Lot's of great debate on whether Bourn makes sense or not. It doesn't seem as though there's any type of consensus brewing so I'm adding a poll to see how big the split actually is. Couldn't figure out how to do a poll as a fanshot so apologies in advance if there's a way that I couldn't figure out. I couldn't even get a new fanshot open.
Under which circumstances, if any, would you agree the Mets should sign Michael Bourn?
Don't sign him for anything more than 3/$30m even if we save the 1st round pick (3 votes)
Give up the 1st round pick and go as high as 3/$45m (10 votes)
Only if we save the 1st round pick and he's 3/$42m or less (39 votes)
Only if we save the 1st round pick and he's 3/$39m or less (20 votes)
Don't sign him at all (3 votes)
Sign him even if it takes more than 3 years & $15m/per (4 votes)
79 total votes