Comments
but, but, but
He’s not CLUTCH!
He has no GRISSION!
He doesn’t get the big hit!
He has no LEADERSHIP!
"Who’s on Second?"
"Right."
"Wright’s on Second?"
"No, Wright’s on Third."
"Then Who’s on Second?"
"Yup."
"Yup WHAT?!"
"Hu’s on Second."
"THAT’S WHAT I ASKED!!!!"
On a more serious note
It’s nice to know that even with a lack of HRs in 2009 and a lower BA and more Ks in 2010, doesn’t keep Wright from still being the best over the past few seasons
Enjoying what may be the final season of two of my favorite Mets in Blue and Orange: Jose Reyes and Carlos Beltran
True
But that doesn’t stop me from loving the idea
Enjoying what may be the final season of two of my favorite Mets in Blue and Orange: Jose Reyes and Carlos Beltran
What did that crappy MLB Network Top 100 countdown show rank him?
I think he was something like 45, or thereabouts. Still not bad.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Mar 9, 2011 8:14 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
In what world are there 44 players better than David Wright?
Unless they were counting pitchers too, then maybe and only if you’re basing the rankings on the last two seasons.
The count must have been done while he was recovering from the beaning
And he would regularly be found doing this because the doctor said he could have lots of ice cream
"Intelligence is not a genetic predisposition. Think stupid!!"
by Wright of passage on Mar 9, 2011 9:45 PM EST up reply actions
The premise of the show is that it's "Right Now", whatever that murkily entails.
I guess that’s basically the last season or two, with a little emphasis on the preceding few years to back up the claim. Jose Reyes was like 74 or something to that effect.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!"
Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 453 posts (10/03/10)
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Mar 9, 2011 11:57 PM EST up reply actions
Every time I read this headline,
I think someone is arguing to trade a guy named David Wong.
"And that's why anybody who invested with Lenny Dykstra should really call that number. Lawyers are standing by."
by BobbyV_Incognito on Mar 10, 2011 12:13 AM EST reply actions
My counter argument:
TRADE JEFF WILPON and his daddy.
"Fantasy, reality, science Fiction. Which is which? Who can tell?"
by feslenraster on Mar 10, 2011 7:35 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Think David wouldn't mind a trade to the Red Sox with the Green monster out in left field
instead of the Grand Canyon.He’d become a Hall of Famer in Beantown and Boston has quality young players (pitching) to send to a rebuilding team.



























