Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 2012 Budweiser Shootout Entry List Released

Kevin Mench is a Free Agent

Kevin Mench was designated for assignment by the Brewers on Monday to make room for recently-acquired Salomon Torres, plucked from the Pirates for a couple of minor leaguers. As for Mench, the Brewers have ten days to trade the outfielder and his famously-large cranium else they must grant him his release.

Mench has five years of big league service team and is eligible for arbitration this offseason. The arbitration option disappears if he is released, as some team can snatch him up for something less than that. He made $3.4 million in 2007, and the collective bargaining agreement stipulates that he can't make any less than that in arbitration. That fact makes a trade extremely unlikely.

Mench is a career .271/.326/.465 hitter with iffy defensive skills. His batting line is unspectacular -- just 1% better than average over the course of his career -- and if you compare his production to other corner outfielders he doesn't come away smelling like roses. He doesn't run very well, and he has struck out almost twice as often as he has walked over the course of his six-year stint in the bigs.

The only reason we're still talking about him -- and the reason he has been a favorite of analytical baseball folks -- is that he absolutely destroys left-handed pitching.

Year OPS vs RHP OPS vs LHP
2002 .753 .825
2004 .792 1.036
2005 .744 .980
2006 .679 .877
2007 .564 .901
Career .730 .924

I left 2003 out because Mench collected only 139 plate appearances for the entire season. His platoon splits are very dramatic; despite taking most of his cuts against righties he really hasn't done a very good job of figuring them out. Worse, his approach against them may actually be getting worse as he sees them more. Or, perhaps their approach is getting better as they see him more. Whatever the case, his reputation as a southpaw-masher is largely undisputed.

Mench might be a reasonable acquisition for the Mets, especially considering that they picked up lefty-hitting Ryan Church a couple of weeks ago in the trade which must not be named. Church has hit considerably better against righties than lefties (.352/.481 OBP/SLG against righties and .331/.392 against lefties).

If it were really that easy, every team would be employing platoons at positions where they can't currently pencil in a star player who hits well against both pitcher varieties. Unfortunately, strict platoons don't work very well for a number of reasons.

  1. Players don't like it. Nobody enjoys being told that they aren't good at something, and professional athletes are no different. Whether or not Kevin Mench knows he sucks against righties likely doesn't change the fact that he doesn't want to be told as much.
  2. It isn't really fair. Lefty/righty platoon splits are terrible unfair to right-handed batters, who would wind up with less than one-third of the aggregate plate appearances were the platoon strictly enforced. As an illustration of this point, the average MLB team had 4,563 plate appearances against righties and just 1,725 against lefties, which means that the right-handed portion of a platoon would only have accounted for approximately 27% of the platoon's plate appearances. Hardly equitable.
  3. It's hard to do. The average big league starting pitcher threw just 5.79 innings per start last year. That number is even (surprisingly) lower in the National League, as elder-circuiters lasted just 5.73 innings per start. The average game lasted right around nine innings (8.97 to be precise), which means that starting pitchers accounted for less than two-thirds of each game. This fact poses logistical problems for any team looking to employ a platoon situation, as they can only guarantee the platoon advantage for six innings every game. Once the starter hands the ball off to the bullpen the platoon scheme becomes a crapshoot.
  4. Platoon splits are an illusion. Okay, so I made that sound more dramatic than it really is. Most players exhibit some manner of platoon advantage, some small and others severe. The problem is that we can't look at Kevin Mench's production against lefties over the course of his career and conclude that he is a .924 OPS-er. That figure only tells us part of the story. The other part, the more depressing part, is that he is also a .730 OPS-er, in this case against righties and in far more plate appearances (1,664 versus 775).

    Mench's seeming ability to mash lefties is clouded by the fact that he has done so in slightly more than a season's worth of playing time. Jose Reyes had 765 plate appearances last season; Mench has the aforementioned 775 in his career against southpaws. Baseball history is littered with mediocre players who have excelled for one or two marvelous seasons before returning to their previous wretched forms. Mench is not a .924 OPS-er anymore than he is a .730 OPS-er. His true ability is somewhere in between, and over a large enough sample of plate appearances his platoon splits would begin to converge, resulting in a far less drastic disparity between his apparent effectiveness against lefties versus righties.

Mench wouldn't be a terrible signing, but bringing him in to platoon with Ryan Church in right field is problematic for all of the reasons listed above. The Mets already have Endy Chavez and Damion Easley in line to be backup outfielders next year, and Mench's usefulness coming off the bench is extremely limited. The Mets would probably be better served looking elsewhere.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

wow winter sucks for baseball talk
You can tell the picken's are slim for good stuff to write about. You just wrote a very nice, long write-up about a average to bad player who just became a free-agent, that you don't think the Mets should sign. Maybe the mets should trade Gomez to the Brewers for Mench so this site can get more posts.
If you gonna act like a fool, I'm gonna treat you like a fool....Fool ~Judge Greg T. Mathis~

by sireric @ Amazin' Avenue on Dec 11, 2007 8:39 AM EST reply actions  

surprisingly?
I will try to raise some discussion.

Why is it surprising that NL pitchers last shorter in starts? They're more likely to get pulled for a pitch-hitter.

Also, while I don't have stats to back this up, it's my feeling that NL pitchers are usually older.

I am surprised that the average innings per game is so high. I would have thought it was shorter, but I guess extra inning games and a lot of extra innings are more common than I think.

Finally, is there a recent free resource for the run expectancy chart? Is there also one for probability of one run and greater than one run? Thanks...

by citimetro on Dec 11, 2007 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

P.S.
If anyone from the Organization is reading, don't sign Mench!

by citimetro on Dec 11, 2007 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Surprisingly
Good point about the pinch hitter. It seems to counteract the effect of having to face a deeper lineup with no breather at the #9 spot.

by Eric Simon on Dec 11, 2007 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

FanShots

Quick hits of video, photos, quotes, chats, links and lists that you find around the web.

Recommended FanShots

Judging by the comments to Matt Callan’s ode to 1986 Mets: A Year To Remember from a few weeks back, the video has a devoted Mets fan following. Despite being too young to remember anything about that season, it has a special place in my fandom as well. It was part of a two video rotation (Ghostbusters being the other) which ran almost daily on my television for a few years in the early 90s. And it remained a once-in-awhile watch through high school and college. 

Unsurprisingly, the physical tape deteriorated over time, and the screen jumps and sound skips made for a less than optimal viewing experience. With sale of the video discontinued, my brother converted it to DVD and gave it to me for Christmas in 2010. See the picture above for the box and DVD. He even created a scene selection function which can be accessed from the main menu. "Get Metsmerized!" plays on loop on the menu screen. It is my favorite Christmas gift ever and is still nice to throw on for a viewing.

"How'd we do it? Mirrors!"
I was flipping through some of my parents' photo albums this afternoon in search of one particular shot of the sign my older sister made for Mets Banner Day back in the late eighties. Though I didn't find that one — I'll post it when I eventually track it down, and I can assure you that it's Keith-themed — but I did stumble upon this wonderful photo of my younger sister's stuffed animal menagerie spread out in front of a glorious rainbow-festooned Mets pennant, also from the late eighties.

She works for the HRC now and was particularly delighted to be reminded of this photo.

(click to embiggen)
Now that banner day is back, hopefully this years will look a little like this. I know it's not great, but i don't pretend to be a professional. embiggen!

Recent FanShots

Dickey is # 2 defensive pitcher
Yahoo Sports comments on Sandy's Tweets
Using hindsight to redo the Mets’ offseason | Mets360
Cespedes to the Athletics
Kevin Goldstein Top 101
Okay, there is no way this is Sandy Alderson
Ike & Duda fantasy stocks rising
Sabermetrics! Fantasy League is live.
What if the Mets Never Traded for Johan Santana? | Patrick Flood
[O]f the $136.7M the Mets spent on players in 2011, $72.8M was given to...

+ New FanShot All FanShots >

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Ctm-logo_small
My dirty little secret: I was once a Yankees fan
Awesome_small
Sabermetrics and Me: Drowning in Objectivity
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #3

Recent FanPosts

Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #6
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #5
X-wing_small
BrooksBaseball Player Cards: An Amazing Resource For Mets Fans Who Are Curious About How Pitchers Pitch In The Major Leagues
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #4
Small
Sandy Alderson, @MetsGM, and getting ready for Spring Training
Mets002_small
2012 AA Prospects List #1 (edit: and apparently #2)
Small
Two New York Players of OBP Yore

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


THE BIG GUY

Aa_avatar_small Eric Simon

THE INCREDIBLES

Blackfish2_small Alex Nelson

Endy_small Rob Castellano

Img_1262_small Matthew Artus

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

Best_infield_ever_small James Kannengieser

Metsstitches_small Eno Sarris

48900_1085732804_4466_n_small Chris McShane

Lg_rocker_ap_small Matthew Callan

Billy_and_daddy_4th_of_july_small Bill Petti

THE NEWS GURUS

Mrmet_small Steve Schreiber

3_small Stephen Schmidt

159714144_040c6c1501_small Pack Bringley

124967042_crop_340x234_small Jeffrey Paternostro