Keith Law Ranks Mets' Farm System #22 - ESPN Insider
It's lower than I've seen from most other outlets, who put the Mets in the middle of the pack.
4 months ago
Eric Simon
22 comments
0 recs |
Comments
KLaw's rankings this year are very off to me
I’d say 14-17 is a more fair ranking but that’s not completely relevant. What I’m more intrigued about is, how does he figure the Braves are at 16, and the Nationals are at 21? I know they kind of ripped the system apart in the Gio trade, but with Rendon and Harper untouchable, and a stacked 2011 draft with high upside picks in Goodwin, Purke, Meyer, etc, that system is still good.
37 - 14 - 41 - 31 - 17 - 42 - SHEA
I don't know how good Keith Law is at this
He has opinions that are too strong and seems pretty locked into them.
What Would Matt Szczur Do?
Fact on Villanova Sports
Law is my least favorite prospect guru because of this exact reason.
He gets too married to his opinions.
keith law, prospect guru
seems a bit farfetched if you ask me
2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!
ESPN = enough said
ESPN, Mike Francesa, NY Post, NY Daily News, Fox Sports = Propaganda
Blue and Orange, Green and White, Red and Black
Twitter: @BlueChill1123
The Icing on the cake
Ranks Yankees 10th based solely on Banuelo and Betances:
I might be jumping the gun here, but I see a lot of star potential on their bottom few affiliates, including new acquisition Jose Campos from Seattle, to go with the two power arms from their Scranton club (Manny Banuelos and Dellin Betances). The flaw in the system is the lack of near-in talent, especially position players, who could either help the big club soon or provide more fodder for trades.
Not to be a homer or anything, but in what world are they better than Harvey and Wheeler? And that’s not even throwing Familia into the mix or Mejia. No way are they 12 rankings higher than the Mets. If you want to flip flop the two teams somewhere in the mid teens, fine. But don’t be so egregious to sip the kool-aid on two pitchers, and ignore two others of equal or even greater value.
You always root for laundry. Of course, you'd like to have good players in that laundry as well.
He didn't mention them by name but I'm sure Gary Sanchez and Austin Romine have something to do with that ranking as well.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
They just traded their top prospect away.
Sanchez is good, but not yet at the level of Montero. Campos was a good addition, but he’s not at Montero’s level in terms of value yet either. Romine isn’t that great, at least when taking recent performance into account. Banuelos and Betances, while fine prospects, have significant command issues. It’s still a decent farm but not top ten IMO.
by MetsFanXXIII on Feb 9, 2012 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
I didn't say I agreed with his rank - before the Montero trade he must have had them even higher which is absolutely crazy - but 10 isn't super crazy.
Save Jenrry Mejia!
2012 Amazin' Avenue Offseason Plan: 2nd place
By itself it isn't as crazy.
But in relation to the Mets’ rank in that list though, I think it is. There’s no way the gap between the two franchises is that significant.
IIRC
Law doesn’t give credit for Mejia due to the service time. But yeah, I’d take Harvey and Wheeler over Banuelos and Betances right now.
by MetsFanXXIII on Feb 9, 2012 12:36 AM EST up reply actions
Wow. Can't agree at all
Seems like a case of #LOLMETS influencing his decision.
"Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!" Gil Hodges IS a Hall of Famer.
Ryder or Riot #WWWYKI
AA Gamethread Embiggening Record Holder- 458 posts (08/24/11)
3rd Place- 2011 AAOP Contest | 1st place- 2012 AAOP Contest
by Brooklyn Dodgers Mets Fan on Feb 9, 2012 12:06 AM EST reply actions
I don't think the Mets are a top ten system or anything
but 22 simply seems too low. Everything I have seen would lead me to believe that the team is more in the 14-16 range—that is to say, squarely in the middle of the pack, with upside at the lower levels.
I don't follow all 30 teams' minor league clubs to really crap on this ranking
But if we’re #22 than there is a ton of stacked systems out there. Maybe it’s because our top prospects are all pitchers with not too many position guys?
That time of year to shit on the Mets already?
Can only mean spring training grows closer! Keith Law can suck it, he said Rick Vaughn would never play past the penal leagues!! Vaughn’s response, look at me now – BITCH!

2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!
This brings up a bigger question imo
who actually pays to read this insider shit?
2012 New York Mets, World Series Champions!
An even bigger question:
With all the intrusive ads on ESPN.com, why are they charging for any content?
"And that's why anybody who invested with Lenny Dykstra should really call that number. Lawyers are standing by."
by BobbyV_Incognito on Feb 9, 2012 1:06 AM EST up reply actions
Pretty close
Overall, I believe the systems are much closer than the rankings would indicate.
For example the top 2 teams, SD & TB – besides LHP Matt Moore for the Rays – don´t feature a single “automatic future star” caliber prospect but in general are impressive for a deep talent pool and significant enough prospects that run well into the 30s.
The Mets also have a pretty deep system – though the higher upside depth is generally at the A-ball level and below beyond the top pitching prospects. What seperates the Rays & Padres from the Mets group is that they are already more advanced and especially the hitting prospects are already more refined.
It´s kind of tough getting a good read on the Mets higher upside hitting prospects like Nimmo, Evans, Puello, Ad.Rodriguez or Flores who are all ages 20 or younger and haven´t really hit with authority at a meaningful level. So, the current lack of advanced hitting prospects with high upside limits the Mets to middle of the pack. And middle of the pack means that you can easily justify ranking a system at # 11 or # 20 at this time.
The Mets system has been somewhat underrated – maybe due to the perception that the Mets have been a poorly managed and / or disfunctional organization in recent years, at least till the current FO took over. In mid 2009, a lot of “experts” considered it as one of the worst if not worst system in Baseball. That barren system already has produced several pretty solid players like Ike Davis, Lucas Duda, Ruben Tejada, Josh Thole, Jon Niese or Dillon Gee since then. We may see others like Nieuwenhuis, Havens, Valdespin, Lagares, Lutz, Familia, Mejia and Carson reach the majors by the end of the 2012 season from that supposedly talentless group of prospects as well.
Of course, barring Ike Davis or Jon Niese breaking out or Jeurys Familia / Jenry Mejia improving their secondary pitches, time will tell if there´s a real star in that group.
Still, since 2010, the Mets have added a lot of upside to the system via the draft & the Beltran trade. Most of all, the Mets haven´t traded a single prospect since the JJ Putz deal in December 2008. That also helps.
Pretty sure, the Mets will rank in the top 10 by this time next year, assuming some of the raw hitters take a step forward and DePodesta & Co. do a solid job in the 2012 draft with 4 picks in the top 60.
by Doob on Feb 9, 2012 5:05 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I like that insight
I agree with those points. It doesn’t have a lot of high impact talent, but it’s still a deep system which is turning out players who can contribute at the major league level.
You always root for laundry. Of course, you'd like to have good players in that laundry as well.
The Worse the Farm The Longer The Purgatory
Let’s face it, we’re waiting for a top farm system so the Mets can have some low cost upside. Post Madoff, there is no other upside.
It really is unfortunate that MLB slammed the door on overslot one year after the Mets were willing to step inside.
I hope Doob is right and this will be rectified in a year or two, so it is possible to at least see better times over the horizon.



























