i trick myself into believing its their year each april. Knowing in my subconscience that they are infact a 500 team at best. And my subconscience hides with that truth until June. When by that time the Mets are 10 games back, have 3 starters on the DL, and Philly is hitting its stride and Lee just pitched a no no and..We go play them in Philly in 2 days.
Then the sad truth sneaks out and drops a virtual mind fuck on my Mets hopes and in a quick second….crushed. Sad and facing the truth that my beloved mets are disappointing again i’ll waver and ask “why do i cheer for these assholes?” Have too many beers, replay the Ventura Single-Slam, and begin recovery.
God forbid the mets actually make the playoffs, I’d be a nervous wreck. Excited that ‘holy crap the mets got a shot ’but at the same time going ’holy crap they could screw this up royally.’
This clip put me in a booze fueled existence for nearly 4 months. I didnt want to talk about it or see baseball. It hurt and still hurts. I didnt morn that season properly cause i felt and still feel it was unfinished. IT WAS TO BE THE YEAR!!!!!
off to cry in rum and cokes.
BULLPEN!!!!!!!!!! FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWK
I hate Philadelphia so much.
Its one thing to be realistic, but its another to be indifferent about losing
Many Mets fans are willing to ride out 2011 so that we’ll be much better in 2012. One step backwards to take two steps forward. But no matter how we try to rationalize losing, however, the pain is still there.
"The Mets are gonna be amazin'!" - Casey Stengel
"Bounding and astounding!" - Clyde Frazier
the average Mets fan is uneducated and frustrated
just look at the comments on the Mets facebook page. they’re not even paying attention this year. why? because the team doesn’t have a chance to win the World Series. there were no bad contracts given to free agents and they’re indifferent because there’s no new name to latch onto.
the bitching will gear into full swing tomorrow when irritated Jets fans (who know even less about football than they do about baseball) get in on the act.
no, i’m not bitter. not one bit.
"they're still shitty"
by Help!I'maRock! on Jan 24, 2011 12:36 PM EST reply actions
Ed Kranepool and Tom Seaver
I’ve been thinking lately that these two are a collective metaphor for the Mets. This is because we traded away Tom Seaver, but kept Ed Kranepool.
I’ve got to repeat this, because after 33 years, I still am dumbfounded. We traded away Tom Seaver. We traded away one of the ten greatest starting pitchers of all time. We traded away “the franchise.”
On the other hand, we kept Ed Kranepool. Even in the free agency era, there are still players who spend a long career with one ball club. Players like George Brett, Mike Schmidt, Tony Gwynn, Sr., Derek Jeter and Kirby Pucket come to mind. Who is the closest that we have had to them? Ed freaking Kranepool. The local kid who played in 18 seasons for the Mets. If Kranepool was with another team, he might have been a retired professional baseball player in 1969 at the age of 24. The man gets an 18 year career, with a ridiculous pension and a World Series ring, that produced 4.4 rWAR, and he’s a fair weather fan. You would think that he might show a little gratitude. Then again, any team stupid enough to keep Kranepool for 18 seasons, while trading away Tom Seaver, probably doesn’t deserve his respect.
"The Mets are gonna be amazin'!" - Casey Stengel
"Bounding and astounding!" - Clyde Frazier
by Russ on Jan 24, 2011 12:47 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Trading Seaver wasn't bad in concept.
He was 32. The Mets were awful. he still had value, but he never put up another 5 WAR season again, and only 3 4 war seasons (although he’d have had 4 but for the strike season), one when he was 40 years old.
I hated it when I was a kid. The main problem was the package wasn’t good enough. Henderson had promise but was already 24, and he had 2.9 war in 2/3rds of a season as a rookie for the Mets, .375 wOBA, 134 wRC+, making him about the teams best hitter, but that was his best season. Pat Zachry had 4 WAR for the Reds in 1976, but he was never as good again (mostly a soft-tossing righty), and Dan Norman had some minor league power but thats it. Flynn was a weak-hitting 2b.
It wasn’t enough of a package and Henerson, the centerpiece, didn’t pan out, but trading Seaver at 32 was something a Branch Rickey would do, even though he ws mainly dealtt because Donald Grant was ac heapskate and an a-hole who didn’t like Seaver. Now, trading Ryan and Stanton for Fregosi, or Otis for Foy, those were dumb moves.
When it's known
that the star player has a dispute with the team, the team will never get full value in a trade.
What's the score, boys?
What did Bugs Bunny do?
What's with the Carrot League baseball today?
Oh it does hurt!
The Mets, when they suck can really damper my summer considering what just happened to the Jets AGAIN and the recent history of the knicks. A long uneventful baseball season hurts more than any other sport. I’ll be watching and speculating with WHAT I HOPE ISN’T false hope from pitchers and catchers in 3 weeks through the dog days up until October when the Phuckin Phillies will probably rub another trophy in our face. Do I care too much? sure. But I wouldn’t have it any other way.
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:03 PM EST reply actions
on that note,
I am planning to go from winter right into next winter, thus bypassing the hope of spring, the torture of summer, and the agony of fall.
by fxcarden on Jan 24, 2011 1:05 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Come on!
Its like battered wife syndrome, u gotta keep coming back!
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
hey didn't Paul Simon write a song about you
and the school yard ?.
by fxcarden on Jan 24, 2011 5:50 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Making generalizations like this about fan bases makes little sense
unless you’re talking about Phillie fans being semi-literate, congenitally criminal mouthbreathers who would sooner projetile vomit on a meditating Buddhist monk than back a team that might be out of the running for the playoffs.
by tmu on Jan 24, 2011 1:11 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I
tend to take individual losses in stride but extended losing streaks can put me in a long funk. The only exception was game 7 of the 06 NLCS. I watched it with my grandfather a Mets fan sice the start of the team and it has to be ranked as the most heart wrenching loss of my entire time as a sports fan.
Ups and Downs
Endys catch was the highesst high, and then we felt the lowest of lows.
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
That
called strike 3 on Beltran was so bad. My gradfather and I do not talk about that game at all.
by bigbluefan1985 on Jan 24, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions
The worse part about it
Is that far away look Beltran aways has like he snacks on paint chips between innings
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
In his defense
he always has that look, strikout,homerun,amazing catch, he always appears unemotional its why so many Met fans hate him. I will always be a Beltran fan though. Hopefully he has a great season.
by bigbluefan1985 on Jan 24, 2011 2:19 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
This ought to be greened.
The average fan just doesn’t realize that Beltran is so insanely good, he doesn’t even look like he has to try.
I am willing to wait to build a world class franchise (h/t to millsy)
by BobbyV_Incognito on Jan 25, 2011 1:29 AM EST up reply actions
BIG MOVES
While most Mets fans give Alderson good grades so far due to his constraint & subsequent lack of “big moves”, I feel as though he may be missing out on some “medium size” moves that would be good both short & long term for the team. The most glaring of his non-moves was failing (or failing to even try) to trade for Matt Garza. Not a $20 million/year player & not a one season rental either- just a good, solid, affordable, top of the rotation pitcher who was available due to Tampa’s abundance of starting pitching & salary constraints.
Alderson gets high marks for NOT trying to trade for Matt Garza
Garza has got to be the most overrated pitcher around. He’s a middling pitcher who is in no way, shape, or form worth the prospects that Tampa wanted. The Cubs were raped.
The biggest lesson about that trade is that no competent GM should trade with Tampa if it can be avoided.
"The Mets are gonna be amazin'!" - Casey Stengel
"Bounding and astounding!" - Clyde Frazier
Wait till the season starts
Garza will be an allstar type this season. Thats the last I’ll say about that. RIP The Garza Saga.
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:36 PM EST up reply actions
Judging by the way the All-Star selections have gone the last few seasons
that’s not saying much.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
I mean the guys is a good pitcher
lets not beat him up for the trade. I wish we could have him, but it may have been too expensive. hard to say with prospects, the guys we held on to may never come close to what Garza does, time will tell
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
by Rickfansince76 on Jan 25, 2011 7:18 AM EST up reply actions
He did lead in one stat, tied with 100 others
He posted a 1.0 nhr for the 2010 season.
nhr= no hitter rate(i just made it up)
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry
I’ll try harder, Sensei.
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions
You need to normalize it for historical comps!!!11!one!
xNHR+
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 24, 2011 11:22 PM EST up reply actions
Your gonna open a can of worms brother!
I agree 100%. But many of the “experts” and “pundits” on this blog will feed you enough statistical analysis of the guy that by the time their done you’ll thank god Ollies still on the roster!
by The real Julio from Paterson on Jan 24, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions
Garza is good, but he's really not worth burning prospect talent for
Any other time, people would look at Garza and think, “eh, he’s ok”. We have some pitching problems that make him look like an attractive option, but I get the feeling we’d have buyers remorse by the time all was said and done. He’s really nothing special.
Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 24, 2011 2:14 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I totally disagree
The most glaring of his non-moves was failing (or failing to even try) to trade for Matt Garza.
Actually, trading what’s left of the farm system (as the Cubs did) for an overrated starter with declining K rates when you have no chance to compete is exactly the kind of “deck chairs on the Titanic” move that Omar would have done. Sandy didn’t, and he deserves major kudos for not doing it.
Also, the Cubs really f’ed up with that one. They don’t really have a chance to compete either (barring an outbreak of Ebola in Cincinnati, Milwaukee, and St. Louis).
"It’s just everytime we think the bar can’t get lower, they lower it. Now next year we’ll just be happy to hear that rogue shirtless officials aren’t implementing useless detrimental drills in spring training for no apparent reason."
-Gina, 3/1/10
by Greenpoint Ian on Jan 24, 2011 6:50 PM EST up reply actions
We lose all the time.
Therefore, we have developed mechanisms for dealing with the Mets failures. We often have the process either shown to us by older Met fans or we learn very fast. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt, we simply know how to deal with it. The thing about the Mets is that you can’t fall out of love with them. You just move on to the next mind blowing, heartbreaking occaision. One thing I have noticed about Met fans is that there is always something that we are ULTRA competitive about. Work, school, hop scotch, alcoholism whatever it may be we are determined to be anti-met in our real lives.
Freedom is a road seldom traveled by the multitudes...
From a Yankee fan perspective...
I honestly feel that it’s hard to judge the Mets fanbase based on the last decade. I follow the Mets mainly due to my friends (and soon my hopefully future career) and I have watched this fanbase deal with the laughable Steve Phillips getting to keep his job while Bobby V, a talented manager in a sea of untalented managers, loses his job for something that I don’t believe was his fault, from having one of the most talented cores in baseball surrounded by mediocrity like Luis Castillo, Ollie Perez, and so on, and managed by someone who literally chuckles after loses and injuries and so on.
I mean, this isn’t like the Royals, who just seem to maintain a constant level of low expectations. Mets fans should rightfully have high expectations for their team because they should be better than this and they should be contenders with the talent they have, and I don’t think they just shrug off a loss like the article suggests, because I don’t think any caring fanbase just shrugs off bad management & a poorly run organization like that when the team has the potential to get to the WS. I think these days they might, due to the last 2 seasons and the common sense realization that they’re probably not going to be a contender in the NL East for another few years or so, but I think the rebuilding phase might be somewhat exciting for Mets fans this season, especially with a new GM & manager.
I’ll be honest, I somewhat envy the Mets fanbase because of shit like this that I have to deal with on my end…
In stark contrast to the most vocal Yankee fans—who insisted an already loaded team HAD TO get Cliff Lee OR ELSE—I feel like most Mets fans are measured and reasonable in their expectations for 2011.Heh, this kind of thing sickens me. So whereas I think the Mets fanbase will just shrug off losses in the coming years, I don’t think that they have in the past years or so. I do think the “God Hates the Mets” thing can get a little out of hand at times, but overall at least your fanbase will never be as little respected as mine or those animals you have to deal with from Philly.
"WHO WOULD LEAD?! THE CLOWN?!"
by I'mGivingYouARaise on Jan 24, 2011 3:50 PM EST reply actions
That's funny because I've always got goofed on by Yank and Phil fans who are friends.
For the camera shots of the crowds showing angry young men, praying middle aged women and crying children. I don’t get the article. It’s like we’re being accused of being Brave fans who can barely work up enough passion to cheer at a playoff game.
My take
I think Met fans, especially the die-hards that post here, can be a reasonable bunch. Obviously every fanbase is a mixed bag of idiots and smart people; a fanbase is drawn from the much bigger pool of which the same is true.
I do think that Met fans are a special bunch, though, for a combination of related reasons. I think die-hards like us are very loyal and really love this team despite having every reason not to.
It was the mid 90s when I was old enough to really start watching and understanding baseball. That was the perfect time to be a Yankee fan, and a bad time to be a Met fan. Growing up in that culture of rooting for the underdog, the hapless little brother to the Yankees, it really built character I think. I won’t hesitate at all, ridiculous as it might seem, to say that being a fan of this team has been a defining/shaping feature for me as a person. As I’ve grown up, my passion for the team has only increased. I’m 22 now, and I shudder to think of what I’ll be like when I’m 40, especially if the team hasn’t won a World Series by then. I need a World Series, badly.
I feel like we as a fanbase treasure special moments more than some other fan bases do, because they are few and far between. When this team is in contention and fighting for a playoff spot, to me, there is really nothing better. As a fan, I live for that, and wait patiently for the chance to watch my team in the playoffs. Is this true of other teams fans? Sure. But, and I could be wrong, I think we just care a little more. New York is a baseball town, and the Mets aren’t a team for bandwagoners. Put those two things together and you have a recipe for an extremely passionate fanbase.
If and when this team wins the World Series, I can say without pause that it will be one of the most special moments of my life. A weight lifted off my back that’s been there a lifetime. Simply put, I’m going to freak the fuck out, I’m probably going to cry. I know this has little to do with the original comments by the Braves fan, but it just got me thinking about how much I, and you guys I think, love this friggin team. Especially with spring training coming up. Even though we probably won’t even make the playoffs, we’re 0-0 on opening day, and if we win that day, we’re in first place. That’s enough to get me pumped up.
This.
I heard somebody say recently that the difference between a true Met fan and a true Yankee fan is that the Met fan could tell you every season that his team made the playoffs, while the Yankee fan could tell you when his team didn’t make the playoffs.
I’ve only been alive for the most recent 3 of the Mets playoff appearances but I could tell you that 1969, 1973, 1986, 1988, 1999, 2000 and 2006 were easily the greatest years to be a Mets fan.
Chamption of the R.A. Dickey Face contest and "Cromulent Photoshopper Extraordinaire" of Amazin' Avenue!
by Steve Schreiber on Jan 24, 2011 9:34 PM EST up reply actions
Mr. Calcaterra
oughta spend more time reading post game commentary here @ AA. I think he’d see things differently.
Sniff-sniff. You guys (and gals) smell what I smell? Baseball season. A dim light flickers in the distance. “CAN’T WAIT!”
"Give me liberty or give me Mets!"
by LOUtheMETandNATSfan on Jan 24, 2011 6:07 PM EST reply actions
this is bullshit
i sit in my basement listening to choppy sounding mets broadcasts on WFAN from philadelphia.
What Would Matt Szczur Do?
Mets fans are the most loyal, die hard, kickass fans I know.
We cry, curse, and scream every season. We go to games until the season ends and then spend the winter planning for the next year. We do not give up on our team. Ever. We are not the bandwagony mother-fuckers who root for the Yankees. No, instead we are the die-hard mother-fuckers who watch/listen 162 games a year. We enjoy our beer and consume as much as we wan’t. When the Mets were mathmatically eliminated this past year I wore my RA Dickey jersey the next day. Proudly.
My best friend has been shot, twice. Once when I was with him. He didn’t cry. He cried instead, when Carlos strike out swinging and then again when Glavine screwed us over in 2007.
Go to hell Calcaterra. Maybe you’ll find people willing to go to Braves games there.
John Franco (shoulda been) HOF 2011
by JoeBighead on Jan 24, 2011 8:03 PM EST reply actions 4 recs
Rec'd
and….your friend needs to hang out at different bars (unless he’s a cop, in which case he’s an hero)
We're both cops.
John Franco (shoulda been) HOF 2011
then you are both an hero
be careful out there, man……..lately it seems like it’s open season.
by fxcarden on Jan 24, 2011 8:34 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
thanks man.
John Franco (shoulda been) HOF 2011
Oh man
We have a cop now? We’re gonna have to watch ourselves on gamethreads next year. Grad students and aging hippies are not sworn to uphold the law.
It's a triumph of number crunching over the human spirit...aaaaaand, it’s about time. -- Play-by-Play Announcer, The Simpsons.
by MookieTheCat on Jan 25, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
I only obey the laws of science
and sometimes not even those.
Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 25, 2011 7:42 PM EST up reply actions
Who needs the Law of Gravity?
Its like a “Don’t Walk” light. Nothing but an inconvenience.
"The Mets are gonna be amazin'!" - Casey Stengel
"Bounding and astounding!" - Clyde Frazier
they're more guidelines really
Hey, wait! I'm having one of those things. You know? A headache with pictures?
by KeithsMoustache on Jan 25, 2011 11:57 PM EST up reply actions
Didn't I mention at the meet-up that I'm starting the next NYS Court Officer Academy?
Place is bugged, man. Watch out.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 26, 2011 12:56 AM EST up reply actions
Don't think you did, but I was a little late.
Good luck with that. I almost took the test last time, and even know a guy who could have helped me out, but I can’t pass the vision test.
I am willing to wait to build a world class franchise (h/t to millsy)
by BobbyV_Incognito on Jan 26, 2011 2:05 AM EST up reply actions
>annoy certain sportswriters (see: Jon Heyman)
Everyone knows Jon Heyman is a f***in’ idiot and has been so ever since his days at Newsday (if not before). Yeah, he gets “scoops.” Big deal. He’s also a big-time Yankee whore.
Really, he only gets scoops when they come from his buddy Boras.
And more often then not, those are just to create a market for Boras’ clients.
This one’s for you Jon…
Yours truly,
mistermet.

Chamption of the R.A. Dickey Face contest and "Cromulent Photoshopper Extraordinaire" of Amazin' Avenue!
by Steve Schreiber on Jan 24, 2011 9:38 PM EST up reply actions
PS
And I can’t wait for the season. Finally, we have a management team with a plan and a clue that won’t be careening from one overpaid free agent to another. We have a field manager who doesn’t appear to be a chuckling verbose strategically-challenged dunce with poor people skills (yeah yeah, I know, just give him ten games). If Met fans are not up-in-arms because they didn’t make the back page of the Post this winter, it’s because we’re smart enough and realistic enough and, yes, passionate enough to understand that this is going to take a season or two but we’re going in the right direction for the first time in ages.
Eh.....
If Met fans are not up-in-arms because they didn’t make the back page of the Post this winter,
I’d rather make the back pages of the Post or the Daily Rag sometime around Halloween
by fxcarden on Jan 24, 2011 8:33 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
rec'd.
John Franco (shoulda been) HOF 2011
Rec'd
Especially if it’s for a picture like your avatar.
What's the score, boys?
What did Bugs Bunny do?
What's with the Carrot League baseball today?
Your wife/girlfriend isn't here; no need to be all PC
We won’t tell. LOL
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Jan 26, 2011 12:56 AM EST up reply actions
I was disappointed that this post wasn't about
pooping
"..."
by Thaddeus Ballpheasant on Jan 24, 2011 10:18 PM EST reply actions
I was going to say "You said load, heh"
And noting that when I posted, there were 69 comments on the post.
Nothing like adding insightful comments to the conversation, right?
The idiot formerly known as pkyankeefan! Now in Technicolour!
by Hasan Paliwala on Jan 25, 2011 3:19 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
but I like the torture in some weird sadistic way
Steady Eddie says he doesn’t watch the Mets unless they’re “a good product.”
I don’t agree
I don’t know there is some satisfaction in being a fan who suffers though bad baseball and then finally seeing the team become something. I know I was young but I remember watching the Mets in the late 70s and seeing some bad teams. Then all of a sudden you see Mookie come up , and Hubie Brooks who had to be dealt to make us better. You start to see some excitement. then guys come via trades or FA like Kingman coming back, and Foster but break your Met heart. Finally Keith Hernandez comes, Strawberry and Doc come out of the minors, a very good supporting cast fills in and boom you have 1986 and all the great feelings.
as much as it pains me to not win, that heart break is what makes winning so much better. It is true with the Mets there is some satisfaction just havinga wining season and making the playoffs. a WS win is so rare you have to enjoy the smaller wins.
As a Steeler fan it is so much different, if the Steelers do not make at least the AFC Championship the season is a total failure, and really unless there is a SB win they have come up short of expectations every year
when the Mets win and if the Islanders ever win again, there is a different feeling for me than when the Steelers win. A feeling of removing the torture just for 1 off season
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
I thought this title was going to be about Dickey
Mets Fans: A Balanced Load?
Any task BIG or small, Do it well or not at all
I have no issue with the comment at all, since I am like that myself.
If you want to indict me as apathetic or a ‘fair-weather fan’, that’s your opinion. Losses don’t bug me and wins, while awesome, don’t usually raise my spirits. It is just a game to me not life and death, and I affiliate myself with a team I enjoy and cherish immensely but they have little to no control over my emotions.
I simply realize that I do not know as much about baseball as I think I do, hence, I’m extremely disinclined to make snap judgments about the Mets’ state of affairs like the litany of boisterous callers who bombard WFAN with apocalyptic proclamations on the team from Queens. I find that I live my life much better by simply letting the outcome go 5-10 minutes after the game has ended and going on with my life. Don’t misconstrue this as me not caring about the team, but they’re not everything to me. I’m just wired to move on from whatever outcome may occur in a given game, and still have a sense of ‘cynical optimism’ (oxymoron, perhaps) because tomorrow’s outcome is still unknown.
That being said, I do envy people who still can watch the game through a lens of subjectivity. I’ve immersed myself into sabermetrics so heavily, that sometimes I only watch games objectively, which can be pretty damn boring. In a way, I’m quite glad the broadcasts only show the rudimentary statistics because they actually shine a light on the same kid who cringed when the Mets lost 5 in a row in 1998 to lose the Wild Card and had to live through the Yankees winning 4 in 5 years in Northern NJ while just getting into the sport.
While you can dismiss certain parts of Calcaterra’s statement as complete bullshit, there is a kernel of truth because he describes me perfectly. I have no qualms with the ‘die-hards’ at all, you have a different experience and a different way of approaching the Mets and that is fine. I just do not go about it the same way and I hope you don’t begrudge me for doing so.
by Five-Tool Tool on Jan 25, 2011 12:21 PM EST reply actions

by 



























