Amazin' Avenue: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

The Top 50 Mets of All Time: #46 Ron Hunt

On October 11, 1962, following the team's 40-120 finish in their inaugural season, the Mets completed a now-and-later cash transaction with the Milwaukee Braves for minor league second baseman Ron Hunt. The deal called for the Mets to pay $5,000 to the Braves up front and, if they decided to keep Hunt, another $45,000 on May 9, 1963. Hunt made his big league debut with the Mets on April 16, 1963, and went 2-for-3 with a walk in a 7-4 loss to the Reds. Three days later, Hunt picked up his first major league RBI -- three of them, actually -- including two on a walkoff double at the Polo Grounds that brought the Mets their first victory of the season in the team's ninth game. Hunt was optimistic at the time:

"I was happy to be traded here. I knew I'd be with a bunch of guys my own age. We can at least give other teams a lot of trouble in the league. I think we're doing all right now, but it sure was great to win the first one."

-- New York Times, 4/20/63

On May 9th Hunt was hitting a robust .299/.392/.418 and the Mets gladly sent the Braves the rest of the $50,000 they owed for their now-starting second baseman.
Year  Age   PA     XBH  BB  AVG/OBP/SLG   EQA  WARP3   VORP
--------------------------------------------------------
1963   22  600   42  43  272/334/396  .278    5.9   28.4
1964   23  521   31  60  303/357/406  .293    8.0   37.5
1965   24  223   14  38  240/309/327  .242    1.0   -0.8
1966   25  543   24  62  288/356/355  .273    4.7   25.9
Hunt was arguably the best hitter on that putrid 1963 Mets team. Pound-for-pound, left fielder Frank Thomas may have had a better season (113 OPS+ to Hunt's 108), but Hunt had almost 150 extra plate appearances so whatever he lacked in rate he made up for in aggregation. Despite slightly better stats, Hunt finished runner up in the rookie of the year voting to Cincinnati's Pete Rose. Hunt had the edge in WARP3 (5.9 to 5.6), EQA (.278 to .268) and VORP (28.4 to 20.8), but he also played for the worst team in the league and likely garnered little recognition as a result.

Not to be deterred, Hunt returned in 1964 to post what would eventually be the best season of his career, leading all national league second basemen -- including ROY Pete Rose -- in everything that mattered: batting average, on-base percentage, slugging percentage, WARP3, EQA, VORP, you name it. For his efforts, Hunt was selected to his first all star game, played at the brand new Shea Stadium in Queens, and even picked up a single vote for MVP (again, the Mets endured yet another historically awful season). Hunt missed the last month of the season with a back injury that he linked to a 1963 car accident, but was once again the best hitter on the team and was voted the team's MVP for the second consecutive year.

After working during the 1964 offseason as a truck driver, Hunt signed a new contract with the Mets worth an estimated $25,000. Unbeknownst to the Mets, Hunt also sustained an injury to the middle finger of his right hand playing handball over the winter. The injury was diagnosed as a "bad bruise", but it was apparently bad enough to keep him out of action from the end of spring training through the end of April, forcing Hunt to miss the team's first 15 games. Hunt hit .265/.359/.324 in ten games before separating his shoulder on May 12 after the Cardinals' Phil Gagliano collided with him in the baseline. Hunt missed another 83 games with the shoulder injury, and he struggled upon his return to the lineup on August 5. He finished the season with just 223 plate appearances and a meh .240/.309/.327 batting line, far and away the worst of his short career to that point.

Determined to put his injuries behind him, Hunt spent the 1965 offseason getting himself in better shape. He played 40 games in the Florida Instructional League and spent two months exercising at St. Louis University. He reported to spring training thirteen pounds lighter and promptly signed a new contract for the same $25,000 he made in 1965. Hunt rebounded nicely in 1966, hitting .293/.370/.379 at the all star break and was named to his second mid-summer classic. He exhibited very little power in the second half of the season, possibly due to lingering back problems. He hit .293/.370/.379 before the break, .280/.335/.317 after, and was traded to the Dodgers in the offseason along with Jim Hickman for Tommy Davis and Derrell Griffith.

In his four seasons with the Mets, Ron Hunt was the best hitter they had three times, missing significant playing time in the fourth year. He was the team's only all star selection in 1964 and 1966, and he collected 41 of his eventual 243 career HBPs. He would never make another all start team after leaving the Mets, but he had a couple of nice seasons with the Giants and Expos before calling it quits in 1974 at age 33.

Sources

Ron Hunt at Baseball-Reference.com
Ron Hunt at Baseball Prospectus

0 recs  |  Comment 13 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

off-topic,
I am sad there are no comments on the last two of these, so here's a practically contentless one.  A few off-topic notes:
  1. I hope to hell that you're retaining copyright to this series of posts, Eric, because the previous poster is right -- this is a book.  I'll edit it if someone needs to.  All it needs is a brief introduction when you're done (explaining how your dog came up with the ranking algorithm, maybe).
  2. Why on earth isn't anyone yet selling downloadable videos of all the individual baseball games in history?  The offseason would be so much less painful if we could use it to trawl through baseball history for forgotten favorites and fun contests.  I know I have a list of a handful of (non-famous, non-postseason) games, at least, that I'd like to pay a few bucks to watch again.
Back on topic: This post in particular reminds me how happy I am not to have lived with the Mets of the early and middle nineteen-sixties.  (Or to have lived through the Dodgers leaving Brooklyn, for that matter.)  There are some eras I'm happy enough to hear other people reminisce about.

by anonymous on Jan 3, 2007 3:26 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

I think
With regards to your second point, I think MLB would do it if they saw any tremendous profit in it. Some games doubtless should be sold and eventually will be. However, to do entire games would require some tremendous resources. 162 games per season for 30 teams is a lot of games. I guess if you don't care who the announcing team is, you can cut that down, but at 3 hours or so a game, that's gonna be some chore to maintain. And it will be largely profitless for many of the games in history. There'll be mass demand for memorable games, but for some Cardinal-Pirate matchup in April 1997 where nothing happened? Doubt it.

by Alex Nelson on Jan 3, 2007 4:28 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

You could probably cut that 3 hours
down to 20 minutes or so if you take out all the breaks in the action.  It would be great if MLB marketed a "Greatest Games" series like the NFL does, at least.
Watch me paste this pathetic palooka with a powerful paralyzing perfect pachydermous percussion pitch.

by Mr. Met on Jan 3, 2007 4:56 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

resources? meh.
Digitizing all that video would be a pain, sure, but MLB and/or the Hall of Fame ought to be doing that already for archival purposes if they want to preserve it for the foreseeable future.

Storage? Figure on an iTunes-movie-like 3GB to store each game in a compressed form (you can go much lower than this if you don't care too much about quality).  Then 162 games * 30 teams = 4860 games per season = 14.5 TB per season.  

That's a little less than two full seasons per (24TB) Sun X4500 "Thumper" server, and it'd be well within MLB's means to sell, say, the last 50 years of games off a server farm of thirty or forty Thumpers.  Storage is cheap enough these days (and always getting cheaper) that I don't see that as a stumbling block for a huge organization like MLB -- the back-end of something like the iTunes store is probably exponentially larger and more complicated.  And each individual purchaser would be paying for the bandwidth used in the download, so no problem there.  

I think this really could be done without too much trouble -- and the "long tail" principle would seem to suggest that selling all the apparently meaningless games would actually be a way to make a lot more money.  Everyone has personal memories of specific otherwise-unmemorable games, and many people would like to buy things like "50 Worst Mets Losses" playlists or "All the Mets games from the year you were born" or whatever else you can imagine.  I think there's a lot of untapped demand there.

by anonymous on Jan 3, 2007 5:30 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Nice work figuring that one out.
I'd guess that there wouldn't be all that much demand for every single game, but perhaps packages of games that had some common theme might be of more interest.  Highlights of a particular player's career, biggest comebacks, I don't know about "worst losses" - maybe for the Yankees.  :P
Watch me paste this pathetic palooka with a powerful paralyzing perfect pachydermous percussion pitch.

by Mr. Met on Jan 3, 2007 6:10 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Small Point
I think that there are actually 2,430 games per season (rather than 4,860), so they would need even less stoarge space.  You have to remember that every game counts as a game for two teams.  Thus, the math runs as follows 162 x 30 / 2 = 2430

by Shomov on Jan 3, 2007 6:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

right,
but we want both teams' home broadcasters (i.e. no way do I want to watch old Met road games without Bob Murphy on audio).  So we double everything again.

by anonymous on Jan 3, 2007 6:32 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Wonderful Series
I am enjoying this 50 greatest Mets project you have going on here.  These remind me of what Bill James and others were doing in his books from 1989-1992, "The Baseball Book" series.  In those books, they had an encyclopedia project going, with entries of players, owners, etc.  

The entries I have read so far have been well-written and informative, and have given me a nice little trip back in time.  

I appreciate the effort that goes into this series.  Thank you for some enjoyable reading, so far.  I look forward to the other 45!  

"We praise or blame as one or the other affords more opportunity for exhibiting our power of judgement." Friedrich Nietzsche, "All Too Human" (1878)

by wgarrett on Jan 3, 2007 5:41 PM EST reply actions   0 recs

Much appreciated
It's nice to know that you folks are enjoying reading these as much as I am writing them.

by Eric Simon on Jan 4, 2007 1:27 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

The shame of it is that the players on the list
aren't nearly as good as your descriptions of them, Eric.  

(At least so far.  And no, I don't expect your descriptions to decline in quality as you move up the list...)

Watch me paste this pathetic palooka with a powerful paralyzing perfect pachydermous percussion pitch.

by Mr. Met on Jan 4, 2007 12:40 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

agreed
Eric is putting up yet another season of stellar, MVP-level VORB (Value Over Replacement Blogger), proving that he's no one-trick pony.  In contrast, many of these guys were average in many ways for most of their career while distinguishing themselves with stellar defense or with one or two great seasons.

by anonymous on Jan 4, 2007 1:25 PM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Great article, but what about HBP?
Wasn't Hunt renowned for his skill (if you can call it that) in getting hit by pitches?  By the time I started following the Mets he had moved on (to SF and MTL, I think), but every time Hunt came to bat against the Mets I remember Murphy-Kiner-Nelson discussing how often he got plunked.  Surely this deserves mention in his career retrospective.  Even statheads should appreciate that, since it helps OBP and thus OPS.  

by madisonmetsfan on Jan 6, 2007 10:46 AM EST reply actions   0 recs

HBP
I mentioned it in passing in the closing paragraph. Hunt got hit by a ton of pitches in his career, though he didn't really pick up steam until he left the Mets. That's mainly why I didn't spend more time talking about them.

by Eric Simon on Jan 6, 2007 11:07 AM EST up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Start posting about the Mets »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

The_buddha_by_lord_karsus_small
2009 Mets Gangsta and Grission Awards
Buckner_small
The robcast Mets Offseason Plan
Hamheadshot__1__small
Poem: There's Only One October Wish

Recent FanPosts

Mwsos8pj_1__small
How Would Other Teams Do in 2009 With The Mets Injuries?
Small
Gonzalez over Davis?
Small
Off-season reading: the best baseball books
Small
Thoughts on Yankees vs. Phillies
43cd0dee9d920fd72b0a2b2bce4f8a00-getty-90957610bb021_los_angeles_k_small
Just curious as to why Met fans "hate" the Phillies
Small
It All Started With Torrealba...
Metseyes_small
'10 Mets Sep-Oct Schedule: Advantage Mets

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Pricks Beat Douchebags to Win World Series

Recent FanShots

Ramon Hernandez an option?
SNY series digs into Mets history
Scouts opinions and grains of salt
Hustle, Dedication, Intelligence, and Teamwork
Myers done with Phillies
Chapman likes New York
White Sox Buy Out Dye's Contract
BA Mets Top 10
Carlos Gomez dealt to the Brewers for JJ Hardy
Hit-and-run victim outside Phillies game dies from injuries

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

Sponsors


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Cj_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

THE NEWS GURU

Wrightfront_small Joe Budd

POET LAUREATE

Hamheadshot__1__small Howard Megdal