The Extra 2%, and What it Means for the Mets
In retrospect, Moneyball had to bring a backlash. It is undeniably great book that kickstarted baseball's sabermetric revolution, but it also has an undercurrent of smugness. The tone of Billy Beane and his acolytes suggests they can scarcely believe how stupid the rest of the league is, and how they should probably not get away with robbing other front offices blind. It's no wonder that so many old-school types have reveled in Oakland's current doldrums.
Jonah Keri's excellent new book about the Tampa Bay Rays' rise from the cellar, The Extra 2%, has no such issues of tone. The front office people he profiles seem like genuinely likable people, and are also much more tight-lipped about their exact methods than Beane and Co. ever were, thus leaving themselves less open for ridicule. Plus, the miseries Tampa Bay suffered through on and off the field prior to 2008 were so soul crushing that the reader can't help but root for them. It helps that the Rays' primary competition, the Yankees and Red Sox, are the baseball equivalent of the rich camp across the lake.
What follows is not really a review of The Extra 2%, though I suppose it could function as that. I read Keri's book partly on its own merits (which are many), and partly to see if it had any lessons to pass along to the Mets as they go through their own rebuilding period.
The Extra 2% is a relentlessly entertaining book, with the same kind of appeal one gets from any good Slobs vs. Snobs tale. The story is so improbable that Keri sometimes gets ahead of himself. Many times in the early going, as he chronicles the Rays' old way of doing things, he can't help but remind us, "Don't worry, things get better!" His prose is engaging and witty as well, making chapters on the intricacies of finance and scouting read much easier than they should. When describing Tampa Bay's acquisition of free agent sluggers Greg Vaughn, Gerald Williams, and Vinny Castilla for the 2000 season, a trio the team dubbed The Hit Show, Keri writes, "The Hit Show needed an extra 'S' to properly illustrate its catastrophic effects on the Devil Rays."
The book is subtitled "How Wall Street Strategies Took a Major League Baseball Team from Worst to First," and that is part of the tale. The new ownership/front office regime of Andrew Friedman, Matt Silverman, and Stuart Sternberg has an impressive Wall Street resume, and the techniques they used in business served them well when rebuilding the Rays (particularly arbitrage, the practice of buying something while simultaneously selling something of greater value, ensuring profit). But it's not so much dollars and cents that have given the Rays new life, but raw numbers.
The same could be said of Beane's Oakland front office, but whereas Moneyball preached a specific gospel--on base percentage as market inefficiency--the Rays tried not to limit themselves to one particular tactic. Their new-found success relied on the accumulation of as much data as possible, relentless analysis of said data, and cultivation of a Loose Links Sink Ships mentality. The Extra 2% contains several examples of baseball analysts who worked for the Rays, virtually in secret, to develop proprietary metrics for the team's use, making their front office seem like Bill James meets CTU.
The Rays, as portrayed in the book, are definitely not the sabermetric zealots of Moneyball. In pointing to the Rays' renewed emphasis on fielding, Keri points to True Outcomes King Adam Dunn and says his home run power is offset by that fact that he "would give much of that value back in the outfield with his suspect range and poor instincts." (A statement that seems hand-crafted to ruffle the feathers of the Slide Rule Set.) Keri isn't afraid to admit that in baseball, as in all human endeavors, luck plays an enormous role, although he concedes that luck is often the residue of design.
The idea presented in the book is not so much that the Rays are tied to any particular method or school or way of doing things, but that in their position, they must give thought to even the most outlandish notions of how to do things. This extends to their manager, Joe Maddon, hired not to be an avatar for the front office a la Art Howe in Oakland, but entrusted to play both the numbers and his gut.
The Extra 2% lists plenty of Maddon's unorthodox decisions, some of which would delight Baseball Prospectus types and others that would give them nightmares. (For Mets fans, there is a brief but encouraging mention of Terry Collins' influence on Maddon, who worked under Collins in the Angels' system.) The Rays believe in his decision making skills and character enough to let him operate virtually unfettered. The chapter on Maddon's upbringing and background is so preternaturally cheery and uplifting, as you read it you have to remind yourself that it's all real and not a Hallmark card.
Long story short, what does all of this mean for the Mets? I'm not sure if it means anything in particular, in terms of how Sandy Alderson and his own Moneyball refugees will rebuild the team. I suspect they are already trying apply many of the principles articulated in The Extra 2% or something in the same vein. Plus, the Mets will not have the same financial limitations going forward that the Rays do. Regardless of what happens with l'Affaire Madoff, the Mets will have lots of money at their disposal, whether it's from the Wilpons' pockets or somebody else's.
However, there is a lesson in here for the team, and it lies in one largely overlooked component of the Rays' rehabilitation: the fans.
Anyone who laments the Wilpons' ownership of the Mets, get on your knees and give thanks to the god(s) of your choice that the Mets were never owned by Vince Naimoli. The former Rays owner was instrumental in bringing a major league franchise to Tampa Bay after decades of being used as a bait-and-switch tactic for MLB teams who wanted sweetheart deals for new stadiums. But the good he did for the team came to an abrupt end there.
When Naimoli wasn't pinching pennies or micromanaging every detail, he was engaing in cartoonish supervillainy of almost Montgomery Burns-ian levels. This was a man who made high school bands invited to play the national anthem at Tropicana Field pay their way inside, who enlisted his ushers to sniff out patrons who brought outside food (and sometimes joined them in the detective work), who encouraged the hometown crowds to boo first-draft-choice bust Dewon Brazleton. No, I did not make any of this up. All of those things actually happened.
For a brand new team with no fanbase, in a region with many transplants from up north who have their own traditional baseball allegiances, Naimoli's ridiculous behavior was box office poison. His inconsistent, ham-fisted roster building techniques were bad enough. Doing things like threatening to revoke a reporter's credentials because he dared bring food into the press box meant that the Rays' awful teams had no equity with the local media, even in a relatively provincial town like St. Petersburg. And when Naimoli wasn't whittling away public goodwill, he was shooting himself in the foot with shortsighted cost-saving measures like not setting up email accounts for his team--a stance that continued as late as 2003.
So when new ownership took over in 2005, they weren't just charged with rescuing the Rays from years of losing. They also had to repair every bridge to the community that Naimoli carelessly burned down. The previous regime's no-outside-food policy was rescinded. Theme nights and postgame concerts were relentlessly promoted as a way of getting extra butts in the seats, and hopefully turning some of them into Rays fans. They even won an auction on a fan who put his loyalties for sale to the highest bidder. In this, as in building the team itself, the Rays were forced to think outside the box and do whatever they could to get attention and build equity with fans.
If the Mets are not quite in this position, they're not that far from it, either. The team has suffered through some seasons that could charitably described as trying. And yet, going to CitiField is still treated as a premium experience, when watching the team has been anything but. Admittedly, the fan experience at the new stadium is much better than it was at Shea, where patrons were treated like distant relatives who showed up at 3 in the morning to borrow money. Still, there is a definite vibe that the Mets (as an organization) take their fans for granted, as if there was no other team in town; say, one with far more financial and on-field success.
Obviously, winning puts people back in the seats. But since no one can foresee when that will happen, the Mets need to take a lesson from the Rays and think outside the box when it comes to reconnecting with fans. You see some signs of willingness to do this, such as Alderson's inclusion of bloggers in the occasional press conference. The reintroduction of smaller ticket plans was a good idea as well. (Hell, I got suckered into a 5-game plan.)
I would have thrown the new Mr. Mets' Landing into this mix, a kids' section at CitiField with low prices, exactly the kind of thing the team should be doing to build up equity with fans. Unfortunately, they just renamed that section BJ's Landing (after sponsor BJ's Warehouse). Had the Mets gotten over their excitement of actually landing a sponsor, they might have noticed that naming any part of their stadium "BJ's"--let alone the kids' section--is another punchline for a team that already has too many.
A little thing? Maybe. It's certainly not as bad as anything Naimoli ever did. However, it is indicative of the team's inability to think through any of its PR moves. This is an area where the team will need much more than 2 percent to catch up with their competition.
29 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
The Post-Moneyball Era
One of the lessons that even statistically-minded FOs have learned is that while the statistical revolution has improved the game, you still have to trust your scouts. You really have to take ALL the available information into account when making decisions. It’s as much about listening as it is about imposing your way of doing things on people. There were a couple of anecdotes in the book about that. the first was how the previous Rays front office ignored a scout’s plea to draft Albert Pujols. The other story involved how the current Rays brass left the war room after their first round pick and played video games while the scouts did the rest.
As an aside, I’m pretty sure that “BJ” story was a satirical piece that ended up being reported as news in other places.
Sadly BJ's clubhouse is a real section in Citi Field for 2011
Chamption of the R.A. Dickey Face contest and "Cromulent Photoshopper Extraordinaire" of Amazin' Avenue!
by Steve Schreiber on Mar 30, 2011 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
(insert rude sexual joke here)
A baseball game is simply a nervous breakdown divided into nine innings.
If anyone is interested. . .
Jonah Keri was on the Adam Carolla Podcast about two weeks ago. He discussed, among many other things (if you’re familiar with Carolla you know why), the new book. It’s a good listen, and the interview with Keri starts around the 50:00 mark.
Here’s the .mp3 link
by s s on Mar 30, 2011 2:23 PM EDT reply actions 2 recs
rec
for mentioning Carolla’s Podcast
"Anybody with ability can play in the big leagues. But to be able to trick people year in and year out the way I did, I think that was a much greater feat." -Bob Uecker
"Who is the girl in the dugout, with the long hair? What's going on here? You have got to be kidding me. Only player personnel in the dugout. I won't say that women belong in the kitchen, but they don't belong in the dugout." -Kieth Hernandez
The smugness of Moneyball
may have been more a function of Michael Lewis than anything else. He is one of those guys you find it difficult to believe can make it through a day without being punched in the face just for the benefit of mankind.
Oh well, Edison was an asshole too…
Well-written commentary
The Extra 2% may not make waves like Moneyball, but judging by the commentary, it certainly seems like a more interesting read. I never read Moneyball (though I certainly intend to at some point), but if you ask me, the Rays are a more interesting team to study, so given everything, I’ll take The Extra 2%.
I had no idea there was ever any owner, besides Charlie Finley maybe, who was as crazy as Vince Naimoli. Now, I wonder – is the Moneyball story based on a similar premise, as its backdrop, prior to the innovation in the A’s managing style?
Crazy oners? Well, let's see...
The de Roulet girls were as cheap as Naimoli, but I don’t think they were mean spirited, just clueless and without their mother’s love for the game. Ted Turner tried to take over the Braves as manager for a night. (Bowie Kuhn put a stop to that.) He also had Andy Messersmith have the word “Channel” above his uniform # 17 instead of his name (because WTBS was Channel 17 in Atlanta). Ted was crazy, but in a mostly harmless sort of way.
What's the score, boys?
What did Bugs Bunny do?
What's with the Carrot League baseball today?
Ted Turner is actually crazy
He once bet CNN in a poker game. Also, Bill Veeck had some antics up his sleeve, including this one – I do think he was generally well-liked by fans, though.
Veeck wasn't crazy; he was a showman.
He did those crazy stunts to put butts in the seats, since his teams were usually terrible. His son, Mike, owns the St. Paul Saints, who are well-known for their promotions.
"And that's why anybody who invested with Lenny Dykstra should really call that number. Lawyers are standing by."
by BobbyV_Incognito on Mar 31, 2011 1:42 AM EDT up reply actions
The need to do things 2% better than teams like Yanks/Sox
From a Jonah Keri chat:
The Extra 2% refers to something the owner Stuart Sternberg said. He states that to beat the Yankees and Red Sox, two loaded teams with smart management and tons of money, you need to do absolutely everything 2% better than the competition. Scouting, player development, promotions, lineup moves, everything.
Essentially, the epitome of false hustle.
by Bieser's Balk on Mar 30, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions
hate to disagree, but...
The Rays, as portrayed in the book, are definitely not the sabermetric zealots of Moneyball. In pointing to the Rays’ renewed emphasis on fielding, Keri points to True Outcomes King Adam Dunn and says his home run power is offset by that fact that he “would give much of that value back in the outfield with his suspect range and poor instincts.” (A statement that seems hand-crafted to ruffle the feathers of the Slide Rule Set.)
I fail to see how this should ruffle any feathers. Who in the sabermetric community discounts defense? Even in Moneyball, defense might have been frowned upon in 2001-02, but only because it was extremely difficult to quantify at that time (Even today, there is often considerable variance between ratings systems.)
I suppose it's not as much as defense as it is scouting ("poor instincts").
The Rays do apply their fair share of sabermetrics, but they are also exploring each advantage they can find, be it getting like a dozen draft picks before the 3rd round or raping dumb GM’s in trades.
In lobby for: Jaime Cevallos, Zack Lutz, orange unis and Rickroll as the 7th inning song.
The Unwritten Rules of AA
Certainly not Baseball Info Solutions
Who is responsible for the UZR that everyone loves to cite from FanGraphs.
But, to be fair, the Sabermetric Community is strong on saying the game is 50% Run Scoring and 50% Run Preventing… And in Run Preventing, they usually classify pitching as much more important than defense. That being said, sabermetricians don’t ignore any part of the game. In fact, they usually analyze every part until there’s nothing left to analyze… And then they analyze their analysis.
traveling photoshooper
@sparbz
But, to be fair, the Sabermetric Community is strong on saying the game is 50% Run Scoring and 50% Run Preventing… And in Run Preventing, they usually classify pitching as much more important than defense.
I vaguely recall hearing the phrase “Pitching is 90% of half the game” – I don’t know who said it, but that what this reminds me of.
Matt
your first paragraph is so on the money.
Terry Collins got a mention in the book
Joe Maddon said that TC was one of his biggest influences as a manager. One of the most interesting aspects of this book was how it breaks down Maddon’s managerial style. IIRC from Moneyball, Art Howe was portrayed as a middle-management type who was just there to execute the game plan created in the front office. Keri’s book shows Maddon as a sponge of knowledge who is unafraid to test out an unorthodox strategy during a game. Examples: giving an intentional walk with the bases loaded, stacking his lineup with same-handed hitters against pitchers with reverse platoon splits, and employing unusual defensive shifts.
When BJs leave you with your head hung low....
Will Jay Horowitz ever be held responsible? I swear he gets a pass while the Mets public relations has been awful for more than a decade.
Wonderful post Matt
The only little quibble I have(& it’s a minor one) with this post is the Adam Dunn part. In Moneyball, they mentioned that the hitter with shit defense will stay be very valuable even if all they do is hit. They used Albert Belle as their example & the A’s stats guy from Alderson’s time there(who’s name escapes me at the moment) said always go with the great hitter. But still, great post & I’ll try to pick this book up along with the Annual.
What's that about?

by 




























